VentureStudios

Venture Studio vs. Incubator vs. VC Fund: What Are the Differences?

In the startup world, founders have more pathways than ever to launch and grow their businesses. Venture studios, incubators, and VC funds are some of the most common models, but they’re often confused. Each plays a different role in a startup’s journey, and understanding how they work can help you choose the right support at the right time.

After reviewing real-world examples, startup reports, and founder experiences, this article breaks down how each model works, how they differ, and when they are most useful.

Venture Studios Create Startups From Scratch

Venture studios don’t wait for external founders to pitch them ideas. Instead, they come up with startup concepts internally and build them in-house. The studio handles early research, product development, branding, and even hires founding team members.

The goal is to create multiple startups each year, test them quickly, and scale the most promising ones. Studios usually retain a large share of equity in the companies they build and stay involved long term. This model offers strong support but less ownership for incoming founders.

Example: Atomic is a top venture studio that co-founded companies like Hims and Bungalow. It provides full support, from engineering to legal, giving startups a strong foundation.

Venture studios are still relatively new compared to incubators and VC funds. Globally, there are estimated to be 500–700 venture studios, while there are thousands of VC funds and incubators. This model shows how investors are moving earlier into the startup lifecycle, often building startups from scratch so that investment and company creation happen simultaneously. Venture studios also reflect a growing trend of investors getting involved earlier in the innovation process, from the ideation phase onward. Unlike traditional VC funds that invest after a product or business model is validated, venture studios combine capital and company creation at the same time. This trend shows how the line between ‘builder’ and ‘investor’ is increasingly blurred.

Incubators Help Early-Stage Founders Shape Their Ideas

Incubators are designed for individuals or teams that already have a startup idea and need help turning it into a viable business. They typically offer mentorship, training sessions, office space, and sometimes small amounts of seed funding.

Most incubators run structured programs that last a few months. Founders join a cohort, attend workshops, get access to experienced mentors, and leave with a more developed product and pitch. The equity taken is usually minimal, and the focus is more on growth than ownership.

Example: The Founder Institute helps first-time founders get started by providing a step-by-step curriculum, access to a network of mentors, and feedback from experienced entrepreneurs.

VC Funds Invest in Startups That Are Ready to Grow

Venture capital funds work differently. They invest money into startups that already have a product, some traction, or a proven business model. VC funds are made up of pooled capital from outside investors called Limited Partners (LPs), and they typically take minority ownership in startups.

VCs don't build startups or run structured programs. Instead, they provide funding, advice, and connections to help companies grow faster. Founders usually seek out VC funding when they need to scale operations, expand into new markets, or hire aggressively.

Example: Andreessen Horowitz is a leading VC firm that has invested in companies like Airbnb and Coinbase. It provides both capital and high-level strategic support.

Key Differences Between Venture Studios, Incubators, and VC Funds

When they get involved:

  • Venture studios come in at the idea stage. They build startups from zero, often without an external founder involved at first.

  • Incubators support startups that are just beginning and need help shaping their ideas.

  • VC funds invest in startups that are already operating and need capital to grow.

How they operate:

  • Venture studios act like co-founders. They are deeply involved in building the company and typically stay long term.

  • Incubators act as mentors and program hosts. They guide founders through the early stages but usually step back after the program ends.

  • VC funds act as investors. They fund startups, join boards, and provide access to additional resources.

What they offer:

  • Venture studios provide internal resources, team members, capital, and strategic direction.

  • Incubators offer mentorship, training, and sometimes small funding or services.

  • VC funds offer larger amounts of capital and help with scaling strategies, fundraising, and hiring.

Equity expectations:

  • Venture studios usually take a significant equity stake, often ranging from 30 to 80 percent depending on how much they contribute.

  • Incubators take a small equity stake, often around 5 to 10 percent.

  • VC funds typically take between 10 to 30 percent, depending on the round and valuation.

Which Model Is Right for You?

The right model depends on where you are in your startup journey.

If you want to build a company but don't yet have an idea or team, a venture studio could be your best option. You’ll get full support, but you’ll share more equity.

If you have a startup idea but need help turning it into something real, an incubator is a great choice. You'll learn, build, and grow with peers, while keeping most of your ownership.

If your product is live and you're looking for funding to expand, a VC fund is the natural next step. You’ll raise larger sums in exchange for equity and get access to high-level strategic support.

Final Thoughts

Venture studios, incubators, and VC funds all aim to build successful startups, but they approach that goal in very different ways. Choosing the right one depends on your stage, goals, and how much ownership or involvement you’re willing to trade for support.

