How to Structure a Cap Table When Building with a Studio

In the fast-evolving world of startups, Venture Studios are becoming a powerful model for company building. Unlike accelerators or incubators, studios co-create startups from the ground up, offering resources, teams, and capital in exchange for equity. As more founders choose to build with studios, one question consistently emerges: how should the cap table be structured?

A well-balanced cap table (short for capitalization table) is not just about equity allocation, it’s a reflection of trust, clarity, and shared incentives between founders, studios, and future investors. In this article, we break down how to approach cap table structuring when launching a startup within a venture studio model.

Understanding the Studio-Startup Relationship

Venture studios usually initiate the idea, assemble the initial team, and contribute significant capital, operational support, and strategic guidance. As such, their role is much deeper than that of a passive investor. Their equity share often reflects this heavier involvement in the early stages.

Startups built with studios typically go through the following early stages:

1. Ideation & Validation – The studio identifies a market gap and develops a viable solution.

2. Team Formation – A founding team is recruited, often led by the studio.

3. MVP Development – Resources like engineering, legal, and marketing are provided.

4. Spinout & Fundraising – Once validated, the startup spins out and raises external capital.

Each of these stages affects the cap table, especially how equity is allocated between the studio, founders, and early team members.

Common Cap Table Structures in Studio Models

Although there’s no one-size-fits-all formula, most cap tables in studio-born startups follow a similar pattern during the spin-out phase:

1. Studio Equity (20%–60%)

Studios generally take a larger equity stake than a traditional investor due to their active role in the company’s creation. This stake typically ranges between 30% and 50%, depending on how much the studio contributed in terms of capital, resources, and risk.

Some models may go as high as 60% in early concept-phase startups, especially where the studio also provides the CEO or core leadership team. Over time, as the startup raises capital and scales, the studio’s ownership usually dilutes.

2. Founding Team Equity (20%–50%)

Founders joining a studio venture may receive 20% to 40% equity, depending on when they join and what responsibilities they take on. A technical co-founder joining post-MVP might receive less equity than one who joins at the ideation stage.

Founders often receive their equity through a vesting schedule, commonly over four years with a one-year cliff, aligning long-term commitment with ownership.

3. Employee Option Pool (10%–15%)

Like any startup, those born from studios need to attract and retain top talent. An option pool—typically 10% to 15% of the cap table, is reserved for employees, especially during the first fundraising round.

Early hires may receive larger chunks from this pool, particularly if they are taking on key operational or product roles in the earliest stages.

4. Investor Equity (5%–30%)

If the startup raises a pre-seed or seed round soon after spinning out of the studio, the new investors’ equity will also need to be accounted for. Early-stage VCs or angel investors may take 5% to 20% depending on the round size and valuation.

This dilutes all existing shareholders, including the studio and founders. Planning for this early ensures the cap table remains fair and balanced post-investment.

Best Practices for Cap Table Planning

● Model Scenarios Early

Before finalizing equity splits, it’s crucial to model various scenarios: What happens if you raise multiple rounds? What if key founders leave early? Having these projections gives clarity and avoids surprises.

● Align Equity with Value Added

The cap table should reflect the actual value contributed. A studio that provides engineers, designers, and growth experts deserves a larger stake than one offering only desk space and mentorship. Likewise, founders driving product and sales should be fairly compensated.

● Use Vesting and Cliff Periods

To ensure long-term commitment, both studios and founders often use vesting schedules. A typical 4-year vesting with a 1-year cliff protects the company from early departures and ensures equity is earned over time.

● Create Clear Operating Agreements

Equity is only one part of the relationship. Make sure legal documents (like operating agreements, term sheets, and founder agreements) clearly outline roles, responsibilities, and equity terms. Transparency builds trust.

How to Think About Studio Involvement Over Time

One unique aspect of cap tables in studio-led startups is the evolving role of the studio. In early stages, the studio is hands-on. But as the founding team grows, external funding is raised, and operations scale, the studio often steps back.

Some studios gradually reduce involvement or maintain board-level influence. This transition should be planned in advance and reflected in vesting or advisory agreements.

Conclusion

Structuring a cap table with a venture studio requires balancing contributions, expectations, and future growth potential. While studios may take a significant early stake, the cap table must remain attractive for future investors and fair to founders who take on operational leadership. By modeling scenarios, aligning value with equity, and using legal clarity, startups can ensure their cap table empowers, not hinders, their long-term success.

As venture studios continue reshaping how startups are born, a thoughtful approach to equity is essential. A well-structured cap table is not just a spreadsheet, it’s a roadmap for shared ownership, mutual accountability, and startup resilience.

How Regulation Will Shape Fintech Innovation in Europe by 2030

As Europe continues to evolve as a global fintech powerhouse, regulation is poised to play a decisive role in shaping the pace, direction, and nature of innovation across the sector. From PSD3 and open finance frameworks to digital identity rules and crypto asset regulation, the future of European fintech will be inextricably linked to how policymakers approach oversight and enablement. By 2030, the relationship between regulators, startups, and financial incumbents may define which markets thrive and which stagnate.

The European Regulatory Landscape in Motion

The European Union has historically taken a proactive stance toward digital financial services. Initiatives like PSD2 (the Second Payment Services Directive) enabled the rise of open banking, paving the way for an ecosystem where banks must share customer data with licensed third-party providers. The upcoming PSD3 and Open Finance Regulation are expected to expand this even further, standardizing access to broader financial data and services beyond payments.

Regulatory harmonization across EU member states is creating a fertile ground for pan-European fintech models. However, the patchwork nature of national implementations still poses a challenge for startups seeking to scale. By 2030, alignment efforts—such as the Digital Finance Package and cross-border regulatory sandboxes, could dramatically lower barriers to entry and expansion.

Compliance as a Competitive Advantage

Historically, regulation has often been viewed by startups as a constraint. But modern fintech players increasingly see compliance as a strategic differentiator. RegTech solutions (regulatory technology) are helping firms automate KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, and reporting obligations, making it easier for even early-stage ventures to navigate complex compliance requirements.

Venture studios and accelerators are also embedding compliance frameworks into their support models, ensuring that new fintechs are ‘compliant by design.’ In a world where trust and security are paramount, especially with increased scrutiny around data privacy and cybersecurity, building with regulation in mind from day one could unlock greater user adoption and investor confidence.

Key Areas of Regulatory Influence by 2030

1. Open Finance and Data Portability

By 2030, open finance regulations are expected to empower consumers to share data across a wide range of financial services, including mortgages, pensions, insurance, and investments. This could drive the emergence of hyper-personalized fintech platforms, enabling tailored financial advice and products based on a 360-degree view of a user’s financial life.

2. Digital Identity and eIDAS 2.0

The revised eIDAS regulation aims to create a unified framework for digital identity across Europe. A trusted digital ID system would streamline onboarding, payments, and verification processes, making it significantly easier for fintech startups to scale across borders and compete with incumbents.

3. Crypto, Tokenization, and MiCA

The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which provides a legal framework for crypto-assets across the EU, is expected to unlock significant growth in the token economy. From asset-backed tokens to decentralized finance (DeFi), MiCA could reduce risk and increase institutional participation in crypto innovation.

4. Green Finance and ESG Standards

The EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and taxonomy frameworks are already influencing investment and product design. Fintechs offering green lending, carbon tracking, or impact investing services will benefit from more clarity around ESG reporting and alignment.

5. AI and Algorithmic Accountability

As AI becomes more prevalent in underwriting, credit scoring, and financial advice, regulators are proposing oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency and prevent discrimination. By 2030, successful fintechs will need to demonstrate ethical and explainable AI practices as part of their product offering.

The Role of Supervisory Technology (SupTech)

It’s not just fintechs using technology, regulators are embracing it too. SupTech refers to the use of technology by supervisory agencies to improve oversight and efficiency. From real-time transaction monitoring to AI-driven anomaly detection, these tools will make it easier for regulators to keep up with the speed of innovation without stifling it.

For fintech founders, this means greater clarity and faster feedback loops, especially when engaging with innovation hubs or regulatory sandboxes. It could also open the door to more dynamic, data-driven policy making.

Final Thought

By 2030, regulation will not simply be a set of constraints that fintechs must work around, it will be a key enabler of innovation, trust, and cross-border scale. As Europe pursues harmonized frameworks around open finance, crypto, ESG, AI, and digital identity, the fintechs that align themselves early with these regulatory shifts will be better positioned to lead. Investors, founders, and studios alike must view regulation not as a hurdle, but as an essential design layer for building the financial services of the future.

Why Corporates Are Launching Their Own Venture Studios

In today’s fast-paced innovation landscape, large corporations are realizing that traditional R&D methods are no longer sufficient to keep up with disruptive startups. As a result, many are turning to venture studios, a powerful model that combines capital, strategic support, and entrepreneurial talent to build new businesses from scratch. But why exactly are corporates launching their own venture studios, and what outcomes are they expecting?

Let’s explore how this shift is reshaping corporate innovation across Europe and beyond. 

What Is a Corporate Venture Studio?

A corporate venture studio (CVS) is an in-house or partnered entity that helps corporates build and launch startups aligned with their long-term strategic goals. Unlike accelerators or incubators that support external founders, a CVS usually creates startups internally, recruits entrepreneurs, and co-owns the ventures.

By leveraging internal resources (capital, data, customer base, infrastructure) and combining them with startup speed and culture, venture studios give corporates a faster, more agile way to explore new markets, technologies, and business models.

Why the Shift to Venture Studios?

Here are five key reasons why corporates are launching venture studios:

1. Faster Innovation Cycles

Corporates typically suffer from bureaucracy and slow decision-making. Venture studios allow them to test and launch ideas in months, not years. Studios build multiple MVPs (minimum viable products), iterate quickly, and kill bad ideas early, much like startups.

This agile experimentation drastically reduces time-to-market and enables corporates to stay ahead of disruptors.

2. Strategic Diversification

Many industries, from insurance and banking to manufacturing and healthcare, are undergoing digital disruption. Corporates can’t afford to stand still. Launching a studio lets them diversify their business models and experiment with innovations outside of their core business, all while maintaining ownership and oversight.

3. Access to Entrepreneurial Talent

Attracting and retaining top entrepreneurial talent within a corporation is notoriously difficult. But a venture studio structure is appealing to founders who want to build, scale, and exit without starting completely from scratch. Corporates are using studios to recruit founders-in-residence, giving them equity, autonomy, and a clear runway to build new ventures.

4. De-risked Corporate Innovation

Studios are designed to fail fast and cheap. Instead of risking millions on a single product that may not fit the market, corporates can spread risk across multiple experiments. When one venture succeeds, it can produce significant ROI. If others fail, they offer learning at a much lower cost than failed internal projects.

This portfolio approach is much more efficient than traditional R&D or M&A strategies.

5. IP Ownership and Strategic Alignment

Unlike investing in external startups or using accelerators, a corporate venture studio allows the parent company to retain full or partial ownership of IP, build ventures that complement their core operations, and align innovation with long-term strategy. This gives them better control over growth areas and exit options.

Real-World Examples of Corporate Venture Studios

Across Europe and globally, several corporates have launched successful venture studios:

• Allianz X (Germany) – A venture arm of Allianz, focused on building and investing in startups in insurtech and beyond.

• Engie Factory (France) – The venture studio of energy giant Engie, which co-creates cleantech startups.

• BCG Digital Ventures (Global) – Although not a corporate itself, BCGDV partners with corporates to co-found and scale ventures that fit their strategic needs.

• Bosch Startup Harbour (Germany) – Focuses on IoT and connected products that can extend Bosch’s innovation capabilities.

• Telefonica Alpha (Spain) – Launched by telecom firm Telefonica to build moonshot tech companies.

These studios often have dedicated teams of product managers, engineers, marketers, and venture architects who operate semi-independently but are strategically aligned with the parent company’s goals.

