#CVCaaS

La Loi Industrie Verte : Un Catalyseur pour l'Épargne Écologique

Promulguée le 23 octobre 2023, la loi Industrie Verte marque un tournant décisif dans la trajectoire environnementale et économique de la France. Cette législation ambitieuse vise à concilier la réindustrialisation du pays avec la transition écologique, en faisant de cette dernière un pilier fondamental du développement économique.

Une approche holistique pour une transition réussie

La loi Industrie Verte se distingue par sa vision globale de la transition écologique, reconnaissant l'interdépendance entre l'économie, l'industrie et l'environnement. Elle s'attaque simultanément à ces trois fronts en :

  • Favorisant le développement d'une industrie verte : en encourageant l'innovation dans les technologies propres et en soutenant les entreprises engagées dans la transition écologique, la loi vise à réduire l'empreinte environnementale de l'industrie française tout en créant des emplois durables.

  • Stimulant la recherche et le développement : en consacrant des ressources importantes à la recherche et au développement dans les domaines clés de la transition écologique, la France se positionne comme un chef de file en matière d'innovation verte.

  • Encourageant l'économie circulaire : en promouvant la réutilisation, la réparation et le recyclage des matériaux, la loi vise à réduire la consommation de ressources naturelles et à minimiser la production de déchets.

L'épargne au cœur de la transition

La loi Industrie Verte place l'épargne des Français au centre de la transition écologique. En créant le Plan d'épargne avenir climat, elle encourage les jeunes à investir dans des projets et entreprises engagés dans la lutte contre le changement climatique. Cette initiative vise à double objectif :

  • Financer la transition écologique : en canalisant l'épargne vers des investissements verts, le plan contribue à financer les projets nécessaires à la décarbonation de l'économie.

  • Sensibiliser les jeunes générations : en encourageant les jeunes à investir dans des projets durables, la loi vise à les sensibiliser à l'importance de l'environnement et à les inciter à adopter des comportements responsables.

Vers une épargne responsable et éthique

La loi Industrie Verte encourage également l'émergence d'une épargne responsable et éthique en intégrant des critères environnementaux dans la commande publique et les dispositifs de soutien publics. Cette mesure vise à :

  • Favoriser les entreprises durables : en conditionnant l'accès aux aides publiques à la performance environnementale des entreprises, la loi encourage les entreprises à adopter des pratiques plus durables.

  • Orienter les investissements vers des projets verts : en intégrant des critères environnementaux dans la commande publique, la loi incite les administrations à privilégier les entreprises et les projets qui respectent l'environnement.

Un nouveau modèle financier pour un avenir durable

La loi Industrie Verte signe l'avènement d'un nouveau modèle financier, où l'épargne est orientée vers des projets bénéfiques pour la planète et la société. En investissant dans des secteurs tels que les énergies renouvelables, la gestion des déchets ou la mobilité durable, les épargnants deviennent des acteurs actifs de la transition écologique et contribuent à la construction d'un avenir plus propre et plus durable.

Une opportunité à saisir pour tous

La loi Industrie Verte représente bien plus qu'une simple législation environnementale. Elle ouvre la voie à un nouveau modèle financier plus durable et responsable, où l'épargne joue un rôle crucial dans la construction d'un avenir meilleur. En investissant dans des projets verts et durables, les épargnants peuvent non seulement espérer des rendements financiers attractifs, mais aussi contribuer à façonner un monde plus juste et plus durable pour les générations futures. La transition écologique devient ainsi une opportunité économique à saisir pour tous les acteurs de la société.

Conclusion

La loi Industrie Verte constitue une étape majeure dans la lutte contre le changement climatique et la construction d'un avenir durable. En mobilisant l'épargne des Français et en encourageant l'investissement dans des projets verts, elle ouvre la voie à un nouveau modèle financier plus responsable et plus respectueux de l'environnement. C'est une opportunité à saisir pour tous ceux qui souhaitent contribuer à la construction d'un monde meilleur pour les générations futures.

L'Impact Transformateur du Corporate-Venture-Capital as a Service (CVCaaS) sur l'Innovation d'Entreprise

Le Corporate-Venture-Capital as a Service (CVCaaS) s'affirme de plus en plus comme un instrument crucial pour catalyser l'innovation au sein des entreprises. Cette approche, qui consiste pour les grandes entreprises à investir dans des startups et des technologies émergentes, offre un canal direct pour accéder à l'innovation et à la disruption. Une étude récente, axée sur le contexte danois, a mis en lumière l'efficacité de cette méthode, tout en soulignant les défis et les opportunités qu'elle présente. Cet article se propose de détailler les avantages du CVCaaS, d'examiner les défis auxquels il est confronté et de discuter des stratégies pour maximiser son potentiel dans le paysage des affaires contemporain.

Le CVCaaS : Un Levier d'Innovation Stratégique

ACCÈS AUX TECHNOLOGIES AVANCÉES :

Le CVCaaS permet aux entreprises établies de se connecter directement avec des startups innovantes, leur offrant ainsi un accès privilégié aux technologies de rupture et aux idées nouvelles. Cette collaboration peut se traduire par l'adoption de nouvelles technologies au sein des entreprises mères, stimulant ainsi leur capacité d'innovation et leur compétitivité sur le marché.

ÉVALUATION ET RENFORCEMENT DES CAPACITÉS :

En plus de l'accès aux technologies, le CVCaaS joue un rôle crucial dans l'évaluation des stratégies d'innovation existantes des entreprises. Il aide à identifier les lacunes en termes de compétences et de ressources, et propose des solutions pour les combler. Cette approche permet non seulement de renforcer les capacités existantes mais aussi d'encourager une culture d'innovation continue au sein des entreprises.

Dans le contexte danois, plusieurs entreprises de renom ont déjà adopté le modèle CVCaaS, constatant une augmentation significative de leur potentiel d'innovation. Ces entreprises ont réussi à intégrer de nouvelles technologies dans leurs processus existants, tout en renforçant leur position sur le marché grâce à des stratégies d'innovation plus robustes et mieux informées.

Défis et Évolutions du CVCaaS

ANALYSE DES DÉFIS RENCONTRÉS 

  • PERCEPTION DU RISQUE

Bien que le CVCaaS offre des opportunités d'innovation, certaines entreprises restent sceptiques quant à son efficacité en matière de gestion des risques. Ce scepticisme peut découler d'une méconnaissance des mécanismes du CVCaaS ou d'une réticence à investir dans des startups aux résultats incertains.

