Is Your Company IPO-Ready? The Singapore Exchange (SGX) Checklist

Going public is a transformative milestone for any company. Listing on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) not only provides access to capital but also enhances credibility, visibility, and growth potential in Asia and beyond. However, the path to an IPO is complex, requiring careful planning, strong governance, and strict compliance with regulatory requirements.

If your company is considering listing on SGX, it’s essential to understand the key readiness criteria. Here’s a comprehensive checklist to help evaluate your IPO preparedness.

1. Corporate Structure and Governance

SGX places a strong emphasis on governance standards. Before pursuing an IPO, companies must ensure their corporate structure is clean, transparent, and investor-ready:

• Board Composition: Companies should have a balanced board with a mix of executive and independent directors. Strong oversight is a critical factor for investor confidence.

• Audit and Compliance: Financial reporting must comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and be audited by a reputable audit firm.

• Legal Structure: Companies should ensure subsidiaries, partnerships, and joint ventures are properly documented and consolidated, avoiding any legal ambiguities.

• Policies and Controls: Implement robust internal controls, risk management systems, and corporate governance policies. This includes conflict-of-interest policies, remuneration frameworks, and ethical guidelines.

A strong governance foundation signals to investors that the company is prepared for public scrutiny and accountability.

2. Financial Health and Performance Track Record

SGX requires companies to demonstrate financial stability and consistent performance. Key financial readiness criteria include:

• Profitability: For the Mainboard listing, companies generally need a record of profitability for at least three years. Certain growth-stage companies may qualify for alternative criteria if they meet revenue or asset thresholds.

• Revenue and Assets: Companies must meet minimum revenue and net tangible asset requirements, ensuring they have a substantive business footprint.

• Audited Statements: Three years of audited financial statements are typically required, showing consistent revenue growth and operational stability.

• Cash Flow Management: Demonstrating strong cash flow management, efficient working capital utilization, and controlled operating expenses is essential for investor confidence.

Financial readiness is critical not only for SGX compliance but also for market confidence and valuation during the IPO process.

3. Operational Readiness and Market Position

SGX investors evaluate whether a company has scalable operations and a competitive market position:

• Business Model Clarity: Clearly articulate your value proposition, target market, and revenue model.

• Scalability: Investors want to see that your operations can scale efficiently, with systems and processes that support growth without proportional cost increases.

• Market Share and Differentiation: Strong positioning, defensible market share, and unique competitive advantages increase the attractiveness of your IPO.

• Operational Metrics: Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as customer acquisition cost, churn rate, or production efficiency should be trackable and transparent.

Operational readiness reassures investors that your company can sustain growth post-IPO.

4. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Compliance with local and international regulations is non-negotiable for an SGX IPO:

• Regulatory Approvals: Ensure all business licenses, permits, and intellectual property rights are in order.

• Contractual Obligations: Review major contracts, joint ventures, and vendor agreements for terms that may affect liquidity, revenue, or risk exposure.

• Litigation Risk: Address any pending or potential litigation that could impact the company’s financial stability or reputation.

• Singapore Listing Requirements: Familiarize yourself with SGX rules for the Mainboard and Catalist boards, including minimum public float, shareholder spread, and disclosure obligations.

A clean legal slate reduces IPO delays and investor hesitation.

5. Corporate and Investor Communication

Transparency is key in public markets. Companies must be ready to communicate effectively with investors, analysts, and regulators:

• Investor Relations (IR) Strategy: Develop an IR team and strategy to provide consistent, accurate, and timely updates.

• Disclosure Readiness: Prepare to comply with continuous disclosure obligations, including announcements of financial results, material events, and board decisions.

• Equity Story: Craft a compelling IPO narrative,  why your company is a strong investment, its growth trajectory, and future potential.

• Financial Forecasting: Present credible financial projections based on realistic assumptions, backed by historical performance.

Strong communication builds investor trust, a critical factor for a successful IPO.

6. Timing and Market Conditions

Even the most prepared company must consider external factors:

• Market Climate: Evaluate current market sentiment, sector performance, and global economic conditions.

• Valuation Expectations: Ensure your expected valuation aligns with market appetite and comparables.

• IPO Readiness Window: A successful IPO often requires 12–18 months of preparation, including auditing, legal review, board restructuring, and marketing the equity story to investors.

Timing can significantly affect the success and valuation of your listing.

7. Post-IPO Planning

An IPO is not the end of the journey, it marks a new phase of growth and scrutiny:

• Corporate Governance Continuity: Maintain strong governance practices post-listing, including board oversight and compliance monitoring.

• Performance Reporting: Continue delivering consistent financial results and operational transparency.

• Strategic Growth Execution: Use IPO proceeds effectively to scale operations, enter new markets, or develop new products.

• Shareholder Engagement: Foster long-term relationships with public investors through regular updates and strategic guidance.

Post-IPO planning ensures sustainable growth and investor confidence, avoiding common pitfalls that lead to underperformance in public markets.

Final Thought:

 Is Your Company IPO-Ready?

Listing on the SGX offers unparalleled access to capital, credibility, and growth opportunities in Asia. However, preparation is key. Companies must demonstrate strong governance, financial health, operational readiness, legal compliance, and communication capabilities, while also planning strategically for post-IPO success.

By following this comprehensive IPO readiness checklist, companies can identify gaps, strengthen core capabilities, and position themselves for a successful public debut.

An IPO is a marathon, not a sprint, but with careful planning and adherence to SGX standards, your company can confidently take the leap and unlock its next phase of growth.

Singapore as a Springboard: Using an SGX Listing to Access Broader Asian Capital

For companies looking to scale across Asia, choosing where to list is more than a regulatory checkbox — it’s a strategic gateway to investors, partners and market credibility. The Singapore Exchange (SGX) has long pitched itself as that gateway: a politically stable, internationally oriented capital market with strong infrastructure, cross-border connectivity and investor reach that can help issuers tap broader Asian capital. Below we unpack why firms consider an SGX listing, the practical channels it opens, and the trade-offs companies should weigh.

Why list on SGX? The strategic proposition

SGX presents a compelling mix for international and regional issuers. It operates under internationally recognised listing rules and offers flexibility for foreign issuers that wish to make Singapore their primary or secondary listing venue, which makes it attractive for firms whose growth strategy targets Asia rather than a single domestic market. SGX positions itself explicitly as an “Asian gateway” — a place that connects corporate issuers in search of global capital with investors chasing Asian growth.

Key practical benefits include:

• Regulatory credibility with flexibility. SGX’s rulebook accommodates foreign issuers while requiring governance standards that investors trust. That mix helps issuers claim the regulatory comfort of a mature market without being boxed into an unfamiliar domestic regime.

• Market infrastructure and liquidity tools. SGX provides global market data, offshore connectivity points, and technical links that let institutional investors and trading firms access SGX liquidity from major financial centres — useful when you want Asia-wide visibility rather than a purely local investor base. 

How an SGX listing opens the rest of Asia

Listing in Singapore can act as a springboard in several, complementary ways:

1. Access to regional institutional investors. Singapore is a major asset-management hub in Asia. A local listing increases the chances of coverage by Singapore-based funds and analysts who allocate capital regionally. Even without massive retail volumes, institutional interest can provide depth and introductions into Southeast Asia and beyond. (SGX markets tend to be institutionally heavy relative to many domestic exchanges.)

2. Cross-border credibility for partnerships and capital raises. A Singapore listing signals to banks, strategic partners and larger institutional investors that a company has passed a rigorous disclosure and governance bar. That credibility eases negotiation of follow-on financing, cross-border M&A, and regional off-take or distribution agreements.

3. Technical connectivity and trading access. SGX’s data and connectivity networks — including offshore “liquidity hubs” and links to other global exchanges and market data providers — make it simpler for international trading desks to access and trade your stock, compared with a smaller, less connected bourse. That matters for price discovery and attracting global funds.

4. Pathways for dual or secondary listings. Companies can combine an SGX listing with another market (e.g., their home market or a larger centre) to blend local demand with broader Asian investor reach. SGX’s rules provide routes for foreign primary and secondary listings; these structures let management tailor disclosure and governance to the investors they most want to attract.

Practical considerations and friction points

A springboard works best when the platform itself is healthy and actively used. Here are the trade-offs companies commonly face:

• Liquidity and retail depth. Compared with mega-exchanges like Hong Kong or US markets, SGX has struggled at times with limited retail trading in some sectors. That can depress valuations or lengthen the time it takes for stock to find a broad investor base. Recent coverage has noted that the number of listed companies on SGX fell to multi-decade lows, and Singapore has launched initiatives to revitalise listings and attract growth firms. Companies should realistically model liquidity outcomes and potential valuation impacts.