How Corporate Venture Studios Work

The typical CVS model includes the following steps:

1. Opportunity Identification: Studios analyze trends, gaps, and strategic goals to define promising venture ideas.

2. Venture Design: Teams prototype business models, develop MVPs, and test market traction.

3. Recruitment of Founders: Studios bring in experienced operators or domain experts to lead the startup.

4. Funding & Incubation: The corporate funds the startup’s early stages and provides access to distribution channels, customers, and infrastructure.

5. Spin-Out or Integration: If successful, the startup can either become a standalone company (with shared equity) or be integrated back into the corporate entity.

Common Challenges

Despite the potential, corporate venture studios face some pitfalls:

• Cultural Clashes: Corporate risk-aversion can conflict with the startup mentality.

• Decision-Making Bottlenecks: Too much red tape can slow progress.

• Talent Drain: Retaining entrepreneurial talent after a spin-out can be tough.

• Unclear Exit Plans: Without a clear commercialization or M&A strategy, studios risk building “zombie” startups that don’t scale.

That’s why successful studios build strong governance, KPIs, and incentives from the beginning.

Final Thought

As markets continue to evolve and competition intensifies, corporates can no longer rely solely on internal R&D or passive venture investments. Launching a venture studio offers a powerful way to own the innovation process, unlock new revenue streams, and drive cultural transformation.

For corporates serious about long-term growth, building a venture studio is no longer a luxury, it’s a strategic necessity.

What Makes a Fintech VC Fund Stand Out in a Saturated Market?

The global fintech boom has led to a surge in venture capital (VC) funds targeting financial technology startups. From digital wallets and neo-banks to embedded finance and crypto infrastructure, the competition among VC firms has never been fiercer. With thousands of funds now chasing the next fintech unicorn, differentiation is no longer a nice-to-have; it's an existential imperative. So, what truly makes a fintech VC fund stand out in today’s saturated market?

Deep Domain Expertise

Generalist VC funds often struggle to keep up with the fast-evolving fintech landscape. The most successful fintech VC firms distinguish themselves through deep domain expertise. They don’t just invest in fintech; they understand its regulatory frameworks, technological underpinnings, and historical cycles. These firms hire partners and advisors with backgrounds in financial services, economics, and emerging technologies. Their teams include former bankers, regulators, and tech entrepreneurs who have built and scaled financial products.

This level of specialization allows fintech-focused VCs to provide strategic value beyond capital. Whether it’s navigating a complex licensing process, introducing a startup to banking partners, or validating go-to-market strategies, deep expertise builds trust with founders and increases the likelihood of portfolio success.

Proprietary Deal Flow

In a crowded environment, access to the best deals is a key differentiator. Top-tier fintech VC funds cultivate proprietary deal flow through long-standing relationships, accelerator partnerships, and founder networks. Some even launch their own venture studios to incubate startups from the ground up.

Proprietary deal flow not only gives these funds early access to promising startups but also allows them to avoid overpriced rounds or me-too investments. It also enables greater influence over initial company formation, terms, and strategic direction. Funds with exclusive access to category-defining founders stand apart from those relying on inbound pitches or demo days.

Value-Added Capital

Gone are the days when writing a check was enough. Fintech founders expect more from their investors: real operational support, product feedback, hiring assistance, and access to potential customers. Leading fintech VCs offer hands-on value that impacts core business outcomes.

Some funds, for instance, have in-house legal teams to help with regulatory filings, or talent partners who assist with hiring top-tier engineers and compliance officers. Others offer custom playbooks for entering new markets or frameworks for B2B fintech sales. These tailored resources build stronger relationships with portfolio companies and increase retention rates in future funding rounds.

Brand and Thought Leadership

Strong brand equity enables fintech VC funds to attract both capital and talent. Funds that consistently publish deep-dive reports, sector analyses, and founder interviews become known for their insights and credibility. Thought leadership can also influence public perception, drive inbound interest from top-tier startups, and strengthen a fund’s negotiating position.

This brand building often extends to event hosting, webinars, podcasts, and active social media engagement. A fund with a strong public presence is often seen as more founder-friendly, more connected, and more influential within the broader ecosystem.

Strategic LP Base

The composition of a VC fund’s limited partners (LPs) can also be a differentiator. Fintech funds that attract strategic LPs,such as banks, insurers, or payment processors, can offer portfolio companies more than just capital. These LPs often become early customers, design partners, or acquirers.

Furthermore, LPs with strong distribution channels can help portfolio companies achieve scale faster. For example, a health-focused fintech backed by an insurance giant may gain early traction by integrating directly into an existing claims or benefits system.

Global and Regulatory Insight

As fintech increasingly becomes a global endeavor, VC firms with international reach gain an advantage. Funds that understand regulatory nuances across different jurisdictions can help startups expand internationally and avoid common pitfalls. Some funds even employ policy experts or maintain relationships with regulators to stay ahead of legislative changes.

Cross-border knowledge also enables fintech VCs to spot arbitrage opportunities, for example, funding a remittance company targeting corridors overlooked by U.S. or EU competitors, or supporting embedded finance models in underbanked markets.

Emphasis on Responsible Innovation

With increased scrutiny from regulators and consumers, fintech VCs that promote responsible innovation have a long-term edge. This includes emphasizing data privacy, ethical lending practices, financial inclusion, and ESG alignment. Funds that guide their portfolio companies toward sustainable practices are better prepared for regulatory changes and reputational risks.

Final Thought

In a saturated market, standing out as a fintech VC fund requires more than just capital and buzzwords. The most differentiated funds are those that combine deep domain expertise, exclusive access to high-quality startups, hands-on support, strategic partnerships, and a forward-looking approach to regulation and ethics. As fintech continues to evolve and mature, funds that offer authentic, strategic value, not just capital, will lead the next generation of innovation and enterprise growth.

Studio vs Accelerator: Which Model Drives Better Founder Outcomes?

In the fast-evolving startup ecosystem, founders face a fundamental question: Should I launch my startup through a venture studio or an accelerator? Both models offer unique advantages, but they cater to different founder profiles and startup stages.

This article explores the key differences between venture studios and accelerators, and which model ultimately delivers better outcomes for founders.

What Is a Venture Studio?

also known as a startup studio, company builder, or venture builder, is an organization that ideates, builds, and launches startups internally. Unlike accelerators that assist external startups, venture studios create their own concepts in-house, test them for market fit, and then recruit co-founders or CEOs to lead these ventures.

Key characteristics of venture studios include:

• Idea Generation: Studios develop startup ideas internally, based on market gaps, trends, and research.

• Validation: These ideas are tested and refined before any company is formally created.

• Founder Recruitment: Once the idea is validated, the studio brings on founders to execute and scale the startup.

• Infrastructure and Capital: The venture studio provides initial funding, legal support, design, product, HR, and technology resources, removing much of the early operational burden from founders.

This model allows founders to focus purely on execution with much less risk. Instead of starting from zero, they’re stepping into a machine that’s already moving, with a pre-validated idea, seed capital, and expert support.

What Is an Accelerator?

A startup accelerator supports early-stage companies through fixed-term programs that typically last between three and six months. Unlike venture studios, accelerators work with startups that already exist and have a founding team in place.

Features of accelerators include:

• Founders Apply With Their Own Idea or MVP: Startups need to be at the idea or product stage to be considered.

• Mentorship and Training: Accelerators offer guidance through workshops, networking, and mentor matching.

• Seed Funding: Participating startups receive small amounts of funding (e.g., $100K–$150K) in exchange for equity.

• Demo Day and Investor Access: At the end of the program, startups pitch to investors for future funding rounds.

Well-known examples include Y Combinator, Techstars, and 500 Startups. These programs often boost visibility and credibility, opening doors to venture capital and strategic partnerships.

Key Differences

Which Drives Better Founder Outcomes?

  For First-Time Founders: Venture Studios

Venture studios de-risk entrepreneurship. Founders join validated projects with funding, a support team, and a clear go-to-market strategy. This is ideal for:

• Domain experts (e.g., engineers, marketers) new to startups

• Entrepreneurs who want operational backing

• Those who prefer execution over ideation

 Example: Antler and eFounders in Europe have helped dozens of first-time founders build multi-million-dollar SaaS and fintech companies with minimal prior startup experience.

For Experienced Founders: Accelerators

Accelerators work best for founders who:

• Already have a clear idea or MVP

• Seek exposure, mentorship, and network effects

• Can leverage the accelerator’s brand to raise funding

Accelerators can supercharge momentum and lead to large seed or Series A rounds, especially in hot sectors like AI and fintech.

Example:Flutterwave (a leading African fintech unicorn) emerged from the Y Combinator accelerator and rapidly scaled after launch.

A Hybrid Approach?

Some founders even benefit from a hybrid approach: building with a studio, then joining an accelerator to scale and raise capital. As startup ecosystems mature, the lines between the two models are beginning to blur.

Final Thoughts

Both venture studios and accelerators have their place in the startup journey. The key is knowing your stage, strengths, and support needs.

If you need structure, capital, and deep operational support, studios are the way to go.
If you already have traction and seek funding and connections, accelerators will help you scale faster.

The best model for founders depends on their experience, the idea stage, and the kind of startup they want to build.

Fintech & Private Equity: A Growing Intersection of Value

The fintech revolution has reshaped how we bank, invest, insure, and manage money. At the same time, private equity (PE) has evolved into one of the most influential forces in global finance. Now, these two financial powerhouses are increasingly converging, transforming not only how capital is allocated but also how innovation is scaled. The intersection of fintech and private equity is creating significant value, unlocking new business models and financial outcomes that weren’t possible a decade ago.

Why Private Equity is Embracing Fintech

Private equity firms have historically excelled at acquiring, restructuring, and growing traditional businesses. However, the rise of fintech has presented a unique opportunity: to inject capital into tech-driven financial services with high growth potential and scalability.

Several factors are drawing PE toward fintech:

1. Digital Transformation in Financial Services: As financial institutions digitalize, fintech companies are often at the forefront. PE firms see value in owning or scaling platforms that help banks, insurers, and asset managers modernize operations.

2. Recurring Revenue Models: Many fintechs, especially those offering SaaS or embedded finance solutions, operate on predictable, subscription-based revenue models, appealing to PE investors who value stable cash flow.

3. Underserved Market Segments: Fintech is often aimed at niches ignored by traditional finance. From gig economy lending platforms to SME-focused banking-as-a-service, these underserved segments provide rich growth opportunities.

Key Sectors Drawing Attention

PE firms are increasingly investing in specific fintech subsectors where innovation and margins align well:

• Payments and Embedded Finance: These offer long-term contracts and scalability. PE sees this as a digital utility play, especially in emerging markets where mobile-first solutions dominate.

• Insurtech: As the insurance sector lags in digitization, PE investors are funding insurtechs that use AI and automation to improve underwriting, claims, and customer experience.

• RegTech and Compliance: Regulatory compliance is expensive and complex. Fintechs offering automated compliance and risk management solutions are prime acquisition targets for PE-backed roll-ups.

• Lending Platforms: From BNPL to SME loan marketplaces, lending is being reimagined. PE’s appetite grows for platforms with strong underwriting technology and data-driven risk models.

How Fintechs Benefit from PE Involvement

While fintechs often start with VC funding, PE involvement introduces new benefits at later stages:

• Operational Efficiency: PE investors bring strong expertise in cost control, governance, and process optimization, critical for scaling fintechs efficiently.

• Buy-and-Build Strategies: Through roll-ups, PE can help fintechs expand into new geographies or adjacent services by acquiring and integrating smaller firms.

• Access to Distribution Channels: PE firms often have broad business networks and can facilitate partnerships with banks, corporations, or government bodies to accelerate fintech growth.

• Longer Investment Horizon: Unlike VCs that seek early exits, PE firms are often comfortable holding assets longer, which aligns better with fintechs that need time to mature and monetize.

Challenges at the Intersection

Despite the synergy, there are challenges fintech founders and PE investors must navigate:

• Cultural Clash: PE firms typically bring rigorous financial discipline, while fintech founders may prioritize innovation and rapid iteration. Aligning goals is critical.