  • MANQUE DE CONTRÔLE DANS LES PHASES ULTÉRIEURES

Une fois la phase initiale de collaboration ou d'investissement passée, les entreprises peuvent se retrouver confrontées à un manque de contrôle sur le développement des technologies ou des startups dans lesquelles elles ont investi. Cela peut entraîner des divergences d'objectifs ou de visions entre les startups et les entreprises investisseuses.

ÉVOLUTIONS NÉCESSAIRES

Pour surmonter ces défis, le CVCaaS doit évoluer. Il est essentiel d'améliorer la compréhension des risques et des avantages associés à cette approche. Des mécanismes de suivi et de contrôle plus robustes pourraient être mis en place pour maintenir une influence constructive dans les phases ultérieures du développement des startups. De plus, le CVCaaS pourrait bénéficier d'une plus grande flexibilité pour s'adapter aux divers secteurs d'activité et aux besoins spécifiques des entreprises.

La Voie à Suivre pour le CVCaaS

Le futur du CVCaaS dépendra fortement de sa capacité à s'adapter aux besoins en constante évolution des entreprises. Pour rester pertinent et efficace, le CVCaaS doit intégrer les aspects suivants :

  1. Scalabilité : Le modèle doit être suffisamment flexible pour s'adapter aux entreprises de différentes tailles et à divers stades de croissance. Cela implique la mise en place de stratégies d'investissement modulables et évolutives.

  2. Expertise Sectorielle : Une connaissance approfondie des secteurs d'activité spécifiques est cruciale pour le succès du CVCaaS. Cette expertise permettra d'identifier les opportunités d'investissement les plus prometteuses et de fournir des conseils stratégiques pertinents aux startups.

En anticipant ces besoins, le CVCaaS peut devenir un outil encore plus puissant pour stimuler l'innovation. Les entreprises cherchent non seulement à investir dans des startups innovantes, mais aussi à trouver des partenariats qui s'alignent étroitement sur leurs objectifs stratégiques à long terme.

Conclusion

Le Corporate-Venture-Capital as a Service émerge comme un vecteur clé de l'innovation d'entreprise, offrant un accès inégalé à des technologies de pointe et des opportunités de collaboration stratégique. Cependant, pour maintenir sa pertinence et son efficacité, il doit continuellement évoluer pour répondre aux défis changeants du paysage des affaires. En s'adaptant aux exigences de scalabilité, d'expertise sectorielle et de gestion des risques, le CVCaaS peut solidifier sa position en tant qu'outil indispensable pour l'innovation d'entreprise dans le monde moderne.

Classement 2023 des Leaders en Assurance Vie en France

Introduction

L'année 2023 marque une période significative pour le secteur de l'assurance vie en France, avec des mouvements notables dans les rangs des principaux acteurs du marché. Le graphique qu’on va vous présentez révèle les dix principales compagnies d'assurance vie en fonction de leurs actifs sous gestion, soulignant la dynamique concurrentielle et les performances financières clés. Dans cet article, nous analysons le récent classement publié par MoneyVox qui met en lumière les géants de l'assurance vie française.

Actifs sous gestion : un indicateur de stabilité financière

Les actifs sous gestion (AUM) sont un baromètre essentiel de la santé financière dans l'industrie de l'assurance vie. Ils reflètent la confiance des investisseurs et la capacité des assureurs à gérer efficacement les portefeuilles d'investissement. Plus les actifs sous gestion sont élevés, plus l'institution financière est considérée comme stable et fiable.

Les Leaders du Marché en 2023

Selon le graphique, Crédit Agricole domine le marché avec 277 milliards d'euros d'actifs sous gestion. CNP Assurances suit de près avec 265 milliards d'euros. Ces chiffres illustrent non seulement leur grande part de marché mais aussi la confiance que les consommateurs et les investisseurs placent en eux.

Credit Mutuel, avec 146 milliards d'euros, BNP Paribas Cardif avec 142 milliards d'euros et Axa France Assurances avec 135 milliards d'euros complètent le top cinq. Chaque compagnie a démontré des compétences notables en gestion d'actifs, en répondant aux besoins de leurs clients et en s'adaptant aux évolutions du marché.

Analyse du Classement

Ce classement est une vitrine pour les tendances actuelles et futures du marché de l'assurance vie. Les positions occupées par ces entreprises témoignent de leur stratégie commerciale, de leur innovation en matière de produits d'assurance vie et de leur réactivité face aux changements réglementaires et économiques.

Conclusion

Le graphique du top 10 des compagnies d'assurance vie en 2023 est plus qu'une simple représentation numérique; c'est un reflet de la stratégie, de la performance et de la confiance. Pour les clients potentiels, les investisseurs et les analystes du marché, ces informations sont cruciales pour comprendre où placer leur confiance et leur capital dans l'année à venir.

A view on the Web3 ecosystem

Mandalore Partners shares its view on Web3 and blockchain dynamics in 2022, focusing on mapping decentralized applications. The geographical scope is mainly Europe, North America and Asia.

Economy of Web3

Mandalore holds that the industry of Web3 will transform all economic sectors on a global scale. As a component of Web3, blockchains have the potential to have a greater impact on how we interact with the internet on how many software applications are currently operating their backends. The way we produce and transmit value online is particularly relevant from an economic standpoint. With the chance to have more power and individuality than ever before, creators are in charge right now.

As it can be seen on the following graph, web3 was a subject of growing interest during the 2 last years.

Search Volume Web3 - Mandalore Partners

2023 is likely to see other countries moving to position themselves as Web3-friendly – often through the use of central bank digital currencies – such as India's forthcoming e-rupee and China's Digital Yuan. This dynamics is all the more important as it accompanies the development of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and metaverse – all technologies which are closely related to new developments in Web3. This represents a very opportunity market for a venture capital firm. However for now, the relative cost of transactions is still prohibitive to many. Web3 is less likely to be utilized in less-wealthy, developing nations due to high transaction fees.

What is Web3 ? A decentralized web

Web3 is a decentralized, trustful, and private internet that makes use of blockchain technology. Web3 refers to the next generation of internet technology, which is based on a decentralized infrastructure. This means that no central authority controls or regulates the internet, and users have more control over their data and privacy: we talk about decentralized web. It has several key characteristics that differentiate it from the current internet:

Decentralized

The biggest difference between web3 and the current internet is that web3 is decentralized, whereas the current internet is centralized with still some static websites. This means that there is no central authority controlling or regulating web3, and users have more control over their data and privacy. It remplaces the ancient web by the ability to create open protocols and decentralized, community-run networks, combining the open infrastructure of web1 with the public participation of web2. One of the goals of the Web3 movement is to create a decentralized social networks.

Secure

One of the advantages of decentralization is that it makes the web3 more secure. Since there is no central server or database, it is much harder for hackers to access user data. Also, each user's data is stored on their own computer, so even if a hacker were to gain access to a database, they could only access the data of one person at a time.