• Regulatory & disclosure trade-offs. While SGX is regarded as credible and stable, certain governance or attestation requirements can differ from other jurisdictions; conversely, recent policy discussions have explored easing some listing requirements to attract high-growth names — a reminder that the rules may shift as Singapore competes for mobile capital. Issuers should factor in both current rules and a horizon for regulatory change.

• Investor targeting and market fit. Not every firm benefits equally. Resource-heavy mining or tiny consumer plays may find better fits elsewhere; but technology, fintech, regional consumer brands and funds-oriented issuers often gain disproportionate value from Singapore’s investor network and corporate services ecosystem. A realistic investor-mapping exercise should precede the decision.

Tactical best practices for issuers

If you’re evaluating SGX as your springboard into Asia, consider these tactics:

• Map investor audiences first. Identify the regional funds, banks and strategic investors most likely to own your stock and verify their propensity to trade on SGX.

• Consider a two-step listing strategy. Some firms list on SGX as a secondary market after establishing governance in their home market, or launch dual-class structures that preserve founder control while opening institutional capital.

• Leverage Singapore’s professional ecosystem. Use local legal, corporate finance and investor relations teams to position the story for Asia — Singapore’s advisers understand how to frame narratives across Southeast Asia, Greater China and South Asia.

Bottom line

An SGX listing is less about a single transaction and more about positioning: it’s a credibility lever, a connectivity node, and a staged route into institutional Asian capital. For the right issuer — one with a regional growth story, institutional investor appeal, and a plan to navigate liquidity constraints — Singapore can be a powerful springboard. But success depends on matchmaking: pick the investor base first, understand the exchange’s structural strengths and limits, and use Singapore’s professional ecosystem to amplify your reach across Asia. When done well, SGX isn’t just a place to list — it’s a launchpad for the next phase of pan-Asian growth. 

How Corporate Venture Studios in Singapore are Driving Industry Innovation

In the past, large corporations were often seen as too slow to innovate. Bound by legacy systems and risk-averse cultures, many struggled to keep pace with startups disrupting their industries. But in Singapore, a new model is changing that narrative: corporate venture studios.

Unlike traditional corporate innovation labs, which often remained internal and incremental, corporate venture studios build entirely new startups - often outside the parent company’s direct operations - designed to tackle big industry challenges. By combining corporate resources with startup agility, these studios are redefining how industries from finance to healthcare evolve in the face of global disruption.

Why Corporates are Turning to Venture Studios

The business case is clear. Traditional R&D is expensive and slow, while acquisitions can be risky and costly. Corporate venture studios offer a middle path: they allow companies to leverage their industry expertise and networks while tapping into entrepreneurial energy to build solutions that might not survive inside traditional corporate structures.

In Singapore, where industries like finance, logistics, and energy play central roles in the economy, corporates are increasingly turning to this model to stay ahead of competition. The result is an ecosystem where startups are not just independent disruptors but co-creations between entrepreneurs and established industry leaders.

The Scale of Corporate Participation

According to a 2023 report by Bain & Company, more than 60% of corporates in Asia now engage in some form of external innovation program, with venture studios emerging as one of the fastest-growing models. In Singapore specifically, Enterprise Singapore and the Economic Development Board (EDB) have actively encouraged corporations to adopt venture building, offering incentives and co-funding opportunities. This has led to a rise in corporate-backed studios, many of which focus on industry-specific problems such as sustainable supply chains, fintech innovation, and healthcare technologies.

Case Study: Standard Chartered’s SC Ventures

One of the most prominent examples is SC Ventures, Standard Chartered Bank’s innovation arm based in Singapore. Rather than just experimenting internally, SC Ventures has co-created and scaled multiple startups addressing financial inclusion, blockchain, and digital banking.

One of its ventures, Solv, is a B2B marketplace for small businesses in emerging markets. Built within the SC Ventures studio, Solv has expanded rapidly into India and other Asian markets, showcasing how corporate studios can combine startup agility with corporate reach to tackle systemic industry challenges.

Case Study: Wilmar International and Next-Gen Agritech

Another example comes from Wilmar International, one of Asia’s largest agribusinesses headquartered in Singapore. Through venture-building collaborations, Wilmar has explored innovations in agritech, including precision farming and sustainable supply chain technologies. While these ventures are still emerging, they highlight how corporates in resource-heavy industries are using venture studios to address sustainability challenges while opening new growth opportunities.

The Advantage of Corporate Assets

What makes corporate venture studios particularly powerful is their ability to provide startups with unfair advantages. Unlike traditional studios that start with little more than capital and talent, corporate studios can offer.

• Immediate access to customers through established distribution channels.

• Proprietary industry data and expertise.

• Infrastructure, from labs to logistics networks, that would otherwise take years for a startup to access.

In Singapore, where corporates are deeply integrated into regional trade and finance networks, these advantages make corporate-built startups especially well-positioned to scale across Asia.

Challenges to Overcome

Of course, the model is not without risks. Corporate bureaucracy can creep in, slowing decision-making. There is also the cultural clash between startup speed and corporate structure. To succeed, corporate venture studios in Singapore have had to learn to create independence - allowing ventures to operate with entrepreneurial freedom while still drawing on corporate resources.

SC Ventures, for example, explicitly structures its startups as independent entities, with separate governance and the ability to raise external capital. This hybrid model has proven more effective than purely internal innovation programs of the past.

Why Singapore is the Ideal Base

Singapore offers a unique environment for corporate venture studios. Its strategic location at the heart of Southeast Asia provides access to a fast-growing market of over 650 million consumers. Its strong regulatory frameworks give corporates the confidence to experiment with new models in fintech, healthcare, and sustainability.

Moreover, Singapore’s government has actively positioned the city as an innovation hub, offering grants and co-investments that reduce the financial risks corporates face when launching studios. Combined with a highly skilled talent pool and proximity to both Western capital and Asian markets, this makes Singapore a natural home for corporate-driven venture building.

The Next Chapter: Corporates as Builders, Not Just Buyers

As global industries undergo massive shifts - digitization, decarbonization, and demographic change - corporates can no longer afford to rely solely on incremental innovation. Venture studios give them a chance to shape disruption rather than be disrupted. In Singapore, the rise of corporate venture studios signals a new era where corporates are not just buyers of innovation but active builders. Whether it’s a bank rethinking financial inclusion, an agribusiness pioneering sustainable food systems, or a logistics giant testing green supply chains, these ventures have the potential to set industry standards across Asia.

For entrepreneurs, this means access to resources and distribution networks that dramatically increase their odds of success. For corporates, it means the chance to reinvent themselves through startups rather than being outpaced by them. The message is clear: in Singapore, corporate venture studios are more than an experiment - they are becoming a cornerstone of how industries innovate. The companies that embrace this model now are not just building startups; they are building the future of their industries.

Les étapes clés pour construire une startup via le Venture Building

Dans l’imaginaire collectif, créer une startup rime souvent avec solitude, prise de risques extrêmes et nuits blanches à chercher son premier client. Mais depuis quelques années, une nouvelle approche change la donne : le Venture Building. Plutôt que de laisser des fondateurs naviguer seuls dans l’incertitude, le Venture Building met à leur disposition une méthode structurée, des ressources partagées et une équipe expérimentée. Résultat : les chances de succès augmentent, et les erreurs fatales diminuent.

En 2025, cette approche attire autant les entrepreneurs que les investisseurs, et il n’est pas difficile de comprendre pourquoi. Pour construire une startup via le Venture Building, certaines étapes clés sont devenues incontournables.

Comprendre le problème avant de penser à la solution

Beaucoup de startups échouent parce qu’elles partent directement d’une idée séduisante, sans s’assurer que le problème est réel. Dans un modèle Venture Building, la première étape consiste à identifier des problèmes de marché concrets. Cela se fait à travers des recherches approfondies : analyse de tendances, entretiens clients, études sectorielles.

L’objectif est clair : valider que le problème existe, qu’il est suffisamment douloureux pour les utilisateurs, et qu’il touche un marché accessible. Sans cette base solide, même la meilleure idée de produit a peu de chances de survivre.

La validation rapide : tester avant d’investir

L’une des grandes forces du Venture Building est sa capacité à tester les hypothèses très tôt. Plutôt que de dépenser des millions dans un produit complet, les studios construisent des prototypes simples ou des “Minimum Viable Products” (MVP). Ces tests permettent de mesurer l’intérêt du marché, d’obtenir des retours concrets et d’ajuster l’idée.