• Regulatory Complexity: As fintech companies scale, they often move into highly regulated territories. PE firms must be ready to support compliance frameworks globally.

• Overvaluation Risks: Some fintech sectors, especially during boom periods, can be overvalued. PE investors must conduct due diligence to avoid buying into hype cycles.

Future Outlook: What to Expect in 2025 and Beyond

The trend of private equity funding fintech is set to continue accelerating. As fintech matures, it’s no longer a fringe innovation sector but a core part of the financial ecosystem. PE firms increasingly view fintech as infrastructure, essential to how modern finance operates.

Moreover, we can expect to see more fintech-focused PE funds emerging, more cross-border M&A activity, and deeper integration between fintech solutions and traditional finance portfolios. Additionally, the rise of ESG-aligned fintechs (e.g., sustainable finance tools, climate risk models) offers PE investors a new path to drive both impact and returns.

Final thought

The growing intersection of fintech and private equity represents a powerful confluence of innovation and capital. While fintech brings agility, customer-centricity, and cutting-edge technology, private equity provides the structure, strategy, and scale needed to turn promising startups into dominant players. Together, they are not only driving financial returns but also redefining how modern financial services are built and delivered.

How Venture Studios Are Redefining Early-Stage Investment in Europe

In recent years, the European startup ecosystem has witnessed a quiet revolution,one led not by individual entrepreneurs or traditional venture capitalists, but by venture studios. Also known as startup studios, company builders, or venture builders, these organizations are fundamentally transforming how startups are launched, scaled, and funded.

From Berlin to Stockholm, venture studios are redefining early-stage investment by creating startups from scratch, combining operational expertise, in-house resources, and capital, and this model is gaining significant momentum across Europe.

What Is a Venture Studio?

A venture studio is a company that creates new startups. Unlike accelerators or incubators that support existing startups, venture studios build their own ventures. They identify business opportunities internally, develop prototypes, and assemble teams to lead the new companies.

They typically provide:

• Business ideas

• Early-stage funding

• Design and development resources

• Marketing and go-to-market strategies

• Recruitment of founding teams

The goal is to reduce startup risk and increase the chances of success by providing hands-on support from day one.

The Rise of Venture Studios in Europe

While the model originated in the U.S. (with pioneers like Idealab and Rocket Internet), Europe has rapidly embraced the venture studio approach, adapting it to local contexts.

Some notable venture studios in Europe include:

• Founders Factory (UK)

• Antler (Pan-European)

• eFounders (France & Belgium)

• Zebra Labs (Germany)

• Rainmaking (Denmark)

The rise of these studios aligns with Europe's growing appetite for innovation, digital transformation, and scalable tech-driven solutions,particularly in sectors like fintech, insurtech, and AI.

Why Venture Studios Are Gaining Ground

1. De-risking Early-Stage Investment

Traditional early-stage investment is risky. Many startups fail due to team mismatches, lack of product-market fit, or execution issues. Venture studios address these challenges by:

• Carefully selecting problems worth solving

• Testing ideas before significant capital is deployed

• Bringing in proven operational teams

• Providing institutional knowledge and repeatable processes

This de-risks early-stage investment, making it more attractive for investors who want exposure to innovation without shouldering all the volatility.

2. Combining Capital and Execution

Venture studios provide more than just money, they bring in execution. Studios typically invest capital alongside deep operational support in product development, marketing, legal, and hiring.

3. Faster Time-to-Market

With in-house resources and processes, studios can launch startups in months rather than years. Time is money in the startup world , and venture studios know how to save both.

4. Stronger Founder Matches

Studios recruit and match founders to ideas after validating those ideas. This approach ensures founders work on something with traction, not just personal passion. It increases the likelihood of founder-market fit.

Case Studies: Success Stories from European Venture Studios

eFounders: Reinventing the Future of Work

Paris-based eFounders has launched over 30 companies in the SaaS space, including:

• Spendesk – a corporate expense management platform

• Front – a shared inbox for teams

• Aircall – cloud-based phone systems

With a portfolio now valued at over $2 billion, eFounders is a prime example of how studios can build repeatable, scalable, and high-value businesses.

Founders Factory: Partnering with Corporates

Founders Factory, headquartered in London, takes a collaborative approach by partnering with corporates like Aviva, L’Oréal, and easyJet to co-create new ventures. This model blends industry expertise with startup agility, resulting in better distribution and exit opportunities.

Challenges for the Venture Studio Model

While the benefits are significant, venture studios also face key challenges:

1. High Operational Costs – Running a studio with multiple teams, developers, and resources is expensive.

2. Talent Bottlenecks – Finding experienced, entrepreneurial founders is not easy, especially for niche industries.

3. Ownership Structures – Studios often retain significant equity in startups they build, which can sometimes discourage later-stage investors or founders.

4. Scalability Issues – Unlike VCs who can deploy capital across dozens of deals, studios require hands-on involvement, making scaling slower.

Yet, many of these challenges are being overcome with better models, diversified funding sources, and growing demand for startup building.

The Future: What’s Next for Venture Studios in Europe?

The next decade looks bright for venture studios in Europe.

1. Niche Studios Will Emerge

Expect to see industry-specific venture studios in areas like:

• HealthTech

• ClimateTech

• InsurTech

• Food and Agriculture

These studios will leverage sector expertise and regulatory knowledge to build highly targeted solutions.

2. More Corporate-Backed Studios

Corporations looking to innovate outside their core business are increasingly turning to studios. This trend will grow as legacy firms in banking, insurance, and logistics face digital disruption.

3. Studio-VC Hybrids

Some studios are evolving into studio-VC hybrids, combining the company-building model with traditional fund investing. This allows them to back external founders while still building in-house ventures.

4. More Government and EU Support

As European governments continue to promote entrepreneurship and innovation, expect more support for venture studios via grants, incubator partnerships, and regulatory incentives.

Final Thoughts

Venture studios represent a powerful shift in how startups are built and funded in Europe. By reducing risk, providing hands-on support, and accelerating time-to-market, they are making early-stage investing more efficient and effective.

As innovation becomes a priority across sectors, and the demand for high-quality startups continues to rise, venture studios are well-positioned to become a central pillar of Europe’s startup ecosystem.

The Rise of Vertical Fintechs in 2025: Why Niche Is the New Scalable

In 2025, the financial technology (fintech) landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation. As horizontal players that aim to serve everyone face challenges in personalization and regulation, vertical fintechs, startups that target specific customer segments or industries, are taking the lead. From fintechs focused on freelancers to those designed for farmers or immigrants, the niche is no longer small, it's the new scalable.

What Are Vertical Fintechs?

Vertical fintechs are companies that design their products, services, and experiences around the unique needs of a specific market segment. Unlike horizontal fintechs like PayPal or Revolut that aim to provide general services to all consumers, vertical players dive deep into the challenges, behavior, and expectations of a narrowly defined group.

Examples include:

• Lendtable, which focuses on helping low-income workers access employer-matching 401(k) contributions.

• Daylight, a digital bank designed for LGBTQ+ individuals.

• Till, a fintech solution for landlords and tenants to manage rent flexibility.

In 2025, the rise of these verticals reflects a broader trend: consumers and businesses are demanding more tailored financial services, and the companies that deliver them are gaining traction.

Why Vertical Fintechs Are Thriving in 2025

1. Deep Customer Understanding = Product-Market Fit

The biggest advantage of vertical fintechs lies in their laser-sharp focus. By honing in on one specific user group or industry, these companies build intimate knowledge of pain points. That insight leads to stronger product-market fit, better retention, and faster word-of-mouth adoption.

For example, a vertical fintech serving migrant workers can customize onboarding, offer remittance tools, and provide local-language support, all features that horizontal platforms might overlook.

2. Better Regulatory Navigation

Financial services are inherently regulated, and different industries or customer segments often have different compliance requirements. Vertical fintechs can more easily navigate the regulatory landscape by focusing on one set of rules. For instance, a fintech that builds solutions for cannabis businesses can specialize in meeting the unique banking and licensing laws that apply to that niche.

In 2025, tighter regulatory frameworks in Europe, the U.S., and Africa are making this advantage more visible. Governments are more receptive to solutions that cater to underserved communities without overgeneralizing.

3. Embedded Finance Opportunities

Vertical fintechs often integrate financial services directly into existing workflows of their target industries. This is known as embedded finance. Whether it's payment tools inside agricultural supply chains or credit lines within e-commerce marketplaces for artisans, fintechs are transforming into essential infrastructure rather than standalone apps.

By embedding financial services where users already spend time, vertical fintechs in 2025 are improving user adoption and building stickier platforms.

4. Capital Efficiency & Lower CAC

Horizontal fintechs often burn massive capital trying to attract a wide user base. In contrast, vertical fintechs enjoy lower customer acquisition costs (CAC) due to precise targeting and high referral rates within tight-knit communities.

In 2025, investors are paying more attention to capital efficiency amid shifting venture capital dynamics. That makes vertical fintechs attractive for funds focused on sustainable growth.

5. Strategic Partnerships & Ecosystem Building

Vertical fintechs are not just building apps, they’re constructing ecosystems. Many partner with nonprofits, trade associations, cooperatives, and even government agencies to deliver value at scale.

An example is a vertical fintech in East Africa that partners with local agricultural cooperatives to offer weather-indexed crop insurance. 

Case Study: Vertical Fintech in Agriculture

Take the agricultural sector. Farmers often face unique financial challenges such as seasonal income, lack of credit history, and  price fluctuation. In 2025, a new wave of fintech startups is emerging that offer:

• Digital lending tailored to planting and harvest cycles

• Crop insurance embedded into seed purchases

• Real-time commodity pricing through mobile apps

These products aren’t just financial tools, they’re lifeline.

Challenges to Scaling Vertically

While vertical fintechs offer tremendous upside, they also face some hurdles:

• Limited TAM (Total Addressable Market): Narrow focus can sometimes limit scalability if not properly planned.

• Dependency on Ecosystem Partners: Many vertical fintechs rely on third-party players (e.g., clinics, NGOs, schools) for customer distribution.

• Product Complexity: Building hyper-specific tools often leads to longer development cycles and complex support needs.

However, these are not deal-breakers. Many vertical fintechs are addressing these issues by expanding into adjacent verticals once they gain traction or by layering horizontal capabilities (e.g., payments, lending) on top of a strong vertical core.

The Future of Vertical Fintechs

As we move through 2025 and beyond, several trends suggest vertical fintechs are here to stay:

• AI and personalization will allow for even deeper tailoring of services to niche needs.

• Open banking regulations in Europe and parts of Africa are making it easier for vertical players to access and build on top of existing financial infrastructure.

• Corporate venture studios are also starting to incubate vertical fintechs, seeing them as quicker paths to innovation in legacy industries like health, construction, or logistics.

Final Thought

In 2025, the fintech game is no longer just about size or volume, it’s about depth, relevance, and impact. Vertical fintechs are proving that when it comes to financial innovation, the riches truly lie in the niches. By serving specific audiences with empathy and precision, they are redefining what scalability means in financial services. For founders, investors, and corporates alike, vertical is not just a strategy, it’s the future.

How AI is Changing the Underwriting Process in B2B Insurance

The B2B insurance landscape is experiencing a seismic transformation. Traditional underwriting, once dominated by manual processes and lengthy decision cycles, is giving way to a new era powered by artificial intelligence. This shift isn't just evolutionary, it's revolutionary, fundamentally changing how insurers assess risk, price policies, and serve their commercial clients.

The Numbers Don't Lie: A Market in Rapid Transformation

The statistics paint a compelling picture of AI's meteoric rise in insurance. The global AI in the insurance market, valued at $8.13 billion in 2024, is projected to explode to $141.44 billion by 2034, representing a staggering 33.06% compound annual growth rate. This isn't just growth; it's a complete market reimagining. What makes this transformation even more remarkable is its pace of adoption. Recent industry surveys reveal that 77% of insurance companies are now in some stage of AI adoption across their value chain, a dramatic leap from just 61% in 2023. Among life and annuity insurers, the adoption rate soars even higher, with 82% having implemented generative AI in one or more business functions.

