Is Your Company IPO-Ready? The Singapore Exchange (SGX) Checklist

Going public is a transformative milestone for any company. Listing on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) not only provides access to capital but also enhances credibility, visibility, and growth potential in Asia and beyond. However, the path to an IPO is complex, requiring careful planning, strong governance, and strict compliance with regulatory requirements.

If your company is considering listing on SGX, it’s essential to understand the key readiness criteria. Here’s a comprehensive checklist to help evaluate your IPO preparedness.

1. Corporate Structure and Governance

SGX places a strong emphasis on governance standards. Before pursuing an IPO, companies must ensure their corporate structure is clean, transparent, and investor-ready:

• Board Composition: Companies should have a balanced board with a mix of executive and independent directors. Strong oversight is a critical factor for investor confidence.

• Audit and Compliance: Financial reporting must comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and be audited by a reputable audit firm.

• Legal Structure: Companies should ensure subsidiaries, partnerships, and joint ventures are properly documented and consolidated, avoiding any legal ambiguities.

• Policies and Controls: Implement robust internal controls, risk management systems, and corporate governance policies. This includes conflict-of-interest policies, remuneration frameworks, and ethical guidelines.

A strong governance foundation signals to investors that the company is prepared for public scrutiny and accountability.

2. Financial Health and Performance Track Record

SGX requires companies to demonstrate financial stability and consistent performance. Key financial readiness criteria include:

• Profitability: For the Mainboard listing, companies generally need a record of profitability for at least three years. Certain growth-stage companies may qualify for alternative criteria if they meet revenue or asset thresholds.

• Revenue and Assets: Companies must meet minimum revenue and net tangible asset requirements, ensuring they have a substantive business footprint.

• Audited Statements: Three years of audited financial statements are typically required, showing consistent revenue growth and operational stability.

• Cash Flow Management: Demonstrating strong cash flow management, efficient working capital utilization, and controlled operating expenses is essential for investor confidence.

Financial readiness is critical not only for SGX compliance but also for market confidence and valuation during the IPO process.

3. Operational Readiness and Market Position

SGX investors evaluate whether a company has scalable operations and a competitive market position:

• Business Model Clarity: Clearly articulate your value proposition, target market, and revenue model.

• Scalability: Investors want to see that your operations can scale efficiently, with systems and processes that support growth without proportional cost increases.

• Market Share and Differentiation: Strong positioning, defensible market share, and unique competitive advantages increase the attractiveness of your IPO.

• Operational Metrics: Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as customer acquisition cost, churn rate, or production efficiency should be trackable and transparent.

Operational readiness reassures investors that your company can sustain growth post-IPO.

4. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Compliance with local and international regulations is non-negotiable for an SGX IPO:

• Regulatory Approvals: Ensure all business licenses, permits, and intellectual property rights are in order.

• Contractual Obligations: Review major contracts, joint ventures, and vendor agreements for terms that may affect liquidity, revenue, or risk exposure.

• Litigation Risk: Address any pending or potential litigation that could impact the company’s financial stability or reputation.

• Singapore Listing Requirements: Familiarize yourself with SGX rules for the Mainboard and Catalist boards, including minimum public float, shareholder spread, and disclosure obligations.

A clean legal slate reduces IPO delays and investor hesitation.

5. Corporate and Investor Communication

Transparency is key in public markets. Companies must be ready to communicate effectively with investors, analysts, and regulators:

• Investor Relations (IR) Strategy: Develop an IR team and strategy to provide consistent, accurate, and timely updates.

• Disclosure Readiness: Prepare to comply with continuous disclosure obligations, including announcements of financial results, material events, and board decisions.

• Equity Story: Craft a compelling IPO narrative,  why your company is a strong investment, its growth trajectory, and future potential.

• Financial Forecasting: Present credible financial projections based on realistic assumptions, backed by historical performance.

Strong communication builds investor trust, a critical factor for a successful IPO.

6. Timing and Market Conditions

Even the most prepared company must consider external factors:

• Market Climate: Evaluate current market sentiment, sector performance, and global economic conditions.

• Valuation Expectations: Ensure your expected valuation aligns with market appetite and comparables.

• IPO Readiness Window: A successful IPO often requires 12–18 months of preparation, including auditing, legal review, board restructuring, and marketing the equity story to investors.

Timing can significantly affect the success and valuation of your listing.

7. Post-IPO Planning

An IPO is not the end of the journey, it marks a new phase of growth and scrutiny:

• Corporate Governance Continuity: Maintain strong governance practices post-listing, including board oversight and compliance monitoring.

• Performance Reporting: Continue delivering consistent financial results and operational transparency.

• Strategic Growth Execution: Use IPO proceeds effectively to scale operations, enter new markets, or develop new products.

• Shareholder Engagement: Foster long-term relationships with public investors through regular updates and strategic guidance.

Post-IPO planning ensures sustainable growth and investor confidence, avoiding common pitfalls that lead to underperformance in public markets.

Final Thought:

 Is Your Company IPO-Ready?

Listing on the SGX offers unparalleled access to capital, credibility, and growth opportunities in Asia. However, preparation is key. Companies must demonstrate strong governance, financial health, operational readiness, legal compliance, and communication capabilities, while also planning strategically for post-IPO success.

By following this comprehensive IPO readiness checklist, companies can identify gaps, strengthen core capabilities, and position themselves for a successful public debut.

An IPO is a marathon, not a sprint, but with careful planning and adherence to SGX standards, your company can confidently take the leap and unlock its next phase of growth.

Singapore as a Springboard: Using an SGX Listing to Access Broader Asian Capital

For companies looking to scale across Asia, choosing where to list is more than a regulatory checkbox — it’s a strategic gateway to investors, partners and market credibility. The Singapore Exchange (SGX) has long pitched itself as that gateway: a politically stable, internationally oriented capital market with strong infrastructure, cross-border connectivity and investor reach that can help issuers tap broader Asian capital. Below we unpack why firms consider an SGX listing, the practical channels it opens, and the trade-offs companies should weigh.

Why list on SGX? The strategic proposition

SGX presents a compelling mix for international and regional issuers. It operates under internationally recognised listing rules and offers flexibility for foreign issuers that wish to make Singapore their primary or secondary listing venue, which makes it attractive for firms whose growth strategy targets Asia rather than a single domestic market. SGX positions itself explicitly as an “Asian gateway” — a place that connects corporate issuers in search of global capital with investors chasing Asian growth.

Key practical benefits include:

• Regulatory credibility with flexibility. SGX’s rulebook accommodates foreign issuers while requiring governance standards that investors trust. That mix helps issuers claim the regulatory comfort of a mature market without being boxed into an unfamiliar domestic regime.

• Market infrastructure and liquidity tools. SGX provides global market data, offshore connectivity points, and technical links that let institutional investors and trading firms access SGX liquidity from major financial centres — useful when you want Asia-wide visibility rather than a purely local investor base. 

How an SGX listing opens the rest of Asia

Listing in Singapore can act as a springboard in several, complementary ways:

1. Access to regional institutional investors. Singapore is a major asset-management hub in Asia. A local listing increases the chances of coverage by Singapore-based funds and analysts who allocate capital regionally. Even without massive retail volumes, institutional interest can provide depth and introductions into Southeast Asia and beyond. (SGX markets tend to be institutionally heavy relative to many domestic exchanges.)

2. Cross-border credibility for partnerships and capital raises. A Singapore listing signals to banks, strategic partners and larger institutional investors that a company has passed a rigorous disclosure and governance bar. That credibility eases negotiation of follow-on financing, cross-border M&A, and regional off-take or distribution agreements.

3. Technical connectivity and trading access. SGX’s data and connectivity networks — including offshore “liquidity hubs” and links to other global exchanges and market data providers — make it simpler for international trading desks to access and trade your stock, compared with a smaller, less connected bourse. That matters for price discovery and attracting global funds.

4. Pathways for dual or secondary listings. Companies can combine an SGX listing with another market (e.g., their home market or a larger centre) to blend local demand with broader Asian investor reach. SGX’s rules provide routes for foreign primary and secondary listings; these structures let management tailor disclosure and governance to the investors they most want to attract.

Practical considerations and friction points

A springboard works best when the platform itself is healthy and actively used. Here are the trade-offs companies commonly face:

• Liquidity and retail depth. Compared with mega-exchanges like Hong Kong or US markets, SGX has struggled at times with limited retail trading in some sectors. That can depress valuations or lengthen the time it takes for stock to find a broad investor base. Recent coverage has noted that the number of listed companies on SGX fell to multi-decade lows, and Singapore has launched initiatives to revitalise listings and attract growth firms. Companies should realistically model liquidity outcomes and potential valuation impacts.

• Regulatory & disclosure trade-offs. While SGX is regarded as credible and stable, certain governance or attestation requirements can differ from other jurisdictions; conversely, recent policy discussions have explored easing some listing requirements to attract high-growth names — a reminder that the rules may shift as Singapore competes for mobile capital. Issuers should factor in both current rules and a horizon for regulatory change.

• Investor targeting and market fit. Not every firm benefits equally. Resource-heavy mining or tiny consumer plays may find better fits elsewhere; but technology, fintech, regional consumer brands and funds-oriented issuers often gain disproportionate value from Singapore’s investor network and corporate services ecosystem. A realistic investor-mapping exercise should precede the decision.

Tactical best practices for issuers

If you’re evaluating SGX as your springboard into Asia, consider these tactics:

• Map investor audiences first. Identify the regional funds, banks and strategic investors most likely to own your stock and verify their propensity to trade on SGX.

• Consider a two-step listing strategy. Some firms list on SGX as a secondary market after establishing governance in their home market, or launch dual-class structures that preserve founder control while opening institutional capital.

• Leverage Singapore’s professional ecosystem. Use local legal, corporate finance and investor relations teams to position the story for Asia — Singapore’s advisers understand how to frame narratives across Southeast Asia, Greater China and South Asia.

Bottom line

An SGX listing is less about a single transaction and more about positioning: it’s a credibility lever, a connectivity node, and a staged route into institutional Asian capital. For the right issuer — one with a regional growth story, institutional investor appeal, and a plan to navigate liquidity constraints — Singapore can be a powerful springboard. But success depends on matchmaking: pick the investor base first, understand the exchange’s structural strengths and limits, and use Singapore’s professional ecosystem to amplify your reach across Asia. When done well, SGX isn’t just a place to list — it’s a launchpad for the next phase of pan-Asian growth. 

How Corporate Venture Studios in Singapore are Driving Industry Innovation

In the past, large corporations were often seen as too slow to innovate. Bound by legacy systems and risk-averse cultures, many struggled to keep pace with startups disrupting their industries. But in Singapore, a new model is changing that narrative: corporate venture studios.

Unlike traditional corporate innovation labs, which often remained internal and incremental, corporate venture studios build entirely new startups - often outside the parent company’s direct operations - designed to tackle big industry challenges. By combining corporate resources with startup agility, these studios are redefining how industries from finance to healthcare evolve in the face of global disruption.

Why Corporates are Turning to Venture Studios

The business case is clear. Traditional R&D is expensive and slow, while acquisitions can be risky and costly. Corporate venture studios offer a middle path: they allow companies to leverage their industry expertise and networks while tapping into entrepreneurial energy to build solutions that might not survive inside traditional corporate structures.

In Singapore, where industries like finance, logistics, and energy play central roles in the economy, corporates are increasingly turning to this model to stay ahead of competition. The result is an ecosystem where startups are not just independent disruptors but co-creations between entrepreneurs and established industry leaders.

The Scale of Corporate Participation

According to a 2023 report by Bain & Company, more than 60% of corporates in Asia now engage in some form of external innovation program, with venture studios emerging as one of the fastest-growing models. In Singapore specifically, Enterprise Singapore and the Economic Development Board (EDB) have actively encouraged corporations to adopt venture building, offering incentives and co-funding opportunities. This has led to a rise in corporate-backed studios, many of which focus on industry-specific problems such as sustainable supply chains, fintech innovation, and healthcare technologies.

Case Study: Standard Chartered’s SC Ventures

One of the most prominent examples is SC Ventures, Standard Chartered Bank’s innovation arm based in Singapore. Rather than just experimenting internally, SC Ventures has co-created and scaled multiple startups addressing financial inclusion, blockchain, and digital banking.

One of its ventures, Solv, is a B2B marketplace for small businesses in emerging markets. Built within the SC Ventures studio, Solv has expanded rapidly into India and other Asian markets, showcasing how corporate studios can combine startup agility with corporate reach to tackle systemic industry challenges.

Case Study: Wilmar International and Next-Gen Agritech

Another example comes from Wilmar International, one of Asia’s largest agribusinesses headquartered in Singapore. Through venture-building collaborations, Wilmar has explored innovations in agritech, including precision farming and sustainable supply chain technologies. While these ventures are still emerging, they highlight how corporates in resource-heavy industries are using venture studios to address sustainability challenges while opening new growth opportunities.

The Advantage of Corporate Assets

What makes corporate venture studios particularly powerful is their ability to provide startups with unfair advantages. Unlike traditional studios that start with little more than capital and talent, corporate studios can offer.

• Immediate access to customers through established distribution channels.

• Proprietary industry data and expertise.

• Infrastructure, from labs to logistics networks, that would otherwise take years for a startup to access.

In Singapore, where corporates are deeply integrated into regional trade and finance networks, these advantages make corporate-built startups especially well-positioned to scale across Asia.

Challenges to Overcome

Of course, the model is not without risks. Corporate bureaucracy can creep in, slowing decision-making. There is also the cultural clash between startup speed and corporate structure. To succeed, corporate venture studios in Singapore have had to learn to create independence - allowing ventures to operate with entrepreneurial freedom while still drawing on corporate resources.

SC Ventures, for example, explicitly structures its startups as independent entities, with separate governance and the ability to raise external capital. This hybrid model has proven more effective than purely internal innovation programs of the past.

Why Singapore is the Ideal Base

Singapore offers a unique environment for corporate venture studios. Its strategic location at the heart of Southeast Asia provides access to a fast-growing market of over 650 million consumers. Its strong regulatory frameworks give corporates the confidence to experiment with new models in fintech, healthcare, and sustainability.

Moreover, Singapore’s government has actively positioned the city as an innovation hub, offering grants and co-investments that reduce the financial risks corporates face when launching studios. Combined with a highly skilled talent pool and proximity to both Western capital and Asian markets, this makes Singapore a natural home for corporate-driven venture building.

