The Founder’s Dilemma: Building with a Venture Studio vs. Going It Alone in the MENA Region

Across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), entrepreneurship is booming. Young innovators are transforming industries, governments are investing heavily in digital economies, and capital is increasingly flowing into startups. Yet for founders, one critical question remains:
Should I build my startup independently, or partner with a venture studio?

This choice, often called the founder’s dilemma, can define the trajectory of a startup. Both paths have the potential to lead to success, but they differ significantly in resources, control, and risk. As MENA’s innovation ecosystem matures, understanding these differences is more important than ever.

Understanding the Venture Studio Model

A venture studio is not just an investor; it’s a company that creates startups from scratch. Unlike venture capital firms that fund existing founders, studios generate business ideas internally, test them, and assemble teams to build them. 

They provide everything a startup needs in its early stages:

• Market research and ideation

• Product design and engineering

• Branding and go-to-market strategy

• Legal and financial setup

• Access to investors and partners

In return, venture studios typically retain a significant equity stake in the startup. For founders, joining a studio often means sharing ownership for shared success.

Going It Alone: The Independent Founder’s Journey

Building a startup independently is the traditional path, one that offers complete autonomy. Founders have full control over the vision, direction, and equity. However, this freedom comes with challenges, especially in MENA’s still-evolving startup ecosystem.

Independent founders often face:

• Limited access to capital and investors

• Gaps in technical or operational expertise

• Difficulty navigating local regulations and markets

• Longer timeframes to validate and scale an idea

While independence allows founders to move according to their instincts, it also exposes them to higher risks and slower progress,  especially without strong networks or experience.

The Venture Studio Advantage: Shared Strengths, Lower Risk

For many aspiring entrepreneurs, venture studios provide a compelling alternative to starting alone. They reduce uncertainty by combining capital, talent, and infrastructure within a single ecosystem.

Here’s how studios reshape the founder journey in MENA:

1. Access to Immediate Resources

Founders who join venture studios don’t start from zero. They inherit a support system that includes designers, developers, marketers, and financial experts. This enables them to transition from idea to launch in months rather than years.

2. Faster Validation and Market Entry

Studios rely on data-driven validation processes, testing product-market fit early and eliminating weak ideas quickly. In the MENA region, where consumer behavior varies significantly between markets such as the UAE, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, this disciplined approach is invaluable.

3. Reduced Financial Pressure

Most studios fund the initial stages of development, meaning founders can focus on execution rather than fundraising. This stability attracts skilled professionals who might otherwise hesitate to join early-stage ventures.

4. Mentorship and Strategic Guidance

Venture studios are built by experienced operators, entrepreneurs, investors, and corporate leaders who have scaled startups before. Their mentorship helps new founders avoid common pitfalls, navigate regulations, and build scalable models from day one.

The Trade-Off: Equity vs. Autonomy

The primary consideration for founders is ownership. Venture studios typically retain between 30% to 60% equity in the startups they help create. While this may seem high, it’s important to remember that the founder is gaining access to millions of dollars’ worth of expertise, networks, and infrastructure.

Independent founders keep all their equity, but they also bear all the risk. Without capital or guidance, many early-stage ideas fail before reaching market traction.

The key question becomes:

“Do I prefer to own 100% of a small idea, or 40% of a big one with higher chances of success?”

How the MENA Context Shapes the Choice

MENA’s entrepreneurial landscape is unique. The region combines strong government support with fast-evolving private capital, but challenges remain, including fragmented markets, regulatory complexity, and a shortage of experienced startup talent.

That’s why the venture studio model is gaining momentum. Studios such as Enhance Ventures, Astrolabs, and Modus Capital have proven that this model can bridge gaps in knowledge, funding, and speed.

At the same time, the independent route still holds strong appeal for experienced entrepreneurs who already have market insight, technical skills, and access to investors.

In short:

• First-time founders or those with limited networks often thrive in a venture studio environment.

• Seasoned entrepreneurs may prefer the independence and full ownership that comes with building solo.

Hybrid Paths: The Future of Founding in MENA

Interestingly, new hybrid models are emerging across MENA. Some studios allow founders to bring their own ideas and co-build them using the studio’s resources, while retaining more equity. Others act as accelerators with shared ownership and operational support.

This flexibility reflects the maturing of the region’s ecosystem, where collaboration is replacing competition as the key to innovation.

Final Thought: Choosing the Right Path

The founder’s dilemma is not about right or wrong; it’s about fit.
Building with a venture studio offers structure, speed, and reduced risk,  ideal for founders seeking support and guidance. Going it alone offers independence and complete control,  ideal for those ready to navigate uncertainty with confidence.

In the end, success in MENA’s startup landscape depends less on how you start, and more on how strategically you build, validate, and grow.

Whether you choose to collaborate with a venture studio or chart your own course, the region’s entrepreneurial future holds immense promise,  for those bold enough to take the first step.

De-risking Discovery: Why LPs Are Flocking to MENA’s Venture Studio Model

In recent years, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region has captured the attention of global investors. With record-breaking startup funding rounds, bold national innovation strategies, and an increasingly tech-savvy population, MENA is rapidly emerging as one of the world’s most promising frontiers for venture investment.

But while traditional venture capital (VC) continues to dominate headlines, a quieter revolution is unfolding, one that’s fundamentally changing how early-stage innovation is financed and built.

Limited Partners (LPs) — the institutional and private investors who fund venture capital firms,  are beginning to shift their attention to a new structure: the venture studio model.

Why? Because it offers something traditional VC often can’t: a systematic way to de-risk early-stage discovery while increasing the chances of creating successful, scalable startups.

The Problem with Traditional Venture Capital

Traditional venture capital thrives on risk, but that risk comes with inefficiencies. Across global markets, the average VC fund invests in 20–30 startups, expecting that only a handful will deliver strong returns. The rest either underperform or fail entirely.

This “spray and pray” model works in mature ecosystems like Silicon Valley, where the sheer density of experienced founders and operators increases the odds of success. But in emerging ecosystems like MENA, where entrepreneurial experience and deep operational talent are still developing, that level of risk can be harder to absorb.

For LPs, this means:

• Longer time horizons before exits or measurable returns.

• Higher failure rates among early-stage portfolio companies.

• visibility into how startups are actually built or supported post-investment.

Venture studios offer a compelling alternative: they build startups in-house, using shared resources, validated ideas, and repeatable systems. The result is a model where discovery, the riskiest stage of venture creation, is not left to chance, but managed like a disciplined process.

What Makes Venture Studios Different

A venture studio is not just a fund or an accelerator. It’s a startup factory, an operational platform that ideates, validates, and launches new ventures internally.

Instead of waiting for founders to approach with pitches, studios:

1. Generate ideas based on market gaps and data insights.

2. Test and validate those ideas through structured experimentation.

3. Assemble teams of founders and operators.

4. Provide capital, infrastructure, and mentorship to scale.

Because of this end-to-end involvement, studios can control quality, reduce risk, and accelerate growth far more efficiently than the traditional VC approach.

For LPs, that means better use of capital, shorter paths to traction, and a portfolio of startups with stronger operational DNA.

Why LPs Are Paying Attention

1. Lower Risk, Higher Control

In a typical VC setup, LPs rely heavily on fund managers to pick the right startups, and hope those founders can execute. In a studio model, the process is more structured.

Each new startup is born inside a tested operational framework, meaning it benefits from shared infrastructure, experienced leadership, and pre-validated business models.

This not only reduces risk but also gives LPs greater transparency into how value is being created. Studios produce measurable data on ideation success rates, time to product-market fit, and capital efficiency,  offering LPs a clearer picture of where their money is going.

2. Institutionalized Venture Building

Venture studios operate more like companies than investment funds. They have permanent teams of operators, strategists, designers, and engineers , all dedicated to turning ideas into sustainable businesses.

This “industrialization of entrepreneurship” is especially appealing to LPs seeking predictable performance.

Instead of betting on hundreds of untested founders, LPs invest in a repeatable venture production process, one capable of generating multiple high-quality startups over the fund’s lifecycle.

3. Portfolio Diversification by Design

Each venture studio typically builds multiple startups across various verticals, leveraging common infrastructure and learnings.

For LPs, this means diversification is built into the model. A single investment in one studio can expose them to 10–20 ventures, each with a lower cost of failure and faster validation cycles.

Moreover, many studios focus on sectors strategically aligned with MENA’s economic visions, such as fintech, healthtech, logistics, and sustainability,  creating alignment with national development goals and corporate partnerships.

4. Early Access and Value Creation

Because venture studios are involved from day zero, LPs effectively gain access to pre-seed and seed-stage value creation, long before traditional VC funds would typically invest.

In other words, LPs in studio models aren’t just financing growth,  they’re financing creation. This early involvement allows them to capture more upside from successful exits, while maintaining oversight over governance and capital deployment.

5. Alignment of Incentives

Perhaps most importantly, venture studios align incentives across all stakeholders — founders, operators, fund managers, and LPs.

Unlike accelerators, which profit mainly from program fees or short-term equity stakes, studios are deeply invested in long-term outcomes. Their teams hold equity in the startups they help build, ensuring that everyone’s success depends on sustainable execution, not short-term valuations.

For LPs, this alignment fosters confidence. When a studio team is building alongside its founders, the risk of mismanagement or overvaluation decreases dramatically.

The MENA Context: Perfect Conditions for Studio Success

MENA’s market dynamics make it a uniquely fertile ground for venture studios and their LP backers:

• Government-driven innovation agendas (e.g., Saudi Vision 2030, UAE’s Entrepreneurial Nation) create demand for structured startup creation.

• A surge of untapped sectors — from logistics to agritech,  provides abundant whitespace for venture discovery.

• Growing pools of regional capital are seeking diversification beyond real estate and oil-linked industries.

• Talent migration and repatriation are fueling a new generation of skilled founders and operators.

Together, these factors make the MENA venture studio model a strategic bridge between government-backed innovation goals, private sector growth, and LP capital seeking sustainable returns.

Case in Point: Studios as Investment Platforms

Forward-thinking studios like Modus Capital, Enhance Ventures, and Astrolabs are already proving this thesis. Their ability to repeatedly create investable, de-risked startups has attracted both regional sovereign funds and global institutional LPs.

Some have even structured hybrid models, blending venture building with fund management,to allow LPs to invest in both the studio itself and the portfolio ventures.

This model offers dual exposure: equity in the ventures plus returns from the studio’s operational growth, effectively giving LPs more ways to win.

Spotting Success: How MENA Venture Studios Identify and Validate Startup Ideas

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most dynamic frontiers for entrepreneurship. Over the past decade, governments, investors, and innovators have been working together to diversify economies, digitize industries, and empower a new generation of founders.

Amid this transformation, venture studios have emerged as a driving force. Unlike traditional venture capital firms that invest in existing startups, venture studios create startups from the ground up, developing ideas internally, testing them rigorously, and building teams around those that prove most promising.

But the real magic lies in how these studios identify and validate ideas with genuine potential. In a region as diverse and fast-changing as MENA, spotting the right opportunity requires a blend of creativity, data, and deep market understanding.

From Concept to Company: The Venture Studio Framework

The success of a venture studio depends on its ability to transform insights into investable businesses. This process follows a disciplined framework that moves from broad market exploration to focused validation and execution.

The four core stages are:

1. Opportunity Scanning

2. Idea Generation and Selection

3. Market Validation

4. Prototyping and Testing

Each stage ensures that only ideas with proven demand and scalable potential move forward.

1. Opportunity Scanning: Discovering the Gaps That Matter

MENA’s economies are evolving rapidly,  moving beyond oil dependency and embracing digital transformation. This shift is creating new gaps in critical sectors such as fintech, logistics, healthtech, agritech, and renewable energy.

Top venture studios begin by identifying these gaps. They analyze macroeconomic trends, policy shifts like Saudi Vision 2030 or the UAE’s Centennial 2071, and consumer behavior to uncover unmet needs.

For example:

• In markets with limited banking access, studios explore fintech solutions for mobile payments and microcredit.

• In countries facing food security challenges, they investigate agritech models that improve production and distribution.

This stage is not about chasing trends; it’s about understanding where innovation meets necessity.