For founders who understand these differences, the startup journey becomes clearer and more strategic, and the chances of building something meaningful increase significantly. As more investors move upstream, the choice of partner; whether studio, incubator, or VC, is more strategic than ever.

Les KPIs clés pour mesurer la performance d’un venture studio

Les venture studios gagnent du terrain dans l’écosystème entrepreneurial, en créant des startups de manière itérative et structurée. Contrairement aux fonds d’investissement ou aux incubateurs, leur modèle repose sur la création interne d’entreprises. Un studio n’est pas qu’une machine à startups, c’est aussi un acteur de transformation. Mais comment mesurer leur réussite ? Quels indicateurs permettent d’évaluer leur performance au-delà des simples sorties financières ?

Dans cet article, nous explorons les principaux KPIs (indicateurs clés de performance) qui permettent de suivre et d’analyser l’efficacité d’un venture studio.

Le taux de création de startups est un indicateur fondamental

Un premier KPI essentiel est le nombre de startups créées sur une période donnée (souvent annuelle). Ce chiffre reflète la capacité du studio à générer, valider et transformer des idées en projets réels.

Il ne s’agit pas seulement de quantité. Le ratio entre idées explorées et startups réellement lancées permet de mesurer l'efficacité du processus de validation en amont.

Le taux de survie des startups montre la solidité du modèle

Créer une startup, c’est bien. Mais assurer sa survie dans les 12 à 36 mois, c’est mieux. Le taux de survie mesure le pourcentage de startups du studio toujours actives après une période définie. Il témoigne de la qualité de l’accompagnement, de la pertinence du produit, et de l’adéquation au marché.

Un bon venture studio ne se contente pas de lancer des projets : il les structure pour qu’ils tiennent la route.

La vitesse de mise sur le marché reflète l’agilité du studio

L’un des grands atouts des venture studios est leur capacité à aller vite. Le time-to-market — soit le temps entre l’idéation et le lancement public du produit — est un KPI clé.

Un cycle de développement court indique que le studio sait mobiliser ses ressources (design, produit, développement, juridique) pour accélérer la croissance des projets.

Les levées de fonds externes mesurent l’attractivité des projets

Lorsque les startups issues d’un studio réussissent à lever des fonds externes, cela valide non seulement leur potentiel, mais aussi la crédibilité du studio aux yeux des investisseurs.

Le montant levé, le nombre de tours de financement réussis, et la qualité des investisseurs impliqués sont autant d’indicateurs de la valeur créée par le studio.

Le retour sur investissement global reste un KPI incontournable

Même si les studios ne fonctionnent pas comme des fonds VC classiques, ils doivent générer un retour sur investissement (ROI) à long terme. Cela peut inclure les exits (reventes), les dividendes perçus, ou encore l’augmentation de la valorisation du portefeuille global.

Ce KPI est souvent analysé sur un horizon de 5 à 10 ans, le temps que les startups atteignent leur maturité.

L’efficacité opérationnelle interne fait aussi la différence

Au-delà des performances des startups, la productivité de l’équipe du studio est aussi un KPI à suivre. Combien de projets un chef de produit ou un développeur peut-il gérer par an ? Le coût moyen par startup créée est-il optimisé ? Ces données permettent de piloter le modèle comme une entreprise à part entière.

Le réseau d’experts et de talents est un levier stratégique

Enfin, un KPI souvent sous-estimé concerne le réseau activé par le studio. Cela inclut les fondateurs recrutés, les experts impliqués, les partenariats industriels ou commerciaux. La richesse et la diversité de cet écosystème renforcent l’effet de levier du studio.

Un studio performant attire des talents de qualité, mobilise des mentors engagés et crée des synergies entre les startups.

L’impact sectoriel ou thématique : un KPI à considérer

Certains venture studios choisissent de se spécialiser dans des secteurs clés comme la santé, le climat, ou la tech sociale. Dans ce cas, il peut être pertinent de mesurer leur influence spécifique sur ces écosystèmes, par exemple à travers le nombre de brevets déposés, les partenariats noués avec des grands groupes industriels, ou encore leur contribution à la transition numérique ou écologique. 

Conclusion : mesurer, c’est piloter

La performance d’un venture studio ne se mesure pas uniquement à travers les succès visibles. Derrière chaque startup lancée, il y a des processus, des paris, des ajustements. En suivant des KPIs adaptés, à la fois quantitatifs et qualitatifs — les studios peuvent affiner leur stratégie, prouver leur impact, et construire un modèle durable.