Private

Another advantage of decentralization is that it makes the web3 more private. Since there is no central server or database, companies cannot track users' online activity. In addition, each user's data is stored on their own computer, so companies cannot access it without the user's permission.

Permissionless

Everyone has equal access to participate in Web3, and no one gets excluded.

Web3 and Blockchain

The Web3 is built on the blockchain which gives the precedent advantages. This technology is not only used for cryptocurrencies, it is also used to conclude contracts or to control the functioning of applications thanks to smart contracts.

As a reminder, it is a kind of registry that contains a list of all exchanges made between users. This register is decentralized - i.e. stored on the servers of its users - and very secure because it relies on a cryptographic system of validation by the users for each transaction. Hence the name "blockchain". It uses smart contracts that are algorithms that operates on the blockchain. You can find a definition of smart contracts on Binance Academy website: https://academy.binance.com/en/glossary/smart-contract.

In the case of decentralized web, this allows the creation of financial assets, in the form of tokens for example, to ensure the internal functioning of each service. The platforms is therefore operated, owned and improved by communities of users. The idea behind Web3 is that technologies like blockchain , cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) give us the tools we need to create online spaces that we truly own, and even to implement digital democracies.

Each user has his digital identity, creating a record on the blockchain of all their activities. And, for example, each time they post a message, they can earn a token for their contribution, giving them both a way to participate within the platform and a financial asset.

A Web3 Map

Venture Map of Web3 - Mandalore Partners

Venture Map of Web3

Here is a commentary about the different categories presented.

I. Infrastructure

Developer tools: Developer tools are pieces of decentralized blockchains software like protocols, Layer X solutions, APIs, and SDKs that make it easier for blockchains to communicate with one another and perform more robustly.

Data analytics: Startups in this category provides blockchain data and analytics solutions to their customers.

Security & Privacy: Startups in this category are developing security and privacy solutions on top of existing blockchains

Reg Tech: Companies that provides various regulatory and compliance solutions to the blockchain ecosystem in areas such as tax compliance and anti-money laundering

Entreprise: Startups working on blockchain-based solutions for healthcare institutions across several fields, including life sciences and clinical trials. Some companies offer blockchain-based supply chain solutions to address issues like agricultural traceability and help them with better vision. Some companies provide a range of blockchain technologies geared toward business use cases.

II. Fintech - Decentralized finance

Currencies: Currencies that run on different blockchains. Created largely with the intention of developing better currency for various use cases, these projects represent either a store of value, a medium of exchange, or a unit of account.

Payment: Startups that provide payment services and support cryptocurrency transactions by developing and running cryptocurrency exchanges or by creating cryptocurrency trading applications.

Insurance: Types of Company that provide insurance technology solutions on the promise of innovation. These projects protect against the vulnerabilities of smart contracts or price volatility by raising public funds to use as hedges.

Wallet services: Startups in this category are developing and operating
crypto wallets. It develops of digital asset security infrastructure helping crypto-native and financial institutions to create digital wallets.

III. NFTs

Most people have probably heard of NFTs, it is a transaction stored on the blockchain which corresponds to non fungible tokens, and therefore completely unique. The idea is to be able to use it as a certificate of authenticity associated with a digital or physical object. Each token is unique but obviously players can have ownership of tokens on different platforms. Among these projects, different types of tokens exist, such as governance tokens, equity tokens, security tokens, or utility tokens.

Gaming: NFT technology is being incorporated into video games by startups in this sector, opening up new business models like play-to-earn. The main contribution of the blockchain for users and players is the "play to earn": each player can play and indulge his passion by earning crypto-currencies. This model appeared with the birth of NFT, these certificates that allow to attest the authenticity of a digital object and therefore to own them, then to resell them. The decentralization brought by the blockchain (no central regulating entity) causes a potential paradigm shift: players no longer pay a license or subscription to play, but invest in the game to obtain tokens and develop, and then earn money from these benefits. Purchased NFTs bring decision-making power, which can take many forms and is independent of the publisher, and bring a gain.

Marketplace: Types of company that are developing and operating exchanges meant to help mint and trade NFTs on different platforms, for very various way of use (art, music,...)

Community: Examples of social media platforms designed for team collaboration, program management and member tracking. Interact with fans on a whole new level through easy to access channels where they can post commentary, fan art,...

Metaverse: The metaverse (contraction of "meta" and "universe", i.e. meta-universe) is a network of always-on virtual environments in which many people can interact with each other and with these digital objects while operating virtual representations - or avatars - of themselves. Corporations in this category are developing NFT experiences
related to the evolving metaverse.

Please find below the different maps on the web3 market that helped us build ours:

Web3 market map from TechCrunch

Tech Crunch Web3 Map

TechCrunch Web3 Map

Web3 market map from Coinbase

Coinbase Web3 Map

Coinbase Web3 Map

Web3 market map from Crunchbase

Crunchbase Web3 Map

Crunchbase Web3 Map

Web3 market map from SPEEDINVEST

Speedinvest Web3 Map

Speedinvest Web3 Map

You can find more information on our commitment to Web3 activities on our website: https://www.mandalorepartners.com/web3surance

Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Insurance Trends in Asia: A Bright Future For Insurtechs? #VC

Insurance in Asia has extremely high growth potential…

Insurtech and insurance in general has extremely high growth prospects in the region, much more so than in other more mature markets like Europe. 

Over 40% of the middle class population in Southeast Asia is uninsured: the scope of penetration for digitally charged insurance businesses through technology mediums like smartphones is huge. As standards of living rise and health concerns (for example linked to the pandemic) remain a preponderant issue, we expect demand for insurance products to increase. Penetration rates for Asia-Pacific stood at 3.8% for life insurance and 2.1% for non-life insurance in 2018, considerably lower than in the UK and the US that reported rates of over 10%. Insurance company Swiss Re estimates that by 2029, 42% of gross insurance premiums would originate from Asia-Pacific, with China accounting for 20% of this. Asian consumers are increasingly looking at insurance not just as a protection but also as an investment option.

This is likely to lead to significant revenue growth for actors in this industry, as shown above by the projection of the evolution of premiums in the coming years. 

….providing a unique opportunity for the development of insurtechs…

According to McKinsey, insurance companies in Asia are therefore very aggressive in terms of growth prospects, and insurtech can be a key way to rapidly reach under-served consumers.

The key point is that while there is a very large potential for growth, it may not be best served by traditional insurers. As shown above, customers now prefer digital solutions.  This is where insurtechs can play a major role. 