The Next Chapter: Corporates as Builders, Not Just Buyers

As global industries undergo massive shifts - digitization, decarbonization, and demographic change - corporates can no longer afford to rely solely on incremental innovation. Venture studios give them a chance to shape disruption rather than be disrupted. In Singapore, the rise of corporate venture studios signals a new era where corporates are not just buyers of innovation but active builders. Whether it’s a bank rethinking financial inclusion, an agribusiness pioneering sustainable food systems, or a logistics giant testing green supply chains, these ventures have the potential to set industry standards across Asia.

For entrepreneurs, this means access to resources and distribution networks that dramatically increase their odds of success. For corporates, it means the chance to reinvent themselves through startups rather than being outpaced by them. The message is clear: in Singapore, corporate venture studios are more than an experiment - they are becoming a cornerstone of how industries innovate. The companies that embrace this model now are not just building startups; they are building the future of their industries.

Les étapes clés pour construire une startup via le Venture Building

Dans l’imaginaire collectif, créer une startup rime souvent avec solitude, prise de risques extrêmes et nuits blanches à chercher son premier client. Mais depuis quelques années, une nouvelle approche change la donne : le Venture Building. Plutôt que de laisser des fondateurs naviguer seuls dans l’incertitude, le Venture Building met à leur disposition une méthode structurée, des ressources partagées et une équipe expérimentée. Résultat : les chances de succès augmentent, et les erreurs fatales diminuent.

En 2025, cette approche attire autant les entrepreneurs que les investisseurs, et il n’est pas difficile de comprendre pourquoi. Pour construire une startup via le Venture Building, certaines étapes clés sont devenues incontournables.

Comprendre le problème avant de penser à la solution

Beaucoup de startups échouent parce qu’elles partent directement d’une idée séduisante, sans s’assurer que le problème est réel. Dans un modèle Venture Building, la première étape consiste à identifier des problèmes de marché concrets. Cela se fait à travers des recherches approfondies : analyse de tendances, entretiens clients, études sectorielles.

L’objectif est clair : valider que le problème existe, qu’il est suffisamment douloureux pour les utilisateurs, et qu’il touche un marché accessible. Sans cette base solide, même la meilleure idée de produit a peu de chances de survivre.

La validation rapide : tester avant d’investir

L’une des grandes forces du Venture Building est sa capacité à tester les hypothèses très tôt. Plutôt que de dépenser des millions dans un produit complet, les studios construisent des prototypes simples ou des “Minimum Viable Products” (MVP). Ces tests permettent de mesurer l’intérêt du marché, d’obtenir des retours concrets et d’ajuster l’idée.

Selon une étude de McKinsey, les venture builders expérimentés multiplient par 2 les chances de succès de leurs startups comparé aux novices, car ils savent répéter ces cycles de test et d’apprentissage.

Constituer l’équipe fondatrice

Le capital humain reste la clé. Un Venture Builder ne se contente pas d’une bonne idée, il cherche aussi à assembler l’équipe fondatrice idéale. Souvent, le studio recrute un CEO, un CTO et parfois un CPO, afin d’équilibrer vision stratégique, expertise technique et exécution produit.

Prenons l’exemple de Hexa (anciennement eFounders), un Venture Builder parisien qui a contribué au lancement de plus de 40 startups SaaS, dont Aircall ou Front. Leur approche ? Associer très tôt des fondateurs complémentaires et les entourer de designers, développeurs et experts en croissance. Résultat : un taux d’échec extrêmement bas, autour de 6%, bien inférieur à la moyenne du marché.

Les ressources partagées : gagner du temps et réduire les coûts

Créer une startup, c’est aussi gérer mille détails : comptabilité, juridique, recrutement, communication. Le Venture Builder fournit des ressources mutualisées qui permettent aux jeunes équipes de se concentrer sur ce qui compte vraiment : le produit et le marché.

C’est un gain de temps énorme. Au lieu de perdre des mois à structurer l’administratif, la startup démarre avec un cadre professionnel dès le jour un. Cela réduit aussi le risque d’erreurs coûteuses, comme de mauvaises clauses juridiques ou un recrutement mal géré.

Trouver le Product-Market Fit

Après la phase de test et le premier MVP, vient l’étape cruciale : atteindre l’adéquation produit-marché (Product-Market Fit). Le Venture Building insiste sur des itérations rapides : écouter les utilisateurs, ajuster les fonctionnalités, repositionner si nécessaire.

Un rapport du Global Startup Studio Network (GSSN) montre que les startups issues de Venture Studios atteignent le Series A en moyenne en 25 mois, contre 56 mois pour les startups traditionnelles. Ce rythme accéléré s’explique par le travail constant sur l’adéquation produit-marché, mené avec méthode et ressources.

Le financement structuré

Contrairement aux startups classiques, qui doivent convaincre des investisseurs dès le début, les startups issues de Venture Building bénéficient d’un financement interne initial. Le studio investit souvent plusieurs centaines de milliers d’euros pour couvrir les premiers 12 à 18 mois. Cela réduit le stress financier et permet de construire des bases solides avant d’aller chercher du capital externe.

Par exemple, Hexa investit environ 800 000 € par projet dès la phase initiale, ce qui permet aux fondateurs de se consacrer pleinement au développement sans se soucier immédiatement de lever des fonds. 

Le spin-off : voler de ses propres ailes

Une fois que le produit a trouvé son marché, que l’équipe est stable et que la traction est prouvée, vient l’étape du spin-off : la startup sort du Venture Builder pour devenir une entité autonome. Elle garde cependant souvent des liens forts avec le studio, qui reste actionnaire (en moyenne autour de 30% de participation).

Ce modèle crée un alignement d’intérêts : le studio a tout intérêt à maximiser les chances de succès, car son rendement dépend de la réussite de l’entreprise sur le long terme.

L’impact global du Venture Building

Avec cette approche, les risques de faillite diminuent sensiblement. Là où 9 startups sur 10 échouent dans le modèle classique, les données montrent qu’une majorité des projets issus de Venture Builders atteignent au moins le stade du financement externe, et certains deviennent des scale-ups internationales.

C’est aussi une manière de répondre à un contexte où les investisseurs recherchent davantage de sécurité et de discipline. En 2025, dans un environnement économique marqué par la prudence, le Venture Building apparaît comme une réponse adaptée : il combine créativité entrepreneuriale et rigueur méthodologique.

Le prochain chapitre

Construire une startup via le Venture Building n’élimine pas tous les risques, mais cela les transforme. Au lieu de parier sur une idée et un fondateur isolé, on s’appuie sur un cadre reproductible, une équipe solide et un accompagnement pas à pas.

Les étapes clés sont claires: identifier un problème réel, valider rapidement, recruter l’équipe fondatrice, bénéficier de ressources partagées, trouver le Product-Market Fit, sécuriser le financement et enfin, voler de ses propres ailes. En suivant ce chemin, les startups issues du Venture Building ne se contentent pas de survivre : elles posent les bases pour grandir plus vite, plus fort, et avec davantage d’impact.

L’avenir du Venture Building dans le prochain cycle d’innovation

L’histoire de l’innovation n’est jamais linéaire. Elle avance par vagues, par cycles, où des périodes d’exubérance sont suivies par des moments de rationalisation. Après les excès de la décennie passée -  capital abondant, valorisations gonflées, course effrénée à la croissance - 2025 ouvre un nouveau chapitre, plus sélectif, plus exigeant. Dans ce contexte, une question émerge avec force : quel sera le rôle du Venture Building dans le prochain cycle d’innovation ?

Ce modèle, encore méconnu du grand public il y a dix ans, s’impose désormais comme un pilier incontournable des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux. Les données le confirment : selon le Global Startup Studio Network, une startup issue d’un Venture Studio a près de 30 % de chances supplémentaires de réussir par rapport à une startup traditionnelle. Et au moment de lever des fonds, ces startups passent du pré-seed à la Série A en 25 mois en moyenne, contre 56 mois pour les autres.

Un contexte favorable à l’émergence des Venture Builders

La première raison de croire en l’avenir du Venture Building réside dans le climat économique actuel. Les investisseurs se montrent plus prudents : les levées de fonds globales ont reculé de près de 42 % en 2023 par rapport à l’année record de 2021. Dans ce nouvel environnement, où chaque euro compte, le Venture Building apparaît comme une réponse logique.

Pourquoi ? Parce qu’il réduit le gaspillage. Les idées sont testées rapidement, les ressources mutualisées, les équipes accompagnées pas à pas. Là où un startup classique peut brûler des millions avant de se rendre compte que son produit ne trouve pas son marché, un projet issu d’un Venture Builder ajuste le tir bien plus tôt.

Leçons tirées des pionniers

Des acteurs comme Flagship Pioneering aux États-Unis ont déjà montré la voie. Ce Venture Builder de Boston est à l’origine de plusieurs géants de la biotech, dont Moderna, qui a joué un rôle clé dans la mise au point du vaccin à ARNm contre le Covid-19. Ici, l’exemple est frappant : sans un Venture Builder capable de financer la recherche fondamentale, de recruter les bons scientifiques et de structurer une startup avant même qu’il y ait un marché, une telle réussite aurait été improbable.

En Europe, le studio parisien Hexa (anciennement eFounders) démontre également la puissance du modèle. Avec plus de 40 startups lancées et un taux d’échec limité à 6 %, Hexa prouve que l’innovation peut être industrialisée sans perdre son agilité. Leurs spin-offs, comme Aircall ou Front, sont devenus des scale-ups internationales, générant des milliers d’emplois.

Le Venture Building comme réponse aux grands défis

Le prochain cycle d’innovation sera marqué par des défis mondiaux : le climat, l’intelligence artificielle, la santé, la cybersécurité. Autant de secteurs où le temps presse et où les erreurs coûtent cher. Or, le Venture Building est particulièrement adapté pour s’attaquer à ces problématiques complexes.

Dans le domaine climatique, par exemple, les projets nécessitent des investissements lourds et des validations scientifiques rigoureuses. Les Venture Builders peuvent absorber ce risque en mutualisant les ressources, en travaillant avec des chercheurs et en créant plusieurs projets en parallèle. Cela augmente les chances qu’au moins l’un d’entre eux réussisse à atteindre une échelle significative.

De même, dans l’IA, où l’innovation avance à une vitesse vertigineuse, les studios offrent un cadre permettant de tester rapidement des cas d’usage, de sécuriser l’accès aux talents et de lever des fonds dès que la traction est prouvée.

Une industrialisation de l’entrepreneuriat ?

Certains critiques voient dans le Venture Building une forme de « fabrique à startups » qui risque de standardiser l’entrepreneuriat. Mais l’expérience montre l’inverse. En réalité, le modèle ne bride pas la créativité : il la canalise. Il donne aux idées le cadre nécessaire pour passer du stade de concept à celui d’entreprise viable.

McKinsey souligne que les Venture Builders expérimentés produisent en moyenne des startups générant 12 fois plus de revenus au bout de cinq ans que celles issues de studios novices. Cela prouve que l’expérience accumulée ne tue pas l’innovation, elle la renforce.

Vers une hybridation des modèles

L’avenir du Venture Building ne se limitera pas aux studios indépendants. On observe déjà une hybridation :

• Des entreprises traditionnelles lancent leurs propres Venture Builders pour explorer de nouveaux marchés (par exemple, les grands groupes énergétiques qui développent des spin-offs dans les énergies renouvelables).

• Des fonds de capital-risque commencent à intégrer des équipes de Venture Building pour mieux accompagner leurs participations.

• Des gouvernements soutiennent des programmes de studios nationaux afin de stimuler l’innovation locale et de retenir les talents.

Cette hybridation crée un écosystème plus robuste, où le Venture Building n’est plus une alternative marginale mais un composant central du cycle d’innovation.

Une promesse d’impact à long terme

À mesure que ce modèle gagne en maturité, une chose devient claire : le Venture Building n’est pas seulement un outil pour créer des startups plus vite, c’est une méthode pour créer des entreprises plus solides et plus alignées sur les grands besoins de la société.

En réduisant les risques d’échec, en attirant les meilleurs talents et en canalisant les capitaux vers des projets réellement validés, il contribue à un écosystème entrepreneurial plus durable. Et dans un monde où les crises se succèdent - sanitaires, climatiques, géopolitiques, cette durabilité est plus précieuse que jamais.

Le prochain chapitre

L’avenir du Venture Building dans le prochain cycle d’innovation sera donc marqué par trois dynamiques : une adoption massive par les investisseurs en quête de sécurité, une expansion vers des secteurs critiques comme le climat et la santé, et une hybridation avec les entreprises et les institutions.

Nous entrons dans une période où l’innovation ne peut plus se permettre d’être chaotique ou gaspilleuse. Le Venture Building, avec sa rigueur et sa créativité, apparaît comme le modèle capable d’écrire les prochaines grandes histoires entrepreneuriales.

Dans dix ans, il est probable que nous ne parlerons plus de Venture Building comme d’une nouveauté, mais comme de l’infrastructure invisible de l’innovation mondiale.

How Venture Builders Reduce Startup Failure Risks

Startups often feel like walking a tightrope in a storm: one wrong step, one misstep in timing, market, or team, and everything falls. It’s no surprise that about 90% of startups fail overall. But in 2025, a different model is proving it can lower those odds: the venture builder. These are organizations that don’t just invest - they build. They nurture ideas, assemble teams, offer infrastructure, and walk alongside founders through early storms.

Here’s how venture builders are reducing failure risks - and what data and case studies show about their effectiveness.

The Stakes: Understanding Startup Risk

The numbers are stark. Many reports show failure rates over time are steep: roughly 10% of new startups fail within their first year, and between years two through five, majority of failures happen. By year ten, few survive. These aren’t just abstract stats, they represent teams who ran out of runway, misread market demand, or couldn’t piece together strong execution. That’s the baseline. Venture builders aim to shift those odds by intervening early on the common failure triggers.

What Venture Builders Do Differently

Venture builders provide what many startups struggle to assemble quickly: clarity of idea, team strength, operational support, and effective validation.

You can think of it this way: instead of solo founders trying to juggle everything - product, user-feedback, hiring, legal, finances - the builder supplies scaffolding. They often supply shared services (legal, HR, strategy), access to domain experts, and a process for iterating ideas before major investment. This means startups born inside builder models often avoid big, early mistakes.