For underwriting specifically, the impact is particularly pronounced. AI-assisted underwriting has emerged as one of the largest use case segments for AI in insurance, with insurers reporting up to 40% improvement in underwriting efficiency when deploying AI tools.

Beyond Speed: The Multifaceted Revolution

The transformation extends far beyond simple automation. Modern AI systems are reshaping every aspect of the B2B underwriting process, creating value that compounds across multiple dimensions.

Risk Assessment Precision: Traditional underwriting relied heavily on historical data and underwriter intuition. Today's AI systems analyze vast datasets from connected devices, satellite imagery, social media, and IoT sensors. With experts estimating one trillion connected devices by 2025, the data available for risk assessment is expanding exponentially. This data deluge enables insurers to understand their commercial clients more deeply than ever before, resulting in pricing accuracy that was previously impossible.

Fraud Detection and Pattern Recognition: AI's pattern recognition capabilities have revolutionized fraud detection in commercial lines. By identifying irregular patterns and reducing subjective biases, AI systems can spot potential fraud that human underwriters might miss. This enhanced detection capability translates directly to improved loss ratios, with some insurers reporting decreases of 1-3% through intelligent recommendations on optimal application approval and quoting decisions.

Real-Time Decision Making: The traditional underwriting process often stretched across weeks or months for complex commercial risks. AI has compressed this timeline dramatically, enabling real-time analysis of applications and instant decision-making for many types of coverage. This speed advantage is particularly crucial in B2B markets where businesses need coverage quickly to support their operations.

The Technology Stack Driving Change

The AI revolution in B2B insurance underwriting isn't powered by a single technology but rather by a sophisticated ecosystem of interconnected tools and platforms. Machine learning algorithms process historical claims data to identify risk patterns, while natural language processing systems extract insights from unstructured documents like financial statements and business plans.

Computer vision technology analyzes satellite imagery and drone footage to assess property risks, while predictive analytics models forecast potential claims scenarios. Integration platforms connect these AI tools with existing underwriting systems, creating seamless workflows that enhance rather than replace human expertise.

The sophistication of these systems continues to evolve rapidly. Today's AI underwriting platforms can process multiple data sources simultaneously, cross-referencing business registration information, financial health indicators, industry risk factors, and real-time market conditions to generate comprehensive risk profiles within minutes.

Industry Leaders Driving Innovation

The competitive landscape is being reshaped by companies that successfully harness AI's potential. Planck, for example, raised $71 million in funding to develop its underwriting AI product, which now operates globally. Their platform demonstrates how specialized AI solutions can transform traditional underwriting approaches.

Similarly, major data companies like Experian are developing AI-powered solutions specifically for commercial insurance. Their "Hazard Tags" system provides comprehensive profiles of five million UK businesses, enabling insurers to make more informed underwriting decisions at scale.

The Path Forward: Challenges and Opportunities

Despite the remarkable progress, the journey toward AI-driven underwriting isn't without obstacles. Data quality remains a persistent challenge, as AI systems are only as good as the information they process. Regulatory compliance adds another layer of complexity, particularly in jurisdictions with strict data protection laws.

The human element remains crucial. While AI excels at processing vast amounts of data and identifying patterns, human underwriters bring contextual understanding and relationship management skills that complement AI capabilities. The most successful implementations combine AI's analytical power with human expertise and judgment.

Looking ahead, the integration of AI in B2B insurance underwriting will likely deepen rather than simply expand. As AI systems become more sophisticated and data sources multiply, underwriters will gain unprecedented insights into commercial risks. The question isn't whether AI will transform B2B insurance underwriting; it's how quickly and comprehensively this transformation will occur.

Final Thought

The transformation of B2B insurance underwriting through AI represents more than technological advancement, it's a fundamental shift toward data-driven, precise, and efficient risk assessment. With 36% of insurance technology experts identifying AI as their top innovation priority for 2025, the momentum behind this transformation continues to build.

For B2B insurers, the choice is clear: embrace AI-driven underwriting or risk being left behind by competitors who have harnessed its power. The insurers who successfully integrate AI into their underwriting processes won't just survive this transformation, they'll thrive in the new landscape of precision, speed, and insight that defines the future of commercial insurance.

The numbers, the technology, and the market momentum all point in the same direction. AI isn't just changing B2B insurance underwriting, it's revolutionizing it, one algorithm at a time.

A summary of Mandalore Partners’ portfolio companies’ impact - 2024

Executive Summary

Mandalore Partners is a leading impact investor, committed to generating positive change alongside strong financial returns. We strategically invest in innovative companies that leverage impact as a driver of performance and differentiation. This report showcases the tangible impact achieved by our portfolio companies in 2024, highlighting their contributions to a healthier, more inclusive, and sustainable world.

Our portfolio companies have collectively improved the well-being of over 81,000 individuals through access to healthcare and optimized work environments. They have facilitated economic empowerment for women in emerging countries, enabling financial stability and skills development. Furthermore, they have enhanced emergency response capabilities, protecting a territorial area of 126,021 km² and improving public safety. Finally, our portfolio companies have empowered organizations to effectively measure and optimize their impact, driving accountability and transparency in the impact sector. These achievements demonstrate the power of impact investing to create a better future, and underscore Mandalore Partners' leadership in driving positive change.

Our Approach to Impact

At Mandalore Partners, we invest in high-growth potential companies that leverage impact as a driver of performance and differentiation. Unlike traditional investment funds, we work closely with our portfolio companies to structure and maximize their impact while ensuring profitable and sustainable growth. Our approach is built on rigorous criteria for evaluating and supporting businesses, focusing on innovative business models that can positively transform their markets.

Our Investment Thesis

We invest in companies that use technology and innovation to address major challenges and have strong scalability potential. Our portfolio consists of companies that meet three fundamental criteria:

Measurable and Tangible Impact: We ensure that companies deliver verifiable value to their stakeholders, with clear performance indicators.

Solid and Scalable Business Model: Impact should not be a constraint but rather an accelerator of growth.

Sustainable Competitive Advantage: We seek companies that can innovate and distinguish themselves sustainably in their market.

We don’t just invest: we actively collaborate with leadership teams to refine their strategy, structure their impact, and strengthen their market positioning.

Our Differentiation

Unlike conventional investment funds, Mandalore Partners does not position itself as an impact fund, but as a pragmatic investor who integrates impact as a lever for value creation. Instead, it actively supports its portfolio companies to align growth with impact without compromising on performance and adopts a targeted sector approach, focusing on technology companies with real potential to transform their markets.

Our Companies and Their Impact

We have invested in several companies that integrate impact as a core element of their business model:

Capsix
Capsix is developing a revolutionary robotic solution to democratize access to body care and reduce chronic pain. This innovation enables broader and more accessible treatment, particularly in workplaces where preventing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is essential.

Isahit
Isahit operates a digital micro-work platform that provides economic opportunities to women in developing countries. It combines social impact and economic performance by meeting corporate needs while promoting the financial empowerment of its workers.

AUM Biosync
AUM Biosync develops AI-driven solutions to improve the quality of life for shift workers. Its goal is to optimize biological rhythms and reduce negative health impacts.

Impact Track
Impact Track offers a platform that helps impact-driven organizations measure and optimize their results. Its data-driven approach structures impact measurement and attracts funding.

---

Capsix

Source used for this section: Résultats Impacts iYU Capsix

Capsix has developed a cutting-edge robotic solution designed to democratize access to physical care and reduce chronic pain, especially in environments where musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are prevalent. By focusing on improving employee wellness and preventing injuries, Capsix contributes to healthier and more productive workplaces. The innovative approach is particularly beneficial in industries where physical labor is required, offering workers accessible and effective solutions for chronic pain management and overall well-being.

Figure 1: iYU massage robot by Capsix

In 2023, Capsix achieved notable improvements across several key impact indicators. These results were based on a study spanning two months, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week. The solution led to a significant reduction in stress levels, with a decrease of 37%, and anxiety was reduced by 64%. Depression levels saw a 33% reduction, and latency (the time it takes for users to feel the benefits of the solution) decreased by 44%. Additionally, users experienced a 25% reduction in various disorders and an 11% improvement in overall physical condition. Serenity and calmness were also notably improved, with increases of 11% and 12%, respectively.

In another study conducted over five weeks, Capsix examined the impact of its solution on individuals suffering from chronic back pain. This study involved a group of 30 participants who received IYU massages for 30 minutes twice per week. Their results were compared with those of two other groups: one that combined 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of IYU, and another that combined 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of relaxation. The findings demonstrated that Capsix's robotic solution significantly alleviated physiological stress, improved perceived health, and enhanced cognitive performance. Sleep disorders were reduced, and participants reported notable improvements in flexibility, muscular endurance, and postural stability.

These benefits not only contribute to the well-being of individuals but also support businesses in creating more resilient and productive workforces. Through its innovative approach, Capsix continues to drive positive change in workplace health, offering scalable solutions that enhance both physical and mental wellness, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of its users and clients alike.

Figure 2. Results of a study spanning two months in 2023, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week.

Figure 3: Changes in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Levels after the Capsix study spanning two months in 2023, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week.

Figure 4: Changes in Sleep Quality, Latency, and Disorders after the Capsix study spanning two months in 2023, conducted on a stressed population of 27 people, during which participants received 20 minutes of IYU massages twice a week.

In 2024, Capsix conducted a study evaluating the efficacy of its iYU robotic massage solution in alleviating low back tension and improving overall well-being. Over five weeks, 30 participants were divided into three groups: one receiving 30-minute iYU massage sessions twice per week, another combining 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of iYU, and a third combining 15 minutes of exercise with 15 minutes of relaxation. The group that received iYU massages demonstrated remarkable improvements, including a 63% reduction in physiological stress (measured via cortisol levels) and a 31% decrease in perceived stress. Pain levels were reduced by 48%, while functional capacity showed significant enhancements, with a 39% and 60% increase in the Biering-Sorensen and Shirado-Ito tests, respectively. Sleep disruption decreased by 24%, and insomnia levels dropped by 28%. Participants also reported a 14% increase in perceived quality of life, a 29% improvement in well-being, and a 20% boost in recovery. These findings underscore iYU’s effectiveness in addressing both physical and mental health challenges, further solidifying Capsix’s impact in promoting holistic wellness.

Figure 5: Changes in Functional Capacity Markers after a Capsix study spanning five weeks in 2024, conducted on 30 participants receiving iYU robotic massages and/or exercise

---

Isahit

Source used for this section: Annual Impact Study June 2022 - May 2023

Isahit is a key player in digital and economic inclusion, providing women in emerging countries with income opportunities while equipping them with valuable digital and professional skills. The platform operates on a dual model: offering supplemental income while fostering sustainable skills development, ensuring long-term employability and financial stability. Unlike other micro-work platforms often criticized for precarious labor conditions, Isahit prioritizes structured, meaningful engagement. By offering a framework that extends beyond immediate compensation, the platform supports professional growth, personal empowerment, and community-building.

Figure 6: Isahit Platform

The impact of Isahit is primarily reflected in the economic and professional empowerment of its beneficiaries. On average, HITers who left the platform positively earned €1,306, demonstrating the platform’s role in providing tangible financial opportunities. More than half of them, 56%, reported being able to save money, indicating improved financial stability. This economic impact is reinforced by Isahit’s structured approach to work, which differs from other micro-task platforms by offering a more sustainable and empowering experience. Rather than being limited to short-term gigs, HITers gain exposure to structured work that enhances their professional trajectory.