Indeed, VC funding in the sector has reached large levels in recent years. Venture capital has also recognized the potential profits to be made from digitally disrupting insurance. According to a paper by Bain,  in the past five years, venture capital firms have invested about $3.8 billion in Asia-Pacific insurtechs, including online sites that sell directly to the public, online brokers and advisers, and aggregators or digital marketplaces.

According to the report, in fast-growing markets such as mainland China, India and Indonesia, insurtechs can “leapfrog” incumbents and gain market share. Digital marketplaces, which allow customers to easily compare and select policies from competing carriers, may be able to conquer a significant share of the insurance profit pool. In major markets around the world, a majority of retail insurance customers—especially young, digitally active ones—are open to switching to another provider, including companies from outside the industry, such as retailers, automakers or tech firms, according to Bain & Company’s fourth global survey of more than 174,000 customers in 18 countries (“Customer Behavior and Loyalty in Insurance: Global Edition 2018”). Asia-Pacific insurance consumers are very receptive to new ideas and new players. In Thailand, Indonesia, mainland China and Malaysia, for example, more than 85% are open to buying from new entrants, according to Bain’s survey.

…which for now remain concentrated in mainland China, Hong Kong and other East Asian countries. However a key trend for coming years will be the emergence of new markets

Banks in financial hubs of SouthAsia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have already received significant investments in Insurtech: For example, DBS bank from Manulife of 1.2 Billion dollars, Citibank from AIA group 800 Million dollars and Standard Charted from Prudential 1.25 Billion dollars.

Singapore and Hongkong are providing a wide range of development and growth options like incubators, insurance labs and more for startups in the insurtech sector.

Asian Insurtechs startups and CVC

Examples of insurtech startups from around the region

As shown above, a number of high potential ventures have developed around the region. For instance, China is also seeking to build up big online platforms to provide various insurance options personal, medical, auto online. Malaysia has already started reaping the benefits of such platforms by slowly reducing the need for live agents.

Nonetheless, other markets are also seeing the development of insurtechs. For example, insurtech funding in India has increased from only 11 million USD in 2016 to 287 million in 2020, with startups such as Turtlemint which raised 30 million in late 2020. 

Insurtech can help the sector remove obstacles to growth…

According to McKinsey, Asian insurers currently tend to suffer from three main weaknesses: 

Sales force professionalization. The entire US insurance industry, as one example, has a few hundred thousand agents. Agency forces in Asia are significantly larger—China alone has roughly eight million insurance agents. However, the level of professionalization in Asia lags behind the developed world. Part-time and poorly trained agents are the norm in much of Asia. As customers continue to grow more sophisticated, Asian carriers will have to upgrade their agency forces. They can learn much from the West in terms of recruiting, capability building, and ongoing performance- and compliance-management. Western carriers are now helping agents migrate from product sellers to holistic advisors which provides a blueprint for Asia.

Analytics-driven decision making. The West is increasingly applying data and analytics in all elements of the business to improve the quality and consistency of decision making. In some cases, this has progressed to rely extensively on third-party data. In Asia, the use of data and analytics is less mature. Carriers need to invest in their internal data assets (i.e., capturing and storing more useful data), external third-party data integration, advanced analytics capabilities, and “last mile” adoption of analytics solutions. There is tremendous opportunity for carriers in all elements of the value chain, including pricing and underwriting, sales force effectiveness, customer servicing, and claims. Given the distributed nature of insurance operations in Asia and the talent gap, this is an even bigger opportunity.

Operational discipline and efficiency. Asian carriers can learn from the operational discipline of insurers in developed markets. Faced with the prospect of slower growth, Western insurers have long focused on improving efficiency through more optimized operations. Asian executives have underinvested in operational discipline and efficiency. It is not uncommon to find dozens of branches or field offices with widely varying operating practices. This increases costs, delivers suboptimal customer experience, and introduces significant compliance risk. Asian carriers will have to focus more time and investment on these issues in the near future. They can benefit from the new toolbox that has emerged which combines digital, analytics, robotics, and NLP to re-invent customer and back office journeys.

… and artificial intelligence is a key driver of change

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (A.I) allows for much faster understanding of this data. This empowers intermediaries and underwriters to engage clients knowledgeable with data driven policy advice in real time.

Customers want to connect with insurers from virtually anywhere and at any time. The employment of AI processing will soon permeate almost every facet of the insurance business. For example, the insurer QBE Asia has “started seeing benefits from integrated AI systems that streamline and automate our claims workflow and reduce costs by consolidating the underwriting processes on a centralized platform”. They also deploy Robotic Process Automation to save significant costs on repetitive non-value adding tasks and have started to actively integrate connected devices (Internet of Things, IoT) into their insurance processes.

Finally, public authorities are likely to modify and adapt regulations in reaction to the development of digital insurance and insurtechs

According to Bain, “digital disruption is getting a push from regulators. In Singapore, Hong Kong and, more recently, Indonesia, authorities are actively promoting digital innovation and have established government funded incubators, known locally as sandboxes, to encourage insurers to experiment with new technologies”. Singapore and Hong Kong are emerging as hubs for telematics and insurtechs, and consumer use of digital channels in those markets is growing rapidly. This means new regulations are likely to be put in place, and insurtechs should prepare for this risk.


Le Corporate Venture Capital dans la bancassurance #VC

La bancassurance est parmi les secteurs les plus actifs dans le CVC au niveau mondial…

Alors que le Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) est en plein développement à l’échelle mondiale, comme indiqué par le dernier rapport CB Insights sur le sujet, le secteur de la bancassurance se confirme comme une des références, dans le monde comme en France.

En effet, si on examine les principaux investisseurs CVC dans le monde, on remarque la présence de nombreux acteurs des industries financières, comme Goldman Sachs et Fidelity, tandis que des entreprises étrangères dans ce secteur, comme SoftBank et Alibaba, investissent des montants considérables dans les services financiers.

…. et impliquant principalement des investissement en fintech ou insurtech, tout en s'intéressant également à des secteurs non financiers

Les fintechs et autres startups liées à la finance restent une priorité pour la plus grande partie des banques. Comme l'indique le graphique ci-dessous, les principales institutions financières américaines ont grandement augmenté le nombre d'investissements dans des start up dans les innovations financières. Néanmoins, des organisations financières comme Goldman Sachs ou des AM comme Fidelity n'hésitent pas à investir dans des startups diverses, allant de la santé aux médias. Par exemple, en 2020 Citi Ventures a mis en place un fonds d'investissement de 150 millions de dollars dédié à l'impact investing.

Cela est également visible en France, avec une transition graduelle vers des portefeuilles de plus en plus généralistes, même si la stratégie pour la plupart des acteurs semble toujours clairement ancrée sur leurs métiers historiques. Par exemple, au sein du portfolio de SG Ventures (l’entité d’investissement en capital-risque de la Société Générale), toutes les startups sont liées soit à l’assurance, soit à la banque soit à la mobilité, qui est l’une des activités de la Société Générale à travers sa filiale ALD.