Selon une étude de McKinsey, les venture builders expérimentés multiplient par 2 les chances de succès de leurs startups comparé aux novices, car ils savent répéter ces cycles de test et d’apprentissage.

Constituer l’équipe fondatrice

Le capital humain reste la clé. Un Venture Builder ne se contente pas d’une bonne idée, il cherche aussi à assembler l’équipe fondatrice idéale. Souvent, le studio recrute un CEO, un CTO et parfois un CPO, afin d’équilibrer vision stratégique, expertise technique et exécution produit.

Prenons l’exemple de Hexa (anciennement eFounders), un Venture Builder parisien qui a contribué au lancement de plus de 40 startups SaaS, dont Aircall ou Front. Leur approche ? Associer très tôt des fondateurs complémentaires et les entourer de designers, développeurs et experts en croissance. Résultat : un taux d’échec extrêmement bas, autour de 6%, bien inférieur à la moyenne du marché.

Les ressources partagées : gagner du temps et réduire les coûts

Créer une startup, c’est aussi gérer mille détails : comptabilité, juridique, recrutement, communication. Le Venture Builder fournit des ressources mutualisées qui permettent aux jeunes équipes de se concentrer sur ce qui compte vraiment : le produit et le marché.

C’est un gain de temps énorme. Au lieu de perdre des mois à structurer l’administratif, la startup démarre avec un cadre professionnel dès le jour un. Cela réduit aussi le risque d’erreurs coûteuses, comme de mauvaises clauses juridiques ou un recrutement mal géré.

Trouver le Product-Market Fit

Après la phase de test et le premier MVP, vient l’étape cruciale : atteindre l’adéquation produit-marché (Product-Market Fit). Le Venture Building insiste sur des itérations rapides : écouter les utilisateurs, ajuster les fonctionnalités, repositionner si nécessaire.

Un rapport du Global Startup Studio Network (GSSN) montre que les startups issues de Venture Studios atteignent le Series A en moyenne en 25 mois, contre 56 mois pour les startups traditionnelles. Ce rythme accéléré s’explique par le travail constant sur l’adéquation produit-marché, mené avec méthode et ressources.

Le financement structuré

Contrairement aux startups classiques, qui doivent convaincre des investisseurs dès le début, les startups issues de Venture Building bénéficient d’un financement interne initial. Le studio investit souvent plusieurs centaines de milliers d’euros pour couvrir les premiers 12 à 18 mois. Cela réduit le stress financier et permet de construire des bases solides avant d’aller chercher du capital externe.

Par exemple, Hexa investit environ 800 000 € par projet dès la phase initiale, ce qui permet aux fondateurs de se consacrer pleinement au développement sans se soucier immédiatement de lever des fonds. 

Le spin-off : voler de ses propres ailes

Une fois que le produit a trouvé son marché, que l’équipe est stable et que la traction est prouvée, vient l’étape du spin-off : la startup sort du Venture Builder pour devenir une entité autonome. Elle garde cependant souvent des liens forts avec le studio, qui reste actionnaire (en moyenne autour de 30% de participation).

Ce modèle crée un alignement d’intérêts : le studio a tout intérêt à maximiser les chances de succès, car son rendement dépend de la réussite de l’entreprise sur le long terme.

L’impact global du Venture Building

Avec cette approche, les risques de faillite diminuent sensiblement. Là où 9 startups sur 10 échouent dans le modèle classique, les données montrent qu’une majorité des projets issus de Venture Builders atteignent au moins le stade du financement externe, et certains deviennent des scale-ups internationales.

C’est aussi une manière de répondre à un contexte où les investisseurs recherchent davantage de sécurité et de discipline. En 2025, dans un environnement économique marqué par la prudence, le Venture Building apparaît comme une réponse adaptée : il combine créativité entrepreneuriale et rigueur méthodologique.

Le prochain chapitre

Construire une startup via le Venture Building n’élimine pas tous les risques, mais cela les transforme. Au lieu de parier sur une idée et un fondateur isolé, on s’appuie sur un cadre reproductible, une équipe solide et un accompagnement pas à pas.

Les étapes clés sont claires: identifier un problème réel, valider rapidement, recruter l’équipe fondatrice, bénéficier de ressources partagées, trouver le Product-Market Fit, sécuriser le financement et enfin, voler de ses propres ailes. En suivant ce chemin, les startups issues du Venture Building ne se contentent pas de survivre : elles posent les bases pour grandir plus vite, plus fort, et avec davantage d’impact.

L’avenir du Venture Building dans le prochain cycle d’innovation

L’histoire de l’innovation n’est jamais linéaire. Elle avance par vagues, par cycles, où des périodes d’exubérance sont suivies par des moments de rationalisation. Après les excès de la décennie passée -  capital abondant, valorisations gonflées, course effrénée à la croissance - 2025 ouvre un nouveau chapitre, plus sélectif, plus exigeant. Dans ce contexte, une question émerge avec force : quel sera le rôle du Venture Building dans le prochain cycle d’innovation ?

Ce modèle, encore méconnu du grand public il y a dix ans, s’impose désormais comme un pilier incontournable des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux. Les données le confirment : selon le Global Startup Studio Network, une startup issue d’un Venture Studio a près de 30 % de chances supplémentaires de réussir par rapport à une startup traditionnelle. Et au moment de lever des fonds, ces startups passent du pré-seed à la Série A en 25 mois en moyenne, contre 56 mois pour les autres.

Un contexte favorable à l’émergence des Venture Builders

La première raison de croire en l’avenir du Venture Building réside dans le climat économique actuel. Les investisseurs se montrent plus prudents : les levées de fonds globales ont reculé de près de 42 % en 2023 par rapport à l’année record de 2021. Dans ce nouvel environnement, où chaque euro compte, le Venture Building apparaît comme une réponse logique.

Pourquoi ? Parce qu’il réduit le gaspillage. Les idées sont testées rapidement, les ressources mutualisées, les équipes accompagnées pas à pas. Là où un startup classique peut brûler des millions avant de se rendre compte que son produit ne trouve pas son marché, un projet issu d’un Venture Builder ajuste le tir bien plus tôt.

Leçons tirées des pionniers

Des acteurs comme Flagship Pioneering aux États-Unis ont déjà montré la voie. Ce Venture Builder de Boston est à l’origine de plusieurs géants de la biotech, dont Moderna, qui a joué un rôle clé dans la mise au point du vaccin à ARNm contre le Covid-19. Ici, l’exemple est frappant : sans un Venture Builder capable de financer la recherche fondamentale, de recruter les bons scientifiques et de structurer une startup avant même qu’il y ait un marché, une telle réussite aurait été improbable.

En Europe, le studio parisien Hexa (anciennement eFounders) démontre également la puissance du modèle. Avec plus de 40 startups lancées et un taux d’échec limité à 6 %, Hexa prouve que l’innovation peut être industrialisée sans perdre son agilité. Leurs spin-offs, comme Aircall ou Front, sont devenus des scale-ups internationales, générant des milliers d’emplois.

Le Venture Building comme réponse aux grands défis

Le prochain cycle d’innovation sera marqué par des défis mondiaux : le climat, l’intelligence artificielle, la santé, la cybersécurité. Autant de secteurs où le temps presse et où les erreurs coûtent cher. Or, le Venture Building est particulièrement adapté pour s’attaquer à ces problématiques complexes.

Dans le domaine climatique, par exemple, les projets nécessitent des investissements lourds et des validations scientifiques rigoureuses. Les Venture Builders peuvent absorber ce risque en mutualisant les ressources, en travaillant avec des chercheurs et en créant plusieurs projets en parallèle. Cela augmente les chances qu’au moins l’un d’entre eux réussisse à atteindre une échelle significative.

De même, dans l’IA, où l’innovation avance à une vitesse vertigineuse, les studios offrent un cadre permettant de tester rapidement des cas d’usage, de sécuriser l’accès aux talents et de lever des fonds dès que la traction est prouvée.

Une industrialisation de l’entrepreneuriat ?

Certains critiques voient dans le Venture Building une forme de « fabrique à startups » qui risque de standardiser l’entrepreneuriat. Mais l’expérience montre l’inverse. En réalité, le modèle ne bride pas la créativité : il la canalise. Il donne aux idées le cadre nécessaire pour passer du stade de concept à celui d’entreprise viable.