2. Idea Generation: Turning Insights into Business Concepts

Once opportunity areas are defined, venture studios organize structured ideation sessions that bring together cross-functional teams, strategists, engineers, designers, and entrepreneurs.

Their goal is to translate real-world problems into business opportunities. To filter viable ideas, they ask:

• Is this a significant and scalable problem?

• Does it align with market realities and regulations?

• Can it expand across different MENA markets?

• What value proposition makes it stand out?

The outcome is a shortlist of potential ventures, each supported by data and a clear hypothesis of how the business will create impact and profit.

3. Market Validation: Testing Assumptions Before Building

Validation is the most crucial step, and it is where most traditional startups stumble. MENA venture studios take a scientific approach to ensure their ideas are backed by evidence, not optimism.

They test each concept through a mix of:

• Customer interviews and surveys to gauge real demand.

• Landing pages or social media campaigns to track interest and engagement.

• Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) or prototypes to test usability and pricing.

• Pilot partnerships with corporates, governments, or NGOs to prove feasibility.

This stage is fast-paced but data-driven. If the market signals are strong, the idea moves forward; if not, it is refined or discarded. The focus is on learning quickly and cheaply, turning insights into informed decisions.

4. Prototyping and Testing: Building with Precision

Once validation confirms a market fit, the studio’s operational team, including product designers, engineers, and growth specialists,  begins building a prototype.

Unlike independent startups that often struggle to find resources, venture studios already have internal teams and shared infrastructure. This enables rapid product development with high technical and creative quality.

The process emphasizes agility: building, testing, learning, and iterating until the product is ready for full launch. This disciplined experimentation allows studios to scale ventures faster and with lower risk.

Local Insight Meets Global Discipline

The MENA region’s diversity,  from the Gulf’s advanced economies to North Africa’s emerging markets, means that what succeeds in one country may not in another.

That’s why top venture studios combine global venture-building methods with local market intelligence. They rely on:

• Data analytics to identify patterns in consumer demand.

• Local partnerships to navigate regulation and distribution.

• Regional experts to ensure cultural alignment and trust.

This blend of data and context allows MENA studios to design ventures that are not only innovative but also grounded in reality.

Leaders in Venture Validation Across MENA

Several studios have become regional role models for their disciplined approach to identifying and validating ideas:

• Enhance Ventures (UAE): Specializes in digital platforms, focusing on robust market testing before scaling.

• Astrolabs (Saudi Arabia): Integrates venture building with ecosystem development and corporate innovation.

• Flat6Labs (Egypt and Bahrain): Leverages its founder network and accelerator experience to validate ideas rapidly.

• Nuwa Capital (UAE): Combines investment and operational expertise to ensure each venture aligns with long-term market trends.

These studios demonstrate that success in venture building is not about luck; it’s about structure, process, and precision.

Final Thought

The Art and Science of Spotting Success

The venture studio model is redefining how startups are built in MENA. By combining creativity with rigorous validation, studios ensure that every business they launch is founded on a solid evidence-based foundation, not assumptions.

In a region eager to diversify its economy and empower youth-led innovation, venture studios are doing more than just creating companies; they are fostering confidence in the entrepreneurial process itself.

By spotting success early and validating ideas systematically, MENA’s top venture studios are proving that innovation is not a gamble,  it’s a strategy.

Beyond Capital: The Operational Engine of MENA’s Top Venture Studios

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is rapidly emerging as one of the most exciting frontiers for innovation and entrepreneurship. In the past decade, the startup ecosystem has expanded at record speed, from fintech and e-commerce to healthtech and edtech. But behind this growth lies a new breed of organization quietly redefining how startups are born and scaled: venture studios.

While traditional venture capital firms focus primarily on funding startups, venture studios go beyond capital. They provide the operational muscle, strategic guidance, and hands-on support that early-stage founders desperately need. In essence, venture studios are not just investors — they are co-creators.

What Makes a Venture Studio Different

A venture studio (also known as a startup studio or company builder) doesn’t wait for external founders to pitch ideas. Instead, it generates startup ideas internally, validates them through market testing, and builds teams to execute those ideas. This model ensures that every startup launched from a studio is based on solid research, tested assumptions, and scalable business models.

Unlike accelerators or incubators, which provide short-term mentorship and funding, venture studios stay deeply involved in the startup’s journey, often from conception to Series A and beyond. The value they bring lies not only in money but also in expertise, infrastructure, and execution capability.

The Operational Engine: The True Power of Venture Studios

The real strength of a venture studio lies in its operational engine, a system of shared resources, specialized teams, and repeatable processes that allow multiple startups to be built efficiently at once.

Here’s how this engine works:

1. Idea Generation and Market Validation
   Studios continuously scan the market for pain points and emerging opportunities. Teams of analysts, strategists, and entrepreneurs brainstorm solutions, then test them through surveys, prototypes, or pilot programs. Only the strongest ideas move forward,  reducing the risk of failure early on.

2. Building Founding Teams
   Once an idea is validated, the studio recruits the right founders or co-founders to lead it. These are often experienced operators or young entrepreneurs with passion and domain expertise. The studio provides them with immediate access to design, tech, marketing, and legal support, allowing them to focus on building the product and scaling fast.

3. Shared Services and Infrastructure
   One of the biggest advantages of a studio model is efficiency. Instead of every startup hiring its own designer, accountant, or HR manager, the studio provides these as shared resources. This reduces costs and speeds up growth,  a crucial advantage in emerging markets like MENA.

4. Data-Driven Decision Making
   Venture studios rely heavily on data analytics to track performance, refine business models, and allocate resources effectively. This operational discipline ensures that each venture is built on measurable outcomes, not just intuition.

5. Capital Efficiency
   Because of their hands-on approach, studios can build startups with less capital but higher success rates. Their involvement in every operational detail , from product design to fundraising,  ensures each dollar spent delivers value.

How MENA’s Top Venture Studios Are Applying This Model

Across the region, leading venture studios are adapting this model to local realities, blending global best practices with MENA’s unique economic and cultural landscape.

Enhance Ventures (UAE)

Enhance Ventures focuses on creating digital platforms and consumer tech startups. Its operational engine emphasizes rapid prototyping and cross-market scalability. The studio’s team of experts handles everything from brand design to investor relations, enabling founders to concentrate on growth.

Astrolabs (Saudi Arabia)

Astrolabs combines venture building with ecosystem development. Beyond building startups, it trains entrepreneurs and helps corporates innovate. Its “operational engine” includes coworking spaces, startup bootcamps, and government partnerships, giving its portfolio companies a strong launchpad in the Saudi market.

Nuwa Capital (UAE)

Nuwa Capital integrates venture studio functions with investment capabilities. Its value-add goes beyond funding, providing portfolio companies with strategic marketing, product, and technology support through a hands-on operational team.

Flat6Labs (Egypt and Bahrain)

Originally an accelerator, Flat6Labs has evolved into a hybrid model that includes venture building. Its shared resources,  from mentorship to product development support,  have helped launch over 300 startups across MENA.

Why This Model Works So Well in MENA

The MENA region has unique challenges,  from fragmented markets to varying regulations and limited access to experienced founders. Venture studios help overcome these by centralizing expertise and de-risking entrepreneurship.

Here’s why the model fits perfectly:

• Talent Gaps: Studios provide access to skilled teams in tech, marketing, and finance, areas where local talent may still be developing.

• Early-Stage Funding Scarcity: Studios invest operational support and seed capital directly, reducing dependence on external investors in the earliest stages.

• Local Insights: Many MENA studios are founded by locals who deeply understand market needs, giving their startups a competitive edge.

• Scalability: Studios design ventures to expand across multiple countries in the region, not just one national market.

Beyond Capital: Building Sustainable Value

The true value of MENA’s venture studios is not in the money they invest,  it’s in the systems they build. By offering structured support, access to networks, and shared knowledge, they are building founder factories, environments where startups can thrive faster and smarter.

As these studios continue to mature, they will become pillars of the regional economy, not just producing successful companies, but also nurturing future founders, investors, and operators who will fuel the next wave of innovation.

Final Thought

Venture capital alone cannot build an ecosystem, but venture studios can. They combine capital, creativity, and capability in one powerful model. In MENA, where entrepreneurship is still finding its footing, this approach offers the most practical path to sustainable startup success.

By going beyond capital and investing deeply in operations, execution, and people, MENA’s top venture studios are not just funding the future, they’re building it.

How Venture Studios are Building the Future of MENA's Economy

In recent years, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region has experienced a remarkable transformation in its entrepreneurial landscape. What was once seen as a market dependent on oil and traditional industries is now becoming a dynamic hub for startups, digital innovation, and technological advancement. At the heart of this shift lies a powerful new model for building companies, the venture studio.

What Is a Venture Studio?

A venture studio (also known as a startup studio, venture builder, or company builder) is an organization that creates and launches startups from scratch. Unlike accelerators or incubators, which support existing startups, venture studios develop ideas internally, test them, and then build teams around the most promising ones. They provide operational support, funding, shared resources, and experienced leadership to help new ventures scale faster.

Essentially, venture studios act as co-founders, providing not only capital but also strategy, technology, design, marketing, and legal expertise. This integrated approach reduces startup failure rates and creates a pipeline of well-tested, scalable businesses.

The Rise of Venture Studios in MENA

Over the past five years, MENA has witnessed a growing wave of venture studios emerging in key markets like the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Bahrain. Governments and investors have realized that the traditional venture capital model, though effective, is not enough to build sustainable ecosystems in markets that are still developing their entrepreneurial infrastructure.

Venture studios bridge this gap by turning local challenges into scalable business opportunities. They combine local market knowledge with global startup-building practices, helping founders focus on solving real regional problems, from financial inclusion and logistics to climate resilience and education technology.

Why the Venture Studio Model Fits the MENA Context

1. Access to Talent and Resources
   Many early-stage founders in MENA face gaps in technical or business expertise. Venture studios fill this void by providing access to multidisciplinary teams of experts, from developers to growth strategists,  allowing founders to focus on execution rather than searching for co-founders or funding.

2. Lower Failure Rate
   Globally, over 90% of startups fail. Venture studios significantly reduce this risk by validating ideas early, testing prototypes, and ensuring product–market fit before scaling. This structured approach has proven particularly effective in emerging ecosystems where access to venture capital is still growing.

3. Alignment with Vision 2030 Goals
   In Saudi Arabia and across the Gulf, national agendas like Vision 2030 aim to diversify economies, empower youth, and foster innovation. Venture studios directly contribute to these goals by creating jobs, attracting foreign investment, and building local tech capacity.

4. Attracting Global Investors
   International venture funds increasingly see MENA as a high-potential region. Studios serve as reliable entry points for investors because they provide deal flow from professionally built, well-governed startups with lower risk and higher scalability.

Leading Venture Studios in the Region

Several notable venture studios are shaping the MENA startup ecosystem:

• Enhance Ventures (UAE): Focused on digital platforms and marketplaces.

• VentureSouq (Saudi Arabia & UAE: Combines a hybrid model of studio and venture fund.

• Nuwa Capital (UAE): Supports early-stage tech ventures through operational expertise.

• Astrolabs (KSA): Blends entrepreneurship education, co-building, and corporate innovation.

• TechGenies and Flat6Labs (Egypt): Create and scale startups across Africa and MENA.

These studios are not only generating successful startups but also training a new generation of founders capable of scaling businesses across borders.

Challenges on the Horizon

Despite the momentum, venture studios in MENA face some challenges:

• Regulatory Complexity: Different legal frameworks across MENA countries can slow down company registration and investment processes.

• Talent Retention: Competition for skilled tech talent remains high, especially in emerging markets.

• Funding Gaps: Early-stage funding is improving but still limited compared to Western ecosystems.

However, many of these barriers are being addressed through new innovation-friendly policies, startup-friendly visa programs, and cross-border partnerships.

The Road Ahead

The next decade promises exponential growth for venture studios in MENA. As governments continue to invest in digital infrastructure and entrepreneurship programs, venture studios will play a pivotal role in transforming economies from oil-driven to innovation-driven.