There are multiple pieces to this, but one that researchers call out often is the capacity to test product-market fit before “going big.” Because builders usually demand early user feedback, safe prototyping, proof of concept. That early feedback loop weeds out ideas with weak demand.

Data & Case Studies: Proof in Practice

• Venture Studio Survival & Alive Ratios

A study called Big Venture Studio Research 2024 looked at hundreds of venture studios, hybrid builders, and corporate builders. They found that hybrid venture studios (those that combine venture studio activities with things like corporate building, accelerator, VC fund) have much higher survival rates: for every studio that closes, there are ~10.86 that remain alive. Corporate builders had ~9.3:1. Pure venture studios had lower survivorship: ~4.73:1.(That means builders which diversify or bring in hybrid functions tend to reduce risk further.

• Experienced Builders vs Novice Ones

McKinsey recently published findings in “The Three Building Blocks of a Successful Venture Factory” that more experienced venture builders are about twice as likely to achieve success compared to newcomer studios. Over time, with repeat efforts, their output (in revenue in fifth year) can be 12 times higher than that of novice studios. That suggests that venture builders don’t just reduce risk by the model - they get better at reducing risk as they build more companies.

• Corporate Venture Building vs Traditional Startup Paths

An article by CreativeDock noted that corporations using venture building (internally creating new startups or spin-outs) report success rates around 66% for their ventures, far above the 20-30% or so typical for venture capital backed startups or corporate ventures without structured building. They also say that venture building-born startups achieve better IRRs (~44% higher on average) compared to traditional startups, faster transitions from seed to Series A, and earlier exits (on average under 4 years) compared to 6-7 years typical elsewhere.

Human Stories Behind the Data

Consider a venture builder that continuously launches several projects per year. With the builder model, a given project might start not with a blank page, but with a research phase. Founders test assumptions: Is there demand? Can the technology or product be built affordably? Who is competition? These early experiments expose flaws early - low demand, wrong features - so adjustments are made before major investment.

Another important case is around the “business-building muscle.” McKinsey points out that entities that build many ventures develop repeated systems: standard ways to onboard teams, validate ideas, launch MVPs, spin-outs. Over time, they make fewer rookie mistakes - less duplicated effort, fewer misfires - so each new project starts from a stronger foundation.

What Failures Are Reduced

By virtue of these mechanisms, venture builders tend to reduce risk in several specific ways:

• Team risk: builders often match people with complementary skills rather than solo founders. They bring in domain experts early.

• Market risk: they test demand, refine product-market fit before big spends.

• Execution risk: shared infrastructure and expertise mean better supply chain, legal, hiring, finance practices early.

• Timing & capital risk: because builders tend to pace investment, control burn, and have staged funding, they avoid over-extension before product is solid.

These interventions don’t eliminate risk entirely. But they shift the risk curve substantially.

Broader Trends & What Investors Are Saying

Investors in 2025 say they want a higher floor - some guarantee of minimal failure, clearer paths from concept to growth. They like models where founders aren’t isolated. Where you can see how an idea was validated, how the team was assembled. Where overhead is shared and costs are lean early.

Corporations also find benefit: many large firms are adopting corporate venture building to create new growth engines. In one survey by EY-Parthenon, nearly 45% of executives from surveyed companies reported they have launched ventures in the last five years that now generate $100 million+ in annual revenue. Venture building gives them structure to do that.

Looking Ahead: What Makes a Builder Even More Robust

The data suggests certain traits make some venture builders better at reducing risk:

• Repetition: builders who launch many ventures learn faster.

• Hybrid or diversified models: studios that also do corporate venturing, VC funds, accelerators tend to have higher survival of their ventures.

• Strong validation early: demand testing before full build.

• Deep domain or technical competence: where builders understand industry/technology well, they avoid mis-positioning or under-estimating costs.

The Next Chapter

Startups will always carry risk. That’s part of what gives them upside. But a model growing in legitimacy in 2025 is one that doesn’t treat failure as inevitable, but as something to manage. Venture builders are showing how structured support, domain expertise, shared infrastructure, and repeated experience can tilt the odds in favor of survival.

For founders thinking of starting under a builder, the message is hopeful: you don’t have to brace for failure alone. For investors, it means better early signals, stronger teams, and less wasted cost.

In a world where capital is tighter and demands are higher, venture builders are proving to be more than trend - they might be the most reliable path through the startup storm.

Funding the Future: The Role of VCs and Sovereign Funds in Singapore’s Venture Studios

The venture studio model has redefined how startups are born. Instead of betting on lone founders, venture studios build companies from the ground up, pairing entrepreneurial talent with capital, infrastructure, and networks. But behind this model lies a critical question: who funds the future?

In Singapore, the answer increasingly comes from two powerful sources - venture capital firms and sovereign wealth funds. Together, they are shaping not just the trajectory of venture studios but the kinds of companies that will define Asia’s innovation landscape over the next decade.

Why Funding Matters in Venture Building

Traditional startups often begin with a small seed round, testing ideas with limited resources. Venture studios flip that dynamic. They require upfront investment to design infrastructure, hire operational teams, and support multiple ventures simultaneously. The model is capital-intensive, but it also increases the odds of producing sustainable startups.

This is why the involvement of venture capital (VCs) and sovereign wealth funds is so significant. They provide not only the capital but also the long-term vision needed to sustain venture studios through the uncertain early stages of building science-driven or industry-specific companies.

The Numbers Speak

In 2022, Singapore attracted more than US$11 billion in startup funding, according to Enterprise Singapore, with a growing share flowing into venture-building initiatives. The global venture studio market itself is projected to reach US$42 billion by 2027, up from around US$20 billion today, as reported by Global Startup Studio Network.

Within Singapore, sovereign wealth funds play a particularly influential role. Temasek Holdings, with assets exceeding US$287 billion, has been steadily increasing its exposure to early-stage innovation through vehicles like Xora Innovation, its venture-building arm. Meanwhile, GIC, with more than US$770 billion in assets under management, has also stepped up its participation in deeptech and sustainability-focused ventures, often co-investing alongside studios and VCs.

Case Study: Temasek and Xora Innovation

Temasek’s launch of Xora Innovation in 2019 was a milestone for Singapore’s venture building ecosystem. Xora focuses on commercializing breakthrough scientific research in fields like climate tech, healthcare, and advanced manufacturing. Unlike traditional VC, Xora doesn’t just invest - it co-builds, bringing together teams of scientists, operators, and entrepreneurs to create companies from scratch.
One example is its investment in Eavor, a geothermal technology startup developing closed-loop systems for renewable energy. By backing such ventures, Temasek shows how sovereign funds can align financial returns with global sustainability goals while anchoring these efforts in Singapore.

The Role of Venture Capital Firms

Venture capital firms, too, are leaning into the venture studio model. Global firms like Sequoia Capital and Vertex Ventures (the latter headquartered in Singapore) have backed startups emerging from studios, drawn by the de-risked nature of ventures that already have structured support and validation.

Antler, one of the world’s most prominent venture builders with a major base in Singapore, has partnered with VCs to scale its portfolio. Since its launch, Antler Singapore has created more than 100 startups, many of which have raised follow-on capital from leading VCs. This collaboration demonstrates a virtuous cycle: studios generate investable companies, while VCs provide the growth capital to scale them globally.

Why Sovereign Funds Matter More in Singapore

Singapore’s sovereign wealth funds bring something that private VCs alone cannot - patient capital. DeepTech, climate, and biotech startups often take years to become commercially viable. Sovereign funds like Temasek and GIC are uniquely positioned to absorb these long timelines while maintaining conviction in long-term returns.

Moreover, their participation signals confidence to the market. When a sovereign fund co-invests in a venture, it often catalyzes additional investment from global VCs, corporates, and even governments. This multiplier effect strengthens the ecosystem and accelerates the scale-up of ventures born in Singapore’s studios.

Singapore as a Regional Magnet for Capital

The presence of sovereign wealth funds also amplifies Singapore’s role as a capital hub for Southeast Asia. With over 650 million people, Southeast Asia represents one of the world’s fastest-growing digital economies, projected by Google and Temasek to reach US$330 billion by 2025. By anchoring venture studios in Singapore and funding them with sovereign-backed capital, the city-state effectively positions itself as the launchpad for ventures targeting this massive market.

The Challenges Ahead

While the alignment of VCs and sovereign funds has fueled the rise of Singapore’s venture studios, challenges remain. Venture building is resource-heavy, and not all studios will survive. There is also the question of focus: should capital prioritize moonshot DeepTech ventures with global ambitions, or scalable consumer-tech plays better suited for regional adoption?

Striking the right balance will be key. Too much emphasis on short-term gains risks diluting the transformative potential of venture building. Too much focus on moonshots without market validation risks creating science projects that never scale.

Looking Ahead: Funding the Next Decade

What’s clear is that the combination of VCs and sovereign wealth funds gives Singapore’s venture studios a uniquely powerful advantage. Venture capital brings agility and global networks, while sovereign funds provide stability and patience. Together, they create an ecosystem capable of nurturing bold ideas through the long road from concept to commercial success.

In the next decade, expect to see more sovereign-VC partnerships in Singapore’s venture building space, particularly in fields like climate tech, AI, and advanced manufacturing. These are areas where global challenges intersect with Singapore’s ambition to lead in innovation.

For founders, the message is clear: in Singapore, you don’t just get access to capital - you get access to aligned capital, designed to see you through the toughest years of building. For investors, the takeaway is equally strong: if you want exposure to the next generation of high-impact ventures in Asia, Singapore’s venture studios are where the story begins.

Singapore’s Role in Shaping the Next Wave of DeepTech through Venture Building

DeepTech refers to technologies rooted in scientific discoveries and engineering breakthroughs and it is increasingly seen as the foundation for solving humanity’s toughest problems. From climate resilience and quantum computing to advanced healthcare and space exploration, the promise of DeepTech extends far beyond incremental innovation. But building DeepTech startups is notoriously hard: they require long development cycles, heavy capital investment, and multidisciplinary expertise.

This is where Singapore is quietly taking center stage. Over the last decade, the city-state has positioned itself as one of Asia’s most compelling hubs for DeepTech innovation, not through chance but through a deliberate embrace of venture building. By pairing research talent with structured startup creation, Singapore is charting a path that could make it a global leader in translating science into scalable businesses.

The DeepTech Imperative

DeepTech is not just hype. According to Boston Consulting Group, DeepTech startups globally attracted more than US$60 billion in funding in 2023, double the levels seen in 2016. Yet the barriers to entry remain high. Unlike software startups, where a minimum viable product can be built in weeks, DeepTech ventures often require years of research before commercial viability.

Singapore has recognized both the challenge and the opportunity. With limited natural resources, the country has long invested in knowledge as its most strategic asset. Today, that strategy is paying off as its universities and research institutions - such as the National University of Singapore (NUS) and A-STAR - are increasingly integrated into venture-building pipelines.

A Government-Backed Ecosystem

The Singapore government has been one of the most active global backers of DeepTech venture building. Through initiatives like the SGInnovate Deep Tech Nexus Strategy, launched in 2017, the country committed more than US$150 million to support the translation of science into companies. SGInnovate itself has directly invested in over 100 DeepTech startups spanning fields like autonomous robotics, medtech, and agritech.

This model is designed not just to fund startups but to systematically derisk them. By offering labs, pilot facilities, and structured venture building programs, Singapore reduces the “valley of death” between academic research and commercial application.

Case Study: A-STAR Spinouts

One of the best examples of Singapore’s DeepTech venture building comes from A-STAR, the Agency for Science, Technology and Research. Over the past five years, A-STAR has spun out dozens of startups in biotech, advanced materials, and AI. Companies like Nanoveu, which develops nanotechnology-based films for optics and antiviral protection, have scaled regionally thanks to early support from A-STAR’s venture co-creation efforts.

Another case is RWDC Industries, a biodegradable plastics startup that originated in Singapore and has since raised more than US$135 million in growth funding. RWDC’s success underscores how research-driven ventures can become globally relevant with the right support structure.

Temasek and the Long-Term View

DeepTech requires patient capital, and few institutions embody patience better than Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek. Through its venture-building arm Xora Innovation, Temasek partners with scientists and entrepreneurs at the very earliest stages, often before a commercial application is fully proven.

This long-term approach is critical. Traditional VCs often shy away from DeepTech because of long timelines, but venture studios like Xora de-risk the process by building operational capacity around founders. This allows breakthroughs in quantum computing or synthetic biology to be pursued without the pressure of unrealistic short-term returns.

Singapore as Asia’s Testbed

Another advantage lies in Singapore’s role as a testbed for emerging technologies. With its compact size, advanced infrastructure, and supportive regulators, the city-state often serves as a “living laboratory” for pilots.

For example, autonomous vehicle trials, drone delivery pilots, and next-gen biotech therapies have all been deployed in Singapore earlier than in most regional markets. This testbed status makes the country an attractive base for DeepTech venture builders: startups can validate complex technologies locally before scaling across Asia’s 650 million-strong Southeast Asian market.

Talent at the Core

DeepTech thrives on talent density, and Singapore has invested heavily in building a global research workforce. The country attracts scientists and engineers through initiatives like the Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE) 2025 Plan, which allocated US$25 billion to science and innovation over five years.

What sets Singapore apart is how this talent is integrated into venture building. Instead of leaving researchers isolated in academia, programs connect them with entrepreneurs, operators, and investors who can help translate breakthroughs into market-ready companies. This culture of collaboration is one reason why Singapore consistently ranks among the top 10 in the Global Innovation Index.

Looking Forward: Singapore’s DeepTech Ambition

The next decade will determine whether Singapore’s DeepTech bets pay off. The foundations are strong: government backing, venture studios, sovereign wealth participation, and global research talent. The challenge lies in scaling beyond local pilots into global leaders.

If Singapore’s studios can consistently produce DeepTech unicorns - companies solving real-world problems in energy, healthcare, and materials - it will cement its place not just as Asia’s DeepTech hub but as one of the world’s great innovation ecosystems.

For founders, Singapore offers a rare combination: scientific depth, supportive policy, and venture-building structures that reduce the odds of failure. For investors, it provides a gateway to high-potential DeepTech startups in Asia with the added security of government and sovereign fund alignment.

The message is clear: while Silicon Valley may dominate software, the next generation of world-changing science-driven startups could well be born in Singapore’s venture studios.