En France également, les entreprises de services financiers sont les moteurs du CVC, et s’organisent selon deux modalités principales

Les acteurs de la banque et de l’assurance sont parmi les plus actifs de l'écosystème CVC en France, et représentent une proportion importante des investissements corporate dans des startups innovantes. Leurs objectifs sont à la fois stratégiques, mais aussi financiers, et leurs investissements, initialement centrés uniquement sur leur cœur de métier, ont tendance à se diversifier de plus en plus.

Les sociétés du secteur de l'assurance sont les acteurs les plus prolifiques du paysage CVC hexagonal. De même, les banques françaises sont relativement actives dans le secteur du corporate venture capital. Certaines d'entre elles sont d'ailleurs parmi les principaux investisseurs en France. Par exemple, en 2017 le Crédit Agricole était troisième, à égalité avec Partech, un des principaux fonds de venture capital en Europe. Certaines banques ont été particulièrement précoces et pro-actives dans leur stratégie de financement de l'innovation, et il existe une hétérogénéité importante dans les montants investis et la diversité des portefeuilles.

Investissements réalisés par différents groupes bancaires français (avant 2017)


Le positionnement unique de Mandalore Partners:

Venture capital as a service : a new state of play

It’s an exciting time to be a gamer, game developer, entrepreneurial gaming leader, and an investor. Over the last few years, gaming has exploded to a $152bn+ industry and is forecast to double to $300bn by 2025, growing larger than the NFL, NBA, music streaming, and worldwide box office combined. Investors have poured over $60 billion of VC funding into gaming ventures. Recent ventures that joined the unicorn club include Game 24×7, Immutable, and Tripedot.

Venture dollars have followed, especially in Europe. In the past 5 years, venture capital investment within the gaming sector in Europe has risen from $636m in 2014 to $1.3 billion in 2021. 25% to 30% of all VC investments in gaming were made in Europe.

Gaming is just one of the tech industries that have emerged with the power of digital. Consider SustainabilityTech, ImmersiveTech, and Web3.0 or cyber security platforms.

With so many new tech sectors emerging, there have never been more sources of funding for startups than there are today. The very best early-stage companies have many options when it comes to financing their business — whether it’s angel funding, crowdsourced funding, accelerator funding, or venture funding provided.

Within the venture capital industry, traditional venture capital firms typically write the biggest cheques as they hold significant resources to support start-ups within their networks. Still, traditional venture capital firms may or may not have the knowledge and expertise to bring their portfolio companies more than financing, meaning negotiating also strategic corporate partnerships to support sustainable sources of growth.

If start-ups are mainly focused on how they can scale their business, then they can look to local and multinational corporations for funding and partnership opportunities. Some of these corporations such as Intel or Google have their own corporate venture capital funds for this purpose. The benefit of this option is that startup businesses can usually secure both strategic partnerships and the capital they seek.

However, there may be a downside if this relationship limits your flexibility to partner with other companies. Some young businesses look at these partnerships as a potential future exit strategy, while corporations may look at minority equity ownership as a test for future majority ownership stakes.

What is Venture Capital as a Service?

New companies create constant pressure that disrupts established ways of doing business, with the average business lifespan on the S&P 500 collapsing by nearly 70% since the 1960s.

In addition, these emerging tech players also have lots of options when it comes to getting funded. I’m not saying that VC is going anywhere, but it’s important to realize that the playing field has changed. In the past, new businesses needed VCs more than VCs needed new businesses. But with the rise of corporate VCs, angels, and crowdfunding, that is no longer the case. small businesses now have more options when it comes to financing.

Consider the corporate venture capital world of today. It is the corporate venture arm of a corporation that makes equity investments in startups, usually with the intention of generating a financial return and/or achieving strategic objectives. Corporate VCs can be either internal (a division of the corporation) or external (an independent VC firm funded by the corporation).

External corporate VCs are often used as a tool to access startup innovation and to build relationships with startups that can be leveraged by the corporation. Internal corporate VCs, on the other hand, are often used as a tool to generate a financial return for the corporation.

Still, as a way to address the emerging market dynamics for startups and corporations, a new venture capital business model has emerged. This model, known as Venture Capital-as-a-Service (VCaaS), provides an optimal mix of capital and business value to startups and corporations by combining strategic alignment, goal-based sourcing, and access to networks of corporate funds.

Firms including Touchdown Ventures and Pegasus Tech Ventures are providing startups with both flexible cheque sizes and targeted business engagements with strategic corporate partners. Touchdown has partnered with corporations such as Aramark, Kelloggs, T-Mobile and 20th Century Fox. Pegasus has partnered with corporations including ASUS, acer and SEGA.

Indeed, incumbent market players can use venture capitalist thinking to plan their market disruptions, evaluate insight to draw strategies, inform corporate strategy and minimize surprises from an impact and financial returns viewpoint — turning venturing into a profit center instead of a cost center by managing, investing, and partnering with portfolio companies.

There are many benefits the venture capital as a service model can provide. First, it allows you to access leading-edge thinking and high-growth potential innovations and to build relationships with tech-led businesses that can be directly deployed by the corporation. Second, it allows you to generate a financial return for the corporation. Third, it allows you to access venture capital thinking and expertise to inform your own corporate strategy. Finally, it helps you minimize surprises from an impact and financial returns viewpoint.

There are also some risks associated with venture capital as a service. First, if you are not careful, it can lead to a conflict of interest between the corporation and the venture capital firm. Second, it can be difficult to find a venture capital firm that is a good fit for your corporation. Third, the venture capital firm may not be able to generate the expected return on investment. Finally, the venture capital firm may not be able to provide the desired level of service.

The three models of Venture Capital funding

There are a few models currently deployed by organizations when it comes to venture capital funding that also leverage a corporation.

Firstly, corporations can choose to directly manage their Corporate Venture Fund or Do It Themselves. This has been the more “traditional” strategy, initially adopted by most major actors, from Google to Axa. It entails significant commitments, in terms of both financial, human, and organizational resources: internal teams and processes have to be set up from scratch, and venture money has to be actively monitored and managed. Our Venture capitalists’ service enables our clients to tailor very specific tech investment thesis and secure their operations with minimum resource involvement to accessing qualified deal flow as well as expensive and sophisticated back-office resources.

Secondly, there is capital investment in independent venture capital funds. This more passive venture capital funding approach requires less corporate commitment and resources, but it also leads to minimal mandate control, limited co-investing opportunities, a closed-end fund structure, and no investment committee participation.