McKinsey souligne que les Venture Builders expérimentés produisent en moyenne des startups générant 12 fois plus de revenus au bout de cinq ans que celles issues de studios novices. Cela prouve que l’expérience accumulée ne tue pas l’innovation, elle la renforce.

Vers une hybridation des modèles

L’avenir du Venture Building ne se limitera pas aux studios indépendants. On observe déjà une hybridation :

• Des entreprises traditionnelles lancent leurs propres Venture Builders pour explorer de nouveaux marchés (par exemple, les grands groupes énergétiques qui développent des spin-offs dans les énergies renouvelables).

• Des fonds de capital-risque commencent à intégrer des équipes de Venture Building pour mieux accompagner leurs participations.

• Des gouvernements soutiennent des programmes de studios nationaux afin de stimuler l’innovation locale et de retenir les talents.

Cette hybridation crée un écosystème plus robuste, où le Venture Building n’est plus une alternative marginale mais un composant central du cycle d’innovation.

Une promesse d’impact à long terme

À mesure que ce modèle gagne en maturité, une chose devient claire : le Venture Building n’est pas seulement un outil pour créer des startups plus vite, c’est une méthode pour créer des entreprises plus solides et plus alignées sur les grands besoins de la société.

En réduisant les risques d’échec, en attirant les meilleurs talents et en canalisant les capitaux vers des projets réellement validés, il contribue à un écosystème entrepreneurial plus durable. Et dans un monde où les crises se succèdent - sanitaires, climatiques, géopolitiques, cette durabilité est plus précieuse que jamais.

Le prochain chapitre

L’avenir du Venture Building dans le prochain cycle d’innovation sera donc marqué par trois dynamiques : une adoption massive par les investisseurs en quête de sécurité, une expansion vers des secteurs critiques comme le climat et la santé, et une hybridation avec les entreprises et les institutions.

Nous entrons dans une période où l’innovation ne peut plus se permettre d’être chaotique ou gaspilleuse. Le Venture Building, avec sa rigueur et sa créativité, apparaît comme le modèle capable d’écrire les prochaines grandes histoires entrepreneuriales.

Dans dix ans, il est probable que nous ne parlerons plus de Venture Building comme d’une nouveauté, mais comme de l’infrastructure invisible de l’innovation mondiale.

How Venture Builders Reduce Startup Failure Risks

Startups often feel like walking a tightrope in a storm: one wrong step, one misstep in timing, market, or team, and everything falls. It’s no surprise that about 90% of startups fail overall. But in 2025, a different model is proving it can lower those odds: the venture builder. These are organizations that don’t just invest - they build. They nurture ideas, assemble teams, offer infrastructure, and walk alongside founders through early storms.

Here’s how venture builders are reducing failure risks - and what data and case studies show about their effectiveness.

The Stakes: Understanding Startup Risk

The numbers are stark. Many reports show failure rates over time are steep: roughly 10% of new startups fail within their first year, and between years two through five, majority of failures happen. By year ten, few survive. These aren’t just abstract stats, they represent teams who ran out of runway, misread market demand, or couldn’t piece together strong execution. That’s the baseline. Venture builders aim to shift those odds by intervening early on the common failure triggers.

What Venture Builders Do Differently

Venture builders provide what many startups struggle to assemble quickly: clarity of idea, team strength, operational support, and effective validation.

You can think of it this way: instead of solo founders trying to juggle everything - product, user-feedback, hiring, legal, finances - the builder supplies scaffolding. They often supply shared services (legal, HR, strategy), access to domain experts, and a process for iterating ideas before major investment. This means startups born inside builder models often avoid big, early mistakes.

There are multiple pieces to this, but one that researchers call out often is the capacity to test product-market fit before “going big.” Because builders usually demand early user feedback, safe prototyping, proof of concept. That early feedback loop weeds out ideas with weak demand.

Data & Case Studies: Proof in Practice

• Venture Studio Survival & Alive Ratios

A study called Big Venture Studio Research 2024 looked at hundreds of venture studios, hybrid builders, and corporate builders. They found that hybrid venture studios (those that combine venture studio activities with things like corporate building, accelerator, VC fund) have much higher survival rates: for every studio that closes, there are ~10.86 that remain alive. Corporate builders had ~9.3:1. Pure venture studios had lower survivorship: ~4.73:1.(That means builders which diversify or bring in hybrid functions tend to reduce risk further.

• Experienced Builders vs Novice Ones

McKinsey recently published findings in “The Three Building Blocks of a Successful Venture Factory” that more experienced venture builders are about twice as likely to achieve success compared to newcomer studios. Over time, with repeat efforts, their output (in revenue in fifth year) can be 12 times higher than that of novice studios. That suggests that venture builders don’t just reduce risk by the model - they get better at reducing risk as they build more companies.

• Corporate Venture Building vs Traditional Startup Paths

An article by CreativeDock noted that corporations using venture building (internally creating new startups or spin-outs) report success rates around 66% for their ventures, far above the 20-30% or so typical for venture capital backed startups or corporate ventures without structured building. They also say that venture building-born startups achieve better IRRs (~44% higher on average) compared to traditional startups, faster transitions from seed to Series A, and earlier exits (on average under 4 years) compared to 6-7 years typical elsewhere.

Human Stories Behind the Data

Consider a venture builder that continuously launches several projects per year. With the builder model, a given project might start not with a blank page, but with a research phase. Founders test assumptions: Is there demand? Can the technology or product be built affordably? Who is competition? These early experiments expose flaws early - low demand, wrong features - so adjustments are made before major investment.

Another important case is around the “business-building muscle.” McKinsey points out that entities that build many ventures develop repeated systems: standard ways to onboard teams, validate ideas, launch MVPs, spin-outs. Over time, they make fewer rookie mistakes - less duplicated effort, fewer misfires - so each new project starts from a stronger foundation.

What Failures Are Reduced

By virtue of these mechanisms, venture builders tend to reduce risk in several specific ways:

• Team risk: builders often match people with complementary skills rather than solo founders. They bring in domain experts early.

• Market risk: they test demand, refine product-market fit before big spends.

• Execution risk: shared infrastructure and expertise mean better supply chain, legal, hiring, finance practices early.

• Timing & capital risk: because builders tend to pace investment, control burn, and have staged funding, they avoid over-extension before product is solid.

These interventions don’t eliminate risk entirely. But they shift the risk curve substantially.

Broader Trends & What Investors Are Saying

Investors in 2025 say they want a higher floor - some guarantee of minimal failure, clearer paths from concept to growth. They like models where founders aren’t isolated. Where you can see how an idea was validated, how the team was assembled. Where overhead is shared and costs are lean early.

Corporations also find benefit: many large firms are adopting corporate venture building to create new growth engines. In one survey by EY-Parthenon, nearly 45% of executives from surveyed companies reported they have launched ventures in the last five years that now generate $100 million+ in annual revenue. Venture building gives them structure to do that.

Looking Ahead: What Makes a Builder Even More Robust

The data suggests certain traits make some venture builders better at reducing risk:

• Repetition: builders who launch many ventures learn faster.

• Hybrid or diversified models: studios that also do corporate venturing, VC funds, accelerators tend to have higher survival of their ventures.

• Strong validation early: demand testing before full build.

• Deep domain or technical competence: where builders understand industry/technology well, they avoid mis-positioning or under-estimating costs.

The Next Chapter

Startups will always carry risk. That’s part of what gives them upside. But a model growing in legitimacy in 2025 is one that doesn’t treat failure as inevitable, but as something to manage. Venture builders are showing how structured support, domain expertise, shared infrastructure, and repeated experience can tilt the odds in favor of survival.

For founders thinking of starting under a builder, the message is hopeful: you don’t have to brace for failure alone. For investors, it means better early signals, stronger teams, and less wasted cost.

In a world where capital is tighter and demands are higher, venture builders are proving to be more than trend - they might be the most reliable path through the startup storm.

Funding the Future: The Role of VCs and Sovereign Funds in Singapore’s Venture Studios

The venture studio model has redefined how startups are born. Instead of betting on lone founders, venture studios build companies from the ground up, pairing entrepreneurial talent with capital, infrastructure, and networks. But behind this model lies a critical question: who funds the future?

In Singapore, the answer increasingly comes from two powerful sources - venture capital firms and sovereign wealth funds. Together, they are shaping not just the trajectory of venture studios but the kinds of companies that will define Asia’s innovation landscape over the next decade.

Why Funding Matters in Venture Building

Traditional startups often begin with a small seed round, testing ideas with limited resources. Venture studios flip that dynamic. They require upfront investment to design infrastructure, hire operational teams, and support multiple ventures simultaneously. The model is capital-intensive, but it also increases the odds of producing sustainable startups.