Why Singapore is Emerging as Asia’s Hub for Venture Building

Singapore has long been known as a global financial center, but in recent years, its ambitions have expanded beyond banking and trade. Today, it is carving out a reputation as Asia’s leading hub for venture building, the model where ideas are not just funded but systematically transformed into startups through the structured support of venture studios. While Silicon Valley remains the gold standard for startup culture, Singapore is demonstrating that the future of innovation in Asia might follow a different playbook.

The rise of venture building in Singapore is not accidental. It is the result of a deliberate strategy combining government foresight, investor appetite, and the city-state’s unique position as a connector between East and West. For founders and investors alike, Singapore is increasingly where the region’s most ambitious ideas are being tested, scaled, and launched into the world.

The Numbers Behind the Story

Singapore’s startup ecosystem has grown at a remarkable pace. According to Enterprise Singapore, the number of tech startups in the country jumped from around 2,800 in 2003 to more than 4,500 in 2023, employing tens of thousands of people and contributing significantly to GDP. In 2022 alone, venture funding in Singapore reached US$11 billion, accounting for more than 50% of all funding across Southeast Asia, according to DealStreetAsia.

But what’s most striking is not just the raw funding numbers. It is the structural shift toward venture building. More than 30 venture studios now operate in Singapore, ranging from independent builders like Antler, which has a strong base in the city, to corporate-backed and government-supported studios that focus on deeptech, fintech, and sustainability. This density is unmatched anywhere else in Asia, positioning Singapore as the natural hub for the model.

A Supportive Government Framework

One of Singapore’s most powerful advantages is the role of government policy. Agencies such as Enterprise Singapore and EDB (Economic Development Board) have actively fostered venture building by co-investing in studios, providing grants, and streamlining regulatory pathways for new businesses.

For instance, in 2020, the government launched the Startup SG Founder Venture Building Program, a scheme designed specifically to support venture builders in co-developing startups with entrepreneurs. This move signaled not only recognition of the venture building model but also a willingness to bet national resources on it.

The regulatory environment also plays a role. With a reputation for clarity, efficiency, and fairness, Singapore provides a rare sense of stability in a region where startups often grapple with red tape. For deeptech or highly regulated sectors like fintech and biotech, this regulatory clarity can make the difference between stagnation and scale.

Case Studies: Successful Venture Builders

The global venture builder Antler made Singapore its launchpad in Asia, running its residency program for founders and producing startups that have since expanded globally. In just five years, Antler Singapore has backed more than 500 founders and created over 100 startups, several of which have gone on to raise significant Series A and B rounds.

Another standout is Xora Innovation, the venture building arm of Temasek, Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund. Unlike traditional venture capital, Xora works directly with scientists and entrepreneurs to transform advanced research into scalable deeptech ventures. This model reflects Singapore’s ambition not just to create more startups but to anchor globally relevant ones in high-tech, defensible fields. These examples show how Singapore is positioning venture building not as a fringe experiment but as a central pillar of its innovation economy.

Location as a Strategic Advantage

Geography has always been part of Singapore’s success story, and venture building is no different. Situated at the crossroads of Southeast Asia, the city-state offers immediate access to a consumer market of over 650 million people, a young, digital-native population hungry for innovation. At the same time, Singapore remains deeply connected to Western capital markets, making it a natural bridge for global investors seeking exposure to Asia.

This dual access - emerging market scale on one side, developed-world capital on the other - is a rare combination. For venture studios looking to create startups that can expand regionally and scale globally, Singapore offers the perfect launchpad.

Why Founders Are Choosing Singapore

It’s not only investors and policymakers driving this momentum. Founders themselves increasingly see Singapore as the best place to build. The city offers one of the most connected startup communities in Asia, access to a deep pool of talent, and a cosmopolitan culture that values experimentation.

Entrepreneurs also appreciate the reduced risk profile that venture building offers. Instead of going it alone, they join studios that provide initial capital, expert support, and access to networks, dramatically improving their odds of success. For many, especially in capital-intensive sectors like biotech or climate tech, this support is the difference between a promising idea and a real company.

Looking Ahead

As venture building matures globally, Singapore is uniquely positioned to lead its adoption in Asia. With strong government support, growing investor participation, and an ecosystem of studios producing measurable results, the city-state has built the foundations of a venture building hub that rivals the best in the world.

The next chapter will depend on whether these studios can consistently produce companies that scale to unicorn status or become regional champions. If they do, Singapore won’t just be a hub for venture building - it will be the place where Asia’s most important startups of the next decade are born.

For founders, the message is clear: if you want to test bold ideas in Asia with a higher chance of survival, Singapore is the place to start. For investors, the message is equally strong: the most interesting stories in venture building are not just being written in Silicon Valley - they are unfolding right here, at the crossroads of the East.

From Talent to Exit: Building Resilient Companies in the Next Innovation Cycle

The entrepreneurial landscape has never been more unforgiving. With 90% of startups failing and 75% of venture-backed companies not making it, the path from talent acquisition to successful exit requires more than just innovative ideas, it demands strategic resilience. As we navigate an era defined by rapid technological change, economic uncertainty, and evolving workforce expectations, building companies that can weather storms while maintaining growth momentum has become the ultimate competitive advantage.

The New Reality of Business Survival

The statistics paint a sobering picture of modern entrepreneurship. 10% of startups fail in the first year, while first-time founders have only an 18% success rate. However, these numbers tell only part of the story. The companies that survive and thrive share common characteristics: they build resilience into their DNA from day one.

Consider the tale of two companies launched in 2020. Company A, a fintech startup, secured $10 million in Series A funding but burned through capital quickly, focusing solely on user acquisition without building sustainable revenue streams. 75% of fintech startups fail despite venture backing, and Company A became part of this statistic within 18 months. Company B, an AI-driven logistics platform, raised similar funding but allocated 40% of resources to talent development and operational resilience. Today, Company B is preparing for its Series C round, having weathered supply chain disruptions and market volatility.

The Talent Foundation: More Than Just Hiring

Building resilient companies starts with reimagining talent strategy. Organizations face a critical shortage of talent and skills, making traditional hiring approaches insufficient. Resilient companies focus on three pillars: acquisition, development, and retention.

• The acquisition phase requires precision targeting. Netflix's approach exemplifies this, they hire for cultural fit and adaptability, not just technical skills. Their famous "keeper test" ensures every hire strengthens organizational resilience. During the 2022 subscriber crisis, Netflix's talent-first approach enabled rapid pivoting to ad-supported tiers and password-sharing monetization.

• Development comes next. Amazon's Career Choice program, investing $700 million in employee upskilling, demonstrates how talent development creates competitive moats. By 2024, companies investing in continuous learning report 23% higher revenue growth and 18% better employee retention rates.

• Retention strategies have evolved beyond traditional benefits. Organizations face a critical decision: redefine retention or risk irrelevance. Modern retention focuses on psychological safety, career mobility, and purpose alignment. Google's Project Aristotle revealed that psychological safety, not talent density, predicts team performance. Companies implementing this insight see 35% lower turnover rates.

Innovation Cycles: Adapting to Accelerating Change

The next innovation cycle differs fundamentally from previous ones. While past cycles lasted 7-10 years, current cycles compress to 3-5 years. This acceleration demands new organizational capabilities.

• Resilient companies embrace "innovation optionality", maintaining multiple strategic bets simultaneously. 3M's famous 15% time policy, allowing employees to pursue passion projects, generated Post-it Notes and countless other innovations. Modern versions include Atlassian's ShipIt days and Shopify's hack days, creating structured chaos that sparks breakthrough innovations.

• The key is balancing exploration with exploitation. McKinsey research shows that companies allocating 70% of innovation resources to core improvements, 20% to adjacent opportunities, and 10% to transformational bets achieve optimal returns. This 70-20-10 rule provides a framework for navigating uncertainty while maintaining growth.

Building Operational Resilience

Operational resilience extends beyond risk management, it's about creating antifragility. Companies that strengthen under stress rather than merely surviving it.

• Supply chain resilience exemplifies this principle. When COVID-19 disrupted global logistics, companies with diversified supplier networks and flexible manufacturing capabilities thrived. Zara's agile supply chain, capable of design-to-shelf cycles in two weeks, enabled rapid adaptation to changing consumer preferences during lockdowns.

• Financial resilience requires different thinking. Traditional metrics focus on efficiency, maximizing returns while minimizing costs. Resilient companies optimize for adaptability, maintaining cash reserves and flexible cost structures. Salesforce's variable expense model, where 60% of costs scale with revenue, provided crucial flexibility during economic downturns.

• Technology resilience involves building systems that improve with stress. Netflix's chaos engineering, deliberately introducing failures to strengthen systems, exemplifies this approach. Their Chaos Monkey randomly terminates production instances, forcing engineers to build fault-tolerant architectures.

The Path to Successful Exit

Successful exits require strategic preparation years in advance. Companies achieving premium valuations share common characteristics: predictable revenue streams, scalable operations, and strong leadership teams.

• Revenue predictability attracts acquirers and investors. SaaS companies with 90%+ gross retention rates command valuation multiples 2-3x higher than those with 80% retention. HubSpot's focus on customer success, not just acquisition, drove their successful IPO and continued growth.

• Scalable operations demonstrate growth potential. When Zoom's daily users jumped from 10 million to 300 million during COVID-19, their scalable architecture handled the load without major outages. This operational resilience contributed to their $100+ billion valuation peak.

• Leadership team strength often determines exit success. When WhatsApp sold to Facebook for $19 billion, investors cited the founding team's product vision and execution capability as key factors. Building leadership bench strength through succession planning and knowledge transfer creates sustainable value.

Data-Driven Resilience Strategies

Modern resilience requires data-driven decision making. Companies leveraging analytics for resilience planning show 15% better crisis performance than those relying on intuition alone.

• Predictive analytics identify potential disruptions before they occur. UPS's ORION system, analyzing millions of delivery routes daily, reduces fuel consumption by 10% while improving delivery reliability. This operational intelligence provides competitive advantages during fuel price volatility.

• Real-time monitoring enables rapid response. Tesla's over-the-air updates demonstrate how continuous monitoring and remote capabilities create resilience. When battery issues emerged in certain Model S vehicles, Tesla pushed software updates preventing thermal runaway, avoiding costly recalls and maintaining brand trust.

The Future of Resilient Companies

As we look toward the next innovation cycle, several trends will shape resilient company building. Artificial intelligence will augment human capabilities, requiring new talent strategies. Remote-first organizations will need different culture-building approaches. Sustainability will become a business imperative, not just a marketing message.

The companies that thrive will be those that embed resilience into their fundamental operating principles. They'll attract talent by offering purpose and growth, not just compensation. They'll innovate continuously while maintaining operational excellence. They'll prepare for exits by building sustainable value, not just chasing valuations.

Final Thoughts 

Building resilient companies isn't just about surviving the next crisis, it's about creating organizations that strengthen through adversity, adapt to change, and deliver exceptional value to all stakeholders. In an era of accelerating change, resilience isn't just a competitive advantage, it's the foundation for sustainable success.

The path from talent to exit has never been more challenging, but the rewards for those who master resilience have never been greater. The question isn't whether disruption will come, it's whether your company will be ready to thrive when it does.

5 Key Mistakes to Avoid When Scaling a Startup Inside a Venture Studio

Venture studios are rapidly becoming a go-to model for startup creation and scaling, offering entrepreneurs a structured environment with shared resources, expert teams, and strategic support. However, despite the advantages, scaling a startup within a venture studio presents unique challenges. Founders who misunderstand the dynamics or misstep in key areas risk slowing their growth, or worse, failing altogether.

In this article, we explore five critical mistakes startups often make when scaling inside a venture studio and how to avoid them.

1. Misaligning Vision Between Founders and the Studio

One of the foundational pillars of success in a venture studio model is alignment. Venture studios typically originate the idea or co-create it alongside entrepreneurs. If the startup’s leadership and the studio’s core team are not aligned on the long-term vision, mission, or go-to-market strategy, internal friction can derail progress.

Solution:
Ensure early and continuous communication about expectations. Discuss roles, equity, timelines, and exit goals upfront. Co-founders should be deeply involved in the decision-making process and feel empowered, not like hired operators. Regular strategy syncs can prevent misalignment and reinforce a shared sense of ownership.

2. Overreliance on Shared Resources

One of the biggest benefits of venture studios is access to shared talent: engineers, designers, marketers, legal advisors, and more. However, startups can become overly reliant on these resources without developing their own internal capabilities. This can lead to a bottleneck as the startup grows, especially when the studio has multiple ventures demanding attention from the same team.

Solution:
Use the shared resources as a launchpad, not a crutch. From the beginning, identify which capabilities need to be internalized as you scale. Start planning for key hires early, especially in product development, sales, and customer success. Think about your independence roadmap.

3. Failing to Establish a Clear Identity

Venture studio startups often struggle with branding and positioning, especially if their identity remains too closely tied to the parent studio. Investors, partners, and even customers might see the startup as a studio project, not a standalone business with its own mission and market.

Solution:
Invest in brand differentiation. Even though you're born inside a studio, the startup should develop a distinct tone, voice, mission, and visual identity. Focus on storytelling from day one: who are your customers, what problem are you solving, and why are you uniquely positioned? Your identity should resonate outside the studio bubble.

4. Ignoring External Market Signals

Being within a venture studio often gives founders a strong internal feedback loop, mentors, fellow founders, and studio advisors. But relying too heavily on internal validation can insulate the startup from real-world signals. Scaling requires deep market traction, customer validation, and constant iteration based on real usage, not assumptions.

Solution:
Get outside early and often. Talk to users. Validate hypotheses. Run lean experiments. Let customers be your compass. Studio guidance is important, but external traction is what validates whether your business is ready to grow. Don’t skip early-stage testing just because you have access to resources.

5. Structuring Equity Poorly for Long-Term Incentives

Cap table structure can be tricky in a venture studio. Since the studio often takes a significant equity stake early on, founders and future hires might feel diluted from the beginning. If this isn’t managed well, it can hurt morale and make future fundraising difficult.

Solution:
Be strategic and transparent about the cap table. Balance studio equity with founder motivation and talent acquisition needs. Keep enough equity reserved for future employees. Be clear with early investors about the studio model and why it creates value. Build flexibility into the structure to evolve as the startup scales.