By systematically building startups that tackle real social and economic challenges, from fintech and healthtech to agrotech and cleantech,  venture studios are laying the foundation for a more resilient, diversified, and knowledge-based economy.

Final Thought

Venture studios represent more than just a trend; they are the blueprint for MENA’s innovation future. They combine creativity, technology, and investment discipline to turn bold ideas into sustainable companies. As the region embraces this model, we can expect to see not only more unicorns but also a deeper culture of entrepreneurship that will shape the MENA economy for generations to come.

Le rôle des Venture Studios dans la création de licornes

L’écosystème mondial de l’innovation est en pleine mutation. Alors que les cycles de financement se resserrent et que les investisseurs deviennent plus sélectifs, une nouvelle approche de la création d’entreprises attire l’attention : les Venture Studios. Ces structures hybrides, à la fois créatrices, investisseurs et partenaires opérationnels, ne se contentent pas de lancer des startups. Leur ambition est plus grande : construire, méthodiquement, les futures licornes.

Le mot « licorne » reste chargé de symboles dans le monde des affaires. Une valorisation d’un milliard de dollars est autant une reconnaissance qu’un passage à une autre dimension. Mais atteindre ce stade est rare : moins de 1 % des startups y parviennent. Alors, pourquoi les Venture Studios semblent-ils mieux armés pour en produire davantage ?

Les chiffres parlent d’eux-mêmes

Ces dernières années, les données commencent à confirmer ce que beaucoup pressentaient. Selon un rapport du Global Startup Studio Network (GSSN), près de 84 % des startups issues de studios parviennent à lever un premier tour de table, contre environ 42 % pour les startups traditionnelles. Plus frappant encore, 72 % de ces jeunes pousses atteignent une série A, un seuil crucial vers l’hypercroissance.

Ces statistiques ne sont pas abstraites. Elles montrent que les Venture Studios offrent un terrain plus fertile pour transformer une idée en entreprise durable, et, par extension, pour maximiser les chances d’atteindre le statut de licorne.

Des licornes construites plutôt que découvertes

Historiquement, la plupart des licornes sont nées de la persévérance d’un ou deux fondateurs visionnaires, souvent isolés au départ. Mais cette trajectoire romantique, presque mythique, n’est pas la seule voie. Les Venture Studios industrialisent le processus entrepreneurial. Ils identifient des tendances de marché, valident des hypothèses rapidement, puis mobilisent des équipes et des financements pour exécuter.

L’exemple le plus éclatant est celui de Flagship Pioneering, le studio basé à Boston qui a donné naissance à Moderna. Lorsque la biotech a révolutionné la vaccination avec son vaccin à ARN messager, ce n’était pas le fruit du hasard. Flagship avait travaillé méthodiquement sur la technologie pendant des années, en lançant plusieurs projets parallèles avant de converger vers ce qui allait devenir une licorne mondiale.

En Europe, Hexa (anciennement eFounders) illustre également ce modèle. Depuis sa création, ce studio parisien a donné naissance à plus de 40 startups dans le SaaS, dont plusieurs dépassent déjà le milliard de dollars en valorisation, comme Front ou Aircall. Leur secret : un processus répétable qui combine créativité, capital et expertise opérationnelle dès le jour zéro.

Un modèle qui réduit les risques

Créer une startup, c’est souvent faire face à des probabilités écrasantes d’échec. On estime que près de 90 % des jeunes entreprises disparaissent dans les cinq premières années. Les Venture Studios changent cette équation en réduisant les incertitudes à chaque étape.

Dès la phase d’idéation, ils testent plusieurs hypothèses en parallèle, ce qui augmente les chances de tomber sur une opportunité massive. Ensuite, ils mobilisent des équipes pluridisciplinaires déjà en place, évitant à la startup de perdre du temps dans la recherche de compétences rares. Enfin, ils apportent un financement initial qui donne aux fondateurs la liberté de se concentrer sur le produit et le marché, plutôt que sur la recherche permanente de capitaux.

Ce processus structuré explique pourquoi les startups issues de studios ont un taux de survie plus élevé et, surtout, une trajectoire de croissance plus rapide. Moins de temps perdu, moins d’erreurs fatales, plus de chances d’atteindre le milliard.

L’avantage de la vitesse

Dans un monde où les marchés évoluent vite, la rapidité est une arme. Les Venture Studios, grâce à leurs ressources partagées et à leur expérience accumulée, permettent de passer de l’idée au produit en quelques mois, là où une startup traditionnelle peut mettre un an ou plus.

Cette vitesse est décisive dans la course aux licornes. Prenons l’exemple de Rocket Internet, un des pionniers européens du Venture Building. Bien que controversé, ce studio allemand a démontré l’importance de l’exécution rapide en répliquant des modèles à succès et en les propulsant sur de nouveaux marchés avant la concurrence. Plusieurs de ses créations, comme Zalando ou Lazada, ont atteint des valorisations de licorne grâce à cette obsession de la vitesse et de l’expansion.

L’effet portefeuille

Un autre facteur qui explique le rôle des Venture Studios dans la création de licornes est leur logique de portefeuille. Là où un fondateur indépendant joue sa carrière entière sur une seule idée, un studio multiplie les paris.

Cette diversification n’est pas seulement financière, elle est aussi méthodologique. Les leçons tirées d’un projet avorté servent immédiatement aux suivants. Chaque échec devient une ressource, chaque succès une preuve que le modèle fonctionne.

En multipliant les lancements, les studios augmentent statistiquement leurs chances de voir émerger des entreprises capables d’atteindre le milliard. Et lorsqu’une de leurs startups décolle, le studio bénéficie directement de cette valorisation grâce à sa part significative au capital.

Les investisseurs ne s’y trompent pas

Les chiffres et les cas d’étude ont convaincu les investisseurs institutionnels de plus en plus frileux. Pour eux, les Venture Studios représentent une forme d’investissement plus disciplinée, où le risque est réduit et le potentiel de rendement amplifié.

Un rapport de McKinsey souligne que les startups issues de studios génèrent en moyenne douze fois plus de revenus après cinq ans que celles issues de parcours traditionnels. Cet écart colossal explique pourquoi de grands fonds de capital-risque commencent à s’associer avec des studios plutôt que de les considérer comme des concurrents.

Vers une nouvelle génération de licornes

Si les licornes d’hier ont souvent été façonnées par des fondateurs visionnaires et charismatiques, celles de demain pourraient bien être construites au sein de Venture Studios. Non pas parce que la créativité individuelle disparaît, mais parce que l’innovation devient trop complexe et trop rapide pour être laissée au hasard.

Les Venture Studios offrent une plateforme où l’intuition des fondateurs rencontre la rigueur des processus, où la passion entrepreneuriale se nourrit de capital, de talents et de méthodologies éprouvées. Dans cet environnement, les idées les plus prometteuses ont plus de chances de se transformer en géants mondiaux.

Le prochain chapitre

Le rôle des Venture Studios dans la création de licornes est déjà tangible, et il ne fera que croître. À mesure que les cycles de financement se contractent et que les marchés deviennent plus exigeants, les investisseurs chercheront des modèles capables de produire des entreprises solides, rapidement et à grande échelle. Les studios, avec leur approche structurée et leur logique industrielle, sont parfaitement positionnés pour répondre à cette demande.

Dans la prochaine décennie, nous verrons sans doute une distinction claire entre deux types de licornes : celles nées du hasard et celles construites par design. Et les Venture Studios, loin d’être de simples laboratoires d’idées, deviendront les architectes d’une nouvelle génération d’entreprises mondiales.

Why Venture Studios Are Attracting More Investors in 2025

Investors used to bet on founders’ ideas. But in 2025, many are shifting strategy: they’re investing in venture studios - organizations that build companies in-house, from problem-identification to founding teams to operational muscle. In a world where uncertainty rules, venture studios offer not just upside, but a clearer path through risk.

Here’s how venture studios are drawing in more investor interest this year, grounded in data and real examples.

Momentum You Can Measure

The interest in venture studios isn’t just hype. According to the Global Startup Studio Network (GSSN), startups born inside studios have about 30% higher success rates than those founded traditionally. From idea to Series A, the timelines are dramatically compressed: studio-born ventures take around 25.2 months to reach Series A, while conventional startups take about 56 months.

Seed funding is far more accessible through studios: approximately 84% of studio-born companies raise a seed round, compared to much lower rates for startups outside that model. And of those, 72% go on to secure Series A funding. By contrast, traditional startup paths hover around 42% for making it to Series A.

Hexa’s Low Failure Rate & Practical Startup Support

Hexa, a Paris-based venture studio, is a live example of why investors are paying attention. Hexa typically launches four to five startups per year. For each project, they invest roughly €800,000 in the early stages - this covers recruiting a co-founder team (CEO + CTO generally), putting together a small team of 10-15 employees, and building the first version of the product.

What’s notable is Hexa’s failure rate: around 6%. That is, only about 6% of its studio projects fail outright. The rest either continue to operate or move toward exit. That is well below the often-cited norm for startup survival (many startups fail at higher rates, often estimated at 10-20% within a few years).

Also, Hexa takes about 30% equity in each of its projects, giving the studio skin in the game. Once a startup spins out of Hexa (usually after ~18 months), it moves toward independent growth and subsequent investor rounds.

What Makes Studios Attractive to Investors

The numbers and case studies point toward several intertwined reasons why studios are drawing interest.

First, studios help de-risk early stages. Because studios run internal validations - market research, prototyping, testing - they reduce the chance of launching a product nobody wants. Investors often cite this validation as a major benefit.

Second, the talent risk is lowered. Studios like Hexa recruit leadership teams (CEO, CTO) early. They build supportive infrastructure (legal, design, accounting). Founders don’t have to bootstrap every role or function themselves. That matters: many startups fail not because the idea is weak, but because execution or team infrastructure is weak.

Third, studios tend to retain larger equity stakes, which means when success comes, returns are amplified. That alignment of incentives - studio, founders, investors - is powerful.

Fourth, studies like those from GSSN show the IRR (internal rate of return) for studio-born companies tends to be far higher - around 53% - than for conventional startups (which may average ~21-22%).

Examples Beyond Hexa

Atomic (San Francisco) is another studio that’s attracted heavy investor attention. Jack Abraham, its founder, once described Atomic’s approach as ideation + prototype + validation + funding - all internal. In 2021, Atomic raised US$260 million for its fund that builds startups. The fact that institutional or large investors are willing to commit this kind of capital to a studio model suggests confidence: they believe studio-built companies are more stable bets.

Other studios - Flagship Pioneering for biotech (Moderna is one of its signature spin-outs), Science Inc., eFounders - also serve as proof points. These studios have repeatedly launched companies that reach very high valuations or perform well in exits, not simply small wins. The common thread: strong domain knowledge, founder support, resource pooling, and long-term alignment.

Funding Realities & What Investors Want to See

Even as venture studios rise, investors are getting more selective about which ones they back. They look for studios that:

• Have a clear thesis and focus (industry, technology, geography).

• Demonstrate rigorous idea validation before spinning out.

• Maintain support beyond just the founding moment (infrastructure, mentoring, follow-on capital).

• Show evidence of past success - low failure rates, exits or scaling companies, good IRR etc.

Investors are also sensitive to the capital cost of running a studio (staff, infrastructure) and how that overhead is balanced by returns from successful spin-outs.

Why 2025 Seems Pivotal

Several market shifts make 2025 a turning point for studios. The venture market is less forgiving of inefficiency. Valuations are more conservative. Founders are more cautious, but also more collaborative. Studios look like a model that absorbs these pressures: faster path to funding, shared overheads, stronger operational support.

LPs (limited partners) are increasingly interested in not just what is being built, but how. If you’re going to place a large bet, you prefer predictability, lower risk, and a model that gives you more influence over the conditions that matter - team strength, product-market fit, execution discipline. Studios deliver on many of those.

Hexa’s recent financing is also a signal. In March 2025, Hexa closed a €29 million financing agreement structured as a revolving credit facility, aimed at ensuring regular liquidity to support its expansion - launching more startups, growing internal team, building long-term capacity. That kind of financial backing from banks shows institutional confidence in the model.