We can clearly see there are advantages and significant downsides to both of these approaches. This is why there is now a more active and strategic alternative participative funding option.

As a financially optimized model, Venture Capital as a Service (VCaaS) can be a fully outsourced service, or it can be a platform providing organizations with the opportunity to complement existing or build new, in-house venture capitalist capabilities. VCaaS delivers financial and strategic returns, as well as scale, context, and focus for corporates, government organizations & family offices.

What are good examples of venture Capital Funds? 

Multiple major corporations have put in place a comprehensive venture capital strategy in the past few years. As noted above both Touchdown Ventures and Pegasus Tech Ventures are well known in the nonfinance sector with respectively 63 and 175 portfolio companies.

The ultimate goal is to accelerate the success of portfolio companies by connecting them to networks of multinational corporate partners to create opportunities for business development, manufacturing, distribution, and global expansion. Some of the core capabilities these corporate venture capitalist arms have bespoke and industrialized for corporations include:

  • Distribution deals focus on using existing and new social channels to bring new products and services to customers.

  • Co-marketing typically involves bundling corporate and startup product messages to potential customers who would be interested in the joint offer.

  • Vendor agreement structuring where one party buys from another. Corporations can purchase products or services from startups, or startups can buy from corporations too.

  • Supply chain collaborations generally allow startups to leverage the scale, experience, and relationships of larger corporations.

  • Licensing transactions can focus on sharing technology know-how, patents, or other forms of intellectual property, including content.

The insurance industry has also been dynamic with a few leading re/insurers leading the pack. Still much more can be done in the sector.

  1. AXA Venture Partners

With $1 billion of assets under management. Axa Venture Partners has been one of the pioneers of corporate venture capital in Europe, launching AXA Venture Partners in 2015 with a focus on seed and early-stage funding opportunities in Europe, US and Canada, Israel, and the Mena region. Unicorns include Blockstream and Phenom.

  1. MunichRe Ventures

Launched in 2015, Munich Re Ventures is an extremely active and respected corporate venture fund that counts seven unicorns, 2 IPOs, and 5 acquisitions. The fund has taken a diversified portfolio approach investing in tech companies in finance, insurance, enterprise technology, transport and logistics, aerospace, and environment tech among the few.

  1. Generali and Inco Ventures:

Designed in partnership with INCO Ventures, a pioneer in impact investing, Generali launched in November 2020 the Generali Impact Investment fund. Reserved for institutional investors, this fund aims to financially support the growth of companies and organizations that contribute to improving the lives of the most vulnerable families and the professional integration of refugees. Generali France has thus taken a new step in its responsible investment strategy, in favor of more inclusive and more sustainable savings. The fund is committed for 20 years to an ambitious approach to Corporate Social Responsibility.

Most corporations do not have one single fund. To diversify portfolio strategy and ensure that they cover a variety of aspects across their value chains, they seek expertise from a variety of venture capitalists and startup commercialization experts.

Why should corporations outsource their Venture Capital arm?

In the 1980s and ’90s, many U.S.-based companies outsourced their research and development activities to Asia to reduce costs and secure the technical talent required to meet the growing demand for new digital products and services. With new remote working demands and talent scarcity, there is a need to access structure competence more readily within countries. Diversifying the talent pool has helped American companies to hedge risk and remain innovative. Overall, these U.S.-based companies performed better and drove higher profit margins, often leading the world across a variety of sectors.

The innovative models

A few VC firms have developed innovative models such as venture-capital as-a-service (VCaaS) as a way to support corporates to modernize and industrialize their innovation activities. They help corporations manage their corporate venture capital funds and find the most innovative startups to invest in, based on their interest areas. The firms also help facilitate startup relationships, developing business and technology collaboration. In many cases, corporations learn about new technology trends, new business models, and best practices from these startups–helping the corporations remain innovative. Startups in this model benefit from access to decision-makers, business guidance, and potentially a new revenue stream.

A venture capital firm: Innotech Corporation

As one of the best-funded venture-backed companies, and a smart automation provider, Osaro, successfully leveraged the opportunities offered by VCaaS and received funding from  Innotech Corporation.

Partnering with Innotech Corporation and Pegasus Tech Ventures has been critical for our international business expansion as well as for funding across multiple rounds of financing. We look forward to continuing our growth together and highly recommend that fellow entrepreneurs establish similar win-win relationships between investors and corporations.

Derik Pridmore, CEO of Osaro.

Indeed, startups often lack the scale, expertise, and experience needed to quickly grow to new markets and segments. As emphasized by Venturebeat, this makes effective partnerships with experienced corporations all the more important:

As our world becomes more connected than ever, it has become easier for startups to expand their businesses into fast-growing markets abroad. Yet, in many circumstances they still need the right partner in order to do so.

Venture capitalists outsource corporate innovation

Outsourcing corporate innovation using VCaaS is a new way to address the ever-growing need of corporates to reinvent their business models. The approach relies on the expertise of angel investors, institutional investors, and corporate investors instead of relying solely on internal resources. VC firms that operate using this model are coming up with creative and flexible strategies that allow any corporation (large or small) to take advantage of corporate venturing thinking and invest in innovation. Outsourcing the investor’s expertise allows companies to run and grow their corporate venturing programs, generating top-tier results while keeping costs under control.

To sum up, both corporate firms and startups benefit from a VCaaS configuration. It’s a win-win framework for both sides as commercial engagements and decision-making are de-risked for all parties.

De-risking corporate innovation

There are two ways we look at de-risking the corporate venture capitalist conundrum.

For corporations: 

The framework allows for quick access to the VC’s network and deal-flow without having to start from scratch. It also eases access to a less expensive solution to in-house R&D to find new technologies and products. Working with the right venture capital firms, corporations benefit from an all-in-one solution with a competitive management fee–all for a fraction of the cost of typical R&D programs.

Corporates can also an innovation strategy without being hindered by the inertia and bureaucracy that is often present in very large firms.

For startups: 

The framework also facilitates easy access to long-term partnerships with established actors in their market. Indeed, the latter entails collaborations with firms that can help corporations quickly enter new markets and offers a potential new avenue to achieve a successful exit (e.g by being acquired by the corporation for instance.)

A young but growing practice

While VCaaS is a young, still fast-growing practice, several actors have already built a strong reputation and track record. As noted before, two of the well-established venture capital firms enabling corporate venturing include Pegasus Tech Ventures in Silicon Valley and Touchdown Ventures in Los Angeles. This means partnering with leading global corporations from Kellog’s to T-Mobile with clear gaps across their innovation value chain and supporting them in shaping and scaling activities enabling them to achieve their long-term goals. Similarly, Mandalore Partners, based in Paris, is working with leading insurance firms to help them put in place their venture capital investment thesis to start to benefit from the strategic and financial returns resulting from well-structured VCas a Service funds. From ideation to exits, we provide access to the resources and expertise you need to build a successful venture portfolio.