Final Thought

Scaling a startup inside a venture studio offers unmatched advantages, speed, support, and shared expertise. But it also requires intentionality and awareness of potential pitfalls. By aligning with the studio on vision, avoiding overdependence on shared resources, establishing a distinct identity, listening to the market, and managing the cap table wisely, founders can turn the venture studio environment into fertile ground for sustainable growth. Like any startup path, success lies in the execution, and in the ability to learn from missteps before they become barriers.

The Liquidity Question: Why It Matters Earlier Than You Think

Liquidity is often an afterthought, until it isn’t. Businesses, investors, and even individuals frequently overlook its importance The Liquidity Question: Why It Matters Earlier Than You Think

Liquidity is the financial world's silent guardian, invisible when present, catastrophic when absent. While most businesses and individuals focus on growth, returns, and profitability, they often overlook the fundamental lifeline that determines survival: the ability to convert assets into cash quickly without significant loss. This oversight has toppled Fortune 500 companies, devastated investment portfolios, and left countless individuals financially stranded.

Understanding liquidity isn't just about financial prudence, it's about recognizing that cash flow, not profit margins, determines who survives economic storms. From corporate giants to individual households, those who master liquidity management thrive while others merely survive, if at all.

The Silent Assassin of Profitable Businesses

The business graveyard is littered with companies that were profitable on paper but failed due to liquidity crises. A comprehensive study by the U.S. Bank revealed that 82% of business failures stem from poor cash flow management, not inadequate profitability. This statistic exposes a fundamental misconception: that revenue equals resilience.

Case Study: The Toys "R" Us Tragedy

Toys "R" Us exemplifies this principle perfectly. In 2017, the retail giant, with $11.5 billion in annual revenue and a dominant market position, filed for bankruptcy. The culprit wasn't declining toy sales or e-commerce competition alone, but rather the company's inability to service its $5 billion debt load amid deteriorating liquidity. The company had tied up capital in inventory and real estate while carrying unsustainable debt obligations, leaving no cushion for operational flexibility.

The lesson is stark: profitability without liquidity is a house of cards. Revenue can mask underlying financial vulnerabilities until external pressures, economic downturns, supply chain disruptions, or unexpected expenses, expose the truth.

The Working Capital Trap

Many businesses fall into the working capital trap, where success breeds failure. Rapid growth often requires increased inventory, extended payment terms to customers, and upfront investments in infrastructure. Without careful liquidity management, growing companies can become victims of their own success, unable to fund operations despite impressive sales figures.

Personal Finance: The Emergency Fund Imperative

The liquidity crisis extends beyond corporate boardrooms to kitchen tables across America. Federal Reserve data reveals that 37% of Americans cannot cover a $400 emergency expense with cash, forcing them into high-interest debt cycles that compound financial instability.

The 3-6 Month Rule: Your Financial Lifeline

Financial advisors universally recommend maintaining 3-6 months of living expenses in liquid assets, cash, savings accounts, or short-term bonds. This buffer serves multiple purposes:

• Prevents forced asset liquidation: Avoids selling stocks, property, or other investments during market downturns

• Maintains credit health: Reduces reliance on credit cards or loans during emergencies

• Preserves opportunities: Enables strategic moves like career changes or investment opportunities

The Psychological Dividend

Beyond financial protection, liquidity provides psychological benefits. Research from the University of Pennsylvania shows that individuals with emergency funds report lower stress levels and greater life satisfaction, even when controlling for income levels. Liquidity isn't just about money, it's about peace of mind.

Market Liquidity: The Investor's Ultimate Insurance

Investment liquidity separates seasoned investors from amateurs. While illiquid assets like real estate and private equity can generate substantial returns, they can also trap capital when liquidity is most needed.

The 2008 Financial Crisis: A Masterclass in Liquidity

The 2008 financial crisis provided a brutal education in liquidity's importance. Investors holding "valuable" mortgage-backed securities discovered that paper wealth means nothing if nobody will buy your assets. Meanwhile, those with cash reserves capitalized on the chaos.

The Numbers Tell the Story:

• The S&P 500 plummeted 57% from peak to trough (2007-2009)

• Investors with liquidity who purchased undervalued stocks generated returns exceeding 300% during the recovery

• Real estate investors with cash bought distressed properties at 30-50% discounts

The Liquidity Premium

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway consistently maintains massive cash reserves, often criticized as "inefficient" by analysts. Yet this strategy enabled Berkshire to acquire quality companies at discounted prices during the 2008 crisis and the 2020 pandemic. The "liquidity premium”, the cost of holding cash versus investing, pales in comparison to the opportunities liquidity creates during market dislocations.

Corporate Liquidity Metrics: Reading the Warning Signs

Businesses measure liquidity through several key ratios that reveal financial health:

Current Ratio (Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities)

• Ideal Range: 1.5-3.0

• Interpretation: Measures ability to cover short-term obligations

• Warning Signs: Ratios below 1.0 indicate potential liquidity stress

Quick Ratio (Quick Assets ÷ Current Liabilities)

• Ideal Range: 1.0 or higher

• Interpretation: Excludes inventory, focusing on most liquid assets

• Critical Insight: More conservative than current ratio, better for cyclical businesses

Apple's Liquidity Mastery

Apple provides a masterclass in liquidity management. Despite a current ratio of 0.94 (seemingly concerning), the company maintains over $166 billion in cash and marketable securities. This strategic liquidity enables Apple to:

• Fund massive R&D investments without external financing

• Acquire companies and technologies opportunistically

• Weather economic downturns without operational disruption

• Return capital to shareholders through dividends and buybacks

 The Liquidity Optimization Framework

For Businesses:

• Cash Reserve Strategy: Maintain 3-6 months of operating expenses in liquid assets. This provides operational flexibility and creditor confidence.

• Credit Line Management: Establish revolving credit facilities before needing them. Banks prefer lending to healthy companies, not distressed ones.

• Receivables Management: Implement aggressive collection policies and consider factoring for immediate cash flow.

• Inventory Optimization: Use just-in-time inventory systems to minimize working capital requirements.

 For Individuals:

• Emergency Fund Construction: Build systematically, start with $1,000, then progress to one month's expenses, eventually reaching 3-6 months.

• Asset Allocation Balance: Avoid overconcentration in illiquid assets. Even real estate investors should maintain liquid reserves.

• Liquid Investment Vehicles: Utilize money market funds, short-term CDs, and high-yield savings accounts for emergency funds.

• Debt Management: Minimize high-interest debt that can quickly erode liquidity during emergencies.

The Liquidity Mindset: Beyond Numbers

Liquidity management requires a fundamental shift in thinking, from maximizing returns to optimizing survival. This doesn't mean being overly conservative, but rather maintaining enough flexibility to navigate uncertainty.

The Opportunity Cost Fallacy

Critics often argue that holding cash is "inefficient" due to opportunity costs. However, this perspective ignores liquidity's option value, the ability to act decisively when opportunities arise. During market crashes, recessions, or personal emergencies, liquidity isn't just protective, it's transformative.

Building Financial Resilience

True financial success isn't measured solely by net worth growth but by the ability to maintain stability across various economic conditions. Liquidity provides the foundation for this resilience, enabling individuals and businesses to not just survive but thrive during challenging periods.

Final Thoughts 

Liquidity isn’t just a financial metric, it’s a survival tool. Whether you’re a business owner, investor, or individual, prioritizing liquidity early prevents desperation later.  

As Warren Buffett famously said:  

"Cash is to a business as oxygen is to an individual: never thought about when it is present, the only thing in mind when it is absent."

Don’t wait until the oxygen runs out. 

AI Startups in PE/VC: Overhyped or Underestimated?

The question of whether AI startups are overhyped or underestimated reveals the fundamental misunderstanding permeating today's investment landscape. Rather than a monolithic sector deserving uniform skepticism or enthusiasm, artificial intelligence represents a complex ecosystem where speculative excess coexists with profound undervaluation. The answer depends entirely on which corner of this vast landscape you examine, and whether you possess the analytical sophistication to distinguish between genuine innovation and cleverly marketed incrementalism.

The Theater of Hype: Where Valuations Defy Gravity

The most visible AI investments often represent the sector's most theatrical performances, where billion-dollar valuations rest on foundations of promise rather than profit. Foundation model companies have captured public imagination and investor capital in equal measure, creating a feeding frenzy that bears an uncomfortable resemblance to previous technology bubbles. These companies command valuations that would make even the most optimistic dot-com investor blush, justified by narratives of artificial general intelligence and revolutionary transformation that remain tantalizingly out of reach.

The application layer presents an even more concerning spectacle of speculation. Countless startups have discovered that adding "AI-powered" to their pitch decks can multiply valuations overnight, regardless of underlying differentiation or sustainable competitive advantages. This phenomenon, dubbed "AI washing" by skeptics, has created a parallel universe where traditional business fundamentals seem quaint and outdated. Consumer-facing AI applications, in particular, have attracted enormous attention despite demonstrating unit economics that would terrify any rational investor operating under normal market conditions.

The Hidden Gems: Where Value Hides in Plain Sight

While headlines fixate on ChatGPT valuations and artificial general intelligence timelines, the most compelling AI investments often operate in the shadows of public attention. Infrastructure companies building the foundational layers of AI deployment represent a dramatically different investment proposition, one characterized by rational valuations, sustainable business models, and defensive competitive positions. These businesses provide the essential plumbing that enables AI deployment at scale, creating platform effects that become more valuable as adoption accelerates.

The vertical AI revolution represents perhaps the most underestimated opportunity in the entire technology landscape. Healthcare AI companies developing FDA-approved diagnostics, financial services firms solving compliance challenges, and manufacturing solutions delivering measurable productivity improvements demonstrate the transformative power of artificial intelligence applied to specific domain problems. European and Asian markets present particularly compelling arbitrage opportunities, where comparable companies trade at significant discounts to American counterparts despite similar growth trajectories and market positions. 

The Sophistication Gap: Why Traditional Frameworks Fail

The challenge facing AI investors extends far beyond simple valuation metrics to encompass fundamental questions about how technological revolutions should be evaluated and financed. Traditional venture capital frameworks, optimized for software businesses with predictable scaling characteristics, struggle to accommodate AI companies' unique cost structures, competitive dynamics, and value creation mechanisms. The result is systematic mispricing that creates both dangerous bubbles and extraordinary opportunities.

Revenue quality emerges as the critical differentiator in this landscape, where two companies with identical top-line growth can justify vastly different valuations based on underlying business model sustainability. Companies achieving platform effects through network externalities, regulatory moats, or proprietary data advantages deserve premium valuations regardless of sector sentiment. Conversely, businesses relying on commodity APIs or consumer adoption without clear monetization paths face inevitable margin compression as market dynamics normalize.

Sector Dynamics: The Tale of Three Markets

Healthcare AI presents the strongest case for systematic underestimation, where regulatory approval processes create natural monopolies and clear value propositions for end customers. The sector's focus on patient outcomes rather than engagement metrics provides sustainable differentiation that pure software companies cannot replicate. FDA breakthrough device designations create competitive advantages measured in years rather than months, while clinical trial data establishes barriers to entry that algorithmic improvements alone cannot overcome.

Financial services AI benefits from regulatory tailwinds as compliance requirements favor established players with deep domain expertise. These companies operate in environments where switching costs are measured in years and relationship-driven sales cycles create additional defensive characteristics. The sector's high-stakes nature means that marginal improvements in fraud detection, risk management, or compliance efficiency can justify substantial technology investments, creating sustainable demand for proven solutions.

Investment Philosophy: Threading the Needle

The AI investment landscape demands portfolio construction that captures legitimate opportunities while avoiding speculative excess. This requires moving beyond binary thinking about sector-wide overvaluation or undervaluation toward company-specific analysis of competitive positioning, market dynamics, and business model sustainability. The most successful investors will be those who can identify genuine innovation amid the noise of marketing hyperbole and venture capital momentum.

Risk management becomes paramount in an environment characterized by extreme volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Scenario planning must incorporate potential AI winter scenarios where speculative investments face significant corrections, while defensive positions in infrastructure and vertical applications provide portfolio stability. Geographic diversification across America, European, and Asian markets helps capture regional arbitrage opportunities while reducing concentration risk in any single regulatory environment.

The temporal dimension adds another layer of complexity, as AI capabilities continue advancing at unprecedented rates while market valuations gyrate wildly based on sentiment and speculation. Patient capital willing to invest through multiple hype cycles will likely be rewarded, while those seeking quick exits may find themselves trapped in valuation bubbles that burst without warning.

Final Thoughts 

The AI investment landscape defies simple categorization as either overhyped or underestimated because it encompasses multiple distinct markets with fundamentally different characteristics and risk profiles. Consumer applications and foundation models trading at extreme multiples clearly exhibit speculative characteristics, while infrastructure companies and vertical AI solutions demonstrate rational valuations based on sustainable business models. The sector's complexity requires sophisticated analysis that moves beyond aggregate funding metrics toward nuanced evaluation of competitive advantages and market positioning. 

3 Reasons Why LPs Should Look at Studio Models in 2025

The venture capital landscape is experiencing a seismic shift. With traditional VC funds struggling to deliver consistent returns and Limited Partners (LPs) facing unprecedented challenges in deploying capital effectively, a new model is emerging as a compelling alternative: venture studios. As we navigate through 2025, the data tells a clear story, venture studios are not just outperforming traditional investment models, they're redefining what institutional investors should expect from their venture allocations.

1. Superior Returns and Risk-Adjusted Performance

The numbers don't lie: venture studios are delivering exceptional results that should make every LP take notice. Venture studios demonstrate Internal Rates of Return (IRR) that are approximately double those of traditional venture capital benchmarks, with a 24% exit rate compared to just 14% for both accelerators and founders-first VCs. This outperformance becomes even more impressive considering speed to liquidity, studio startups are acquired 33% faster and take 31% less time to IPO.

The systematic approach delivers consistent results: 84% of studio startups raise seed rounds and 72% reach Series A funding, compared to just 42% of traditional ventures reaching Series A. Real-world success stories like Moderna, Twilio, and Bitly demonstrate this isn't coincidence but systematic value creation. For LPs grappling with poor distributions from traditional VC funds, less than 10% of 2021 funds have had any DPI after 3 years, venture studios offer a proven alternative with both higher returns and faster liquidity events.