Dans un écosystème en constante évolution, les venture studios qui savent se mesurer sont ceux qui savent durer.

How Bending Spoons is Rebuilding Digital Classics: A Blueprint for European Innovation Powerhouses

Case Study: Exploration into Bending Spoons’ Acquisition Strategy and Product-Led Growth Model

This case study draws from verified public sources, press coverage, product updates, and leadership statements surrounding Bending Spoons’ acquisition of Evernote and other well-known consumer apps. The analysis highlights strategic patterns, core principles, and actionable insights for ecosystem builders, founders, and digital product operators exploring innovation through acquisition.

In Brief: What You’ll Learn

  • Bending Spoons is a Milan-based tech company building world-class digital products through strategic acquisitions and operational excellence.

  • In 2023, it acquired Evernote, one of the most recognizable productivity apps, and has since rebuilt it from the ground up.

  • Its model combines deep product expertise with centralized operational infrastructure.

  • The company manages a portfolio of widely-used apps like Remini and Splice, reaching over 200 million monthly users.

  • This case offers a proven roadmap for scaling software companies through bold acquisitions and thoughtful integration.


Bending Spoons quietly built one of Europe’s most downloaded app portfolios, then acquired Evernote

Founded in 2013 and headquartered in Milan, Bending Spoons spent years outside the spotlight building a portfolio of globally used mobile applications. Known for hits like Remini (AI photo enhancement), Splice (video editing), and 30 Day Fitness, the company had become a quiet juggernaut in the consumer tech world.

Then, in late 2022, Bending Spoons made a bold move: it acquired Evernote, the note-taking pioneer that helped define modern productivity. The acquisition was completed in early 2023, marking a turning point, not just for Evernote, but for Bending Spoons’ position in global tech..

It acquired Evernote to reimagine a product millions still rely on

By the time of acquisition, Evernote was no longer top of mind for many users. Once a category-defining app, it had suffered from technical issues, lagging updates, and rising competition from Notion, OneNote, and others.

Bending Spoons didn’t see a legacy product; they saw a foundation worth rebuilding. They immediately began reengineering Evernote’s infrastructure, launching performance upgrades and revamping the user experience. It wasn’t a brand reboot, it was a full product overhaul aimed at returning Evernote to form.

Bending Spoons combines product obsession with an operator-first model

What sets Bending Spoons apart is its ability to operate like a modern tech company and a disciplined acquisition firm all in one.

Its Milan-based team is engineering-led, product-centric, and deeply analytical. When it acquires a product, it doesn’t just rebrand or bundle it reinvests. From core code to monetization mechanics, the company takes ownership of every layer. It centralizes operations, HR, marketing, and infrastructure, to allow product teams to focus.

It’s this blend of operational control and creative freedom that has made it possible to run multiple high-performing apps with small, efficient teams.

Evernote was just one move in a bigger playbook, and more are coming

The Evernote acquisition wasn’t a one-off bet. It was part of a larger strategy. Bending Spoons now manages a portfolio with more than a dozen active products and over 200 million monthly users. These include:

In 2024, Reuters reported that Bending Spoons had raised capital at a $2.55 billion valuation and was considering a U.S. IPO. It now sits among Europe’s most valuable and profitable consumer app builders.

Bending Spoons moves quickly, reinvests deeply, and builds for longevity

Key advantages of the Bending Spoons model:

  • Centralized operations: Core functions like finance, HR, and data science are shared across apps.

  • Deep product refactoring: Legacy apps are rebuilt to perform like new.

  • Cohesive team culture: Hiring is rigorous, and most team members work from the Milan HQ.

  • Focus on long-term retention: Rather than chase installs, apps are optimized for subscriber lifetime value.

  • Selective M&A: The company acquires only when it sees lasting product potential.

This model gives acquired products like Evernote a true second life, not just a rebrand, but a re-foundation.

Bending Spoons offers a powerful case for European tech leadership

In a world where most top consumer apps are based in the U.S. or China, Bending Spoons is a standout. It's proving that European tech companies can scale globally without leaving their principles or their headquarters behind.

Its approach is neither flashy nor growth-at-all-costs. It's deliberate, product-led, and relentlessly operational. For other tech ecosystems looking to nurture world-class innovation, Bending Spoons offers a blueprint grounded in smart talent, long-term thinking, and conviction around product excellence

Conclusion: Bending Spoons isn’t chasing headlines; it’s rewriting playbooks

What’s most impressive about Bending Spoons isn’t just what it’s built, it’s how quietly and intentionally it has done it.