Roadmap for success

For us, success comes from quickly identifying growth ventures that fit within the strategic roadmap of corporate partners. After the VC introduces corporations to top emerging entrants, they work together to create joint development and revenue opportunities. Partnerships like this are mutually beneficial, leading to corporate innovation initiatives and helping startups scale their business faster.

VC money can drive many opportunities. What if you don’t have the time or resources to source and diligence these deals? Maybe you’re an entrepreneur who wants to raise money for your startup but doesn’t know where to start. Or maybe you’re an established business that needs access to future lens innovative thinking and wants to tap into the startup ecosystem but doesn’t have the know-how. This is where VC as a service comes in. We are a new breed of VC that provides not just capital, but also expertise, resources, and networks to help future-focused corporations and growth ventures succeed. Let’s not just write cheques. Let’s write success stories.

Don’t forget to listen to…

Sabine and I discussed VC as a Service recently on her podcast #scoutingforgrowth. You can find the discussion and episode just here.

About Minh Q. Tran

Founder & Managing Partner Mandalore Partners

Minh is the founder and managing partner of Mandalore Partners, which created an innovative framework that enables investors of early-stage companies to achieve scale by being exposed to a range of traditional, alternative, and tech venture capital assets.

In addition to his experience as one of the founding team members at AXA Strategic Ventures, Minh was also an integral part of several other VC firms, including Nokia Ventures, Bertelsmann Ventures, and Truffle Capital.

Minh is also a co-founder of Alchemy Crew where he works closely with Sabine VanderLinden to refine the corporate-startup engagement model through commercialization execution.

Twitter – Linkedinminh@mandalorepartners.com

Photo by Jonathan Pielmayer on Unsplash

VC-as-a-Service: Benchmark of the sector & Strategic Positioning of Mandalore Partners #VC #VCaaS

Venture capital (VC) is a form of investment for early-stage, innovative businesses with strong growth potential. Often led by funds, Venture Capital investments are not for the faint of heart.

However, VC investments can be a fully outsourced service build new, in-house VC capabilities for Corporations, family offices or Business Angels. Known as VC-as-a-Service, the demand for such a service is booming.

Why ?

Corporate venture capital (CVC) is the investment of corporate funds directly in external startup companies.

CVC is beneficial for corporations for two aspects:

  • From a strategic point of view, CVC represents a true external source of innovation and enables an active monitoring of the sector’s future evolutions for corporations. CVC is also allowing corporations to attract the best profiles willing to work in a dynamic environment.

  • From a financial perspective, CVC often leads to return on investment. As for classical VC investment, CVC investments are generally characterized as very high-risk/high-return opportunities.

CVC is also a great opportunity for start-ups. More than getting only financial resources like with VC funds, they can get the optimal mix of capital and business value from the corporations. Indeed, start-ups have access to the fund’s financial expertise but also to the corporations’ knowledge about the sector.

Thus, CVC is a win-win solution for both corporations and start-ups. However, this solution is hard to implement in real life.

Indeed, VC abilities requires a lot of time, resources, contacts in the start-up ecosystem to have access to a strong deal flow, expertise for deep innovative analysis, expertise about legal aspects of VC investments. Corporations do not always have all those assets in-house.

Moreover, a misalignment of purposes can rise between the financial and strategic department of a large corporations due to the high-risk nature of VC investments. Besides, once the investment done, the gap between conservative mindsets in corporations and agile ones in start-ups may not be profit holder for both.

As CVC is very hard to implement, one may wonder on the way to deal with it.

How ?

Many actors are offering external services to enable corporations to have access to VC abilities for investments.

Each actor offers VC-as-a-Service abilities, some are pure players like Touchdown Ventures, some are bringing also a consulting expertise like McKinsey and Mandalore Partners is bringing a Digital Ecosystem along with its VC abilities.

There are three different categories of actors offering VC-as-a-Service abilities.

  • Pure players like Touchdown Ventures. Among this category, pure players are often multi-sector oriented and operate at a local scale like Techmind or at a global scale like Pegasus Ventures.

  • Consulting groups like Bain are bringing along their CVC abilities some of their consulting expertise. They operate at a global scale and on many sectors but mostly digital ones (TMT).

  • Mandalore Partners is a pure player but also brings its Digital Ecosystem along with its VC abilities. Mandalore has a global expertise and is specialized in Insurtech.

What ?

The objective of VC-as-a-Service is to bring VC abilities to corporations and start-ups:

Sourcing is one of the hardest abilities to acquire when a corporation wants to acquire VC skills. Indeed, it requires a lot of time and relations to build an efficient network. Using VC-as-a-Service gives corporations access to top-notch deals. VC-as-a-Service also quickly identify startups that fit within the strategic roadmap of the corporate partners thanks to previous deals and accumulated experiences.

More than Sourcing, VC-as-a-Service also brings a structure and a platform to rely on. Indeed, VC-as-a-Service funds have financial expertise, fine knowledge of the sector and contacts to find the best diligence as possible.

An efficient CVC investment is not finished when the start-up has received the funds from the company. VC-as-a-Service funds also follows the portfolio of the company and helps the start-up in its future milestone.

Using a VC-as-a-Service fund is in fact time saving and cost effective. It only takes few weeks to launch and to follow a CVC strategy for a corporation.

All along the investment process, decisions are made by the corporate which is enlighten by VC-as-a-Service fund. The fund is not making any investment alone.

Le CVC, un secteur en pleine expansion

D'après l’article paru sur TechCrunch en mars 2022. 


Le boom d’investissements en capital risque qui a marqué l’année 2021 n’a pas été uniquement le fait de fonds en capital risque traditionnels. En effet, d’autres acteurs et sources de capital ont joué un rôle clé: des nouvelles méthodes d’investissements angel et seed, jusqu’à des fonds crossover qui soutiennent des startups late stage. Et au milieu de toute cette activité frénétique et des levées records, les investisseurs corporate ont continué à développer leurs importance au sein du paysage VC. 

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) est la méthode par laquelle des entreprises mettent en place leur propre structure d’investissement. Traditionnellement, cette démarche unit des objectifs stratégiques (M&A, accès à la technologie, partenariats) et financiers (retours sur investissement). La pondération de chacun varie en fonction de l’entreprise et du développement de leurs équipes CVC, mais il est rare de trouver des CVC qui n’ont qu’un de ces objectifs. Cela fait de leurs investissements un intéressant mélange d’investissement en capital risque classique et action stratégique de l’entreprise. Du point de vue des startups, le CVC est également très attractif. Par exemple, cela leur permet de s’adosser à un partenaire expérimenté, et donc de bénéficier de ses ressources, réseaux et expériences. La perspective d'être potentiellement racheté par le corporate offre également une sortie attrayante pour les entrepreneurs et les investisseurs. 


