Les implications juridiques et fiscales de l’investissement en capital risque

Bienvenue dans notre série d'articles sur le venture capital. Cette série d'articles fournira une base solide pour comprendre les opportunités et les défis liés au capital risque et aidera à prendre des décisions éclairées en matière de financement. Nous espérons que vous apprécierez autant la lecture de ces articles que nous avons aimé les écrire et les partager avec vous.

L'investissement en capital-risque (Venture Capital — VC) a des implications fiscales et juridiques importantes en France, tant pour les investisseurs que pour les start-ups et leurs conseils. Cet article a pour but d’en faire une présentation générale.

Le régime fiscal du capital risque

Du point de vue du régime fiscal, l’investissement capital-risque est considéré comme un investissement à haut risque, et peut ainsi donner droit à des réductions (ou à une exonération) d'impôts aux particuliers sur leur plus value, de sorte à fournir une contrepartie à ce risque.

Un capital risqueur peut bénéficier d'une réduction d'impôt sur le revenu et d’avantages fiscaux équivalents à 18% du montant investi et dans la limite de 50 000 € par an pour un investisseur individuel et de 100 000 € par an pour un couple marié.

Les plus-values réalisées par les actionnaires sur la vente de parts sont, quant à elles, soumises à une prélèvement forfaitaire unique de 30%. Aussi, les pertes sur les investissements peuvent être fiscalement déduites des gains réalisés sur d'autres investissements et ce au cours de la même année ou des cinq années suivants la date de cession, selon le cas.

Pour les entreprises, et selon les dispositions du droit fiscal en vigueur, il peut également être possible de déduire les pertes en capital. Si une entreprise ou un entrepreneur ayant reçu un investissement en capital-risque ne réalise pas les rendements attendus, le fonds d’investissement et/ou les investisseurs peuvent déduire les pertes liées à leurs placements sur leur déclaration. Si l'entreprise réalise en revanche un gain en capital, la structure dans laquelle elle avait investi étant en croissance, les investisseurs peuvent en effet être imposés sur ces gains en fonction de leur taux d'imposition marginal selon la loi de finances applicable.

Les investisseurs corporate ou sociétés de capital risque peuvent aussi déduire les frais liés à l'investissement, tels que les frais d'avocat et les frais de due diligence. Les dividendes perçus sur les actions d'une entreprise financée par du capital-risque sont quant-à-eux imposables comme des revenus ordinaires pour les investisseurs.

Enfin, si une entreprise accorde des stock options (ou BSPCE) à ses employés en tant qu'incitation à la performance, ces options peuvent être soumises à des impôts sur les gains en capital lorsqu'elles sont exercées, selon les autres type de titres existants.

Il est important de consulter un expert-comptable ou un conseiller fiscal pour comprendre les implications fiscales spécifiques de l'investissement en capital-risque, en fonction de sa situation et de son statut, ainsi qu’en fonction des caractéristiques de vos objectifs d’investissement.

Le régime juridique applicable aux sociétés de capital risque

Pour ce qui est du juridique, le capital-risque implique des obligations conséquentes dans le champ de la transparence et d’obligation d'information (obligation de reporting) pour les entreprises. Les investisseurs sont eux aussi tenus de respecter les lois et règlements relatifs aux différents types de titres disponibles à l’achat ou à la cession, au stade d’une augmentation de capital par exemple, ainsi que les lois relatives aux opérations de M&A (fusions-acquisitions) et les lois concernant la protection des investisseurs.

Les entreprises peuvent être tenues de signer un accord de participation, qui définit les droits et obligations des parties, dont il est crucial d’étudier les implications. Ils peuvent être exigés de la part des entités fournissant le nouveau capital, des droits de vote ou une participation active dans la direction de la société, ce qui entraîne une perte ou dilution du contrôle pour les fondateurs.

Aussi, il est primordial pour les fonds de capital risque d’assurer leurs possibilités de sortie avec les clauses délimitant les conditions d’éventuels cash-out, le cadre d’un rachat, ainsi que les modalités d’une liquidation éventuelle de la société concernée.

Les investisseurs en capital-risque peuvent aussi exiger la réglementation de la propriété intellectuelle et innovation associée au projet concerné par l’investissement, il faudra faire attention à ce que celle-ci soit concentrée sur l’entreprise et non la personne du fondateur. Aussi, des clauses de garantie d’exclusivité seront pertinentes tant par rapport à la propriété intellectuelle des fondateurs qu’aux sources de financement de l’entreprise et de ses processus de recherche et développement (R&D). Les conditions de ce partenariat long-terme entre fonds et sociétés doivent faire l’objet d’une définition très précise, de sorte à ce que la nature des avantages que chaque partie peut retirer de son activité soit claire.