Looking Ahead: The Studio Model’s Growing Role

If the trends hold, studios will move from being exciting alternative models to being core infrastructure in many ecosystems. We may see generalist VCs building studio arms, governments sponsoring studio hubs, more founders choosing to launch inside studios rather than from zero alone.

For investors, this means studio portfolios will feature more predictable outcomes, stronger early metrics, and potentially higher returns per dollar invested. For founders, it means less of the chaos of starting with nothing, and more of building with safety nets - expertise, funding, structure - while remaining creative and ambitious.

The Next Chapter

Venture studios are not just catching eyes - they’re delivering. In 2025, when investors evaluate risk more carefully, the studio model often wins: it compresses timelines, reduces failure risk, aligns incentives, and produces meaningful exits.

For those watching capital flows, this shift matters: the studios that perfect this model - balancing discipline with innovation - will likely be among the defining organizations in the startup ecosystems of the next decade.

The Rise of Thematic Venture Capital Funds: Climate, Deep Tech, and Impact

Venture capital is changing shape. For decades, generalist funds dominated the landscape, chasing outsized returns across consumer, fintech, and SaaS. But as the market adjusts after pandemic highs, a new type of investor is stepping into the spotlight: thematic venture capital funds. These funds concentrate on specific areas like climate, deep tech, and impact. They are not merely chasing a trend - they are reshaping how capital meets purpose, with measurable results that suggest they are here to stay.

A Market Holding Its Ground

The last few years have been turbulent for venture markets globally. Deal volume is down, valuations have corrected, and late-stage funding has become scarcer. Yet within this volatility, thematic funds have shown remarkable resilience.

PwC’s State of Climate Tech 2023 report found that while overall VC and private equity investment fell by nearly half between 2022 and 2023, climate-tech investment dropped by a smaller margin - about 40%. That still amounted to roughly $32 billion globally in 2023, and since 2020, cumulative climate investment has surpassed $140 billion across 4,000 deals. According to Silicon Valley Bank’s Future of Climate Tech report, U.S. clean energy and power companies alone attracted $7.6 billion in VC funding in 2024, a 15% increase year-over-year, with more than three-quarters of deals at seed and Series A stage.

These figures show that while venture capital has cooled broadly, investors continue to channel capital into funds aligned with structural shifts like the energy transition, technological sovereignty, and social resilience.

Climate Funds: From Metrics to Unicorns

Climate tech is the clearest example of this thematic resilience, and its story is increasingly supported by data. World Fund, a European climate VC, analyzed more than 150 climate-tech unicorns created between 2020 and 2024 in Europe and the U.S. Their research revealed that over 60% of these unicorns met their “Climate Performance Potential” criteria, meaning their technologies could deliver significant emissions reductions. By contrast, only a small minority of startups in general deal flow met this threshold. Even more telling, over 80% of climate unicorns that went bankrupt had failed to meet those impact criteria.

The implication is striking: measuring real climate performance is not just an ethical filter, but a predictor of financial resilience. In other words, impact is becoming a risk-management tool.

One case that illustrates this dynamic is Berlin-based Enpal, Europe’s fastest-growing solar company, which became a unicorn in 2021. By combining a subscription model with household solar installation, Enpal has raised more than €1.6 billion in financing. Its climate impact is measurable in the tons of CO₂ avoided each year, and its financial backing is a testament to how climate metrics can underpin durable business models.

Deep Tech and the Long View

eyond climate, deep-tech thematic funds are also gaining ground. These funds focus on frontier innovations - quantum computing, semiconductors, space, and advanced materials - that require longer time horizons and highly specialized knowledge. Historically, such ventures have been considered too capital-intensive for most generalist VCs. But governments and sovereign wealth funds are increasingly backing deep-tech funds, recognizing that technologies of this nature are critical for economic competitiveness and security.

In Europe, for instance, funds like European Innovation Council Fund and Future Ventures have stepped in to bridge the financing gap for deep-tech startups. A case in point is PsiQuantum, a U.S.-U.K. company working on photonic quantum computing, which has raised more than $600 million from backers including BlackRock and Microsoft’s venture arm. For investors, the appeal lies in both the defensibility of the science and the long-term potential to dominate trillion-dollar markets.

Impact as Risk Mitigation

Impact-focused thematic funds are no longer sidelined as philanthropic capital. Instead, they are building track records of resilience by combining rigorous impact metrics with disciplined financial frameworks. Large LPs such as pension funds and endowments are under pressure to align with net-zero goals or the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and this capital demand is flowing into dedicated impact funds.

For example, BlueOrchard, one of the world’s oldest impact investment firms, has mobilized more than $10 billion across 100 countries, targeting both financial inclusion and climate resilience. Similarly, Leapfrog Investments, an emerging-markets impact investor, has consistently delivered market-rate returns while reaching over 400 million people with essential services. The data suggests that aligning with social and environmental goals does not preclude strong returns - if anything, it de-risks them.

Policy and Capital Efficiency

A key driver of thematic funds’ rise is regulatory support. In the U.S., the Inflation Reduction Act has created clear incentives for investment in clean energy and electrification, while the EU’s Green Deal has set ambitious targets for decarbonization. These policy frameworks create predictable demand and lower the risk of market adoption for startups.

At the same time, thematic funds are embracing capital efficiency in ways that generalist investors often overlook. Early-stage climate deals are smaller and more disciplined than the frothy rounds of 2021. Founders are learning to do more with less, and thematic funds, with their sector expertise, can provide not only capital but also strategic partnerships and customer access

Global Case Examples

Thematic investing is no longer confined to Silicon Valley or Berlin. In late 2023, Climactic, a new U.S. seed-stage climate VC, closed a $65 million inaugural fund led by seasoned founders, signaling confidence in early-stage climate investing despite a tougher funding environment.

In Europe, 2023 saw climate-tech investment surge to a record quarter in Q3, with $8.8 billion invested, according to Dealroom. Meanwhile, in MENA, Flat6Labs has emerged as one of the most active climate-tech investors, supporting startups in sustainable agriculture, energy, and water. These regional examples underscore the global nature of the thematic shift.

The Next Chapter

Thematic funds are proving that specialization is not just a marketing angle - it is a structural advantage. By focusing on climate, deep tech, and impact, these investors are aligning with megatrends that will define the next several decades. They are demonstrating that measuring emissions avoided, funding quantum breakthroughs, or scaling essential services in emerging markets can all be pathways to competitive returns.

The rise of thematic venture capital is a reminder that markets evolve with the world’s biggest challenges. For investors, the lesson is clear: purpose and performance are no longer at odds. The funds that marry domain expertise with disciplined execution will not only survive the current venture downturn, they will likely define the next era of growth.

Comment fonctionne le modèle économique d’un Venture Studio ?

À première vue, un Venture Studio peut sembler mystérieux. Ce n’est ni tout à fait un incubateur, ni un accélérateur, ni un fonds d’investissement classique. Pourtant, il combine un peu de chacun de ces rôles, tout en ajoutant quelque chose de plus fondamental : il construit ses propres startups de l’intérieur. Alors, comment fonctionne le modèle économique de ces structures qui attirent de plus en plus d’investisseurs et de fondateurs à travers le monde ?

Pour le comprendre, il faut revenir à l’essence même du Venture Studio : sa mission est de transformer des idées en entreprises viables, en assumant une partie des risques initiaux et en mutualisant les ressources nécessaires au lancement. Mais cette promesse doit reposer sur un modèle économique robuste.

L’investissement initial : le moteur du studio

Contrairement à un fonds de capital-risque traditionnel, qui attend qu’une startup existe avant d’y investir, un Venture Studio prend l’initiative. Il commence par financer la phase zéro : la recherche d’idées, la validation des problèmes de marché, la création des premiers prototypes.

Cet investissement initial provient généralement du studio lui-même, grâce à son propre fonds ou à des partenaires financiers. Par exemple, le Venture Studio parisien Hexa (anciennementeFounders) injecte environ 800 000 € dans chaque projet dès la phase initiale. Ce capital sert à recruter une équipe fondatrice, développer un MVP (produit minimum viable) et valider les premiers retours utilisateurs. En d’autres termes, le studio prend à sa charge une étape que la plupart des startups doivent assumer seules, souvent avec des moyens limités.

Le partage d’équité : un alignement d’intérêts

L’une des spécificités du modèle économique des Venture Studios est le partage d’équité. Puisque le studio assume le risque financier et opérationnel dès le départ, il reçoit une part importante du capital de la startup en échange.

Chez Hexa, par exemple, le studio conserve environ 30 % de l’équité lorsque la startup est « spin-offée », c’est-à-dire qu’elle prend son envol comme entité indépendante. Cette part peut varier selon les studios, certains allant de 20 % à 50 % selon la taille de l’investissement initial et le niveau de ressources mises à disposition.

Ce mécanisme aligne les intérêts : le studio, les fondateurs et les investisseurs ultérieurs ont tous intérêt à ce que l’entreprise grandisse et réussisse.

Des revenus différés mais potentiellement massifs

Le modèle économique d’un Venture Studio n’est pas conçu pour générer des revenus immédiats. Contrairement à une agence de conseil qui facture ses services ou à un incubateur qui demande des frais d’entrée, un studio mise sur le long terme.

Ses revenus viennent principalement de deux sources :

1. Les exits (revente d’actions lors d’acquisitions ou d’introductions en bourse).

2. La valorisation croissante de son portefeuille à mesure que ses startups lèvent des fonds et se développent.

C’est un pari patient, mais qui peut rapporter gros. L’exemple le plus emblématique reste celui de Flagship Pioneering, un Venture Builder basé à Boston, qui a contribué à la création de Moderna. Lorsque la biotech est entrée en bourse en 2018, la valorisation a explosé, générant un retour colossal pour Flagship.

Le coût de fonctionnement : une machine bien huilée

Bien sûr, maintenir un Venture Studio implique des coûts élevés. Ces structures emploient souvent des dizaines de personnes en interne: designers, développeurs, experts en marketing, recruteurs, juristes. Ce sont eux qui fournissent les services mutualisés aux startups en construction.

Ces coûts sont couverts par le fonds du studio, parfois complété par des financements externes. En mars 2025, Hexa a ainsi levé 29 millions d’euros via un financement bancaire structuré en crédit revolving, destiné à soutenir ses activités de création et à garantir une liquidité régulière. Ce type de financement illustre bien que les studios fonctionnent comme de véritables entreprises, avec une gestion de trésorerie et une stratégie financière sophistiquées.

Une logique de portefeuille

Un Venture Studio ne mise pas sur une seule idée, mais sur un portefeuille de startups. Chaque année, il peut en lancer plusieurs, avec l’idée que toutes ne réussiront pas. Mais si une ou deux deviennent des scale-ups internationales, elles compenseront largement les échecs éventuels.

C’est ici que le modèle économique prend tout son sens : il repose sur la diversification et sur un taux de réussite supérieur à la moyenne. Selon le Global Startup Studio Network, environ 84 % des startups issues de studios réussissent à lever un seed round, et 72 % atteignent la Série A, contre environ 42 % pour les startups traditionnelles. Ces chiffres montrent que le rendement d’un portefeuille issu d’un Venture Studio est statistiquement plus élevé et plus stable.

L’intérêt croissant des investisseurs

De plus en plus de fonds traditionnels et d’investisseurs institutionnels s’intéressent aux Venture Studios. Pour eux, le modèle présente un double avantage :

• Une réduction du risque grâce à la validation précoce des projets.

• Une meilleure rentabilité potentielle grâce à la part significative du capital détenue par le studio.

Un rapport de McKinsey souligne d’ailleurs que les startups issues de Venture Builders expérimentés génèrent en moyenne 12 fois plus de revenus au bout de cinq ans que celles lancées dans un cadre classique.

Vers une industrialisation de l’innovation

En observant le modèle économique des Venture Studios, on comprend qu’il ne s’agit pas seulement d’un mode de financement alternatif. C’est une véritable industrialisation de l’entrepreneuriat. Là où les startups classiques reposent sur l’intuition d’un fondateur isolé, le Venture Studio systématise la recherche d’idées, leur validation et leur exécution.