A key differentiating factor of Isahit is its educational and community-driven approach. The platform provides 56 free digital courses, enabling users to develop skills that align with market demands. This commitment to continuous learning is reflected in user satisfaction, with 91% of HITers reporting that the digital skills acquired on the platform met their expectations. The experience gained on Isahit is widely recognized as an asset in job searches, with 80% of HITers considering it a valuable professional credential. Furthermore, the platform serves as a catalyst for personal growth, with 70% of users stating that Isahit has helped them achieve or will help them achieve their personal projects.

Figure 7: Effects of Isahit on personal growth

The social impact of Isahit extends beyond skills development and financial gains. The sense of belonging to an international community plays a crucial role in the empowerment of HITers, with 88% of users recognizing the added value of being part of such a network. This community aspect fosters confidence, motivation, and experience-sharing, creating an environment conducive to long-term professional integration. Data also highlight significant improvements in soft skills and workplace readiness. Before joining the platform, 69% of HITers felt confident in themselves, a figure that rose to 96% after leaving. Similarly, the ability to make independent decisions improved from 69% to 95%, while comfort with entering the job market increased from 50% to 92%. These metrics underscore the role of Isahit in strengthening self-esteem, autonomy, and employability.

Figure 8: Effects of Isahit on growth in confidence and workplace readiness

Isahit’s model not only provides income but also facilitates the successful transition of HITers into the workforce. One of the most concrete indicators of impact is the realization of life projects. During the study period, 64 HITers, representing 5.2% of those who left the platform, successfully completed their professional projects after working more than 50 hours on Isahit. This data highlights the platform’s ability to serve as a stepping stone for users aiming to launch careers, businesses, or educational endeavors.

While Isahit has demonstrated a strong and measurable impact, challenges remain in sustaining its long-term effects. Ensuring that HITers continue to benefit from their experience beyond their time on the platform is a key priority. Expanding training offerings, particularly through certified learning paths, could further enhance employability and career prospects. Additionally, diversifying task opportunities to better align with individual aspirations may strengthen the platform’s role in career development.

Ultimately, Isahit goes beyond being a simple micro-work platform by integrating income generation, skills training, and personal development into a cohesive model. The high recommendation rate of 84% from HITers reflects strong overall satisfaction and confidence in the platform’s ability to drive meaningful change. By fostering digital and economic inclusion, Isahit empowers women to build stable and ambitious futures, contributing to a more inclusive global workforce.

---

AUM Biosync

Source used for this section: https://page.impacttrack.org/aum-biosync 

AUM Biosync is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for workers in high-risk and shift-based professions through AI-driven solutions that optimize biological rhythms and improve operational efficiency. By equipping emergency response teams, firefighters, and public service personnel with innovative tools, AUM Biosync contributes to improved health, safety, and performance across its client organizations. The company’s growing impact is evident in key performance indicators, reflecting its expanding role in optimizing emergency response operations and strengthening public safety infrastructure.

Figure 9: AUM Biosync platform

Between 2022 and 2024, AUM Biosync saw a substantial increase in engagement and operational reach. The total number of individuals engaged across its client base rose from 54,600 in 2022 to 81,053 in 2024, with the number of voluntary firefighters increasing from 42,700 to 56,724 over the same period. This expansion underscores AUM Biosync’s role in fostering workforce participation and strengthening emergency response capacity.

Figure 10: Total Number of personnel Engaged Across Clients (2022 vs 2024)

Operational impact has also grown significantly. The annual number of emergency interventions performed by AUM Biosync’s client organizations more than doubled, increasing from 895,000 in 2022 to 1.82 million in 2024. This surge highlights the efficiency gains facilitated by the company’s solutions, which enhance risk analysis, response coordination, and overall service delivery. 

Figure 11: Annual Interventions Conducted by Clients (2022 vs 2024)

The company’s impact extends beyond operational improvements to broader social contributions. In 2024, AUM Biosync donated €69,000 to charitable organizations supporting children, including initiatives for firefighter orphans and programs such as Pompy l’ourson and Rêves de gosses. Additionally, the total territorial area protected by client organizations increased from 94,000 km² in 2022 to 126,021 km² in 2024, reflecting a significant expansion in service coverage.

Figure 12: Territorial Area Protected by Clients (2022 vs 2024)

AUM Biosync's products and services receive strong endorsements from users, particularly in their ability to enhance emergency response efficiency, operational alignment, and crisis management. 69.7% of users strongly agree that the company's solutions contribute to the equitable and sustainable distribution of emergency services, ensuring fair access to critical interventions. Furthermore, 70.1% believe that AUM Biosync’s offerings effectively meet professional and operational expectations, reinforcing their relevance in real-world applications.

In terms of risk management, 72.9% of respondents strongly agree that AUM Biosync’s solutions enhance risk analysis and response coverage efficiency, making them a vital tool for decision-making in high-pressure environments. Additionally, 65.8% of users acknowledge that these tools improve the accessibility and sustainability of civic engagement, reflecting their role in supporting volunteer and professional emergency responders.

A particularly notable impact is seen in crisis understanding and resilience, where 76.3% of respondents affirm that AUM Biosync’s solutions help them better comprehend the complexity of major crises and resilience factors. This highlights the company's contribution to strengthening preparedness and response strategies in high-risk situations.

Financial Commitment to Protection and Safety

AUM Biosync’s client organizations collectively allocate significant resources toward the protection of people and assets. In 2024, the total budget dedicated to safeguarding personnel and infrastructure reached €2,477,300,711. This substantial investment underscores the critical role that AUM Biosync plays in optimizing resource allocation and ensuring cost-effective emergency management strategies. By integrating AI-driven predictive analytics and data-driven decision-making tools, AUM Biosync helps its partners maximize the efficiency of their financial commitments, ensuring that every euro spent contributes to enhanced safety and operational effectiveness.

The allocation of these funds supports a wide range of activities, including training programs for emergency responders, the acquisition of cutting-edge safety equipment, and the development of digital platforms for improved situational awareness. These financial investments are crucial in enabling organizations to anticipate risks, coordinate interventions more effectively, and minimize response time in critical situations.

Enhanced Emergency Response Capabilities

The operational effectiveness of AUM Biosync’s solutions is further demonstrated by the dramatic rise in emergency response activities. The total number of annual interventions conducted by client organizations surged from 895,000 in 2022 to 1,820,189 in 2024. This near doubling of interventions underscores the enhanced efficiency and coordination facilitated by AUM Biosync’s AI-powered technology, which streamlines intervention processes and improves overall response time.

By leveraging real-time data analytics and intelligent resource allocation, AUM Biosync enables emergency responders to prioritize incidents based on severity, optimize dispatch routes, and minimize delays. These improvements have a direct impact on public safety outcomes, reducing casualties and mitigating the impact of critical incidents. Additionally, the platform’s ability to analyze historical data allows for proactive risk assessment, helping organizations implement preventive measures and allocate resources more effectively before emergencies arise.

Figure 13: Total number of annual interventions conducted by client organizations (2022 vs 2024)

Strengthening Workforce Engagement

AUM Biosync’s impact is also reflected in the increasing number of personnel engaged across its client organizations. From 2022 to 2024, the number of individuals participating in emergency and protective services rose from 54,600 to 81,053. This expansion signifies the company’s effectiveness in fostering workforce engagement and reinforcing public service infrastructure. The growing number of engaged personnel highlights an increasing reliance on AUM Biosync’s technology to support first responders and ensure their well-being during high-pressure operations.

In particular, the number of voluntary firefighters has grown significantly, increasing from 42,700 in 2022 to 56,724 in 2024. This trend suggests that

AUM Biosync’s solutions not only optimize emergency response efforts but also enhance the appeal of volunteer service by providing better working conditions, more predictable schedules, and greater support for personnel. The ability to manage workloads more effectively and mitigate fatigue has been a key factor in retaining skilled professionals and encouraging new recruits to join the workforce.

Figure 14: Total Number of Personnel Engaged Across Clients (2022 vs 2024)

---

Impact Track

Source used for this section: https://page.impacttrack.org/impact-track 

In a landscape where impact measurement is increasingly essential for businesses, investors, and associations, Impact Track serves as a strategic enabler by providing a robust methodological framework and specialized tools for assessing and demonstrating impact. The platform goes beyond traditional data tracking, transforming how organizations approach impact measurement by making best practices more accessible. By equipping organizations of all sizes with advanced impact measurement capabilities, Impact Track fosters data-driven decision-making and enhances strategic planning to maximize long-term outcomes.

Figure 15: Impact Track platform

A core strength of Impact Track is its ability to cultivate sustained engagement in impact measurement. Rather than serving as a one-time reporting tool, the platform integrates impact tracking into organizational workflows, enabling continuous improvement. This is reflected in user behavior, with 60.5% of organizations continuing to measure their impact beyond their initial subscription. Such long-term adoption underscores the platform’s effectiveness in embedding impact measurement as a sustainable and strategic practice.

Beyond operational benefits, Impact Track strengthens organizational credibility and visibility. In an environment where transparency and verifiable impact data are critical to securing stakeholder trust, the platform enables organizations to substantiate their claims with concrete evidence. As a result, 57.9% of users report that Impact Track has enhanced their project credibility, improving their ability to engage investors, funders, and beneficiaries. Furthermore, 59.5% of users feel confident in independently managing their impact measurement, demonstrating the platform’s role in fostering internal capacity and long-term autonomy

The adoption and utilization of Impact Track have grown significantly, as demonstrated by key performance indicators. The number of active projects tracked on the platform increased from 288 in 2023 to 359 in 2024, reflecting expanding engagement. Additionally, user satisfaction with training and support improved from 93.8% in 2023 to 97.2% in 2024, reinforcing the platform’s commitment to continuous service enhancement.

Despite strong adoption and satisfaction levels, opportunities for improvement remain. The user renewal rate stands at 43%, indicating that while nearly half of users continue beyond their initial subscription, there is room to further enhance retention. Offering more flexible plans, advanced analytical tools, and tailored support services could help convert a higher percentage of initial users into long-term subscribers. Additionally, Impact Track’s model could be adapted for new sectors, such as public administration and local governments, broadening its reach and relevance.

Impact Track is more than a technological solution; it is a driver of transformation in impact measurement practices. Its influence extends beyond the number of projects tracked, promoting a culture of rigorous, transparent, and effective impact evaluation. By equipping organizations with the tools needed to measure and optimize their impact, Impact Track is playing a critical role in strengthening accountability and fostering strategic decision-making across the impact sector.

Figure 16: User Feedback on Impact Measurement and Platform Usability

---

Conclusion

Mandalore Partners is dedicated to building a future where positive impact and financial success go hand-in-hand. We believe that investing in companies that are committed to solving critical challenges is not only the right thing to do, but also a smart investment strategy. The achievements of our portfolio companies, as detailed in this report, demonstrate the power of impact investing to create a better world.

By leveraging innovation, technology, and a rigorous impact measurement framework, we are confident that our portfolio companies will continue to generate significant positive change while delivering strong financial performance. Mandalore Partners remains committed to our mission of investing in a better future, and we invite you to join us on this journey.

Venture Studio vs. Incubator vs. VC Fund: What Are the Differences?

In the startup world, founders have more pathways than ever to launch and grow their businesses. Venture studios, incubators, and VC funds are some of the most common models, but they’re often confused. Each plays a different role in a startup’s journey, and understanding how they work can help you choose the right support at the right time.

After reviewing real-world examples, startup reports, and founder experiences, this article breaks down how each model works, how they differ, and when they are most useful.

Venture Studios Create Startups From Scratch

Venture studios don’t wait for external founders to pitch them ideas. Instead, they come up with startup concepts internally and build them in-house. The studio handles early research, product development, branding, and even hires founding team members.

The goal is to create multiple startups each year, test them quickly, and scale the most promising ones. Studios usually retain a large share of equity in the companies they build and stay involved long term. This model offers strong support but less ownership for incoming founders.

Example: Atomic is a top venture studio that co-founded companies like Hims and Bungalow. It provides full support, from engineering to legal, giving startups a strong foundation.