This is why the involvement of venture capital (VCs) and sovereign wealth funds is so significant. They provide not only the capital but also the long-term vision needed to sustain venture studios through the uncertain early stages of building science-driven or industry-specific companies.

The Numbers Speak

In 2022, Singapore attracted more than US$11 billion in startup funding, according to Enterprise Singapore, with a growing share flowing into venture-building initiatives. The global venture studio market itself is projected to reach US$42 billion by 2027, up from around US$20 billion today, as reported by Global Startup Studio Network.

Within Singapore, sovereign wealth funds play a particularly influential role. Temasek Holdings, with assets exceeding US$287 billion, has been steadily increasing its exposure to early-stage innovation through vehicles like Xora Innovation, its venture-building arm. Meanwhile, GIC, with more than US$770 billion in assets under management, has also stepped up its participation in deeptech and sustainability-focused ventures, often co-investing alongside studios and VCs.

Case Study: Temasek and Xora Innovation

Temasek’s launch of Xora Innovation in 2019 was a milestone for Singapore’s venture building ecosystem. Xora focuses on commercializing breakthrough scientific research in fields like climate tech, healthcare, and advanced manufacturing. Unlike traditional VC, Xora doesn’t just invest - it co-builds, bringing together teams of scientists, operators, and entrepreneurs to create companies from scratch.
One example is its investment in Eavor, a geothermal technology startup developing closed-loop systems for renewable energy. By backing such ventures, Temasek shows how sovereign funds can align financial returns with global sustainability goals while anchoring these efforts in Singapore.

The Role of Venture Capital Firms

Venture capital firms, too, are leaning into the venture studio model. Global firms like Sequoia Capital and Vertex Ventures (the latter headquartered in Singapore) have backed startups emerging from studios, drawn by the de-risked nature of ventures that already have structured support and validation.

Antler, one of the world’s most prominent venture builders with a major base in Singapore, has partnered with VCs to scale its portfolio. Since its launch, Antler Singapore has created more than 100 startups, many of which have raised follow-on capital from leading VCs. This collaboration demonstrates a virtuous cycle: studios generate investable companies, while VCs provide the growth capital to scale them globally.

Why Sovereign Funds Matter More in Singapore

Singapore’s sovereign wealth funds bring something that private VCs alone cannot - patient capital. DeepTech, climate, and biotech startups often take years to become commercially viable. Sovereign funds like Temasek and GIC are uniquely positioned to absorb these long timelines while maintaining conviction in long-term returns.

Moreover, their participation signals confidence to the market. When a sovereign fund co-invests in a venture, it often catalyzes additional investment from global VCs, corporates, and even governments. This multiplier effect strengthens the ecosystem and accelerates the scale-up of ventures born in Singapore’s studios.

Singapore as a Regional Magnet for Capital

The presence of sovereign wealth funds also amplifies Singapore’s role as a capital hub for Southeast Asia. With over 650 million people, Southeast Asia represents one of the world’s fastest-growing digital economies, projected by Google and Temasek to reach US$330 billion by 2025. By anchoring venture studios in Singapore and funding them with sovereign-backed capital, the city-state effectively positions itself as the launchpad for ventures targeting this massive market.

The Challenges Ahead

While the alignment of VCs and sovereign funds has fueled the rise of Singapore’s venture studios, challenges remain. Venture building is resource-heavy, and not all studios will survive. There is also the question of focus: should capital prioritize moonshot DeepTech ventures with global ambitions, or scalable consumer-tech plays better suited for regional adoption?

Striking the right balance will be key. Too much emphasis on short-term gains risks diluting the transformative potential of venture building. Too much focus on moonshots without market validation risks creating science projects that never scale.

Looking Ahead: Funding the Next Decade

What’s clear is that the combination of VCs and sovereign wealth funds gives Singapore’s venture studios a uniquely powerful advantage. Venture capital brings agility and global networks, while sovereign funds provide stability and patience. Together, they create an ecosystem capable of nurturing bold ideas through the long road from concept to commercial success.

In the next decade, expect to see more sovereign-VC partnerships in Singapore’s venture building space, particularly in fields like climate tech, AI, and advanced manufacturing. These are areas where global challenges intersect with Singapore’s ambition to lead in innovation.

For founders, the message is clear: in Singapore, you don’t just get access to capital - you get access to aligned capital, designed to see you through the toughest years of building. For investors, the takeaway is equally strong: if you want exposure to the next generation of high-impact ventures in Asia, Singapore’s venture studios are where the story begins.

Singapore’s Role in Shaping the Next Wave of DeepTech through Venture Building

DeepTech refers to technologies rooted in scientific discoveries and engineering breakthroughs and it is increasingly seen as the foundation for solving humanity’s toughest problems. From climate resilience and quantum computing to advanced healthcare and space exploration, the promise of DeepTech extends far beyond incremental innovation. But building DeepTech startups is notoriously hard: they require long development cycles, heavy capital investment, and multidisciplinary expertise.

This is where Singapore is quietly taking center stage. Over the last decade, the city-state has positioned itself as one of Asia’s most compelling hubs for DeepTech innovation, not through chance but through a deliberate embrace of venture building. By pairing research talent with structured startup creation, Singapore is charting a path that could make it a global leader in translating science into scalable businesses.

The DeepTech Imperative

DeepTech is not just hype. According to Boston Consulting Group, DeepTech startups globally attracted more than US$60 billion in funding in 2023, double the levels seen in 2016. Yet the barriers to entry remain high. Unlike software startups, where a minimum viable product can be built in weeks, DeepTech ventures often require years of research before commercial viability.

Singapore has recognized both the challenge and the opportunity. With limited natural resources, the country has long invested in knowledge as its most strategic asset. Today, that strategy is paying off as its universities and research institutions - such as the National University of Singapore (NUS) and A-STAR - are increasingly integrated into venture-building pipelines.

A Government-Backed Ecosystem

The Singapore government has been one of the most active global backers of DeepTech venture building. Through initiatives like the SGInnovate Deep Tech Nexus Strategy, launched in 2017, the country committed more than US$150 million to support the translation of science into companies. SGInnovate itself has directly invested in over 100 DeepTech startups spanning fields like autonomous robotics, medtech, and agritech.

This model is designed not just to fund startups but to systematically derisk them. By offering labs, pilot facilities, and structured venture building programs, Singapore reduces the “valley of death” between academic research and commercial application.

Case Study: A-STAR Spinouts

One of the best examples of Singapore’s DeepTech venture building comes from A-STAR, the Agency for Science, Technology and Research. Over the past five years, A-STAR has spun out dozens of startups in biotech, advanced materials, and AI. Companies like Nanoveu, which develops nanotechnology-based films for optics and antiviral protection, have scaled regionally thanks to early support from A-STAR’s venture co-creation efforts.

Another case is RWDC Industries, a biodegradable plastics startup that originated in Singapore and has since raised more than US$135 million in growth funding. RWDC’s success underscores how research-driven ventures can become globally relevant with the right support structure.

Temasek and the Long-Term View

DeepTech requires patient capital, and few institutions embody patience better than Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek. Through its venture-building arm Xora Innovation, Temasek partners with scientists and entrepreneurs at the very earliest stages, often before a commercial application is fully proven.

This long-term approach is critical. Traditional VCs often shy away from DeepTech because of long timelines, but venture studios like Xora de-risk the process by building operational capacity around founders. This allows breakthroughs in quantum computing or synthetic biology to be pursued without the pressure of unrealistic short-term returns.

Singapore as Asia’s Testbed

Another advantage lies in Singapore’s role as a testbed for emerging technologies. With its compact size, advanced infrastructure, and supportive regulators, the city-state often serves as a “living laboratory” for pilots.

For example, autonomous vehicle trials, drone delivery pilots, and next-gen biotech therapies have all been deployed in Singapore earlier than in most regional markets. This testbed status makes the country an attractive base for DeepTech venture builders: startups can validate complex technologies locally before scaling across Asia’s 650 million-strong Southeast Asian market.

Talent at the Core

DeepTech thrives on talent density, and Singapore has invested heavily in building a global research workforce. The country attracts scientists and engineers through initiatives like the Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE) 2025 Plan, which allocated US$25 billion to science and innovation over five years.

What sets Singapore apart is how this talent is integrated into venture building. Instead of leaving researchers isolated in academia, programs connect them with entrepreneurs, operators, and investors who can help translate breakthroughs into market-ready companies. This culture of collaboration is one reason why Singapore consistently ranks among the top 10 in the Global Innovation Index.