Cette rigueur explique pourquoi tant d’investisseurs voient dans les studios un modèle du futur : ils transforment un pari incertain en une stratégie d’innovation plus prévisible.

Le prochain chapitre

Le modèle économique d’un Venture Studio est donc un pari patient : investir tôt, assumer les coûts de construction, prendre une part du capital et attendre que les pépites émergent. Cela demande des moyens, de la discipline et une vision à long terme.

Mais les chiffres parlent d’eux-mêmes : les studios produisent des startups plus solides, plus rapides à croître, et avec un risque réduit pour les investisseurs. Dans le prochain cycle d’innovation, ce modèle ne sera plus périphérique : il deviendra une infrastructure centrale de la création d’entreprises.

En fin de compte, un Venture Studio, ce n’est pas seulement une usine à startups. C’est un moteur économique où chaque idée devient une opportunité, chaque risque une expérience, et chaque succès une preuve que l’innovation peut être à la fois créative et méthodique.

Singapore’s Role in Shaping the Next Wave of DeepTech through Venture Building

DeepTech refers to technologies rooted in scientific discoveries and engineering breakthroughs and it is increasingly seen as the foundation for solving humanity’s toughest problems. From climate resilience and quantum computing to advanced healthcare and space exploration, the promise of DeepTech extends far beyond incremental innovation. But building DeepTech startups is notoriously hard: they require long development cycles, heavy capital investment, and multidisciplinary expertise.

This is where Singapore is quietly taking center stage. Over the last decade, the city-state has positioned itself as one of Asia’s most compelling hubs for DeepTech innovation, not through chance but through a deliberate embrace of venture building. By pairing research talent with structured startup creation, Singapore is charting a path that could make it a global leader in translating science into scalable businesses.

The DeepTech Imperative

DeepTech is not just hype. According to Boston Consulting Group, DeepTech startups globally attracted more than US$60 billion in funding in 2023, double the levels seen in 2016. Yet the barriers to entry remain high. Unlike software startups, where a minimum viable product can be built in weeks, DeepTech ventures often require years of research before commercial viability.

Singapore has recognized both the challenge and the opportunity. With limited natural resources, the country has long invested in knowledge as its most strategic asset. Today, that strategy is paying off as its universities and research institutions - such as the National University of Singapore (NUS) and A-STAR - are increasingly integrated into venture-building pipelines.

A Government-Backed Ecosystem

The Singapore government has been one of the most active global backers of DeepTech venture building. Through initiatives like the SGInnovate Deep Tech Nexus Strategy, launched in 2017, the country committed more than US$150 million to support the translation of science into companies. SGInnovate itself has directly invested in over 100 DeepTech startups spanning fields like autonomous robotics, medtech, and agritech.

This model is designed not just to fund startups but to systematically derisk them. By offering labs, pilot facilities, and structured venture building programs, Singapore reduces the “valley of death” between academic research and commercial application.

Case Study: A-STAR Spinouts

One of the best examples of Singapore’s DeepTech venture building comes from A-STAR, the Agency for Science, Technology and Research. Over the past five years, A-STAR has spun out dozens of startups in biotech, advanced materials, and AI. Companies like Nanoveu, which develops nanotechnology-based films for optics and antiviral protection, have scaled regionally thanks to early support from A-STAR’s venture co-creation efforts.

Another case is RWDC Industries, a biodegradable plastics startup that originated in Singapore and has since raised more than US$135 million in growth funding. RWDC’s success underscores how research-driven ventures can become globally relevant with the right support structure.

Temasek and the Long-Term View

DeepTech requires patient capital, and few institutions embody patience better than Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek. Through its venture-building arm Xora Innovation, Temasek partners with scientists and entrepreneurs at the very earliest stages, often before a commercial application is fully proven.

This long-term approach is critical. Traditional VCs often shy away from DeepTech because of long timelines, but venture studios like Xora de-risk the process by building operational capacity around founders. This allows breakthroughs in quantum computing or synthetic biology to be pursued without the pressure of unrealistic short-term returns.

Singapore as Asia’s Testbed

Another advantage lies in Singapore’s role as a testbed for emerging technologies. With its compact size, advanced infrastructure, and supportive regulators, the city-state often serves as a “living laboratory” for pilots.

For example, autonomous vehicle trials, drone delivery pilots, and next-gen biotech therapies have all been deployed in Singapore earlier than in most regional markets. This testbed status makes the country an attractive base for DeepTech venture builders: startups can validate complex technologies locally before scaling across Asia’s 650 million-strong Southeast Asian market.

Talent at the Core

DeepTech thrives on talent density, and Singapore has invested heavily in building a global research workforce. The country attracts scientists and engineers through initiatives like the Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE) 2025 Plan, which allocated US$25 billion to science and innovation over five years.

What sets Singapore apart is how this talent is integrated into venture building. Instead of leaving researchers isolated in academia, programs connect them with entrepreneurs, operators, and investors who can help translate breakthroughs into market-ready companies. This culture of collaboration is one reason why Singapore consistently ranks among the top 10 in the Global Innovation Index.

Looking Forward: Singapore’s DeepTech Ambition

The next decade will determine whether Singapore’s DeepTech bets pay off. The foundations are strong: government backing, venture studios, sovereign wealth participation, and global research talent. The challenge lies in scaling beyond local pilots into global leaders.

If Singapore’s studios can consistently produce DeepTech unicorns - companies solving real-world problems in energy, healthcare, and materials - it will cement its place not just as Asia’s DeepTech hub but as one of the world’s great innovation ecosystems.

For founders, Singapore offers a rare combination: scientific depth, supportive policy, and venture-building structures that reduce the odds of failure. For investors, it provides a gateway to high-potential DeepTech startups in Asia with the added security of government and sovereign fund alignment.

The message is clear: while Silicon Valley may dominate software, the next generation of world-changing science-driven startups could well be born in Singapore’s venture studios.

How to Structure a Cap Table When Building with a Studio

In the fast-evolving world of startups, Venture Studios are becoming a powerful model for company building. Unlike accelerators or incubators, studios co-create startups from the ground up, offering resources, teams, and capital in exchange for equity. As more founders choose to build with studios, one question consistently emerges: how should the cap table be structured?

A well-balanced cap table (short for capitalization table) is not just about equity allocation, it’s a reflection of trust, clarity, and shared incentives between founders, studios, and future investors. In this article, we break down how to approach cap table structuring when launching a startup within a venture studio model.

Understanding the Studio-Startup Relationship

Venture studios usually initiate the idea, assemble the initial team, and contribute significant capital, operational support, and strategic guidance. As such, their role is much deeper than that of a passive investor. Their equity share often reflects this heavier involvement in the early stages.

Startups built with studios typically go through the following early stages:

1. Ideation & Validation – The studio identifies a market gap and develops a viable solution.

2. Team Formation – A founding team is recruited, often led by the studio.

3. MVP Development – Resources like engineering, legal, and marketing are provided.

4. Spinout & Fundraising – Once validated, the startup spins out and raises external capital.

Each of these stages affects the cap table, especially how equity is allocated between the studio, founders, and early team members.

Common Cap Table Structures in Studio Models

Although there’s no one-size-fits-all formula, most cap tables in studio-born startups follow a similar pattern during the spin-out phase:

1. Studio Equity (20%–60%)

Studios generally take a larger equity stake than a traditional investor due to their active role in the company’s creation. This stake typically ranges between 30% and 50%, depending on how much the studio contributed in terms of capital, resources, and risk.

Some models may go as high as 60% in early concept-phase startups, especially where the studio also provides the CEO or core leadership team. Over time, as the startup raises capital and scales, the studio’s ownership usually dilutes.

2. Founding Team Equity (20%–50%)

Founders joining a studio venture may receive 20% to 40% equity, depending on when they join and what responsibilities they take on. A technical co-founder joining post-MVP might receive less equity than one who joins at the ideation stage.

Founders often receive their equity through a vesting schedule, commonly over four years with a one-year cliff, aligning long-term commitment with ownership.

3. Employee Option Pool (10%–15%)

Like any startup, those born from studios need to attract and retain top talent. An option pool—typically 10% to 15% of the cap table, is reserved for employees, especially during the first fundraising round.

Early hires may receive larger chunks from this pool, particularly if they are taking on key operational or product roles in the earliest stages.

4. Investor Equity (5%–30%)

If the startup raises a pre-seed or seed round soon after spinning out of the studio, the new investors’ equity will also need to be accounted for. Early-stage VCs or angel investors may take 5% to 20% depending on the round size and valuation.

This dilutes all existing shareholders, including the studio and founders. Planning for this early ensures the cap table remains fair and balanced post-investment.

Best Practices for Cap Table Planning

● Model Scenarios Early

Before finalizing equity splits, it’s crucial to model various scenarios: What happens if you raise multiple rounds? What if key founders leave early? Having these projections gives clarity and avoids surprises.

● Align Equity with Value Added

The cap table should reflect the actual value contributed. A studio that provides engineers, designers, and growth experts deserves a larger stake than one offering only desk space and mentorship. Likewise, founders driving product and sales should be fairly compensated.

● Use Vesting and Cliff Periods

To ensure long-term commitment, both studios and founders often use vesting schedules. A typical 4-year vesting with a 1-year cliff protects the company from early departures and ensures equity is earned over time.

● Create Clear Operating Agreements

Equity is only one part of the relationship. Make sure legal documents (like operating agreements, term sheets, and founder agreements) clearly outline roles, responsibilities, and equity terms. Transparency builds trust.

How to Think About Studio Involvement Over Time

One unique aspect of cap tables in studio-led startups is the evolving role of the studio. In early stages, the studio is hands-on. But as the founding team grows, external funding is raised, and operations scale, the studio often steps back.

Some studios gradually reduce involvement or maintain board-level influence. This transition should be planned in advance and reflected in vesting or advisory agreements.

Conclusion

Structuring a cap table with a venture studio requires balancing contributions, expectations, and future growth potential. While studios may take a significant early stake, the cap table must remain attractive for future investors and fair to founders who take on operational leadership. By modeling scenarios, aligning value with equity, and using legal clarity, startups can ensure their cap table empowers, not hinders, their long-term success.

As venture studios continue reshaping how startups are born, a thoughtful approach to equity is essential. A well-structured cap table is not just a spreadsheet, it’s a roadmap for shared ownership, mutual accountability, and startup resilience.

How Regulation Will Shape Fintech Innovation in Europe by 2030

As Europe continues to evolve as a global fintech powerhouse, regulation is poised to play a decisive role in shaping the pace, direction, and nature of innovation across the sector. From PSD3 and open finance frameworks to digital identity rules and crypto asset regulation, the future of European fintech will be inextricably linked to how policymakers approach oversight and enablement. By 2030, the relationship between regulators, startups, and financial incumbents may define which markets thrive and which stagnate.

The European Regulatory Landscape in Motion

The European Union has historically taken a proactive stance toward digital financial services. Initiatives like PSD2 (the Second Payment Services Directive) enabled the rise of open banking, paving the way for an ecosystem where banks must share customer data with licensed third-party providers. The upcoming PSD3 and Open Finance Regulation are expected to expand this even further, standardizing access to broader financial data and services beyond payments.

Regulatory harmonization across EU member states is creating a fertile ground for pan-European fintech models. However, the patchwork nature of national implementations still poses a challenge for startups seeking to scale. By 2030, alignment efforts—such as the Digital Finance Package and cross-border regulatory sandboxes, could dramatically lower barriers to entry and expansion.

Compliance as a Competitive Advantage

Historically, regulation has often been viewed by startups as a constraint. But modern fintech players increasingly see compliance as a strategic differentiator. RegTech solutions (regulatory technology) are helping firms automate KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, and reporting obligations, making it easier for even early-stage ventures to navigate complex compliance requirements.

Venture studios and accelerators are also embedding compliance frameworks into their support models, ensuring that new fintechs are ‘compliant by design.’ In a world where trust and security are paramount, especially with increased scrutiny around data privacy and cybersecurity, building with regulation in mind from day one could unlock greater user adoption and investor confidence.