Venture studios are still relatively new compared to incubators and VC funds. Globally, there are estimated to be 500–700 venture studios, while there are thousands of VC funds and incubators. This model shows how investors are moving earlier into the startup lifecycle, often building startups from scratch so that investment and company creation happen simultaneously. Venture studios also reflect a growing trend of investors getting involved earlier in the innovation process, from the ideation phase onward. Unlike traditional VC funds that invest after a product or business model is validated, venture studios combine capital and company creation at the same time. This trend shows how the line between ‘builder’ and ‘investor’ is increasingly blurred.

Incubators Help Early-Stage Founders Shape Their Ideas

Incubators are designed for individuals or teams that already have a startup idea and need help turning it into a viable business. They typically offer mentorship, training sessions, office space, and sometimes small amounts of seed funding.

Most incubators run structured programs that last a few months. Founders join a cohort, attend workshops, get access to experienced mentors, and leave with a more developed product and pitch. The equity taken is usually minimal, and the focus is more on growth than ownership.

Example: The Founder Institute helps first-time founders get started by providing a step-by-step curriculum, access to a network of mentors, and feedback from experienced entrepreneurs.

VC Funds Invest in Startups That Are Ready to Grow

Venture capital funds work differently. They invest money into startups that already have a product, some traction, or a proven business model. VC funds are made up of pooled capital from outside investors called Limited Partners (LPs), and they typically take minority ownership in startups.

VCs don't build startups or run structured programs. Instead, they provide funding, advice, and connections to help companies grow faster. Founders usually seek out VC funding when they need to scale operations, expand into new markets, or hire aggressively.

Example: Andreessen Horowitz is a leading VC firm that has invested in companies like Airbnb and Coinbase. It provides both capital and high-level strategic support.

Key Differences Between Venture Studios, Incubators, and VC Funds

When they get involved:

• Venture studios come in at the idea stage. They build startups from zero, often without an external founder involved at first.

• Incubators support startups that are just beginning and need help shaping their ideas.

• VC funds invest in startups that are already operating and need capital to grow.

How they operate:

• Venture studios act like co-founders. They are deeply involved in building the company and typically stay long term.

• Incubators act as mentors and program hosts. They guide founders through the early stages but usually step back after the program ends.

• VC funds act as investors. They fund startups, join boards, and provide access to additional resources.

What they offer:

• Venture studios provide internal resources, team members, capital, and strategic direction.

• Incubators offer mentorship, training, and sometimes small funding or services.

• VC funds offer larger amounts of capital and help with scaling strategies, fundraising, and hiring.

Equity expectations:

• Venture studios usually take a significant equity stake, often ranging from 30 to 80 percent depending on how much they contribute.

• Incubators take a small equity stake, often around 5 to 10 percent.

• VC funds typically take between 10 to 30 percent, depending on the round and valuation.

Which Model Is Right for You?

The right model depends on where you are in your startup journey.

If you want to build a company but don't yet have an idea or team, a venture studio could be your best option. You’ll get full support, but you’ll share more equity.

If you have a startup idea but need help turning it into something real, an incubator is a great choice. You'll learn, build, and grow with peers, while keeping most of your ownership.

If your product is live and you're looking for funding to expand, a VC fund is the natural next step. You’ll raise larger sums in exchange for equity and get access to high-level strategic support.

Final Thoughts

Venture studios, incubators, and VC funds all aim to build successful startups, but they approach that goal in very different ways. Choosing the right one depends on your stage, goals, and how much ownership or involvement you’re willing to trade for support.

For founders who understand these differences, the startup journey becomes clearer and more strategic, and the chances of building something meaningful increase significantly. As more investors move upstream, the choice of partner; whether studio, incubator, or VC, is more strategic than ever.

Les KPIs clés pour mesurer la performance d’un venture studio

Les venture studios gagnent du terrain dans l’écosystème entrepreneurial, en créant des startups de manière itérative et structurée. Contrairement aux fonds d’investissement ou aux incubateurs, leur modèle repose sur la création interne d’entreprises. Un studio n’est pas qu’une machine à startups, c’est aussi un acteur de transformation. Mais comment mesurer leur réussite ? Quels indicateurs permettent d’évaluer leur performance au-delà des simples sorties financières ?

Dans cet article, nous explorons les principaux KPIs (indicateurs clés de performance) qui permettent de suivre et d’analyser l’efficacité d’un venture studio.

Le taux de création de startups est un indicateur fondamental

Un premier KPI essentiel est le nombre de startups créées sur une période donnée (souvent annuelle). Ce chiffre reflète la capacité du studio à générer, valider et transformer des idées en projets réels.

Il ne s’agit pas seulement de quantité. Le ratio entre idées explorées et startups réellement lancées permet de mesurer l'efficacité du processus de validation en amont.

Le taux de survie des startups montre la solidité du modèle

Créer une startup, c’est bien. Mais assurer sa survie dans les 12 à 36 mois, c’est mieux. Le taux de survie mesure le pourcentage de startups du studio toujours actives après une période définie. Il témoigne de la qualité de l’accompagnement, de la pertinence du produit, et de l’adéquation au marché.

Un bon venture studio ne se contente pas de lancer des projets : il les structure pour qu’ils tiennent la route.

La vitesse de mise sur le marché reflète l’agilité du studio

L’un des grands atouts des venture studios est leur capacité à aller vite. Le time-to-market — soit le temps entre l’idéation et le lancement public du produit — est un KPI clé.

Un cycle de développement court indique que le studio sait mobiliser ses ressources (design, produit, développement, juridique) pour accélérer la croissance des projets.

Les levées de fonds externes mesurent l’attractivité des projets

Lorsque les startups issues d’un studio réussissent à lever des fonds externes, cela valide non seulement leur potentiel, mais aussi la crédibilité du studio aux yeux des investisseurs.

Le montant levé, le nombre de tours de financement réussis, et la qualité des investisseurs impliqués sont autant d’indicateurs de la valeur créée par le studio.

Le retour sur investissement global reste un KPI incontournable

Même si les studios ne fonctionnent pas comme des fonds VC classiques, ils doivent générer un retour sur investissement (ROI) à long terme. Cela peut inclure les exits (reventes), les dividendes perçus, ou encore l’augmentation de la valorisation du portefeuille global.

Ce KPI est souvent analysé sur un horizon de 5 à 10 ans, le temps que les startups atteignent leur maturité.

L’efficacité opérationnelle interne fait aussi la différence

Au-delà des performances des startups, la productivité de l’équipe du studio est aussi un KPI à suivre. Combien de projets un chef de produit ou un développeur peut-il gérer par an ? Le coût moyen par startup créée est-il optimisé ? Ces données permettent de piloter le modèle comme une entreprise à part entière.

Le réseau d’experts et de talents est un levier stratégique

Enfin, un KPI souvent sous-estimé concerne le réseau activé par le studio. Cela inclut les fondateurs recrutés, les experts impliqués, les partenariats industriels ou commerciaux. La richesse et la diversité de cet écosystème renforcent l’effet de levier du studio.

Un studio performant attire des talents de qualité, mobilise des mentors engagés et crée des synergies entre les startups.

L’impact sectoriel ou thématique : un KPI à considérer

Certains venture studios choisissent de se spécialiser dans des secteurs clés comme la santé, le climat, ou la tech sociale. Dans ce cas, il peut être pertinent de mesurer leur influence spécifique sur ces écosystèmes, par exemple à travers le nombre de brevets déposés, les partenariats noués avec des grands groupes industriels, ou encore leur contribution à la transition numérique ou écologique. 

Conclusion : mesurer, c’est piloter

La performance d’un venture studio ne se mesure pas uniquement à travers les succès visibles. Derrière chaque startup lancée, il y a des processus, des paris, des ajustements. En suivant des KPIs adaptés, à la fois quantitatifs et qualitatifs — les studios peuvent affiner leur stratégie, prouver leur impact, et construire un modèle durable.

Dans un écosystème en constante évolution, les venture studios qui savent se mesurer sont ceux qui savent durer.

AI in WealthTech: Where the Next Wave of Innovation Lies

Artificial intelligence is not just a feature in WealthTech—it’s the foundation of the next generation of solutions. 

Our methodology involved gathering numerous venture maps from around the world to identify recurring categories and sources of innovation in AI. From this extensive research, we developed the Mandalore AI in WealthTech Venture Map 2025, which captures the current state of the art in AI technology and innovation. Using these insights, we analyzed how innovation is driven across different sectors and crafted this article to highlight the key trends and opportunities shaping the future of AI.

AI enables dynamic portfolio optimization

AI is redefining portfolio construction through hyper-personalization and continuous optimization. Algorithms can ingest investor goals, risk tolerance, and real-time market data to dynamically rebalance portfolios. This enables scalable, advisor-like services delivered automatically, with less human intervention and greater adaptability.

While unlocking private markets through automated sourcing and valuation

Access to private assets is being democratized and de-risked through AI-powered deal sourcing, valuation modeling, and scenario simulation. Machine learning models uncover hidden opportunities and automate diligence processes, creating a competitive edge in an opaque and fragmented landscape.

And turning financial planning into adaptive guidance

AI transforms static financial plans into living, breathing systems that adjust to life changes in real time. By integrating behavioral data and predictive analytics, platforms can guide users proactively—recommending decisions, anticipating shortfalls, and making planning feel less like a spreadsheet and more like a conversation.

As well as modernizing compliance with intelligent monitoring

Legacy compliance processes are being replaced by intelligent monitoring systems that learn from data and flag risks before they materialize. AI enhances transparency and reduces manual workloads, making it possible for firms to scale governance and stay ahead of evolving regulations with minimal friction.

While also enhancing market insight through unstructured data analysis

AI mines unstructured data—from news to social feeds—to generate real-time insights and sentiment indicators. This empowers investors to make faster, more informed decisions and unlocks new alpha from sources that traditional models overlook.

And finally personalizing client experience with predictive interfaces

AI personalizes the advisor-client relationship at scale. From conversational interfaces to predictive nudges, AI enables firms to deliver tailored advice, anticipate needs, and build trust—making digital wealth platforms feel human, even when no one is on the other end.

How is AI reshaping InsurTech ?

AI unlocks unprecedented underwriting value through non-traditional data processing, while simultaneously enabling substantial margin improvements via automated claims handling and fraud detection. Furthermore, behavioral prediction engines dramatically reduce acquisition costs, just as sector-specific applications improve loss ratios and create new premium pools. Finally, dynamic pricing optimization delivers defensible advantages through improved ratios and conversion rates.

Our methodology involved gathering numerous venture maps from around the world to identify recurring categories and sources of innovation in AI. From this extensive research, we developed the Mandalore AI in InsurTech Venture Map 2025, which captures the current state of the art in AI technology and innovation. Using these insights, we analyzed how innovation is driven across different sectors and crafted this article to highlight the key trends and opportunities shaping the future of AI.

AI unlocks unprecedented underwriting value through non-traditional data processing

The most promising AI investments in underwriting target the opportunity in reducing mispriced risk. Algorithms now process thousands of non-traditional variables that traditional actuarial models miss completely. The emerging gold rush is in proprietary data acquisition strategies that feed these models with unique signals beyond standard industry datasets. We're particularly bullish on computer vision applications that can extract property characteristics remotely, eliminating the need for costly physical inspections while dramatically improving accuracy of risk assessment.

While enabling margin improvements via automated claims handling and fraud detection

Claims processing represents perhaps the largest near-term ROI opportunity in insurtech, with potential margin improvements through AI automation. The value creation formula is straightforward: each percentage point of fraud detection improvement could translate to annual savings industry-wide. We see immediate traction for solutions combining computer vision for damage assessment with natural language processing for claims documentation analysis. The most investable opportunities are emerging at the intersection of these technologies, where end-to-end claims automation platforms can deliver increasing processing rates.

Behavioral prediction engines dramatically reduce acquisition costs

With customer acquisition costs in insurance being high, AI-powered distribution efficiency represents a massive opportunity. The most compelling investment cases are platforms that leverage behavioral prediction engines to identify high-conversion prospects before competitors. The next frontier will be conversational AI that can handle complex insurance consultations with human-like understanding of coverage nuances, effectively democratizing expert-level insurance guidance.