Les fondateurs de l'entreprise peuvent être tenus responsables des actions ou des décisions prises par l'entreprise, y compris les obligations contractuelles envers les investisseurs en capital-risque. Cette responsabilité doit cependant toujours être délimitée précisément dans les clauses dédiées.

Enfin, des clauses de sortie dans l'accord de participation encadreront la cession éventuelle des titres des investisseurs VC : celles-ci peuvent avoir des conséquences importantes sur la gouvernance de l’entreprise et doivent donc toujours être rigoureusement rédigées. La création d’un produit de placement en capital risque peut ramener d’importants produits, mais doit toujours être le sujet d’une diligence importante quel que soit l’ état d’avancement de l’opération.

Vous pouvez trouver nos différents articles ici : https://www.mandalorepartners.com/research

N'hésitez pas à nous contacter pour discuter d'un partenariat ou pour plus d'informations sur cet article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Capital risque pour les startups : avantages et inconvénients

Bienvenue dans notre série d'articles sur le venture capital. Cette série d'articles fournira une base solide pour comprendre les opportunités et les défis liés au capital risque et aidera à prendre des décisions éclairées en matière de financement. Nous espérons que vous apprécierez autant la lecture de ces articles que nous avons aimé les écrire et les partager avec vous.

Qu’est-ce que le capital risque ?

Le venture capital ou le capital risque est un type de financement qui permet à des entreprises innovantes et à haut potentiel de croissance d'obtenir des fonds pour leur développement. En effet, les investisseurs en capital risque apportent leur soutien monétaire à ces entreprises en échange de parts de l'entreprise. Contrairement aux investissements traditionnels, le capital risque est considéré comme un investissement à haut risque mais à haut potentiel de rendement.

Le capital risque est mis en œuvre par des sociétés de gestion, agréées par l'Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), qui gèrent des véhicules d'investissement appelés "fonds".

Ces fonds peuvent prendre plusieurs formes : sociétés de capital risque (SCR), fonds communs de placement à risque (FCPR), fonds communs de placement dans l'innovation (FCPI), fonds d'investissements de proximité (FIP) et sont soumis à des quotas d'investissement fixés par voie législative.

Le montant du financement apporté à l’entreprise peut varier considérablement en fonction des besoins et de l'attractivité de l’entreprise pour les investisseurs. En général, les montants peuvent aller de quelques dizaines de milliers d'euros à plusieurs millions d'euros dans certains cas.

Le capital risque joue un rôle crucial dans le financement des start-ups, cependant, comme tout investissement, il présente à la fois des avantages et des inconvénients pour les start-ups.

Avantages du capital risque pour les startups :

On peut distinguer de nombreux avantages du capital risque pour les entreprises, notamment :

L’épanouissement de l’entreprise : 

Grâce aux venture capitalists, les start-ups peuvent mieux se développer. Le plus souvent, ces entreprises utilisent les fonds pour développer leurs produits ou leurs services et conquérir de nouveaux marchés. 

À titre d’exemple, en France, il y a l’entreprise BlaBlaCar, une entreprise de covoiturage qui a levé plus de 450 millions d'euros auprès de fonds de capital risque pour développer son activité à l'échelle mondiale. Il y a également Doctolib, une entreprise de prise de rendez-vous en ligne pour les professionnels de santé, qui a levé plus de 500 millions d'euros pour développer son activité en France et en Europe. Ou encore Ynsect, une entreprise spécialisée dans l'élevage d'insectes destinés à la production de protéines pour l'alimentation animale et humaine, qui a levé plus de 372 millions d'euros .

D’autre part, à l’aide de ces fonds, les startups peuvent également embaucher des employés supplémentaires pour former son équipe et évoluer ou encore acheter de nouveaux matériels.

L’expertise des venture capitalists : 

Généralement, les venture capitalists n'apportent pas seulement leurs argents, mais aussi l'expertise de l'équipe et des partenaires qui font partie du fonds, ce qui est l'un des principaux avantages d'obtenir l'argent de ces venture capitalists. En effet, les investisseurs en capital risque sont souvent des personnes dotés de grandes expériences. Ils vont pouvoir apporter leurs connaissances en matière de gestion d'entreprise et de développement de produits. 