Key Areas of Regulatory Influence by 2030

1. Open Finance and Data Portability

By 2030, open finance regulations are expected to empower consumers to share data across a wide range of financial services, including mortgages, pensions, insurance, and investments. This could drive the emergence of hyper-personalized fintech platforms, enabling tailored financial advice and products based on a 360-degree view of a user’s financial life.

2. Digital Identity and eIDAS 2.0

The revised eIDAS regulation aims to create a unified framework for digital identity across Europe. A trusted digital ID system would streamline onboarding, payments, and verification processes, making it significantly easier for fintech startups to scale across borders and compete with incumbents.

3. Crypto, Tokenization, and MiCA

The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which provides a legal framework for crypto-assets across the EU, is expected to unlock significant growth in the token economy. From asset-backed tokens to decentralized finance (DeFi), MiCA could reduce risk and increase institutional participation in crypto innovation.

4. Green Finance and ESG Standards

The EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and taxonomy frameworks are already influencing investment and product design. Fintechs offering green lending, carbon tracking, or impact investing services will benefit from more clarity around ESG reporting and alignment.

5. AI and Algorithmic Accountability

As AI becomes more prevalent in underwriting, credit scoring, and financial advice, regulators are proposing oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency and prevent discrimination. By 2030, successful fintechs will need to demonstrate ethical and explainable AI practices as part of their product offering.

The Role of Supervisory Technology (SupTech)

It’s not just fintechs using technology, regulators are embracing it too. SupTech refers to the use of technology by supervisory agencies to improve oversight and efficiency. From real-time transaction monitoring to AI-driven anomaly detection, these tools will make it easier for regulators to keep up with the speed of innovation without stifling it.

For fintech founders, this means greater clarity and faster feedback loops, especially when engaging with innovation hubs or regulatory sandboxes. It could also open the door to more dynamic, data-driven policy making.

Final Thought

By 2030, regulation will not simply be a set of constraints that fintechs must work around, it will be a key enabler of innovation, trust, and cross-border scale. As Europe pursues harmonized frameworks around open finance, crypto, ESG, AI, and digital identity, the fintechs that align themselves early with these regulatory shifts will be better positioned to lead. Investors, founders, and studios alike must view regulation not as a hurdle, but as an essential design layer for building the financial services of the future.

Why Corporates Are Launching Their Own Venture Studios

In today’s fast-paced innovation landscape, large corporations are realizing that traditional R&D methods are no longer sufficient to keep up with disruptive startups. As a result, many are turning to venture studios, a powerful model that combines capital, strategic support, and entrepreneurial talent to build new businesses from scratch. But why exactly are corporates launching their own venture studios, and what outcomes are they expecting?

Let’s explore how this shift is reshaping corporate innovation across Europe and beyond. 

What Is a Corporate Venture Studio?

A corporate venture studio (CVS) is an in-house or partnered entity that helps corporates build and launch startups aligned with their long-term strategic goals. Unlike accelerators or incubators that support external founders, a CVS usually creates startups internally, recruits entrepreneurs, and co-owns the ventures.

By leveraging internal resources (capital, data, customer base, infrastructure) and combining them with startup speed and culture, venture studios give corporates a faster, more agile way to explore new markets, technologies, and business models.

Why the Shift to Venture Studios?

Here are five key reasons why corporates are launching venture studios:

1. Faster Innovation Cycles

Corporates typically suffer from bureaucracy and slow decision-making. Venture studios allow them to test and launch ideas in months, not years. Studios build multiple MVPs (minimum viable products), iterate quickly, and kill bad ideas early, much like startups.

This agile experimentation drastically reduces time-to-market and enables corporates to stay ahead of disruptors.

2. Strategic Diversification

Many industries, from insurance and banking to manufacturing and healthcare, are undergoing digital disruption. Corporates can’t afford to stand still. Launching a studio lets them diversify their business models and experiment with innovations outside of their core business, all while maintaining ownership and oversight.

3. Access to Entrepreneurial Talent

Attracting and retaining top entrepreneurial talent within a corporation is notoriously difficult. But a venture studio structure is appealing to founders who want to build, scale, and exit without starting completely from scratch. Corporates are using studios to recruit founders-in-residence, giving them equity, autonomy, and a clear runway to build new ventures.

4. De-risked Corporate Innovation

Studios are designed to fail fast and cheap. Instead of risking millions on a single product that may not fit the market, corporates can spread risk across multiple experiments. When one venture succeeds, it can produce significant ROI. If others fail, they offer learning at a much lower cost than failed internal projects.

This portfolio approach is much more efficient than traditional R&D or M&A strategies.

5. IP Ownership and Strategic Alignment

Unlike investing in external startups or using accelerators, a corporate venture studio allows the parent company to retain full or partial ownership of IP, build ventures that complement their core operations, and align innovation with long-term strategy. This gives them better control over growth areas and exit options.

Real-World Examples of Corporate Venture Studios

Across Europe and globally, several corporates have launched successful venture studios:

• Allianz X (Germany) – A venture arm of Allianz, focused on building and investing in startups in insurtech and beyond.

• Engie Factory (France) – The venture studio of energy giant Engie, which co-creates cleantech startups.

• BCG Digital Ventures (Global) – Although not a corporate itself, BCGDV partners with corporates to co-found and scale ventures that fit their strategic needs.

• Bosch Startup Harbour (Germany) – Focuses on IoT and connected products that can extend Bosch’s innovation capabilities.

• Telefonica Alpha (Spain) – Launched by telecom firm Telefonica to build moonshot tech companies.

These studios often have dedicated teams of product managers, engineers, marketers, and venture architects who operate semi-independently but are strategically aligned with the parent company’s goals.

How Corporate Venture Studios Work

The typical CVS model includes the following steps:

1. Opportunity Identification: Studios analyze trends, gaps, and strategic goals to define promising venture ideas.

2. Venture Design: Teams prototype business models, develop MVPs, and test market traction.

3. Recruitment of Founders: Studios bring in experienced operators or domain experts to lead the startup.

4. Funding & Incubation: The corporate funds the startup’s early stages and provides access to distribution channels, customers, and infrastructure.

5. Spin-Out or Integration: If successful, the startup can either become a standalone company (with shared equity) or be integrated back into the corporate entity.

Common Challenges

Despite the potential, corporate venture studios face some pitfalls:

• Cultural Clashes: Corporate risk-aversion can conflict with the startup mentality.

• Decision-Making Bottlenecks: Too much red tape can slow progress.

• Talent Drain: Retaining entrepreneurial talent after a spin-out can be tough.

• Unclear Exit Plans: Without a clear commercialization or M&A strategy, studios risk building “zombie” startups that don’t scale.

That’s why successful studios build strong governance, KPIs, and incentives from the beginning.

Final Thought

As markets continue to evolve and competition intensifies, corporates can no longer rely solely on internal R&D or passive venture investments. Launching a venture studio offers a powerful way to own the innovation process, unlock new revenue streams, and drive cultural transformation.

For corporates serious about long-term growth, building a venture studio is no longer a luxury, it’s a strategic necessity.

What Makes a Fintech VC Fund Stand Out in a Saturated Market?

The global fintech boom has led to a surge in venture capital (VC) funds targeting financial technology startups. From digital wallets and neo-banks to embedded finance and crypto infrastructure, the competition among VC firms has never been fiercer. With thousands of funds now chasing the next fintech unicorn, differentiation is no longer a nice-to-have; it's an existential imperative. So, what truly makes a fintech VC fund stand out in today’s saturated market?

Deep Domain Expertise

Generalist VC funds often struggle to keep up with the fast-evolving fintech landscape. The most successful fintech VC firms distinguish themselves through deep domain expertise. They don’t just invest in fintech; they understand its regulatory frameworks, technological underpinnings, and historical cycles. These firms hire partners and advisors with backgrounds in financial services, economics, and emerging technologies. Their teams include former bankers, regulators, and tech entrepreneurs who have built and scaled financial products.

This level of specialization allows fintech-focused VCs to provide strategic value beyond capital. Whether it’s navigating a complex licensing process, introducing a startup to banking partners, or validating go-to-market strategies, deep expertise builds trust with founders and increases the likelihood of portfolio success.

Proprietary Deal Flow

In a crowded environment, access to the best deals is a key differentiator. Top-tier fintech VC funds cultivate proprietary deal flow through long-standing relationships, accelerator partnerships, and founder networks. Some even launch their own venture studios to incubate startups from the ground up.

Proprietary deal flow not only gives these funds early access to promising startups but also allows them to avoid overpriced rounds or me-too investments. It also enables greater influence over initial company formation, terms, and strategic direction. Funds with exclusive access to category-defining founders stand apart from those relying on inbound pitches or demo days.

Value-Added Capital

Gone are the days when writing a check was enough. Fintech founders expect more from their investors: real operational support, product feedback, hiring assistance, and access to potential customers. Leading fintech VCs offer hands-on value that impacts core business outcomes.

Some funds, for instance, have in-house legal teams to help with regulatory filings, or talent partners who assist with hiring top-tier engineers and compliance officers. Others offer custom playbooks for entering new markets or frameworks for B2B fintech sales. These tailored resources build stronger relationships with portfolio companies and increase retention rates in future funding rounds.

Brand and Thought Leadership

Strong brand equity enables fintech VC funds to attract both capital and talent. Funds that consistently publish deep-dive reports, sector analyses, and founder interviews become known for their insights and credibility. Thought leadership can also influence public perception, drive inbound interest from top-tier startups, and strengthen a fund’s negotiating position.

This brand building often extends to event hosting, webinars, podcasts, and active social media engagement. A fund with a strong public presence is often seen as more founder-friendly, more connected, and more influential within the broader ecosystem.

Strategic LP Base

The composition of a VC fund’s limited partners (LPs) can also be a differentiator. Fintech funds that attract strategic LPs,such as banks, insurers, or payment processors, can offer portfolio companies more than just capital. These LPs often become early customers, design partners, or acquirers.

Furthermore, LPs with strong distribution channels can help portfolio companies achieve scale faster. For example, a health-focused fintech backed by an insurance giant may gain early traction by integrating directly into an existing claims or benefits system.

Global and Regulatory Insight

As fintech increasingly becomes a global endeavor, VC firms with international reach gain an advantage. Funds that understand regulatory nuances across different jurisdictions can help startups expand internationally and avoid common pitfalls. Some funds even employ policy experts or maintain relationships with regulators to stay ahead of legislative changes.

Cross-border knowledge also enables fintech VCs to spot arbitrage opportunities, for example, funding a remittance company targeting corridors overlooked by U.S. or EU competitors, or supporting embedded finance models in underbanked markets.

Emphasis on Responsible Innovation

With increased scrutiny from regulators and consumers, fintech VCs that promote responsible innovation have a long-term edge. This includes emphasizing data privacy, ethical lending practices, financial inclusion, and ESG alignment. Funds that guide their portfolio companies toward sustainable practices are better prepared for regulatory changes and reputational risks.

Final Thought

In a saturated market, standing out as a fintech VC fund requires more than just capital and buzzwords. The most differentiated funds are those that combine deep domain expertise, exclusive access to high-quality startups, hands-on support, strategic partnerships, and a forward-looking approach to regulation and ethics. As fintech continues to evolve and mature, funds that offer authentic, strategic value, not just capital, will lead the next generation of innovation and enterprise growth.

Studio vs Accelerator: Which Model Drives Better Founder Outcomes?

In the fast-evolving startup ecosystem, founders face a fundamental question: Should I launch my startup through a venture studio or an accelerator? Both models offer unique advantages, but they cater to different founder profiles and startup stages.

This article explores the key differences between venture studios and accelerators, and which model ultimately delivers better outcomes for founders.

What Is a Venture Studio?

also known as a startup studio, company builder, or venture builder, is an organization that ideates, builds, and launches startups internally. Unlike accelerators that assist external startups, venture studios create their own concepts in-house, test them for market fit, and then recruit co-founders or CEOs to lead these ventures.

Key characteristics of venture studios include:

• Idea Generation: Studios develop startup ideas internally, based on market gaps, trends, and research.

• Validation: These ideas are tested and refined before any company is formally created.

• Founder Recruitment: Once the idea is validated, the studio brings on founders to execute and scale the startup.