Just as sector-specific applications improve loss ratios and create new premium pools

Sector-specific AI applications are producing the fastest path to market leadership. In auto insurance, companies deploying telematics with behavioral analysis algorithms are decreasing loss ratios below industry averages. Life insurers leveraging continuous underwriting models through wearable data are expanding their addressable market by making coverage accessible to previously uninsurable populations. The cyber insurance sector presents the most asymmetric return profile, where AI that can quantify previously unmodeled risks creates entirely new premium pools..

Finally, dynamic pricing optimization delivers defensible advantages

AI-driven pricing represents the most defensible competitive advantage in insurance. The investment opportunity lies in platforms that balance pricing optimization with regulatory compliance through explainable AI. Dynamic pricing engines that can continuously adjust to market conditions without human intervention are a big opportunity. The next wave of innovation will come from causal inference algorithms that simulate customer responses to price changes, allowing insurers to optimize elasticity at the individual level.

The Future of AI: Key Technologies and Breakthrough Opportunities Transforming Industries

This article explores the major AI technology categories reshaping industries today. From foundational language models to generative content creation, computer vision, robotics, and cybersecurity, it highlights the core innovations driving new use cases and efficiencies. It also emphasizes the growing importance of ethical AI governance to ensure responsible adoption across sectors.

Our methodology involved gathering numerous venture maps from around the world to identify recurring categories and sources of innovation in AI. From this extensive research, we developed the Mandalore AI Techno Venture Map 2025, which captures the current state of the art in AI technology and innovation. Using these insights, we analyzed how innovation is driven across different sectors and crafted this article to highlight the key trends and opportunities shaping the future of AI.

Foundation models and LLMs are transforming language understanding

Foundation models and large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing machine understanding and generation of natural language. These models serve as the backbone of modern AI, capable of performing a wide range of tasks with minimal supervision. Innovation is happening at multiple levels: from developing new, more efficient architectures, to fine-tuning models for domain-specific applications. Open-source ecosystems and infrastructure tools are expanding access, while autonomous agents and AI copilots are beginning to act independently across productivity tools and enterprise workflows.

Meanwhile, generative AI powers content creation

Generative AI enables machines to create original content across text, images, video, code, audio, and even 3D models. In creative industries, this means automated content production, real-time media editing, and synthetic design. For developers, new AI coding assistants accelerate software development and testing. Audio and music generation platforms provide personalized media experiences, while generative 3D tools transform asset creation in gaming, digital twins, and immersive environments.

At the same time, computer vision interprets visual data

Computer vision allows machines to interpret and act on visual information, unlocking a broad range of applications. In industrial contexts, AI can detect manufacturing defects, monitor quality, and optimize production lines. In healthcare, it assists in analyzing medical imaging to support diagnostics. Vision-based surveillance systems are transforming security operations, while autonomous driving relies on real-time image processing to navigate dynamic environments. Facial recognition and biometrics further extend vision’s reach into authentication and identity verification.

While NLP drives language recognition

NLP technologies extract meaning from unstructured language data. Machine translation tools bridge language barriers across global organizations. Text summarization and information extraction streamline document processing, legal analysis, and research. Augmented search capabilities combine retrieval and generation to provide accurate, context-aware responses in enterprise knowledge systems. In voice, real-time transcription and synthetic voice cloning enable more natural and scalable human-machine interaction.

Additionally, robotics and automation enhance efficiency

AI-driven robotics is reshaping physical work across sectors. Humanoid and task-specific robots are being deployed in manufacturing, retail, and service industries. Warehouses are increasingly automated through intelligent systems that move, sort, and package goods with minimal human input. Edge computing enables real-time decision-making in low-latency environments like vehicles or sensors. Smart city infrastructure leverages AI to manage traffic flow, safety, and urban logistics.

Also, AI in science speeds up drug discovery and materials innovation.

AI is fast becoming a core tool in scientific discovery. In life sciences, it accelerates drug discovery by modeling molecule interactions and predicting treatment outcomes. In material science and chemistry, AI models generate new compounds with specific properties, drastically reducing the time required for R&D. These technologies not only enhance research productivity but also open new possibilities across medicine, energy, and sustainability.

Meanwhile, AI for cybersecurity improves threat detection and protection

Cybersecurity is evolving with AI on both sides of the threat landscape. Security operations are becoming more autonomous, with AI systems detecting and responding to incidents in real time. Deepfake detection and malicious content identification help combat new forms of digital fraud. AI-specific guardrails are emerging to monitor prompt injection, data leakage, and model misuse—ensuring safer deployment of large-scale AI systems.

Still promoting AI Ethics & Governance

As AI becomes more powerful and pervasive, governance frameworks are essential to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability. Tools that audit model behavior, track data provenance, and enforce compliance standards are being embedded across industries. AI monitoring systems detect drift, bias, and anomalies, while governance platforms help organizations align model development with ethical principles and regulatory requirements.

Corporate Venture Building : un levier stratégique pour les conseils d’administration

À l’ère du digital, la survie des grandes entreprises dépend de leur capacité à innover rapidement. Alors que l'espérance de vie moyenne d'une entreprise est passée de 90 ans en 1935 à un peu plus de 10 ans aujourd’hui, les conseils d’administration doivent désormais jouer un rôle actif dans la transformation de leurs organisations.

Le Corporate Venture Building : une réponse stratégique

Le Corporate Venture Building (CVB) s’impose comme un levier stratégique puissant pour créer de nouvelles sources de revenus tout en renforçant la résilience de l’entreprise. Ce modèle hybride permet de :

• Tirer parti des actifs internes (clients, données, expertise sectorielle…)

• Reproduire l’agilité des start-ups

• Réduire les risques tout en accélérant l’innovation

Selon les experts, les entreprises qui adoptent ce modèle peuvent multiplier par 14 leurs chances de bâtir un business à forte croissance par rapport aux start-ups classiques.

🎯 4 leviers clés pour réussir un programme de Corporate Venture Building

Fixer des objectifs clairs et ambitieux

Définir une vision long terme, des axes de développement prioritaires, et des indicateurs de performance (OKR) est essentiel. Le conseil d’administration doit aussi statuer tôt sur la stratégie : spin-in (intégration au cœur de l’entreprise) ou spin-out (filiale autonome).

Adopter une logique de portefeuille et de financement progressif

Plutôt que de miser sur un seul projet, les entreprises les plus performantes adoptent une approche portefeuille, avec des décisions d’investissement basées sur des étapes clés (stage-gates). Cela permet d'optimiser le capital investi tout en réduisant les risques.

Mettre en place une gouvernance agile

L’un des freins majeurs à l’innovation est la lenteur des processus décisionnels. Pour réussir, il faut donner aux équipes une réelle autonomie, instaurer un cadre clair, et s’inspirer des meilleures pratiques des fonds de capital-risque.

Attirer et fidéliser les meilleurs talents entrepreneuriaux

Le succès d’un corporate venture repose sur ses fondateurs. Il faut savoir attirer des profils entrepreneurs/intrapreneurs et mettre en place des systèmes d’incentives inspirés des start-ups (participations, phantom shares, autonomie stratégique…).

📌 Leçons du terrain : le cas Axiata Digital

Le groupe télécom Axiata a lancé son programme de CVB en 2014. Résultat : des filiales comme Boost (wallet), ADA (data & marketing) ou Aspirasi (micro-financement) ont levé plus de 100 millions de dollars et généré des relais de croissance majeurs.

Leur recette du succès ?
👉 Une gouvernance claire, un capital dédié, des équipes autonomes, et une approche rigoureuse du portefeuille.

✅Pourquoi les conseils d’administration doivent s’impliquer dès aujourd’hui

Dans un monde où l’innovation est une question de survie, les conseils d’administration doivent :

• Challenger la vision long terme

• Soutenir l’investissement dans des projets disruptifs

• Créer un environnement favorable à l’expérimentation et à la prise de risque contrôlée

Le Corporate Venture Building est bien plus qu’un buzzword. C’est une stratégie d’innovation structurée, mesurable et scalable, capable de transformer en profondeur les modèles économiques.

Menyala & le modèle Venture Studio : une nouvelle approche de l’innovation stratégique

Qu’est-ce qu’un Venture Studio ?

Un Venture Studio, ou startup studio, est une structure qui conçoit, développe et lance des startups de manière systématique. Contrairement à un incubateur ou à un fonds d’investissement traditionnel, il agit comme un cofondateur actif : il génère les idées, construit les équipes, fournit les ressources nécessaires (technologie, financement, marketing) et accompagne les projets de leur conception à leur lancement.​

L’objectif est de réduire l’incertitude liée à l’innovation et de maximiser les chances de succès des nouvelles entreprises.​

Menyala : le studio d’innovation lancé par Temasek

Basé à Singapour, Menyala est un Venture Studio fondé avec le soutien de Temasek, un important investisseur institutionnel asiatique. Sa mission est d’anticiper les grandes transitions technologiques et de construire des solutions innovantes.​

Parmi ses domaines d’intervention prioritaires :​menyala.com+11techinasia.com+11menyala.com+11

• Finance décentralisée et infrastructures numériques

• Cybersécurité et souveraineté technologique

• Transition énergétique et climat

• Web3 et innovations de rupture​

Menyala ne se contente pas d’identifier les tendances : il lance activement des startups, structure leur développement et les positionne sur des marchés globaux.​

Pourquoi ce modèle nous inspire chez Mandalore Partners ?

Chez Mandalore Partners, nous croyons en un modèle intégré de croissance : créer, investir et faire grandir des entreprises alignées avec les enjeux de demain.​

Le modèle Venture Studio, et en particulier celui de Menyala, incarne une vision proche de la nôtre :​

• Stratégie dès le départ : les idées sont testées, modélisées, ajustées.

• Exécution rigoureuse : les équipes disposent des bons outils, mentors et ressources.

• Connexion au monde réel : chaque startup est conçue pour répondre à un besoin réel du marché.

• Réduction des risques : les erreurs classiques du "from scratch" sont limitées grâce à la mutualisation des compétences.​

Une opportunité pour les grands groupes : innover hors cadre

Le Venture Studio est également un outil stratégique pour les grandes entreprises. Souvent, les initiatives d’intrapreneuriat peinent à dépasser les limites de l’organisation. Le Venture Studio offre un cadre indépendant, agile et orienté vers les résultats, tout en maintenant un lien fort avec l’entreprise mère.​

Menyala en est un exemple : il bénéficie de la vision à long terme de Temasek, tout en conservant une autonomie entrepreneuriale forte.​

Mandalore Fintech Venture Map 2025

Methodology

This Fintech Venture Map brings together the best fintech maps available online in 2025 to create a clear and insightful overview of the financial technology ecosystem. From the essential infrastructure powering innovation - APIs, cloud computing - to the specialized services shaping the future of finance, including digital banking, payments, insurance, lending, and investment solutions, this map highlights the key players and trends driving the industry forward.

In Brief

The fintech ecosystem, structured like a building, is built on strong regulatory foundations (RegTech) and rises through robust technical infrastructures (APIs & Infra). Between these two pillars, core universal services—Digital Banking, Payments—and specialized services—Insurance, Lending—are interwoven, alongside solutions for businesses, investment, and sustainable finance, forming a comprehensive system serving both individuals and enterprises.

An infrastructure serving the entire ecosystem

At the core of the fintech revolution lies financial infrastructure and APIs, serving as the essential technological framework enabling seamless transactions, data sharing, and financial services innovation. Open banking, cloud computing, and API-driven connectivity empower fintech companies to build next-generation solutions, from digital wallets to embedded finance. Without this backbone, modern financial services wouldn’t be possible.