Looking Forward: Singapore’s DeepTech Ambition

The next decade will determine whether Singapore’s DeepTech bets pay off. The foundations are strong: government backing, venture studios, sovereign wealth participation, and global research talent. The challenge lies in scaling beyond local pilots into global leaders.

If Singapore’s studios can consistently produce DeepTech unicorns - companies solving real-world problems in energy, healthcare, and materials - it will cement its place not just as Asia’s DeepTech hub but as one of the world’s great innovation ecosystems.

For founders, Singapore offers a rare combination: scientific depth, supportive policy, and venture-building structures that reduce the odds of failure. For investors, it provides a gateway to high-potential DeepTech startups in Asia with the added security of government and sovereign fund alignment.

The message is clear: while Silicon Valley may dominate software, the next generation of world-changing science-driven startups could well be born in Singapore’s venture studios.

Why Singapore is Emerging as Asia’s Hub for Venture Building

Singapore has long been known as a global financial center, but in recent years, its ambitions have expanded beyond banking and trade. Today, it is carving out a reputation as Asia’s leading hub for venture building, the model where ideas are not just funded but systematically transformed into startups through the structured support of venture studios. While Silicon Valley remains the gold standard for startup culture, Singapore is demonstrating that the future of innovation in Asia might follow a different playbook.

The rise of venture building in Singapore is not accidental. It is the result of a deliberate strategy combining government foresight, investor appetite, and the city-state’s unique position as a connector between East and West. For founders and investors alike, Singapore is increasingly where the region’s most ambitious ideas are being tested, scaled, and launched into the world.

The Numbers Behind the Story

Singapore’s startup ecosystem has grown at a remarkable pace. According to Enterprise Singapore, the number of tech startups in the country jumped from around 2,800 in 2003 to more than 4,500 in 2023, employing tens of thousands of people and contributing significantly to GDP. In 2022 alone, venture funding in Singapore reached US$11 billion, accounting for more than 50% of all funding across Southeast Asia, according to DealStreetAsia.

But what’s most striking is not just the raw funding numbers. It is the structural shift toward venture building. More than 30 venture studios now operate in Singapore, ranging from independent builders like Antler, which has a strong base in the city, to corporate-backed and government-supported studios that focus on deeptech, fintech, and sustainability. This density is unmatched anywhere else in Asia, positioning Singapore as the natural hub for the model.

A Supportive Government Framework

One of Singapore’s most powerful advantages is the role of government policy. Agencies such as Enterprise Singapore and EDB (Economic Development Board) have actively fostered venture building by co-investing in studios, providing grants, and streamlining regulatory pathways for new businesses.

For instance, in 2020, the government launched the Startup SG Founder Venture Building Program, a scheme designed specifically to support venture builders in co-developing startups with entrepreneurs. This move signaled not only recognition of the venture building model but also a willingness to bet national resources on it.

The regulatory environment also plays a role. With a reputation for clarity, efficiency, and fairness, Singapore provides a rare sense of stability in a region where startups often grapple with red tape. For deeptech or highly regulated sectors like fintech and biotech, this regulatory clarity can make the difference between stagnation and scale.

Case Studies: Successful Venture Builders

The global venture builder Antler made Singapore its launchpad in Asia, running its residency program for founders and producing startups that have since expanded globally. In just five years, Antler Singapore has backed more than 500 founders and created over 100 startups, several of which have gone on to raise significant Series A and B rounds.

Another standout is Xora Innovation, the venture building arm of Temasek, Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund. Unlike traditional venture capital, Xora works directly with scientists and entrepreneurs to transform advanced research into scalable deeptech ventures. This model reflects Singapore’s ambition not just to create more startups but to anchor globally relevant ones in high-tech, defensible fields. These examples show how Singapore is positioning venture building not as a fringe experiment but as a central pillar of its innovation economy.

Location as a Strategic Advantage

Geography has always been part of Singapore’s success story, and venture building is no different. Situated at the crossroads of Southeast Asia, the city-state offers immediate access to a consumer market of over 650 million people, a young, digital-native population hungry for innovation. At the same time, Singapore remains deeply connected to Western capital markets, making it a natural bridge for global investors seeking exposure to Asia.

This dual access - emerging market scale on one side, developed-world capital on the other - is a rare combination. For venture studios looking to create startups that can expand regionally and scale globally, Singapore offers the perfect launchpad.

Why Founders Are Choosing Singapore

It’s not only investors and policymakers driving this momentum. Founders themselves increasingly see Singapore as the best place to build. The city offers one of the most connected startup communities in Asia, access to a deep pool of talent, and a cosmopolitan culture that values experimentation.

Entrepreneurs also appreciate the reduced risk profile that venture building offers. Instead of going it alone, they join studios that provide initial capital, expert support, and access to networks, dramatically improving their odds of success. For many, especially in capital-intensive sectors like biotech or climate tech, this support is the difference between a promising idea and a real company.

Looking Ahead

As venture building matures globally, Singapore is uniquely positioned to lead its adoption in Asia. With strong government support, growing investor participation, and an ecosystem of studios producing measurable results, the city-state has built the foundations of a venture building hub that rivals the best in the world.

The next chapter will depend on whether these studios can consistently produce companies that scale to unicorn status or become regional champions. If they do, Singapore won’t just be a hub for venture building - it will be the place where Asia’s most important startups of the next decade are born.

For founders, the message is clear: if you want to test bold ideas in Asia with a higher chance of survival, Singapore is the place to start. For investors, the message is equally strong: the most interesting stories in venture building are not just being written in Silicon Valley - they are unfolding right here, at the crossroads of the East.

From Payment Rails to Embedded Finance: What VCs Are Betting on in Fintech

The fintech revolution has evolved far beyond simple payment apps and digital wallets. As we advance through 2025, venture capitalists are recalibrating their strategies, moving away from traditional fintech plays toward sophisticated infrastructure and embedded financial services that promise to reshape how businesses and consumers interact with money.

The Great Fintech Reset: Where the Smart Money Is Going

The numbers tell a compelling story of transformation. While overall VC investment in fintech remains near six-year lows, strategic investors are doubling down on specific segments that demonstrate exceptional growth potential. The embedded finance market, valued at $104.8 billion in 2024, is projected to explode to $690.39 billion by 2030, a staggering 36.4% compound annual growth rate that has captured the attention of sophisticated investors worldwide.

This isn't just another tech trend. It represents a fundamental shift in how financial services are delivered, consumed, and integrated into daily life. Smart VCs recognize that the future belongs to companies that can seamlessly weave financial functionality into existing platforms rather than building standalone financial products

Payment Rails: The Infrastructure Play That's Paying Off

The backbone of modern finance is undergoing a radical transformation, and investors are taking notice. FedNow, the Federal Reserve's instant payment system, is processing $190 million in payments daily, while Real-Time Payments (RTP) networks reported a remarkable 94% increase in transaction volume throughout 2024. This explosive growth has tripled participation in instant payment rails over the past year, with over 1,200 financial institutions now connected to these systems.

For VCs, this represents more than just impressive statistics, it signals a massive opportunity in payment infrastructure. Companies building the pipes that enable instant, seamless transactions are attracting significant investment because they're positioned to capture value from every transaction flowing through their systems. The shift from traditional payment processing to instant settlement creates entirely new revenue streams and business models that savvy investors are eager to fund.

Embedded Finance: The Trillion-Dollar Opportunity

The embedded finance sector is where VCs are placing their biggest bets, and the data supports their enthusiasm. Multiple market research firms project the sector will reach between $570.9 billion and $1.73 trillion by 2033, depending on adoption rates and regulatory environments. These aren't just optimistic projections, they're backed by real market momentum.

Consider the rapid expansion beyond traditional sectors. Healthcare, construction, and hospitality, industries previously slow to adopt financial technology, are now integrating tailored financial services directly into their platforms. This expansion is driving what investors call the "invisible finance" trend, where financial services become so seamlessly integrated that users barely notice they're engaging with sophisticated financial products.

The retail sector alone demonstrates the power of this shift. Fintech companies have grown from handling 22% of personal loan originations in 2019 to approximately 39% in 2024. This isn't just market share displacement, it's evidence of a fundamental change in how consumers prefer to access financial services: embedded within the platforms and services they already use.