2. Accelerated Time-to-Market and Capital Efficiency

The venture studio model delivers unprecedented speed and capital efficiency, with startups reaching Series A in just 25.2 months compared to industry averages. This acceleration stems from studios' systematic approach, proactively identifying opportunities, assembling expert teams, and providing comprehensive operational support from day one, eliminating the founder learning curve that typically consumes years and millions. The operational leverage is particularly evident in AI-driven markets, allowing studios to deploy cutting-edge infrastructure across their entire portfolio simultaneously. 

3. Market Momentum and Strategic Positioning for the Future

The institutional investment landscape is rapidly shifting toward venture studios, positioning early LP adopters for significant advantages. In 2024, venture studio funds were nearly twice as common as accelerator funds, accounting for 10.3% of all venture capital funds launched compared to 5.5% for accelerators.

This trend reflects a broader recognition among sophisticated investors that the traditional VC model faces structural challenges. VC fundraisers raised $76.1 billion in 2024, making it the lowest fundraising year since 2019, while only 30% of Limited Partners (LPs) are looking to add VC managers to their portfolios, down 36 points from previous years. The shift represents more than just performance metrics, it's about alignment and control. Traditional VC funds face inherent conflicts between generating management fees and optimizing portfolio returns. Venture studios, by contrast, earn equity through direct value creation and capital investment, aligning their interests more closely with LP returns.

Final Thoughts 

The venture capital industry stands at an inflection point, with traditional models struggling to deliver consistent returns in today's fast-paced, technology-driven market. Venture studios represent a fundamental reimagining of how institutional capital can be deployed, offering LPs superior risk-adjusted returns, faster liquidity, and strategic positioning for the future backed by robust data and proven track records. The question isn't whether venture studios will continue to outperform traditional VC models, the data already confirms this reality, but whether LPs will recognize this shift early enough to capture the significant alpha still available. As we progress through 2025, the LPs who embrace venture studios today will likely look back on this decision as a defining moment that positioned them at the forefront of the next generation of venture capital.

How We See the Future of Company Building at Mandalore Partners

At Mandalore Partners, we believe the future of company building is fundamentally different from what we've seen before. As we navigate through 2025, we're witnessing a paradigm shift that goes beyond traditional venture capital models, and we're positioning ourselves at the forefront of this transformation.

The old playbook of throwing capital at promising startups and hoping for exponential returns is not just outdated; it's counterproductive in today's complex business environment. We've observed that the most successful companies of the past five years weren't just well-funded, they were strategically guided, operationally supported, and deeply integrated into their target industries from day one.

Our Vision: Beyond Capital to Strategic Partnership

We've spent years observing the venture capital landscape, and frankly, we believe the traditional model is broken. The industry generated $149.2 billion in exit value in 2024, yet despite a $47 billion increase in overall deal value, we saw 936 fewer deals compared to the previous year. This tells us something profound: the market is demanding quality over quantity, strategic depth over transactional relationships.

At Mandalore, we see this as validation of our core thesis. The future belongs to companies that receive more than just capital, they need strategic expertise, operational support, and deep industry integration. This is why we've pioneered our Venture Capital-as-a-Service (VCaaS) model.

What We Mean by Venture Capital-as-a-Service

At Mandalore Partners, we don’t just write checks and step back, we embed ourselves as strategic partners through our VCaaS model, transforming how corporations build and scale innovation. Unlike traditional VCs, we stay hands-on from idea to market leadership, providing not only capital but deep regulatory expertise, industry networks, and operational insight. Our work with insurtech startups shows how this integrated approach turns potential into market dominance, proving that success hinges on more than just technology—it demands the right strategic guidance. With 93% of CEOs set to maintain or grow corporate venture investments in 2024, our model is exactly what forward-thinking companies need: a trusted partner to co-architect their future.

Our 6 Ss Framework: The Architecture of Success

We've developed what we call the 6 Ss model, our proprietary framework that has become the gold standard for successful company building in the modern era. This isn't theoretical; it's battle-tested across dozens of portfolio companies and multiple market cycles:

1.Strategy: We believe every successful company begins with a clear strategic vision aligned with market realities. Our data-driven approach ensures the startups we partner with address genuine market needs rather than pursuing solutions seeking problems.

2. Sourcing: We've built a global network and AI-powered sourcing capabilities that enable us to discover breakthrough technologies and visionary entrepreneurs before they become obvious opportunities. We're not followers, we are discoverers.

3. Scaling: Growth without foundation leads to failure. We provide operational expertise that helps companies build sustainable scaling mechanisms, from technology infrastructure to team development and market expansion strategies.

4. Synergy: We facilitate strategic partnerships that amplify growth potential and create competitive advantages. The most successful companies of the future will be those that create meaningful connections within their ecosystems.

5. Sustainability: Our investment thesis prioritizes companies building solutions for tomorrow's challenges. We consider long-term viability across financial, environmental, and social dimensions.

6. Success: We measure success not just in financial returns, but in creating lasting value for all stakeholders, entrepreneurs, corporations, and society at large.

How We're Leveraging Technology Convergence

We're particularly excited about the convergence of artificial intelligence, IoT, and robotics. These technologies aren't just changing how companies operate, they're fundamentally transforming how they're built.

Our portfolio companies are reimagining traditional industries through technological integration. We're backing robotics companies creating new paradigms for industrial automation and AI-powered startups revolutionizing risk assessment in insurance. What excites us most is witnessing the emergence of hybrid business models that combine digital innovation with deep industry expertise, creating defensible moats that traditional tech companies can't replicate.
This convergence represents more than technological advancement; it's the foundation of sustainable competitive advantage in the next decade.

Our Take on Market Corrections and Opportunities

The valuation corrections from 2021 highs have created what we see as unprecedented opportunities. While others view down rounds and unicorn devaluations as challenges, we see them as market efficiency improvements that favor strategic investors like us.

We're witnessing trends like co-investments, extensions, and significant valuation cuts, all of which play to our strengths as strategic partners who provide more than capital. When financial investors retreat, strategic value becomes even more important.

This market correction has also revealed something crucial: companies built on solid fundamentals with strong strategic partnerships weather economic storms better than those relying solely on financial backing. Our portfolio companies have demonstrated remarkable resilience during this period, with several achieving profitability ahead of schedule while their purely VC-backed competitors struggled with runway management.

What We Predict for the Next Decade

Based on our market position and portfolio insights, we see several key trends defining the next decade of company building:

• Ecosystem Integration: We believe successful companies will be those that seamlessly integrate into broader innovation ecosystems, creating value through partnerships rather than competition. This aligns perfectly with our VCaaS model. Companies that try to build everything in-house will find themselves outmaneuvered by those that strategically leverage ecosystem partnerships.

• Regulatory Proactivity: Companies that anticipate and shape regulatory frameworks rather than merely comply with them will gain significant competitive advantages. Our deep industry expertise positions us to help companies navigate this complexity. We've seen companies gain 18-month market advantages simply by understanding regulatory trends before their competitors.

• Stakeholder Capitalism: We're investing in companies that create value for all stakeholders, customers, employees, investors, and society, rather than optimizing for single metrics. This isn't just about ESG compliance; it's about building sustainable business models that can weather long-term market cycles.

• Global-Local Balance: Future companies will need to operate globally while maintaining deep local expertise and cultural sensitivity. Our network enables this balance, helping companies expand internationally while maintaining local market authenticity.

• AI-Human Collaboration: The future belongs to companies that enhance human capabilities rather than replace them. We're particularly excited about companies that use AI to augment human decision-making rather than automate it away entirely.

Our Competitive Advantage

What sets us apart is our unique position at the intersection of corporate strategy and entrepreneurial execution. We combine the best of corporate strategic thinking with entrepreneurial agility, creating sustainable competitive advantages for all stakeholders.

Our VCaaS model enables corporations to maintain focus on core operations while building breakthrough innovation capabilities. We're not just facilitating transactions, we're architecting the future of corporate innovation.

Why This Matters Now

The companies that will define the next decade are being built today. We're not just predicting this transformation, we're actively creating it through strategic partnerships with forward-thinking corporations and breakthrough technology companies.

Our approach transcends traditional venture capital limitations by creating a new category of value creation. We're building bridges between corporate resources and entrepreneurial innovation, enabling both to achieve outcomes neither could reach alone.

Our Commitment Moving Forward

At Mandalore Partners, we're committed to leading this transformation in company building. We're creating exceptional value for entrepreneurs, corporations, and society at large by reimagining how strategic capital, operational expertise, and market access can be combined.

The future of company building belongs to those who can successfully navigate the intersection of technology, strategy, and execution. We're not just participants in this evolution, we're architects of it.

Final Thoughts 

The venture capital industry is at a turning point, and Mandalore Partners is leading the way with a bold alternative to outdated, transactional investing. Through our Venture Capital as a Service (VCaaS) model, we combine the strategic resources of established corporations with the agility of innovative startups to create lasting value beyond traditional VC limitations. As markets demand quality, strategic depth, and sustainable growth, we’re building companies that leverage technology, industry expertise, and regulatory foresight to drive real impact. At Mandalore, we’re not just funding businesses, we’re designing the infrastructure for tomorrow’s economy. Join us to shape this transformation, not just react to it.

Is AI Transforming Venture Capital?

Methodology: Mapping AI’s Impact Across the VC Value Chain

This analysis draws from recent VC investment trends, AI tooling adoption across fund operations, startup market behavior, and published reports from leading firms in venture and enterprise AI. We focus on identifying how artificial intelligence influences sourcing, due diligence, portfolio support, and decision-making within venture capital firms, and whether it’s enhancing efficiency or replacing core human functions.

In Brief: What’s Changing?

• AI tools are being widely adopted for deal sourcing, screening, and due diligence.

• LPs are showing increased interest in VC funds with a defined AI advantage.

• New firms are emerging with AI-built investment platforms, offering algorithmically driven portfolios.

• Portfolio support is becoming more data-informed, from hiring intelligence to pricing optimization.

• The human element of venture capital: relationships, trust, judgment, remains irreplaceable, but it’s being redefined

Rethinking Venture Capital: Why Evolution Isn’t Optional

While venture capital has long been considered a relationship-driven business, it’s also a sector rich in data, startup metrics, founder backgrounds, market dynamics, and exit multiples. As these datasets grow, VCs are increasingly turning to AI-powered platforms to extract insight, surface opportunities, and reduce operational burden.

Tools like Affinity, PitchBook’s AI modules, and custom GPT-based systems are now used to automate initial sourcing and provide predictive scoring on potential investments. Some firms, like SignalFire and Zetta, have fully integrated AI into their scouting stack.

“What used to take weeks of founder outreach and CRM updates can now be done in hours,” says one GP at a data-native early-stage fund.

AI-Driven Deal Flow: Filtering Noise with Signal

One of AI’s most impactful applications has been in the triage of inbound deal flow. Firms now deploy models that rank incoming decks and emails based on historic performance patterns, investment thesis fit, and keyword matching.

Some early-stage firms are even experimenting with LLM-powered memo generation, allowing analysts to summarize founder calls and create investment memos in minutes rather than days.

However, this is not about removing human insight; it's about freeing teams to focus on founder evaluation, industry diligence, and partnership building.

Due Diligence Gets Smarter and Faster

Diligence used to be slow, expensive, and heavily manual. With AI, venture teams now automate:

• Market sizing analysis

• Competitor landscape mapping

• Sentiment tracking across social/web

• Technical benchmarking using code or API audits

Firms like a16z and FirstMark have invested in internal tools that run structured diligence pipelines, combining data scraping with analyst review. AI makes the process leaner without compromising depth.

Still, human interpretation, especially for early-stage, pre-revenue bets, remains essential.

AI at the Portfolio Level: Coaching and Insight at Scale

Beyond the investment decision, AI is reshaping how firms support their startups. From hiring intelligence (e.g,. identifying likely candidate attrition) to churn risk detection and customer segmentation, venture teams are leveraging platforms to give founders smarter feedback, faster.

Portfolio dashboards with embedded AI modules offer near real-time insights, transforming GPs into strategic advisors supported by robust tooling.
Some emerging fund models even offer “productized venture support”, giving founders access to plug-and-play AI toolkits as a default benefit of the partnership.

What AI Won’t Replace

For all its analytical power, AI has limitations. Venture remains a trust business. Relationship building, founder empathy, and strategic thinking still matter deeply, particularly at the earliest stages, where conviction often precedes data.

The winning firms in this new landscape won’t be the ones that replace people with bots, but those that use AI to scale what humans do best: pattern recognition, intuition, and judgment.

Final Thought: AI Is Reshaping Venture Quietly and Permanently

AI is not replacing venture capital but it is changing the pace, process, and precision with which it’s practiced. Firms embracing this shift are seeing faster cycles, smarter insights, and a competitive edge in both sourcing and portfolio management. Those resisting risk falling behind not because they can’t find deals, but because they’re spending time where AI can already add value. The future of VC isn’t fully automated. It’s augmented and the transformation is already well underway.

From Payment Rails to Embedded Finance: What VCs Are Betting on in Fintech

The fintech revolution has evolved far beyond simple payment apps and digital wallets. As we advance through 2025, venture capitalists are recalibrating their strategies, moving away from traditional fintech plays toward sophisticated infrastructure and embedded financial services that promise to reshape how businesses and consumers interact with money.

The Great Fintech Reset: Where the Smart Money Is Going

The numbers tell a compelling story of transformation. While overall VC investment in fintech remains near six-year lows, strategic investors are doubling down on specific segments that demonstrate exceptional growth potential. The embedded finance market, valued at $104.8 billion in 2024, is projected to explode to $690.39 billion by 2030, a staggering 36.4% compound annual growth rate that has captured the attention of sophisticated investors worldwide.

This isn't just another tech trend. It represents a fundamental shift in how financial services are delivered, consumed, and integrated into daily life. Smart VCs recognize that the future belongs to companies that can seamlessly weave financial functionality into existing platforms rather than building standalone financial products

Payment Rails: The Infrastructure Play That's Paying Off

The backbone of modern finance is undergoing a radical transformation, and investors are taking notice. FedNow, the Federal Reserve's instant payment system, is processing $190 million in payments daily, while Real-Time Payments (RTP) networks reported a remarkable 94% increase in transaction volume throughout 2024. This explosive growth has tripled participation in instant payment rails over the past year, with over 1,200 financial institutions now connected to these systems.

For VCs, this represents more than just impressive statistics, it signals a massive opportunity in payment infrastructure. Companies building the pipes that enable instant, seamless transactions are attracting significant investment because they're positioned to capture value from every transaction flowing through their systems. The shift from traditional payment processing to instant settlement creates entirely new revenue streams and business models that savvy investors are eager to fund.