That  powers the financial services people use every day

Banking & Digital Financial Services - The transformation of banking and digital financial services is the heart of fintech, replacing traditional brick-and-mortar banking with fully digital experiences. Challenger banks, neobanks, and digital-first financial institutions now offer instant account opening, AI-driven financial management, and 24/7 mobile banking services, reshaping how people interact with money.

Payments & Transaction Processing - From mobile payments to cross-border money transfers, payments and transaction processing are the engines of digital commerce. Innovations such as real-time payments (RTP), buy now, pay later (BNPL), blockchain-based transfers, and contactless payments have revolutionized the way consumers and businesses send and receive money, ensuring fast, secure, and frictionless transactions.

These services rely on specialized solutions that address specific needs

InsurTech – A rapidly growing fintech segment, it is modernizing the insurance industry through AI-powered risk assessment, on-demand policies, and automated claims processing. With the rise of embedded insurance and personalized coverage, InsurTech is making insurance more accessible, efficient, and tailored to consumer needs.

Lending & Credit - The lending and credit sector within fintech is revolutionizing how individuals and businesses access financing. Through alternative credit scoring, peer-to-peer lending, and AI-driven loan underwriting, fintech lenders are providing faster, more inclusive, and more flexible financing options compared to traditional banks. Whether it’s personal loans, business credit, or BNPL solutions, fintech is reshaping the lending landscape.

Where all these services converge at the enterprise level

Corporate & Business Finance - At the intersection of fintech advancements, corporate and business finance solutions integrate banking, payments, lending, and investment technologies to optimize cash flow, automate accounting, and support financial decision-making. Fintech tools such as AI-powered financial planning, automated invoicing, and embedded treasury solutions help businesses operate more efficiently and scale with confidence.

Businesses must balance financial performance with responsibility

ESG & Sustainable Finance - As businesses and investors prioritize sustainability, ESG and sustainable finance have become essential components of the fintech landscape. From green bonds and impact investing to carbon footprint tracking tools, fintech is enabling companies and individuals to make financially and ethically responsible decisions.

WealthTech & Investment - Fintech is reshaping investment strategies with WealthTech solutions, making asset management more accessible through robo-advisors, AI-driven portfolio management, fractional investing, and cryptocurrency trading platforms. With lower costs, real-time insights, and algorithmic optimization, WealthTech is democratizing investment opportunities for individuals and institutions alike.

Under the watchful eye of a crucial safeguard

RegTech & Compliance - Fintech’s rapid growth demands robust regulatory technology and compliance solutions to prevent fraud, ensure financial transparency, and meet global regulatory standards. AI-powered KYC, AML, and real-time transaction monitoring are critical to maintaining trust and security in financial services. Without compliance, fintech innovation cannot thrive.

Some Fintech Maps spotted on the web

February 2025 : Venture Studios: Driving Innovation and Facing Strategic Challenges

As the venture studio model continues to gain traction worldwide, new initiatives are emerging across industries, focusing on innovation in energy storage, healthtech, and pet care, while some face financial and strategic challenges. This article explores the latest developments shaping the venture studio ecosystem.

GenLab Launches Silicon Valley Venture Studio for Energy Storage Innovation

On February 11, 2025, GenLab Venture Studios announced the launch of a new venture studio in Silicon Valley aimed at driving innovation in energy storage and AI infrastructure. With artificial intelligence increasingly demanding energy-intensive processing, this initiative seeks to alleviate pressure on national power grids by developing next-generation storage solutions.

The studio, led by CTO Sarah Novotny, will focus on creating advanced grid resilience technologies that ensure energy efficiency and sustainability. Leveraging cutting-edge agentic AI, GenLab aims to enhance energy storage capabilities for data centers and industrial applications, positioning itself as a key player in the clean energy transition.

Company Ventures Unveils Terrarium Venture Studio to Support Healthtech Startups

On February 18, 2025, Company Ventures, in collaboration with innovation consultancy Cactus and Wellstar Health System, launched Terrarium, a new venture studio focused on incubating startups in the health technology sector.

Terrarium plans to support up to ten startups over the next three years, with an emphasis on market validation through research-driven development. The first startup emerging from this initiative, Rota Health, is dedicated to solving healthcare data interoperability issues by leveraging artificial intelligence to streamline medical data integration.

By providing mentorship, funding, and strategic partnerships, Terrarium aims to bridge gaps in healthcare innovation and accelerate the adoption of transformative digital health solutions.

Leap Venture Studio Announces Ninth Cohort for Pet Care Startups

Leap Venture Studio & Academy, a leading accelerator program for pet care startups, has announced its ninth cohort, providing six innovative companies with funding, mentorship, and business development support.

The program, running from February to May 2025, will conclude with a Demo Day in London. Participating startups, including BistroCat, Buddy Bites, Happy Howl, James & Ella, Oh Norman!, and Otis, are pioneering new approaches in pet wellness, nutrition, and AI-driven pet care solutions.

With increasing consumer demand for premium pet products and services, Leap Venture Studio continues to foster high-growth companies that redefine the pet industry.

Avandra Raises $17.75 Million to Advance Real-World Medical Data Utilization

Avandra, a federated network specializing in medical imaging and clinical data, has successfully secured $17.75 million in funding to expand its data-sharing platform. The round, co-led by Aegis Ventures and SpringRock Ventures, will enable Avandra to enhance its data infrastructure and form new partnerships with leading healthcare providers.

The company’s mission is to improve real-world data accessibility for medical researchers and biopharmaceutical companies, accelerating drug development and personalized medicine. By leveraging AI and machine learning, Avandra aims to bridge the gap between raw medical data and actionable insights, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

54 Collective to Shut Down African Venture Studio Operations

Despite the growing global momentum of venture studios, not all initiatives thrive. 54 Collective, formerly known as Founders Factory Africa, has announced the closure of its venture studio operations on the continent, citing strategic shifts and funding challenges.

The decision comes as the organization’s partnership with the Mastercard Foundation is set to end in April 2025. This shift marks a significant change in the African startup ecosystem, raising concerns about the sustainability of venture-backed innovation models in emerging markets.

As Africa continues to develop its entrepreneurial landscape, the closure of 54 Collective highlights the ongoing funding constraints that many venture studios face, emphasizing the need for sustainable financing models to support long-term startup growth.

NEC X Partners with Carbide Ventures to Accelerate Early-Stage Startups

Silicon Valley-based NEC X has announced a strategic partnership with Carbide Ventures to boost early-stage startups. This collaboration aims to provide emerging companies with crucial resources, industry expertise, and mentorship to help transform promising ideas into scalable businesses.

By leveraging NEC X’s technical expertise and Carbide Ventures’ experience in startup acceleration, the partnership seeks to drive innovation across multiple sectors, including AI, robotics, and deep tech. This initiative underscores the growing role of venture studios in bridging the gap between cutting-edge research and commercial success.

What are the key success factors of Venture Studios ?

Venture studios are transforming the startup ecosystem with their unique approach to company building—one that combines funding, hands-on support, and structured execution. A recent in-depth analysis from the Big Venture Studio Research 2024 (Authors: Maksim Malyy, PhD; Max Pog & Contributors) illuminates the key success factors in this model. We, at Mandalore Partners, analyzed the latest findings, revealing both the strengths and challenges of venture studios today.

In Short: 

Venture studios are redefining startup creation by combining funding, hands-on support, and structured execution. They typically invest $130,000 for 17% equity, positioning themselves between accelerators and VC funds. However, success is elusive, 76% of startups fail, and exits take over seven years on average. Key success factors include experienced founders, strategic use of Entrepreneurs in Residence (EIRs), and efficient MVP development. Studios that combine consulting services with startup-building and maintain lower equity stakes outperform pure-play models. Ultimately, studios follow two paths: stable, predictable growth or high-risk, disruptive innovation. The future of venture studios depends on mastering this balance.

A Standardized Model Focused on Startup Building

Modern venture studios operate under a distinct framework. Most follow a pure-play model, focusing exclusively on launching startups rather than diversifying into corporate partnerships or fund management. While typically sector-agnostic, they commonly operate in Health, B2B SaaS, Fintech, and Sustainability. The venture studio boom centers primarily in the US and Europe, with most adopting a single studio model—operating without an associated VC fund backing.

Venture Studios Invest Early for Meaningful Equity

Venture studios typically invest an average of $130,000 per startup for 17% equity, acting as active, early-stage investors. Their startups begin with a pre-seed valuation of $1.09 million, positioning them between accelerators and traditional venture capital funds. This investment level secures a meaningful stake while preserving room for future investors.

High Failure Rates and Long Exit Timelines Define the Game

Despite their support structure, venture studios face significant challenges. They see a 24% exit to 76% failure ratio—meaning three of four studio-backed startups fail. Let’s be precise on that point: success here was defined as any startup that did not go bankrupt.

Exits take time, averaging 7.11 years, typically through VC exit. The process is highly selective: studios review 200 ideas, develop 40 MVPs, yet only one reaches an exit - an exit was defined here as any occurrence of a liquidity event, quite a broad definition. Adding to these challenges is a negative valuation growth trend - obviously negative as 76% of startups fail - with startups losing an average of -$0.14 million per year in value, when VC funds are at -$0.12 million per year.

Support Services are common, but Market Execution is Key

Entrepreneurs in Residence are vital to venture studio success, contributing during the early ideation phase or during the creation phase. Leading studios offer comprehensive support services: advisors and go-to-market (GTM) assistance appear in 91% of studios, while operational and technical development support exists in more than 80%. Over 70% of studios provide access to first customers and financial resources. Yet despite these advantages, negative valuation growth indicates that strong operational support alone isn't sufficient—market execution remains crucial.

Hybrid Studios See Higher Survival Rates

Success varies significantly among venture studios. Those combining consulting or corporate services with startup-building achieve an impressive survival ratio, outperforming pure-play studios. Studios being vertical agnostic achieve a 19% success rate.

Scale significantly influences success. Studios launching between four and seven ventures yearly outperform those with lower output. At 30 ventures or more, success rates climb, highlighting the importance of operational experience and network effects. Equity structure also matters—studios keeping less than 20% equity achieve the highest success rates at 33%, likely by leaving adequate room for future investors.

Founder experience proves crucial. Studios recruiting founders with previous startup exits show better outcomes. Timing of EIR integration is also key—69% of studios with successful exits brought in EIRs during the creation phase, versus 46% among those without exits. This suggests that well-timed entrepreneurial leadership significantly impacts scaling and funding success.

Efficient MVP Development Increases Startup Survival

Product development efficiency strongly indicates success potential. Studios keeping MVP development costs under $50,000 achieve a 15% success rate, demonstrating lean development's advantages. Time of execution matters—MVPs launched within six to twelve months achieve a 21% success rate, higher than those launched in less than six months. Studios delivering fully functional, market-ready MVPs rather than prototypes reach 19% success rates, emphasizing the importance of quality execution.

Two Roads Diverge: Play It Safe or Go All In on Disruption

Research reveals two distinct strategic approaches. The first strategy prioritizes stable returns, focusing on predictable growth over high-risk bets. These studios target sustainable business creation through corporate focus or steady niche market growth. This approach offers lower but more predictable returns, suiting new studios without significant competitive advantages.

The second strategy embraces disruption and high-risk ventures, aiming to create breakthrough companies through cutting-edge technology, innovative business models, or exceptional talent. While offering potential for massive returns, this path carries a high failure rate and demands unique competitive advantages. Research suggests newcomers should start with the stable returns strategy before attempting disruptive startups.

The Future of Venture Studios Lies in Execution and Adaptation

The data presents clear insights into venture studio evolution and success factors. Despite high failure rates and valuation challenges, top performers follow consistent patterns. Studios that combine startup building with consulting services, maintain low equity stakes, develop MVPs efficiently, and integrate experienced founders strategically consistently outperform peers.

For investors and entrepreneurs, this research provides a clear framework for evaluating venture studio opportunities in 2025 and beyond. With strategic execution, venture studios can continue revolutionizing the startup ecosystem. The key question remains: who will master this model and shape the next generation of successful startups?