Les CVCs étaient exceptionnellement actifs l’année dernière, et il n’y a jamais eu autant d’acteurs. Si on analyse les données publiées par CB Insights, il est clair que 2021 fut une année charnière pour ce secteur, avec des records battus dans la plupart des indicateurs. Les CVC sont également de plus en plus présents au sein de l’espace médiatique. Par exemple, MondoDB, une startup de codage qui a fait son introduction en bourse il y a cinq ans, a mis en place son propre fond. MondoDB et d’autres startups à succès comme Coinbase sont intéressantes car elles sont actives dans le CVC avant même d’atteindre le statut d’entreprise mature et établie. Cette dynamique ne s'arrête pas là, et le CVC n’est désormais plus cantonné à une poignée de multinationales comme Axa et General Electric. Maintenant, même des entreprises privées plus petites s’y mettent, ce qui met en évidence à la fois les délais de plus en plus larges avant les IPOs, et l’abondance de fonds disponibles pour être utilisés en VC. 


Examinons maintenant les données du secteur de manière plus précise. Il y a deux indicateurs principaux pour examiner l'évolution du secteur. Tout d’abord, le nombre et la rapidité avec laquelle de nouveaux CVC sont mis en place, et le rythme auquel ceux déjà existants investissent. Si on examine le premier indicateur, il est clair que nous assistons, ces dernières années, à une expansion sans précédent du secteur. Selon CB Insights, il y a eu 221 nouvelles structures CVC, un chiffre en augmentation de 53% par rapport à 2020. Néanmoins, ce chiffre reste légèrement en deçà de l’augmentation en 2018, qui était de 259. 2021 reste tout de même la deuxième année en termes de créations depuis que nous avons des données sur les CVC. 


Une expansion rapide, ainsi que des acteurs diversifiés


Serge Tanjga, Senior Vice President chez MongoDB, remarque que, d’un point de vue technologique, les entreprises tech plus matures “mettent en place des équipes CVC car ils ont des capitaux en surplus à allouer, et parce qu'être un acteur VC aidera le positionnement de leur marque”, tandis que les entreprises tech plus jeunes “ ont tendance à lancer leur CVC pour attirer des startups qui puissent aider à aider à développer leurs produits, pour financer leurs clients existants ou supercharge des partenariats go-to-market”. Quand on analyse combien de CVCs sont mis en place, il est donc important de toujours se rappeler que ce secteur n’est pas un monolithe uniforme, mais au contraire ses acteurs ont une diversité d’objectifs. 


Il est difficile de déterminer quels types de CVC sont le plus représentés parmi le haut niveau de créations l’année dernière. Mais si on part du principe que la nouvelle “promotion” d’acteurs CVC est similaire à ses prédécesseurs, on peut prédire qu’un nombre important de fonds ont été lancés à la fois avec l’objectif “returns-first” et “strategy-first”. Si on s’interesse également aux montants investis par les CVC, on constate également une expansion constante ces dernières années, comme l’indique l’image ci-dessous, produite par CB Insights. 



Pour les startups, cela signifie que leurs options de financement sont non seulement plus larges, mais aussi que le segment “corporate” du marché est plus profond que jamais. Il est donc probable que les partenariats et investissements corporate-startup sont voués à continuer leur développement, et à concerner un segment d’entreprises de plus en plus large et varié.

Original Article:

The venture capital boom of 2021 was not built from merely traditional VC money. A host of other capital sources played a role in the global trend, from new methods of disbursing angel and seed capital to crossover funds pouring into late-stage startups. And amid all the noise, record-setting totals, and rapid-fire dealmaking, corporate venture investors were busy, investing gobs of parent-company cash into far-smaller concerns.

 

Corporate venture capital, or CVC for short, is the method by which wealthy businesses build their own investing arm. Traditionally, these efforts blend strategic goals (M&A, early access to technology, partnerships) and financial ones (returns). The exact mix varies by company and CVC effort, but it’s rare to find a corporate venture concern that has none of one or the other. This makes their investing an interesting blend of traditional venture and corporate opportunism.

CVCs were busy last year. New data from CB Insights makes it clear that 2021 was a colossal period for CVCs, an all-time record by some metrics and a near-record year by others. CVCs are in the news lately as well, thanks to MongoDB – a NoSQL company that went public in 2017 – putting together its own fund, an event that the technology world took note of. MongoDB joins recently public companies like Coinbase in employing corporate investor work before reaching mega-cap status. The trend goes further: We’ve even seen private companies launch their own CVCs, evidence at once of the lengthening period in which high-growth tech startups stay private and the sheer amount of capital available to pre-IPO companies.

 

Today, we’re exploring the data behind 2021’s CVC investing boom with commentary from Serge Tanjga, SVP Finance at MongoDB. Tomorrow, we’ll dive into the hows and whys of CVC in the current venture climate with commentary from a number of corporate investing players — and even one public company that is choosing to not build its own investing arm. Sounds good? Let’s get into the data.

 

How quickly is corporate venture capital investment accelerating?

There are two ways to track the growth of corporate venture capital: The pace at which new CVC concerns are set up, and the rate at which the larger CVC segment invests.

We’ll take them in order. It’s clear that more CVCs are being compiled in the current market than nearly ever before. Indeed, CB Insights data indicates that some 221 new CVCs were created in 2021, a huge 53% increase on 2020 data. However, the 2021 result was actually fractionally lower than the 259 built in 2018. That said, 2021 was the second-hottest year for which we have data when it came to new CVCs reaching the market.

 

Tanjga, discussing the CVC market from a technology perspective, said that more mature tech companies “tend to set up CVC arms because they have excess capital to deploy, or because being in the VC space will help with their brand positioning,” while younger technology companies “tend to start CVC efforts to attract startups to build on their product, to fund their existing customers or supercharge go-to-market partnerships.” So when we discuss just how many CVCs are being built, keep in mind that they are not a monolith when it comes to goals.

 

We can’t tease out a perfect split of CVC focus from the pace at which new funds were put to market last year. But if we presume that the new crop of corporate venture players is similar to those that came before it, it is safe to infer that a good number of returns-first and strategy-first CVCs were launched in 2021. For startups, that means that their set of capital funding options is not only broader than ever, but also that the corporate portion of the market is deeper than ever.

Why do we care?