Embedded Finance: The Trillion-Dollar Opportunity

The embedded finance sector is where VCs are placing their biggest bets, and the data supports their enthusiasm. Multiple market research firms project the sector will reach between $570.9 billion and $1.73 trillion by 2033, depending on adoption rates and regulatory environments. These aren't just optimistic projections, they're backed by real market momentum.

Consider the rapid expansion beyond traditional sectors. Healthcare, construction, and hospitality, industries previously slow to adopt financial technology, are now integrating tailored financial services directly into their platforms. This expansion is driving what investors call the "invisible finance" trend, where financial services become so seamlessly integrated that users barely notice they're engaging with sophisticated financial products.

The retail sector alone demonstrates the power of this shift. Fintech companies have grown from handling 22% of personal loan originations in 2019 to approximately 39% in 2024. This isn't just market share displacement, it's evidence of a fundamental change in how consumers prefer to access financial services: embedded within the platforms and services they already use.

The AI Wild Card: Intelligent Financial Services

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a bright spot in an otherwise cautious investment environment. VCs are particularly excited about AI applications that enhance embedded finance platforms, enabling real-time credit decisions, personalized financial products, and predictive analytics that can anticipate user needs before they're explicitly expressed.

The convergence of AI and embedded finance is creating opportunities for companies to offer hyper-personalized financial services at scale. For investors, this represents the holy grail of fintech: technology that can increase conversion rates, reduce risk, and create sticky customer relationships simultaneously.

Geographic Hotspots: Where the Action Is

The global nature of fintech investment is creating interesting regional dynamics. China's embedded finance market is expected to grow at a remarkable 32.8% CAGR through 2030, driven by tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent integrating financial services into their ecosystems. Meanwhile, India is witnessing significant growth with a 19.5% CAGR, fueled by a massive underbanked population and supportive regulatory environment.

These geographic variations are creating opportunities for VCs to invest in region-specific solutions that can later be adapted for global markets. The most successful fintech companies are those that can navigate diverse regulatory environments while maintaining their core value propositions.

The Regulatory Reality Check

Smart investors are also paying close attention to the regulatory landscape. Increased regulation, predicted as one of the top fintech trends for 2025, isn't necessarily a headwind, it's an opportunity for well-positioned companies to create competitive moats. Firms that can navigate complex compliance requirements while maintaining user experience advantages are attracting premium valuations.

The regulatory environment is actually accelerating the embedded finance trend, as companies seek to partner with established financial institutions rather than navigate licensing requirements independently. This creates opportunities for B2B fintech companies that can serve as bridges between traditional financial institutions and technology platforms.

The Investment Thesis: Infrastructure Over Apps

The most successful fintech VCs are shifting their focus from consumer-facing applications to the infrastructure that powers them. The companies receiving the largest funding rounds are those building the rails, APIs, and platforms that enable other businesses to offer financial services seamlessly.

This infrastructure-first approach reflects a mature understanding of the fintech ecosystem. While consumer apps can achieve viral growth, infrastructure companies build sustainable, defensible businesses with predictable revenue streams and strong network effects.

Looking Forward: The Next Wave

As we move deeper into 2025, the fintech landscape is being reshaped by three key forces: the maturation of instant payment rails, the explosive growth of embedded finance, and the intelligent application of AI to financial services. VCs who understand these dynamics and invest accordingly are positioning themselves to capture outsized returns in what promises to be the most transformative period in financial services history.

The message is clear: the future of fintech isn't about building better banking apps, it's about making finance invisible, instant, and intelligent. The companies and investors who embrace this reality will define the next decade of financial innovation.

Final Thoughts

The fintech evolution we're witnessing today represents more than just technological advancement, it's a fundamental reimagining of how financial services integrate into human and business experiences. For venture capitalists, this moment presents both unprecedented opportunity and significant risk. 

The data overwhelmingly supports one conclusion: the age of standalone fintech products is ending, and the era of invisible, embedded financial services has begun. The question isn't whether this transformation will happen, it's whether investors will have the vision to back the companies that make it reality.

A summary of Mandalore Partners’ portfolio companies’ impact - 2024

Executive Summary

Mandalore Partners is a leading impact investor, committed to generating positive change alongside strong financial returns. We strategically invest in innovative companies that leverage impact as a driver of performance and differentiation. This report showcases the tangible impact achieved by our portfolio companies in 2024, highlighting their contributions to a healthier, more inclusive, and sustainable world.

Our portfolio companies have collectively improved the well-being of over 81,000 individuals through access to healthcare and optimized work environments. They have facilitated economic empowerment for women in emerging countries, enabling financial stability and skills development. Furthermore, they have enhanced emergency response capabilities, protecting a territorial area of 126,021 km² and improving public safety. Finally, our portfolio companies have empowered organizations to effectively measure and optimize their impact, driving accountability and transparency in the impact sector. These achievements demonstrate the power of impact investing to create a better future, and underscore Mandalore Partners' leadership in driving positive change.

Our Approach to Impact

At Mandalore Partners, we invest in high-growth potential companies that leverage impact as a driver of performance and differentiation. Unlike traditional investment funds, we work closely with our portfolio companies to structure and maximize their impact while ensuring profitable and sustainable growth. Our approach is built on rigorous criteria for evaluating and supporting businesses, focusing on innovative business models that can positively transform their markets.

Our Investment Thesis

We invest in companies that use technology and innovation to address major challenges and have strong scalability potential. Our portfolio consists of companies that meet three fundamental criteria:

Measurable and Tangible Impact: We ensure that companies deliver verifiable value to their stakeholders, with clear performance indicators.

Solid and Scalable Business Model: Impact should not be a constraint but rather an accelerator of growth.

Sustainable Competitive Advantage: We seek companies that can innovate and distinguish themselves sustainably in their market.

We don’t just invest: we actively collaborate with leadership teams to refine their strategy, structure their impact, and strengthen their market positioning.

Our Differentiation

Unlike conventional investment funds, Mandalore Partners does not position itself as an impact fund, but as a pragmatic investor who integrates impact as a lever for value creation. Instead, it actively supports its portfolio companies to align growth with impact without compromising on performance and adopts a targeted sector approach, focusing on technology companies with real potential to transform their markets.

Our Companies and Their Impact

We have invested in several companies that integrate impact as a core element of their business model:

Capsix
Capsix is developing a revolutionary robotic solution to democratize access to body care and reduce chronic pain. This innovation enables broader and more accessible treatment, particularly in workplaces where preventing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is essential.

Isahit
Isahit operates a digital micro-work platform that provides economic opportunities to women in developing countries. It combines social impact and economic performance by meeting corporate needs while promoting the financial empowerment of its workers.

AUM Biosync
AUM Biosync develops AI-driven solutions to improve the quality of life for shift workers. Its goal is to optimize biological rhythms and reduce negative health impacts.

Impact Track
Impact Track offers a platform that helps impact-driven organizations measure and optimize their results. Its data-driven approach structures impact measurement and attracts funding.

---

Capsix

Source used for this section: Résultats Impacts iYU Capsix

Capsix has developed a cutting-edge robotic solution designed to democratize access to physical care and reduce chronic pain, especially in environments where musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are prevalent. By focusing on improving employee wellness and preventing injuries, Capsix contributes to healthier and more productive workplaces. The innovative approach is particularly beneficial in industries where physical labor is required, offering workers accessible and effective solutions for chronic pain management and overall well-being.

Figure 1: iYU massage robot by Capsix

In 2023, Capsix achieved notable improvements across several key impact indicators. These results were based on a study spanning two months, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week. The solution led to a significant reduction in stress levels, with a decrease of 37%, and anxiety was reduced by 64%. Depression levels saw a 33% reduction, and latency (the time it takes for users to feel the benefits of the solution) decreased by 44%. Additionally, users experienced a 25% reduction in various disorders and an 11% improvement in overall physical condition. Serenity and calmness were also notably improved, with increases of 11% and 12%, respectively.

In another study conducted over five weeks, Capsix examined the impact of its solution on individuals suffering from chronic back pain. This study involved a group of 30 participants who received IYU massages for 30 minutes twice per week. Their results were compared with those of two other groups: one that combined 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of IYU, and another that combined 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of relaxation. The findings demonstrated that Capsix's robotic solution significantly alleviated physiological stress, improved perceived health, and enhanced cognitive performance. Sleep disorders were reduced, and participants reported notable improvements in flexibility, muscular endurance, and postural stability.

These benefits not only contribute to the well-being of individuals but also support businesses in creating more resilient and productive workforces. Through its innovative approach, Capsix continues to drive positive change in workplace health, offering scalable solutions that enhance both physical and mental wellness, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of its users and clients alike.

Figure 2. Results of a study spanning two months in 2023, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week.

Figure 3: Changes in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Levels after the Capsix study spanning two months in 2023, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week.

Figure 4: Changes in Sleep Quality, Latency, and Disorders after the Capsix study spanning two months in 2023, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week.

In 2024, Capsix conducted a study evaluating the efficacy of its iYU robotic massage solution in alleviating low back tension and improving overall well-being. Over five weeks, 30 participants were divided into three groups: one receiving 30-minute iYU massage sessions twice per week, another combining 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of iYU, and a third combining 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of relaxation. The group that received iYU massages demonstrated remarkable improvements, including a 63% reduction in physiological stress (measured via cortisol levels) and a 31% decrease in perceived stress. Pain levels were reduced by 48%, while functional capacity showed significant enhancements, with a 39% and 60% increase in the Biering-Sorensen and Shirado-Ito tests, respectively. Sleep disruption decreased by 24%, and insomnia levels dropped by 28%. Participants also reported a 14% increase in perceived quality of life, a 29% improvement in well-being, and a 20% boost in recovery. These findings underscore iYU’s effectiveness in addressing both physical and mental health challenges, further solidifying Capsix’s impact in promoting holistic wellness.

Figure 5: Changes in Functional Capacity Markers after a Capsix study spanning five weeks in 2024, conducted on 30 participants receiving iYU robotic massages and/or exercise

---

Isahit

Source used for this section: Annual Impact Study June 2022 - May 2023

Isahit is a key player in digital and economic inclusion, providing women in emerging countries with income opportunities while equipping them with valuable digital and professional skills. The platform operates on a dual model: offering supplemental income while fostering sustainable skills development, ensuring long-term employability and financial stability. Unlike other micro-work platforms often criticized for precarious labor conditions, Isahit prioritizes structured, meaningful engagement. By offering a framework that extends beyond immediate compensation, the platform supports professional growth, personal empowerment, and community-building.

Figure 6: Isahit Platform

The impact of Isahit is primarily reflected in the economic and professional empowerment of its beneficiaries. On average, HITers who left the platform positively earned €1,306, demonstrating the platform’s role in providing tangible financial opportunities. More than half of them, 56%, reported being able to save money, indicating improved financial stability. This economic impact is reinforced by Isahit’s structured approach to work, which differs from other micro-task platforms by offering a more sustainable and empowering experience. Rather than being limited to short-term gigs, HITers gain exposure to structured work that enhances their professional trajectory.

A key differentiating factor of Isahit is its educational and community-driven approach. The platform provides 56 free digital courses, enabling users to develop skills that align with market demands. This commitment to continuous learning is reflected in user satisfaction, with 91% of HITers reporting that the digital skills acquired on the platform met their expectations. The experience gained on Isahit is widely recognized as an asset in job searches, with 80% of HITers considering it a valuable professional credential. Furthermore, the platform serves as a catalyst for personal growth, with 70% of users stating that Isahit has helped them achieve or will help them achieve their personal projects.

Figure 7: Effects of Isahit on personal growth

The social impact of Isahit extends beyond skills development and financial gains. The sense of belonging to an international community plays a crucial role in the empowerment of HITers, with 88% of users recognizing the added value of being part of such a network. This community aspect fosters confidence, motivation, and experience-sharing, creating an environment conducive to long-term professional integration. Data also highlight significant improvements in soft skills and workplace readiness. Before joining the platform, 69% of HITers felt confident in themselves, a figure that rose to 96% after leaving. Similarly, the ability to make independent decisions improved from 69% to 95%, while comfort with entering the job market increased from 50% to 92%. These metrics underscore the role of Isahit in strengthening self-esteem, autonomy, and employability.

Figure 8: Effects of Isahit on growth in confidence and workplace readiness

Isahit’s model not only provides income but also facilitates the successful transition of HITers into the workforce. One of the most concrete indicators of impact is the realization of life projects. During the study period, 64 HITers, representing 5.2% of those who left the platform, successfully completed their professional projects after working more than 50 hours on Isahit. This data highlights the platform’s ability to serve as a stepping stone for users aiming to launch careers, businesses, or educational endeavors.

While Isahit has demonstrated a strong and measurable impact, challenges remain in sustaining its long-term effects. Ensuring that HITers continue to benefit from their experience beyond their time on the platform is a key priority. Expanding training offerings, particularly through certified learning paths, could further enhance employability and career prospects. Additionally, diversifying task opportunities to better align with individual aspirations may strengthen the platform’s role in career development.

Ultimately, Isahit goes beyond being a simple micro-work platform by integrating income generation, skills training, and personal development into a cohesive model. The high recommendation rate of 84% from HITers reflects strong overall satisfaction and confidence in the platform’s ability to drive meaningful change. By fostering digital and economic inclusion, Isahit empowers women to build stable and ambitious futures, contributing to a more inclusive global workforce.

---

AUM Biosync

Source used for this section: https://page.impacttrack.org/aum-biosync 

AUM Biosync is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for workers in high-risk and shift-based professions through AI-driven solutions that optimize biological rhythms and improve operational efficiency. By equipping emergency response teams, firefighters, and public service personnel with innovative tools, AUM Biosync contributes to improved health, safety, and performance across its client organizations. The company’s growing impact is evident in key performance indicators, reflecting its expanding role in optimizing emergency response operations and strengthening public safety infrastructure.

Figure 9: AUM Biosync platform

Between 2022 and 2024, AUM Biosync saw a substantial increase in engagement and operational reach. The total number of individuals engaged across its client base rose from 54,600 in 2022 to 81,053 in 2024, with the number of voluntary firefighters increasing from 42,700 to 56,724 over the same period. This expansion underscores AUM Biosync’s role in fostering workforce participation and strengthening emergency response capacity.