While others chase blitz-scaling or viral hype, this Milanese firm is quietly transforming well-known software products and returning them to best-in-class quality. And it’s doing so while building a company that’s profitable, disciplined, and increasingly global.

The future of consumer software doesn’t belong only to Silicon Valley. And if Bending Spoons has anything to say about it, the next great productivity revolution may just start in Milan.

How Kevin Ryan Built AlleyCorp: A Venture Studio Blueprint Powering NYC’s Startup Ecosystem

Methodology: A Deep Dive into the Venture Studio Model and Kevin Ryan’s Track Record

This case study draws from verified public records, interviews, press releases, and market reports covering Kevin Ryan’s business ventures, the operational structure of AlleyCorp, and outcomes from the startups it has helped launch. The analysis highlights strategic patterns, shared methodologies, and actionable insights for ecosystem builders, founders, and early-stage investors.

In Brief: What You’ll Learn

  • Kevin Ryan’s approach to building companies, not just funding them, has reshaped New York’s tech scene.

  • AlleyCorp combines in-house innovation with hands-on operational support to reduce risk and accelerate startup success.

  • The studio has produced breakout companies like MongoDB, Business Insider, and Nomad Health.

  • With a $250M fund, AlleyCorp is proving that the venture studio model is more than a trend, it's a system.

  • This case offers a clear framework for replicating the venture studio model in emerging ecosystems.

Full Article

Kevin Ryan scaled his first startup into a billion-dollar exit then built an engine for more

In the late 1990s, Kevin Ryan helped transform DoubleClick into a digital advertising giant. That journey ended in a $1.1 billion sale, later folded into Google for $3.1 billion. But Ryan didn’t walk away after one success. He asked a bigger question: What if we could build high-potential startups systematically?

He launched AlleyCorp to make entrepreneurship repeatable and infrastructure-driven

Unlike traditional investors who wait for promising founders to pitch them, AlleyCorp starts at zero with original ideas, internal teams, and shared resources. This model allows it to move quickly from concept to execution, while minimizing the typical startup risks. It’s not just capital. It’s co-creation.

AlleyCorp combines a venture studio’s rigor with a seed fund’s agility

AlleyCorp operates on two complementary tracks:

  • Studio arm: Generates startup ideas internally, recruits founding teams, and offers full-stack support.

  • Seed fund: Invests in external startups, often as the first check in.

This dual model allows it to both create and accelerate companies, maintaining long-term involvement across the board. In 2024, AlleyCorp raised $250 million in its first fund with outside LPs, a strong endorsement of both its results and model.

The model is validated by some of NYC’s biggest startup wins

AlleyCorp’s portfolio reads like a greatest hits list in New York tech:

Each of these companies was either co-founded or backed early by AlleyCorp, and each addressed a real market inefficiency with bold, tech-enabled solutions.

How AlleyCorp builds smarter, faster, and with more support than typical startups

Key advantages of the AlleyCorp model:

  • Centralized services: Legal, HR, design, and tech resources are shared, reducing startup friction.

  • Speed to market: In-house teams move faster than founder-led ideas alone.

  • Operator involvement: Kevin Ryan and senior leadership stay hands-on throughout each startup’s lifecycle.

  • Market-first mindset: Instead of chasing trends, AlleyCorp tackles real gaps with measurable demand.

This ecosystem helps new founders avoid classic early-stage pitfalls—while giving investors better odds of success.

The venture studio model offers a clear roadmap for other startup ecosystems

The AlleyCorp story isn’t just about one founder, it’s about what’s possible when innovation is treated as a process, not luck. And that has big implications for other cities and regions.

Startups don’t need to emerge randomly. With:

  • A structured ideation process

  • Access to senior operators

  • Pooled resources across ventures

  • Localized industry knowledge

Venture studios can help emerging markets replicate success whether in East Africa, Southeast Asia, or mid-sized U.S. cities.

Final Thought: Kevin Ryan didn’t wait for unicorns, he designed a system to build them

AlleyCorp shows that startup creation doesn’t have to be chaotic or founder-dependent. When experienced builders partner with talent early, and provide structure at every step, great companies can be built more predictably.

For anyone looking to nurture a stronger innovation ecosystem, this model offers a roadmap, and a reason to believe that big success can come from focused, local effort.