The AI Wild Card: Intelligent Financial Services

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a bright spot in an otherwise cautious investment environment. VCs are particularly excited about AI applications that enhance embedded finance platforms, enabling real-time credit decisions, personalized financial products, and predictive analytics that can anticipate user needs before they're explicitly expressed.

The convergence of AI and embedded finance is creating opportunities for companies to offer hyper-personalized financial services at scale. For investors, this represents the holy grail of fintech: technology that can increase conversion rates, reduce risk, and create sticky customer relationships simultaneously.

Geographic Hotspots: Where the Action Is

The global nature of fintech investment is creating interesting regional dynamics. China's embedded finance market is expected to grow at a remarkable 32.8% CAGR through 2030, driven by tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent integrating financial services into their ecosystems. Meanwhile, India is witnessing significant growth with a 19.5% CAGR, fueled by a massive underbanked population and supportive regulatory environment.

These geographic variations are creating opportunities for VCs to invest in region-specific solutions that can later be adapted for global markets. The most successful fintech companies are those that can navigate diverse regulatory environments while maintaining their core value propositions.

The Regulatory Reality Check

Smart investors are also paying close attention to the regulatory landscape. Increased regulation, predicted as one of the top fintech trends for 2025, isn't necessarily a headwind, it's an opportunity for well-positioned companies to create competitive moats. Firms that can navigate complex compliance requirements while maintaining user experience advantages are attracting premium valuations.

The regulatory environment is actually accelerating the embedded finance trend, as companies seek to partner with established financial institutions rather than navigate licensing requirements independently. This creates opportunities for B2B fintech companies that can serve as bridges between traditional financial institutions and technology platforms.

The Investment Thesis: Infrastructure Over Apps

The most successful fintech VCs are shifting their focus from consumer-facing applications to the infrastructure that powers them. The companies receiving the largest funding rounds are those building the rails, APIs, and platforms that enable other businesses to offer financial services seamlessly.

This infrastructure-first approach reflects a mature understanding of the fintech ecosystem. While consumer apps can achieve viral growth, infrastructure companies build sustainable, defensible businesses with predictable revenue streams and strong network effects.

Looking Forward: The Next Wave

As we move deeper into 2025, the fintech landscape is being reshaped by three key forces: the maturation of instant payment rails, the explosive growth of embedded finance, and the intelligent application of AI to financial services. VCs who understand these dynamics and invest accordingly are positioning themselves to capture outsized returns in what promises to be the most transformative period in financial services history.

The message is clear: the future of fintech isn't about building better banking apps, it's about making finance invisible, instant, and intelligent. The companies and investors who embrace this reality will define the next decade of financial innovation.

Final Thoughts

The fintech evolution we're witnessing today represents more than just technological advancement, it's a fundamental reimagining of how financial services integrate into human and business experiences. For venture capitalists, this moment presents both unprecedented opportunity and significant risk. 

The data overwhelmingly supports one conclusion: the age of standalone fintech products is ending, and the era of invisible, embedded financial services has begun. The question isn't whether this transformation will happen, it's whether investors will have the vision to back the companies that make it reality.

Exploring the Link Between Venture Building and VC-as-a-Service

In the ever-evolving startup ecosystem, two models have emerged as key players in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship: venture building and VC-as-a-Service (Venture Capital-as-a-Service). While their approaches differ significantly, they are interconnected in ways that create synergies and drive value for startups, investors, and corporations alike. This article explores the definitions, differences, and the link between these two models.

What is Venture Building?

Venture building refers to the process of systematically creating startups from scratch within a structured environment, often led by venture studios or startup studios. These studios act as co-founders, providing resources, expertise, and funding to build and launch startups.

Key characteristics of venture building include:

• Idea Generation: Studios identify market gaps and develop startup ideas.

• Operational Involvement: They take an active role in building the team, developing products, and managing operations.

• Shared Resources: Startups benefit from shared infrastructure, such as legal, marketing, and technical support.

• Equity Ownership: Studios typically hold equity in the startups they create.

Venture building minimizes the risk of failure by providing startups with a strong foundation and access to expertise, making it an attractive model for entrepreneurs and investors alike.

What is VC-as-a-Service?

VC-as-a-Service is a model where a venture capital firm offers its expertise and services to manage investments on behalf of external entities, such as corporations, family offices, and institutional investors. Instead of raising a traditional VC fund, these firms act as strategic partners, deploying capital into startups that align with the client’s goals.

Key characteristics of VC-as-a-Service include:

• Customized Investment Strategies: Investments are tailored to the client’s objectives, whether financial returns, strategic innovation, or market access.

• Outsourced Expertise: Clients leverage the VC firm’s network, deal flow, and knowledge without building an internal team.

• Focus on Innovation: Corporations often use VC-as-a-Service to invest in disruptive startups that align with their long-term vision.

This model is particularly appealing to organizations looking to innovate through external investments while mitigating the risks and complexities of direct startup engagement.

How Venture Building and VC-as-a-Service are Linked

Though venture building and VC-as-a-Service serve different purposes, they intersect in several ways, creating opportunities for collaboration and mutual benefit:

1. Complementary Roles in the Startup Ecosystem

• Venture builders focus on creating startups from the ground up, often in the pre-seed or seed stage.

• VC-as-a-Service providers focus on funding and scaling startups, often at later stages.

This complementary relationship allows venture studios to collaborate with VC-as-a-Service firms to secure funding for their portfolio startups, while VC-as-a-Service firms gain access to high-quality, de-risked investment opportunities.

2. Partnerships for Strategic Investment

Venture studios often partner with VC-as-a-Service providers to attract external capital for their startups. For instance:

• A corporation using a VC-as-a-Service model might invest in startups created by a venture studio as part of its innovation strategy.

• Venture studios benefit from these partnerships by securing funding and strategic support for their startups.

3. Integrated Models

Some organizations combine both models under one roof. For example:

• A venture studio may offer VC-as-a-Service to external partners, allowing them to co-invest in the startups the studio creates.

• This hybrid approach aligns the interests of venture builders and investors, creating a streamlined pipeline from startup creation to scaling.

4. Focus on Innovation and Risk Mitigation

Both models aim to foster innovation while reducing risks:

• Venture building reduces the risk of startup failure by providing operational support and expertise.

• VC-as-a-Service diversifies investment risks by spreading capital across multiple startups.

Together, they create a robust ecosystem where startups are not only built but also funded and scaled efficiently.

Key Differences Between Venture Building and VC-as-a-Service :

Conclusion

Venture building and VC-as-a-Service are two distinct yet interconnected models that play vital roles in the startup ecosystem. Venture studios focus on the creation of startups, while VC-as-a-Service enables the funding and scaling of these ventures. Together, they form a powerful combination that drives innovation, reduces risks, and creates value for all stakeholders involved.

As the startup ecosystem continues to evolve, the collaboration between venture builders and VC-as-a-Service providers is likely to grow, creating new opportunities for entrepreneurs, investors, and corporations to thrive.

Leçons de la mise en sauvegarde d’Ÿnsect : ce que Mandalore IndustryTech fait différemment pour assurer la pérennité de ses investissements

Source : © Ynsect
https://www.reussir.fr/ladepeche/ynsect-leve-des-fonds-et-construit-une-ferme-verticale-pour-sa-production-dinsectes

Le parcours de la start-up française Ÿnsect, autrefois considérée comme un fleuron de l’agri-tech française, a pris un tournant difficile en 2024 lorsqu’elle a été placée en procédure de sauvegarde. Cette démarche, visant à réorganiser ses activités tout en conservant ses emplois et ses dettes, a mis en lumière des défis auxquels sont confrontées de nombreuses start-ups dans les secteurs industriels et technologiques. Ces défis permettent d’identifier des écueils que Mandalore IndustryTech s’efforce d’éviter pour ses propres investissements, en ajustant sa thèse pour une approche plus résiliente et adaptée.

Une vision réaliste et progressive du financement à long terme

L’ambition de Ÿnsect de construire la plus grande ferme verticale d’insectes au monde a nécessité des investissements massifs. Cependant, cette expansion rapide n’a pas permis à l’entreprise d’anticiper suffisamment les besoins de financement à plus long terme, en particulier dans un contexte de marché en ralentissement.

Chez Mandalore IndustryTech, nous intégrons cette leçon en optant pour un accompagnement rigoureux dans la gestion des financements. Nous privilégions des stratégies qui assurent non seulement la levée de fonds initiale mais aussi une planification à long terme, adaptée aux cycles financiers. En conséquence, les entreprises que nous soutenons doivent démontrer une voie vers des revenus autonomes, avec une croissance modulable en fonction de la disponibilité des ressources.