• Infrastructure and Capital: The venture studio provides initial funding, legal support, design, product, HR, and technology resources, removing much of the early operational burden from founders.

This model allows founders to focus purely on execution with much less risk. Instead of starting from zero, they’re stepping into a machine that’s already moving, with a pre-validated idea, seed capital, and expert support.

What Is an Accelerator?

A startup accelerator supports early-stage companies through fixed-term programs that typically last between three and six months. Unlike venture studios, accelerators work with startups that already exist and have a founding team in place.

Features of accelerators include:

• Founders Apply With Their Own Idea or MVP: Startups need to be at the idea or product stage to be considered.

• Mentorship and Training: Accelerators offer guidance through workshops, networking, and mentor matching.

• Seed Funding: Participating startups receive small amounts of funding (e.g., $100K–$150K) in exchange for equity.

• Demo Day and Investor Access: At the end of the program, startups pitch to investors for future funding rounds.

Well-known examples include Y Combinator, Techstars, and 500 Startups. These programs often boost visibility and credibility, opening doors to venture capital and strategic partnerships.

Key Differences

Which Drives Better Founder Outcomes?

  For First-Time Founders: Venture Studios

Venture studios de-risk entrepreneurship. Founders join validated projects with funding, a support team, and a clear go-to-market strategy. This is ideal for:

• Domain experts (e.g., engineers, marketers) new to startups

• Entrepreneurs who want operational backing

• Those who prefer execution over ideation

 Example: Antler and eFounders in Europe have helped dozens of first-time founders build multi-million-dollar SaaS and fintech companies with minimal prior startup experience.

For Experienced Founders: Accelerators

Accelerators work best for founders who:

• Already have a clear idea or MVP

• Seek exposure, mentorship, and network effects

• Can leverage the accelerator’s brand to raise funding

Accelerators can supercharge momentum and lead to large seed or Series A rounds, especially in hot sectors like AI and fintech.

Example:Flutterwave (a leading African fintech unicorn) emerged from the Y Combinator accelerator and rapidly scaled after launch.

A Hybrid Approach?

Some founders even benefit from a hybrid approach: building with a studio, then joining an accelerator to scale and raise capital. As startup ecosystems mature, the lines between the two models are beginning to blur.

Final Thoughts

Both venture studios and accelerators have their place in the startup journey. The key is knowing your stage, strengths, and support needs.

If you need structure, capital, and deep operational support, studios are the way to go.
If you already have traction and seek funding and connections, accelerators will help you scale faster.

The best model for founders depends on their experience, the idea stage, and the kind of startup they want to build.

Fintech & Private Equity: A Growing Intersection of Value

The fintech revolution has reshaped how we bank, invest, insure, and manage money. At the same time, private equity (PE) has evolved into one of the most influential forces in global finance. Now, these two financial powerhouses are increasingly converging, transforming not only how capital is allocated but also how innovation is scaled. The intersection of fintech and private equity is creating significant value, unlocking new business models and financial outcomes that weren’t possible a decade ago.

Why Private Equity is Embracing Fintech

Private equity firms have historically excelled at acquiring, restructuring, and growing traditional businesses. However, the rise of fintech has presented a unique opportunity: to inject capital into tech-driven financial services with high growth potential and scalability.

Several factors are drawing PE toward fintech:

1. Digital Transformation in Financial Services: As financial institutions digitalize, fintech companies are often at the forefront. PE firms see value in owning or scaling platforms that help banks, insurers, and asset managers modernize operations.

2. Recurring Revenue Models: Many fintechs, especially those offering SaaS or embedded finance solutions, operate on predictable, subscription-based revenue models, appealing to PE investors who value stable cash flow.

3. Underserved Market Segments: Fintech is often aimed at niches ignored by traditional finance. From gig economy lending platforms to SME-focused banking-as-a-service, these underserved segments provide rich growth opportunities.

Key Sectors Drawing Attention

PE firms are increasingly investing in specific fintech subsectors where innovation and margins align well:

• Payments and Embedded Finance: These offer long-term contracts and scalability. PE sees this as a digital utility play, especially in emerging markets where mobile-first solutions dominate.

• Insurtech: As the insurance sector lags in digitization, PE investors are funding insurtechs that use AI and automation to improve underwriting, claims, and customer experience.

• RegTech and Compliance: Regulatory compliance is expensive and complex. Fintechs offering automated compliance and risk management solutions are prime acquisition targets for PE-backed roll-ups.

• Lending Platforms: From BNPL to SME loan marketplaces, lending is being reimagined. PE’s appetite grows for platforms with strong underwriting technology and data-driven risk models.

How Fintechs Benefit from PE Involvement

While fintechs often start with VC funding, PE involvement introduces new benefits at later stages:

• Operational Efficiency: PE investors bring strong expertise in cost control, governance, and process optimization, critical for scaling fintechs efficiently.

• Buy-and-Build Strategies: Through roll-ups, PE can help fintechs expand into new geographies or adjacent services by acquiring and integrating smaller firms.

• Access to Distribution Channels: PE firms often have broad business networks and can facilitate partnerships with banks, corporations, or government bodies to accelerate fintech growth.

• Longer Investment Horizon: Unlike VCs that seek early exits, PE firms are often comfortable holding assets longer, which aligns better with fintechs that need time to mature and monetize.

Challenges at the Intersection

Despite the synergy, there are challenges fintech founders and PE investors must navigate:

• Cultural Clash: PE firms typically bring rigorous financial discipline, while fintech founders may prioritize innovation and rapid iteration. Aligning goals is critical.

• Regulatory Complexity: As fintech companies scale, they often move into highly regulated territories. PE firms must be ready to support compliance frameworks globally.

• Overvaluation Risks: Some fintech sectors, especially during boom periods, can be overvalued. PE investors must conduct due diligence to avoid buying into hype cycles.

Future Outlook: What to Expect in 2025 and Beyond

The trend of private equity funding fintech is set to continue accelerating. As fintech matures, it’s no longer a fringe innovation sector but a core part of the financial ecosystem. PE firms increasingly view fintech as infrastructure, essential to how modern finance operates.

Moreover, we can expect to see more fintech-focused PE funds emerging, more cross-border M&A activity, and deeper integration between fintech solutions and traditional finance portfolios. Additionally, the rise of ESG-aligned fintechs (e.g., sustainable finance tools, climate risk models) offers PE investors a new path to drive both impact and returns.

Final thought

The growing intersection of fintech and private equity represents a powerful confluence of innovation and capital. While fintech brings agility, customer-centricity, and cutting-edge technology, private equity provides the structure, strategy, and scale needed to turn promising startups into dominant players. Together, they are not only driving financial returns but also redefining how modern financial services are built and delivered.

How Venture Studios Are Redefining Early-Stage Investment in Europe

In recent years, the European startup ecosystem has witnessed a quiet revolution,one led not by individual entrepreneurs or traditional venture capitalists, but by venture studios. Also known as startup studios, company builders, or venture builders, these organizations are fundamentally transforming how startups are launched, scaled, and funded.

From Berlin to Stockholm, venture studios are redefining early-stage investment by creating startups from scratch, combining operational expertise, in-house resources, and capital, and this model is gaining significant momentum across Europe.

What Is a Venture Studio?

A venture studio is a company that creates new startups. Unlike accelerators or incubators that support existing startups, venture studios build their own ventures. They identify business opportunities internally, develop prototypes, and assemble teams to lead the new companies.

They typically provide:

• Business ideas

• Early-stage funding

• Design and development resources

• Marketing and go-to-market strategies

• Recruitment of founding teams

The goal is to reduce startup risk and increase the chances of success by providing hands-on support from day one.

The Rise of Venture Studios in Europe

While the model originated in the U.S. (with pioneers like Idealab and Rocket Internet), Europe has rapidly embraced the venture studio approach, adapting it to local contexts.

Some notable venture studios in Europe include:

• Founders Factory (UK)

• Antler (Pan-European)

• eFounders (France & Belgium)

• Zebra Labs (Germany)

• Rainmaking (Denmark)

The rise of these studios aligns with Europe's growing appetite for innovation, digital transformation, and scalable tech-driven solutions,particularly in sectors like fintech, insurtech, and AI.

Why Venture Studios Are Gaining Ground

1. De-risking Early-Stage Investment

Traditional early-stage investment is risky. Many startups fail due to team mismatches, lack of product-market fit, or execution issues. Venture studios address these challenges by:

• Carefully selecting problems worth solving

• Testing ideas before significant capital is deployed

• Bringing in proven operational teams

• Providing institutional knowledge and repeatable processes

This de-risks early-stage investment, making it more attractive for investors who want exposure to innovation without shouldering all the volatility.

2. Combining Capital and Execution

Venture studios provide more than just money, they bring in execution. Studios typically invest capital alongside deep operational support in product development, marketing, legal, and hiring.

3. Faster Time-to-Market

With in-house resources and processes, studios can launch startups in months rather than years. Time is money in the startup world , and venture studios know how to save both.

4. Stronger Founder Matches

Studios recruit and match founders to ideas after validating those ideas. This approach ensures founders work on something with traction, not just personal passion. It increases the likelihood of founder-market fit.

Case Studies: Success Stories from European Venture Studios

eFounders: Reinventing the Future of Work

Paris-based eFounders has launched over 30 companies in the SaaS space, including:

• Spendesk – a corporate expense management platform

• Front – a shared inbox for teams

• Aircall – cloud-based phone systems

With a portfolio now valued at over $2 billion, eFounders is a prime example of how studios can build repeatable, scalable, and high-value businesses.

Founders Factory: Partnering with Corporates

Founders Factory, headquartered in London, takes a collaborative approach by partnering with corporates like Aviva, L’Oréal, and easyJet to co-create new ventures. This model blends industry expertise with startup agility, resulting in better distribution and exit opportunities.

Challenges for the Venture Studio Model

While the benefits are significant, venture studios also face key challenges:

1. High Operational Costs – Running a studio with multiple teams, developers, and resources is expensive.

2. Talent Bottlenecks – Finding experienced, entrepreneurial founders is not easy, especially for niche industries.

3. Ownership Structures – Studios often retain significant equity in startups they build, which can sometimes discourage later-stage investors or founders.

4. Scalability Issues – Unlike VCs who can deploy capital across dozens of deals, studios require hands-on involvement, making scaling slower.

Yet, many of these challenges are being overcome with better models, diversified funding sources, and growing demand for startup building.

The Future: What’s Next for Venture Studios in Europe?

The next decade looks bright for venture studios in Europe.

1. Niche Studios Will Emerge

Expect to see industry-specific venture studios in areas like:

• HealthTech

• ClimateTech

• InsurTech

• Food and Agriculture

These studios will leverage sector expertise and regulatory knowledge to build highly targeted solutions.

2. More Corporate-Backed Studios

Corporations looking to innovate outside their core business are increasingly turning to studios. This trend will grow as legacy firms in banking, insurance, and logistics face digital disruption.

3. Studio-VC Hybrids

Some studios are evolving into studio-VC hybrids, combining the company-building model with traditional fund investing. This allows them to back external founders while still building in-house ventures.

4. More Government and EU Support

As European governments continue to promote entrepreneurship and innovation, expect more support for venture studios via grants, incubator partnerships, and regulatory incentives.

Final Thoughts

Venture studios represent a powerful shift in how startups are built and funded in Europe. By reducing risk, providing hands-on support, and accelerating time-to-market, they are making early-stage investing more efficient and effective.

As innovation becomes a priority across sectors, and the demand for high-quality startups continues to rise, venture studios are well-positioned to become a central pillar of Europe’s startup ecosystem.

The Rise of Vertical Fintechs in 2025: Why Niche Is the New Scalable

In 2025, the financial technology (fintech) landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation. As horizontal players that aim to serve everyone face challenges in personalization and regulation, vertical fintechs, startups that target specific customer segments or industries, are taking the lead. From fintechs focused on freelancers to those designed for farmers or immigrants, the niche is no longer small, it's the new scalable.

What Are Vertical Fintechs?

Vertical fintechs are companies that design their products, services, and experiences around the unique needs of a specific market segment. Unlike horizontal fintechs like PayPal or Revolut that aim to provide general services to all consumers, vertical players dive deep into the challenges, behavior, and expectations of a narrowly defined group.