Figure 10: Total Number of personnel Engaged Across Clients (2022 vs 2024)

Operational impact has also grown significantly. The annual number of emergency interventions performed by AUM Biosync’s client organizations more than doubled, increasing from 895,000 in 2022 to 1.82 million in 2024. This surge highlights the efficiency gains facilitated by the company’s solutions, which enhance risk analysis, response coordination, and overall service delivery. 

Figure 11: Annual Interventions Conducted by Clients (2022 vs 2024)

The company’s impact extends beyond operational improvements to broader social contributions. In 2024, AUM Biosync donated €69,000 to charitable organizations supporting children, including initiatives for firefighter orphans and programs such as Pompy l’ourson and Rêves de gosses. Additionally, the total territorial area protected by client organizations increased from 94,000 km² in 2022 to 126,021 km² in 2024, reflecting a significant expansion in service coverage.

Figure 12: Territorial Area Protected by Clients (2022 vs 2024)

AUM Biosync's products and services receive strong endorsements from users, particularly in their ability to enhance emergency response efficiency, operational alignment, and crisis management. 69.7% of users strongly agree that the company's solutions contribute to the equitable and sustainable distribution of emergency services, ensuring fair access to critical interventions. Furthermore, 70.1% believe that AUM Biosync’s offerings effectively meet professional and operational expectations, reinforcing their relevance in real-world applications.

In terms of risk management, 72.9% of respondents strongly agree that AUM Biosync’s solutions enhance risk analysis and response coverage efficiency, making them a vital tool for decision-making in high-pressure environments. Additionally, 65.8% of users acknowledge that these tools improve the accessibility and sustainability of civic engagement, reflecting their role in supporting volunteer and professional emergency responders.

A particularly notable impact is seen in crisis understanding and resilience, where 76.3% of respondents affirm that AUM Biosync’s solutions help them better comprehend the complexity of major crises and resilience factors. This highlights the company's contribution to strengthening preparedness and response strategies in high-risk situations.

Financial Commitment to Protection and Safety

AUM Biosync’s client organizations collectively allocate significant resources toward the protection of people and assets. In 2024, the total budget dedicated to safeguarding personnel and infrastructure reached €2,477,300,711. This substantial investment underscores the critical role that AUM Biosync plays in optimizing resource allocation and ensuring cost-effective emergency management strategies. By integrating AI-driven predictive analytics and data-driven decision-making tools, AUM Biosync helps its partners maximize the efficiency of their financial commitments, ensuring that every euro spent contributes to enhanced safety and operational effectiveness.

The allocation of these funds supports a wide range of activities, including training programs for emergency responders, the acquisition of cutting-edge safety equipment, and the development of digital platforms for improved situational awareness. These financial investments are crucial in enabling organizations to anticipate risks, coordinate interventions more effectively, and minimize response time in critical situations.

Enhanced Emergency Response Capabilities

The operational effectiveness of AUM Biosync’s solutions is further demonstrated by the dramatic rise in emergency response activities. The total number of annual interventions conducted by client organizations surged from 895,000 in 2022 to 1,820,189 in 2024. This near doubling of interventions underscores the enhanced efficiency and coordination facilitated by AUM Biosync’s AI-powered technology, which streamlines intervention processes and improves overall response time.

By leveraging real-time data analytics and intelligent resource allocation, AUM Biosync enables emergency responders to prioritize incidents based on severity, optimize dispatch routes, and minimize delays. These improvements have a direct impact on public safety outcomes, reducing casualties and mitigating the impact of critical incidents. Additionally, the platform’s ability to analyze historical data allows for proactive risk assessment, helping organizations implement preventive measures and allocate resources more effectively before emergencies arise.

Figure 13: Total number of annual interventions conducted by client organizations (2022 vs 2024)

Strengthening Workforce Engagement

AUM Biosync’s impact is also reflected in the increasing number of personnel engaged across its client organizations. From 2022 to 2024, the number of individuals participating in emergency and protective services rose from 54,600 to 81,053. This expansion signifies the company’s effectiveness in fostering workforce engagement and reinforcing public service infrastructure. The growing number of engaged personnel highlights an increasing reliance on AUM Biosync’s technology to support first responders and ensure their well-being during high-pressure operations.

In particular, the number of voluntary firefighters has grown significantly, increasing from 42,700 in 2022 to 56,724 in 2024. This trend suggests that

AUM Biosync’s solutions not only optimize emergency response efforts but also enhance the appeal of volunteer service by providing better working conditions, more predictable schedules, and greater support for personnel. The ability to manage workloads more effectively and mitigate fatigue has been a key factor in retaining skilled professionals and encouraging new recruits to join the workforce.

Figure 14: Total Number of Personnel Engaged Across Clients (2022 vs 2024)

---

Impact Track

Source used for this section: https://page.impacttrack.org/impact-track 

In a landscape where impact measurement is increasingly essential for businesses, investors, and associations, Impact Track serves as a strategic enabler by providing a robust methodological framework and specialized tools for assessing and demonstrating impact. The platform goes beyond traditional data tracking, transforming how organizations approach impact measurement by making best practices more accessible. By equipping organizations of all sizes with advanced impact measurement capabilities, Impact Track fosters data-driven decision-making and enhances strategic planning to maximize long-term outcomes.

Figure 15: Impact Track platform

A core strength of Impact Track is its ability to cultivate sustained engagement in impact measurement. Rather than serving as a one-time reporting tool, the platform integrates impact tracking into organizational workflows, enabling continuous improvement. This is reflected in user behavior, with 60.5% of organizations continuing to measure their impact beyond their initial subscription. Such long-term adoption underscores the platform’s effectiveness in embedding impact measurement as a sustainable and strategic practice.

Beyond operational benefits, Impact Track strengthens organizational credibility and visibility. In an environment where transparency and verifiable impact data are critical to securing stakeholder trust, the platform enables organizations to substantiate their claims with concrete evidence. As a result, 57.9% of users report that Impact Track has enhanced their project credibility, improving their ability to engage investors, funders, and beneficiaries. Furthermore, 59.5% of users feel confident in independently managing their impact measurement, demonstrating the platform’s role in fostering internal capacity and long-term autonomy

The adoption and utilization of Impact Track have grown significantly, as demonstrated by key performance indicators. The number of active projects tracked on the platform increased from 288 in 2023 to 359 in 2024, reflecting expanding engagement. Additionally, user satisfaction with training and support improved from 93.8% in 2023 to 97.2% in 2024, reinforcing the platform’s commitment to continuous service enhancement.

Despite strong adoption and satisfaction levels, opportunities for improvement remain. The user renewal rate stands at 43%, indicating that while nearly half of users continue beyond their initial subscription, there is room to further enhance retention. Offering more flexible plans, advanced analytical tools, and tailored support services could help convert a higher percentage of initial users into long-term subscribers. Additionally, Impact Track’s model could be adapted for new sectors, such as public administration and local governments, broadening its reach and relevance.

Impact Track is more than a technological solution; it is a driver of transformation in impact measurement practices. Its influence extends beyond the number of projects tracked, promoting a culture of rigorous, transparent, and effective impact evaluation. By equipping organizations with the tools needed to measure and optimize their impact, Impact Track is playing a critical role in strengthening accountability and fostering strategic decision-making across the impact sector.

Figure 16: User Feedback on Impact Measurement and Platform Usability

---

Conclusion

Mandalore Partners is dedicated to building a future where positive impact and financial success go hand-in-hand. We believe that investing in companies that are committed to solving critical challenges is not only the right thing to do, but also a smart investment strategy. The achievements of our portfolio companies, as detailed in this report, demonstrate the power of impact investing to create a better world.

By leveraging innovation, technology, and a rigorous impact measurement framework, we are confident that our portfolio companies will continue to generate significant positive change while delivering strong financial performance. Mandalore Partners remains committed to our mission of investing in a better future, and we invite you to join us on this journey.

The Most VC-Funded Sectors in Europe

The Most VC-Funded Sectors in Europe

Europe’s startup ecosystem has grown rapidly over the past decade, attracting billions in venture capital (VC) from both local and global investors. While overall funding levels fluctuate with macroeconomic conditions, certain sectors consistently draw strong VC attention. From climate tech and deep tech to fintech, health innovations, and enterprise software, the continent’s innovation landscape is increasingly diverse and resilient.

Climate Tech Leads the Pack

Climate tech and energy transition startups are now Europe’s single largest VC-funded sector, accounting for approximately 27–30% of total venture capital investment in 2023 (Dealroom/Sifted). This surge reflects the EU’s ambitious carbon neutrality targets, supportive policy frameworks, and the growing appetite among investors for climate-positive solutions.

Startups tackling renewable energy, sustainable mobility, carbon capture, and circular economy solutions are driving the trend. Countries like the Netherlands, Germany, and the Nordics are at the forefront, combining strong cleantech ecosystems with dedicated climate funds.

AI & Deep Tech Keep Rising

AI and deep tech (which includes frontier technologies like advanced hardware, quantum computing, and automation) accounted for about 17% of Europe’s VC funding in 2023. The rise of generative AI and automation tools is accelerating investor interest, with large rounds for companies like Mistral AI, DeepL, and Aleph Alpha showing the strength of the ecosystem.

Key hubs for AI and deep tech include Berlin, Paris, and London, all benefiting from talent density and supportive research institutions.

Fintech Remains a Pillar

Fintech remains a major draw, attracting roughly 15–19% of total VC investment, down slightly from its peak but still firmly in the top three sectors. From digital banks to blockchain platforms and payments solutions, European fintech leaders like Revolut (UK), N26 (Germany), and Lydia (France) continue to scale, supported by consumers’ shift away from traditional banking.

London remains Europe’s fintech capital, thanks to its mature regulatory environment and deep investor pools.

Healthtech & Enterprise Software Stay Solid

While harder to split precisely, healthtech and enterprise software together continue to be pillars of European VC activity. Over the last 20 years, they have consistently accounted for a combined ~40% of total VC funding (Dealroom). Healthtech startups in telemedicine, AI diagnostics, and mental health are still seeing healthy long-term growth, while B2B SaaS and cloud solutions remain attractive bets for their scalability and recurring revenues.

Companies like Doctolib (France), Kry (Sweden), and Celonis (Germany) show how Europe’s healthtech and enterprise software scenes remain globally competitive.

Emerging Sectors to Watch

Beyond these leading sectors, several emerging areas are gaining momentum:

• AgriTech: With food security and regenerative farming in focus, AgriTech is steadily attracting more funding.

• Cybersecurity: Increasing digital threats are driving larger rounds for European security startups.

• Edtech: While post-pandemic growth slowed, niches like corporate training and AI-driven learning are evolving.

• Space Tech: Once US-dominated, Europe’s space tech sector is quietly expanding, supported by national programs and private capital.

How Does Europe Compare Globally?

According to Dealroom’s 2023 and early 2024 data, Europe’s top-funded sectors now mirror global trends in the US and East Asia. In the US, the top sectors by VC investment are:

1. Health & Biotech

2. Enterprise Software / AI

3. Fintech

East Asia follows a similar pattern, with deep tech, fintech, and industrial tech attracting the biggest rounds. Notably, Europe’s climate tech stands out: its share of total VC funding is higher than in North America or Asia, thanks to EU policy incentives and investor demand for sustainable growth.

Final Thoughts

The European VC landscape is dynamic, but certain sectors continue to stand out for their scale, impact, and resilience. Climate tech, deep tech, fintech, healthtech, and enterprise software together account for the lion’s share of VC investment, while emerging verticals like AgriTech and space tech hint at the next wave of innovation.

For founders, understanding which sectors attract capital and why can shape how you position your startup. For investors, the current trends reflect where both opportunity and responsibility intersect in the next era of European innovation.

What Are the Characteristics of a Unicorn Founder?

Unicorn founders possess distinct traits and strategies that set them apart in the entrepreneurial landscape. Contrary to the belief that technological innovation is the primary driver of success, evidence shows that effective strategy, leadership, and timing are crucial for building billion-dollar companies. Here are the key characteristics of successful unicorn founders:

1. Strategic Vision

Unicorn founders excel at identifying and capitalizing on emerging trends. They have a keen ability to spot opportunities in the market and navigate their ventures with a strategic mindset. This skill allows them to lead their companies effectively, even in competitive environments.

Example:

• Steve Jobs improved existing technology rather than creating it from scratch, demonstrating that strategic enhancement can lead to substantial success.

2. Focus on Execution Over Innovation

While innovation is important, it is not the sole factor for success. Many billion-dollar entrepreneurs succeed by imitating and refining existing ideas rather than relying on breakthrough technology. They understand that execution and strategy often outweigh raw innovation.

Notable Founders:

• Bill Gates purchased software and enhanced it.

• Jeff Bezos imitated online booksellers and revolutionized e-commerce infrastructure.

3. Independence from Venture Capital

A significant percentage of billion-dollar entrepreneurs—94%—build their businesses without heavy reliance on venture capital (VC). They prioritize maintaining control over their companies, often delaying or avoiding VC funding until they are in a position of strength.

Key Cases:

• Mark Zuckerberg delayed VC involvement to retain control of Facebook.

• Jan Koum bootstrapped WhatsApp before its acquisition for $19 billion.

4. Leadership Skills

Unicorn founders possess strong leadership capabilities that enable them to guide their companies through various stages of growth. They are adept at rallying teams, making pivotal decisions, and executing their vision effectively.

Leadership Insights:

• Founders who remain in control often retain 2x to 7x more wealth compared to those who hand over leadership to professional CEOs after receiving VC funding.

5. Ability to Adapt and Scale

Successful unicorn founders can adapt their strategies to changing market conditions and scale their businesses efficiently. They leverage their understanding of the industry to navigate challenges and capitalize on new opportunities.

Examples of Adaptation:

• Brian Chesky (Airbnb) took the concept of online rentals and significantly improved it, helping landlords maximize their rental potential.

6. Emphasis on Wealth Creation and Impact

Unicorn founders focus not just on building successful companies but also on creating lasting impact and wealth for themselves and their stakeholders. They understand that true success encompasses both financial rewards and positive societal contributions.

Conclusion

The characteristics of unicorn founders challenge the conventional narrative that technology alone drives success. Instead, it is the combination of strategic vision, execution, independence from VC, leadership skills, adaptability, and a focus on impact that defines these exceptional entrepreneurs. As we rethink entrepreneurship education, it is essential to emphasize these traits to cultivate the next generation of successful founders.