Au lieu de miser sur une expansion rapide comme Ÿnsect, Mandalore IndustryTech propose un accompagnement rigoureux dans la gestion des financements en planifiant sur le long terme.

Maîtrise des opérations industrielles : une priorité stratégique

Ÿnsect s’est lancée dans un projet ambitieux et technologiquement complexe. Mais dans un secteur industriel à forte intensité capitalistique, toute faille dans la chaîne de production ou la logistique peut rapidement devenir coûteuse.

Pour éviter ce type de problème, Mandalore IndustryTech se concentre sur des entreprises qui affichent une solide expertise industrielle et une capacité à gérer leurs opérations de manière stable et efficace. En effet, le fonds cible les startups étrangères de série B+ ou les entreprises de taille moyenne ayant des activités en Europe et cherchant à se développer en France.

Nous encourageons des partenariats industriels dès les premières phases de conception, garantissant que les projets soient soutenus par des acteurs expérimentés. Cela inclut aussi des tests de faisabilité et des études industrielles rigoureuses avant d’engager des investissements significatifs. Le fonds vise à sélectionner des acteurs étrangers capables de s’implanter en Europe à partir de la France. L’objectif est d’investir dans des entreprises souhaitant s’implanter en France pour développer leur marché européen.

Rentabilité et génération de flux de trésorerie : une condition essentielle

Dans le cas de Ÿnsect, une forte croissance n’a pas été suivie par une rentabilité suffisante, rendant la start-up dépendante des financements externes. Cette dépendance peut devenir problématique lorsque les investisseurs adoptent une approche plus conservatrice, comme cela a été le cas ces dernières années.

Mandalore IndustryTech se distingue par son exigence d’un modèle économique clair et viable dès les débuts d’un projet. Nous soutenons des entreprises qui montrent une capacité à générer des flux de trésorerie et qui ne dépendent pas uniquement de financements externes pour survivre. La rentabilité, ou du moins une voie crédible vers celle-ci, est un critère fondamental pour nos investissements, car elle permet aux entreprises de maintenir une certaine autonomie.

À la différence d'Ÿnsect, qui était dépendante des financements externes, Mandalore IndustryTech exige un modèle économique viable dès le départ. Le fonds recherche des entreprises capables de générer des flux de trésorerie et vise un rendement financier de 3x.

Adaptabilité et résilience face aux cycles économiques

La mise en sauvegarde d’Ÿnsect s’inscrit dans un contexte de ralentissement économique où les investisseurs deviennent plus prudents. Cela souligne la nécessité pour une start-up de savoir s’adapter aux fluctuations des cycles économiques.

Pour Mandalore IndustryTech, l’adaptabilité est une qualité essentielle. Nous investissons dans des entreprises capables de moduler leur croissance en fonction des conditions du marché. Cela signifie que nos investissements sont pensés pour offrir des leviers d’ajustement, permettant aux entreprises de naviguer efficacement dans des périodes de ralentissement sans compromettre leur pérennité.

Pour autant qu’il faut savoir moduler sa croissance dans les périodes compliquées, les conditions de marché sont actuellement prometteuses. En effet, le marché américain de l’Industry 4.0 devrait atteindre 9 104 millions de dollars en 2032, contre 5 342 millions de dollars en 2022. L’écosystème des start-ups spécialisées dans l’innovation technologique est florissant aux États-Unis, et de nouvelles opportunités se développent en Europe et en Asie. Les gouvernements locaux investissent massivement dans l’innovation industrielle.

Diversification des marchés et clientèle pour plus de stabilité

Ÿnsect s’est concentrée sur des segments de marché spécifiques, comme l’alimentation animale, limitant ainsi ses options lorsque ces marchés ralentissent. La diversification est un axe clé pour assurer une résilience à long terme.

Mandalore IndustryTech adopte une approche qui encourage la diversification des marchés et des segments de clientèle, afin que les entreprises puissent rebondir face aux imprévus. Nous privilégions des modèles d’affaires qui permettent une certaine flexibilité en termes d’offres et de marchés cibles, assurant ainsi que les entreprises ne soient pas vulnérables à un seul secteur.

Pour éviter les problèmes de concentration rencontrés par Ÿnsect, Mandalore IndustryTech encourage la diversification en ciblant 1000 entreprises technologiques : 40% aux États-Unis, 30% au Japon et 30% dans le reste du monde. Le fonds vise à réaliser 15 à 20 lignes d’investissement, dont 80% avec le bureau de représentation de l’UE pour la commercialisation.

En conclusion : Une approche de Mandalore IndustryTech pour des investissements robustes

La mise en sauvegarde d’Ÿnsect rappelle combien les start-ups doivent faire face à des défis complexes dans des secteurs nécessitant d’importants capitaux. Chez Mandalore IndustryTech, nous avons intégré ces enseignements dans notre thèse d’investissement pour éviter les erreurs qui pourraient compromettre la stabilité de nos participations. En misant sur la planification financière à long terme, la maîtrise opérationnelle, la recherche de rentabilité, l’adaptabilité économique et la diversification, Mandalore IndustryTech vise à construire un portefeuille d’entreprises solides, résilientes et prêtes à traverser les cycles économiques sans perdre de vue leur croissance durable.

Ces principes nous guident pour offrir à nos investisseurs des perspectives de rendement alignées avec une vision de croissance responsable et de pérennité, essentielle dans un contexte de marché en constante évolution.

Major Innovations Shaping Today's Tech Industry and France's Reindustrialization: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

The technological landscape is undergoing a period of remarkable transformation, driven by groundbreaking advancements like Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and the Internet of Things (IoT). These innovations are disrupting various sectors, fostering economic growth, and creating unprecedented possibilities. This article explores the impact of these key technologies and analyzes France's reindustrialization strategy that leverages these advancements.

Key Technological Innovations

• Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI, powered by machine learning, natural language processing, and data analytics, is revolutionizing industries. From automation and personalized customer experiences to predictive maintenance, AI is optimizing operations and empowering better decision-making. Its integration across healthcare, finance, and manufacturing is driving significant economic growth and innovation.

• Blockchain Technology: Blockchain offers a secure, transparent, and tamper-proof platform for transactions. It is transforming sectors like finance, supply chain management, and real estate by enabling secure and decentralized operations. Smart contracts, built on blockchain, automate and streamline processes, reducing costs and enhancing reliability. This fosters trust and transparency in digital transactions, promoting widespread adoption.

• Internet of Things (IoT): IoT connects devices, enabling real-time data collection and analysis. This data empowers industries like healthcare, agriculture, and smart cities to optimize operations, resource utilization, and decision-making. IoT's potential to revolutionize everyday life and industrial processes is immense, with applications for monitoring, automation, and predictive analytics.

France's Reindustrialization Strategy

France is actively pursuing a robust reindustrialization strategy to revitalize its manufacturing sector. This ambitious plan aims to increase the industrial value-added contribution to GDP to 12% by 2035, creating up to 800,000 new jobs. However, challenges in financing, innovation, skills development, and sustainability need to be addressed.

• Economic Sovereignty: Reindustrialization is crucial for enhancing France's economic sovereignty. By reducing reliance on foreign manufacturing, France aims to strengthen its domestic production capabilities. This approach ensures greater resilience against global supply chain disruptions and strengthens the national economy.

• Innovation and Technology Adoption: France recognizes the importance of adopting advanced technologies for successful reindustrialization. Integrating AI, IoT, and automation into manufacturing processes is key to achieving greater productivity and global competitiveness. The focus on research & development (R&D) and collaboration between academia and industry fosters innovation, driving economic growth.

• Skills Development: Developing a skilled workforce is paramount for France's reindustrialization success. Investments in education and training programs aim to equip individuals with the necessary skills for modern manufacturing. Collaboration between industries and educational institutions ensures a steady supply of qualified professionals, addressing the existing skills gap.

• Sustainability and Green Initiatives: Sustainability is a core principle of France's reindustrialization strategy. The emphasis is on green technologies and eco-friendly practices to reduce carbon emissions and promote environmental sustainability. Investments in renewable energy sources and sustainable manufacturing processes align with global environmental goals.

Conclusion

The convergence of major technological advancements and France's strategic reindustrialization efforts presents a unique opportunity for significant economic growth and development. Embracing AI, blockchain, and IoT can drive industrial transformation, while France's reindustrialization efforts can enhance economic sovereignty and sustainability. By fostering innovation, developing a skilled workforce, and prioritizing sustainability, France is well-positioned to become a leader in the global industrial landscape.