Examples include:

• Lendtable, which focuses on helping low-income workers access employer-matching 401(k) contributions.

• Daylight, a digital bank designed for LGBTQ+ individuals.

• Till, a fintech solution for landlords and tenants to manage rent flexibility.

In 2025, the rise of these verticals reflects a broader trend: consumers and businesses are demanding more tailored financial services, and the companies that deliver them are gaining traction.

Why Vertical Fintechs Are Thriving in 2025

1. Deep Customer Understanding = Product-Market Fit

The biggest advantage of vertical fintechs lies in their laser-sharp focus. By honing in on one specific user group or industry, these companies build intimate knowledge of pain points. That insight leads to stronger product-market fit, better retention, and faster word-of-mouth adoption.

For example, a vertical fintech serving migrant workers can customize onboarding, offer remittance tools, and provide local-language support, all features that horizontal platforms might overlook.

2. Better Regulatory Navigation

Financial services are inherently regulated, and different industries or customer segments often have different compliance requirements. Vertical fintechs can more easily navigate the regulatory landscape by focusing on one set of rules. For instance, a fintech that builds solutions for cannabis businesses can specialize in meeting the unique banking and licensing laws that apply to that niche.

In 2025, tighter regulatory frameworks in Europe, the U.S., and Africa are making this advantage more visible. Governments are more receptive to solutions that cater to underserved communities without overgeneralizing.

3. Embedded Finance Opportunities

Vertical fintechs often integrate financial services directly into existing workflows of their target industries. This is known as embedded finance. Whether it's payment tools inside agricultural supply chains or credit lines within e-commerce marketplaces for artisans, fintechs are transforming into essential infrastructure rather than standalone apps.

By embedding financial services where users already spend time, vertical fintechs in 2025 are improving user adoption and building stickier platforms.

4. Capital Efficiency & Lower CAC

Horizontal fintechs often burn massive capital trying to attract a wide user base. In contrast, vertical fintechs enjoy lower customer acquisition costs (CAC) due to precise targeting and high referral rates within tight-knit communities.

In 2025, investors are paying more attention to capital efficiency amid shifting venture capital dynamics. That makes vertical fintechs attractive for funds focused on sustainable growth.

5. Strategic Partnerships & Ecosystem Building

Vertical fintechs are not just building apps, they’re constructing ecosystems. Many partner with nonprofits, trade associations, cooperatives, and even government agencies to deliver value at scale.

An example is a vertical fintech in East Africa that partners with local agricultural cooperatives to offer weather-indexed crop insurance. 

Case Study: Vertical Fintech in Agriculture

Take the agricultural sector. Farmers often face unique financial challenges such as seasonal income, lack of credit history, and  price fluctuation. In 2025, a new wave of fintech startups is emerging that offer:

• Digital lending tailored to planting and harvest cycles

• Crop insurance embedded into seed purchases

• Real-time commodity pricing through mobile apps

These products aren’t just financial tools, they’re lifeline.

Challenges to Scaling Vertically

While vertical fintechs offer tremendous upside, they also face some hurdles:

• Limited TAM (Total Addressable Market): Narrow focus can sometimes limit scalability if not properly planned.

• Dependency on Ecosystem Partners: Many vertical fintechs rely on third-party players (e.g., clinics, NGOs, schools) for customer distribution.

• Product Complexity: Building hyper-specific tools often leads to longer development cycles and complex support needs.

However, these are not deal-breakers. Many vertical fintechs are addressing these issues by expanding into adjacent verticals once they gain traction or by layering horizontal capabilities (e.g., payments, lending) on top of a strong vertical core.

The Future of Vertical Fintechs

As we move through 2025 and beyond, several trends suggest vertical fintechs are here to stay:

• AI and personalization will allow for even deeper tailoring of services to niche needs.

• Open banking regulations in Europe and parts of Africa are making it easier for vertical players to access and build on top of existing financial infrastructure.

• Corporate venture studios are also starting to incubate vertical fintechs, seeing them as quicker paths to innovation in legacy industries like health, construction, or logistics.

Final Thought

In 2025, the fintech game is no longer just about size or volume, it’s about depth, relevance, and impact. Vertical fintechs are proving that when it comes to financial innovation, the riches truly lie in the niches. By serving specific audiences with empathy and precision, they are redefining what scalability means in financial services. For founders, investors, and corporates alike, vertical is not just a strategy, it’s the future.

Investing in Artificial Intelligence: Key Trends for Funds

Methodology: A Fund-Focused View on AI Investment Dynamics

This article draws from market reports, fund manager insights, and AI ecosystem analyses to outline the main trends shaping how venture, growth, and corporate funds are investing in artificial intelligence today. We look at deal activity, sector focus, and strategic themes guiding capital allocation.

In Brief: What Funds Need to Know

• AI deal volume remains strong, with funds focusing on core infrastructure, applied AI, and ethical frameworks.

• Large funds and corporate VCs are increasingly backing AI tools that reshape entire industries.

• Geopolitics, regulation, and responsible AI principles are playing a bigger role in diligence.

• The next wave of winners may emerge from vertical AI not general-purpose models.

AI Investment Is Maturing But the Opportunity Remains Huge

Over the past decade, funds have steadily increased their exposure to artificial intelligence. From early bets on core machine learning platforms to today’s more refined focus on vertical applications (healthcare AI, legal tech AI, climate AI), the landscape has evolved.

AI deal activity remains resilient even in cautious markets, as funds seek companies offering real, scalable applications rather than AI hype.

According to PitchBook, AI and machine learning startups captured over $50 billion in venture funding globally in 2024, with enterprise AI infrastructure and applied AI solutions leading the way.

Key Trend 1: From General AI to Vertical AI

• Fund managers are shifting attention from general-purpose AI tools to sector-specific solutions. Why?

• Vertical AI startups typically show faster paths to product-market fit.

• Customers value AI embedded in their existing workflows (e.g., legal document review, clinical trial analysis).

• Regulatory clarity is stronger in narrow-use cases.

Funds investing in AI are looking for companies that deeply understand their end markets, not just ones building horizontal tools.

Key Trend 2: Responsible AI Moves Front and Center

Ethical AI isn’t just a discussion point anymore, it's a diligence priority.

LPs increasingly expect funds to assess AI safety, bias mitigation, and explainability during investment screening. Startups offering transparency features (e.g., model audits, bias dashboards) are gaining an edge in fundraising.

Funds that position themselves as champions of responsible AI will not only de-risk portfolios but also build brand credibility with partners and regulators.

Key Trend 3: Corporate Venture Capital Is Leading in AI Scaling

Corporate funds are playing a growing role in AI funding rounds especially at the growth stage. Why?

• AI solutions often require integration with large enterprise systems.

• Corporate VCs provide go-to-market pathways AI startups need to scale.

• Strategic investors are focused on AI that directly augments their core business lines.

We see funds co-investing alongside corporates in areas like AI-driven cybersecurity, supply chain optimization, and predictive analytics.

Final Thought: What’s Next for AI-Focused Funds?

The AI gold rush is shifting from model-building to real-world deployment. Funds that succeed will:

• Back founders solving specific industry problems.

• Prioritize responsible, explainable AI.

• Align with partners who can accelerate adoption at scale.

For investors, artificial intelligence isn’t just a theme, it's becoming an essential part of any modern portfolio.

Is There Still Room for Disruption in the European Insurance Market?

The European insurance landscape stands at a fascinating crossroads. While traditional players have dominated for centuries, a new wave of technological innovation is reshaping the very foundations of how insurance operates. The question isn't whether disruption is possible, it's whether incumbents will adapt fast enough to survive the transformation already underway.

The Digital Revolution is Just Beginning

The numbers tell a compelling story. The insurance technology market size in Europe is estimated to grow by USD 19.72 billion from 2024-2028, according to Technavio, with the market estimated to grow at a CAGR of almost 36.5% during the forecast period. This explosive growth signals that we're witnessing the early stages of a technological revolution, not its conclusion.

What makes this particularly striking is the stark contrast with traditional growth patterns. While the broader European insurance market maintains steady single-digit growth, insurtech is expanding at rates that would make Silicon Valley envious. This disparity reveals massive opportunities for companies willing to embrace digital-first approaches.

Where Traditional Models Show Vulnerability

European insurance has historically relied on intermediaries, complex underwriting processes, and lengthy claim settlements. These legacy systems create friction points that modern consumers increasingly refuse to tolerate. Consider the average home insurance claim in Germany, which can take 30-45 days to process through traditional channels, compared to digital-first insurers who promise resolution within 48 hours.

• The protection gap presents another compelling opportunity. Climate change has created new risks that traditional models struggle to assess and price accurately. The insurance industry is transforming, driven by new tech, tax laws, and expectations, yet many European insurers remain reactive rather than proactive in addressing emerging risks like cyber threats and extreme weather events.

• Young Europeans represent perhaps the largest untapped market. Digital natives aged 25-35 show significantly lower insurance penetration rates than previous generations at the same age, not because they don't need coverage, but because existing products don't align with their lifestyle and expectations. They demand instant quotes, transparent pricing, and seamless mobile experiences, areas where traditional insurers often fall short.

Successful Disruption Models Already Emerging

Several European companies have proven that disruption isn't just possible, it's profitable. Lemonade, while originally American, has successfully expanded into European markets by offering renters and homeowners insurance through an AI-powered platform that can process claims in seconds rather than weeks.

• Sweden's Hedvig has revolutionized home and contents insurance by eliminating deductibles and offering transparent, flat-rate pricing. Their model shows how removing traditional insurance complexity can attract younger demographics who previously avoided coverage altogether.

• In the UK, Zego has transformed commercial vehicle insurance by providing flexible, pay-as-you-go coverage for delivery drivers and ride-share operators. This micro-insurance model addresses the gig economy's unique needs, a market segment traditional insurers largely ignored.

Technology as the Great Enabler

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have matured to the point where they can now handle tasks that previously required human expertise. Modern AI can analyze satellite imagery to assess property damage, process natural language to understand claim descriptions, and detect fraud patterns with greater accuracy than human investigators.

• IoT devices create unprecedented data streams that enable real-time risk assessment. A smart home system can prevent water damage by automatically shutting off pipes when leaks are detected, then instantly notify insurers to update coverage terms. This shift from reactive claim processing to proactive risk prevention represents a fundamental business model transformation.

• Blockchain technology, while still emerging, promises to streamline multi-party insurance transactions and create tamper-proof claim histories. European regulatory frameworks like GDPR actually position the region well for blockchain adoption, as the technology aligns with data sovereignty requirements.

Regulatory Environment Creates Opportunities

European insurance regulation, often viewed as constraining innovation, actually creates moats for disruptors who can navigate compliance effectively. Solvency II requirements, while complex, establish trust frameworks that tech-savvy companies can leverage more efficiently than traditional insurers burdened by legacy systems.

• The EU's Digital Single Market strategy actively encourages cross-border insurance innovation, making it easier for successful models to scale across the continent. This regulatory support contrasts sharply with the fragmented approach in other regions, giving European disruptors a significant advantage.

• Open Banking regulations have also created precedents for data sharing that could extend to insurance. When customers can seamlessly share their financial and behavioral data with insurers, it enables more accurate risk assessment and personalized pricing, core advantages for innovative players.

The Path Forward

The European insurance market isn't just ripe for disruption, it's demanding it. Consumer expectations, technological capabilities, and regulatory frameworks have aligned to create an environment where innovative approaches can thrive. While investments in insurtech saw both deal volume and funding decline in 2023, this consolidation phase often precedes breakthrough innovations as the strongest players emerge.

The companies that will define the next decade won't be those trying to digitize existing processes, but those reimagining insurance from first principles. They'll use data to predict and prevent losses rather than just compensate for them. They'll create products that adapt to individual lifestyles rather than forcing customers into standardized categories. Most importantly, they'll build trust through transparency and speed rather than complexity and tradition.

The question facing European insurance isn't whether disruption will continue, it's whether established players will lead the transformation or be swept aside by it. For entrepreneurs and innovators, the answer is clear: the opportunities have never been greater, and the time to act is now.