L’augmentation du réseau

Dans le monde des affaires d'aujourd'hui, tout tourne autour du réseautage. Le capital risqueur possède et/ou a financé plusieurs entreprises. Ce réseau d’entreprise peut représenter une véritable opportunité de développement. Cela peut également aider les petites entreprises à établir des liens avec d'autres entreprises et individus qui peuvent les aider à se développer.

Le mentorat des investisseurs

En plus de leur expertise et de leur réseau, les investisseurs peuvent également offrir un soutien stratégique précieux pour les fondateurs et les équipes de direction des entreprises qui ont recours au capital risque

Bien que le mentorat puisse être bénéfique pour les employés à tous les niveaux d'une organisation, il peut être particulièrement utile pour les entreprises en démarrage. Les startups se caractérisent souvent par un manque de ressources, à cause de cela, il est difficile pour les fondateurs et les employés en début de carrière d’obtenir la formation et le développement dont ils ont besoin. Les capital risqueurs peuvent fournir les ressources manquantes, aider à combler les lacunes et fournir des informations et des conseils précieux.

La valorisation de l’entreprise

La valorisation d’entreprise est une estimation de la valeur financière ou patrimoniale d’un projet ou d’une société, et ce en prenant en compte ses actifs et ses différents titres d’exploitation.  

La valorisation d’une entreprise repose essentiellement sur deux concepts clés : la projection financière des performances futures et la comparaison des entreprises entre elles. Ces deux concepts sont loin d’être faciles pour les startups. Or, la valorisation d’une Start-up est une étape-clé pour son développement. Grâce à l’augmentation de capital réalisée suite à l’investissement du venture capitalist, la valeur de l’entreprise se voit aussi augmenter. En conséquence, l’entreprise pourra : 

  • Améliorer son positionnement sur le marché ;

  • Connaître ses forces et ses faiblesses ;

  • Mettre en place une stratégie d’exploitation et de développement efficace ;

  • Faciliter la mise en place d’un business plan plus pertinent ;

  • Amener d’autres investisseurs et partenaires financiers à injecter de nouveaux fonds ;

  • Maîtriser le flux de trésorerie de la société.

L’accès à des ressources supplémentaires

Jusqu’à présent, les investisseurs en capital risque peuvent apporter de puissant réseau de ressources comme des outils de développement de produits, des logiciels, des systèmes de gestion et des relations avec des fournisseurs clés.

L’aide à la prise de décision stratégique

Les sociétés de capital risque interviennent souvent de façon directe dans la gestion et la prise de décision. En effet, en tant qu'actionnaire, les investisseurs se doivent d’assurer la réalisation des objectifs décidés. Ils peuvent aider les fondateurs et les équipes de direction à prendre des décisions stratégiques en leur fournissant des données pertinentes et des points de vue sur le marché et les tendances de l'industrie.

La possibilité de lever plus de fonds : 

Grâce aux expertises des capital risqueurs, il est plus facile pour les startups d’attirer l’attention des investisseurs institutionnels et de lever des fonds supplémentaires. D’ailleurs, pour réussir, une entreprise doit être en mesure d'anticiper et de se préparer aux futures rondes de financement. 

Inconvénients du capital risque pour les startups :

Le capital risque peut également présenter des inconvénients pour les start-ups, notamment :

La perte d'autorité : 

Lorsqu'une entreprise sollicite des financements auprès d'investisseurs en capital risque, ceux-ci peuvent exiger une part importante de la société en échange et demander à avoir une influence sur les décisions stratégiques de l'entreprise. Si les investisseurs en capital risque ont un pouvoir de décision au moins égal à celui du dirigeant, il est possible qu'ils choisissent de revendre l'entreprise à tout moment. En effet, si l'entreprise ne se développe pas aussi rapidement qu'espéré, les investisseurs peuvent décider de revendre leur participation afin de minimiser leur risque et d'obtenir un retour sur investissement minimum.

La pression pour atteindre les objectifs : 

C’est bien connu, les propriétaires de sociétés et les entrepreneurs ne sont pas toujours enchantés de la pression que peuvent exercer sur eux leurs nouveaux partenaires. Effectivement, les investisseurs en capital risque cherchent à réaliser des bénéfices importants et rapidement, ce qui peut entraîner une pression sur les employés des startups pour atteindre des objectifs de croissance irréalistes. 

Les risques financiers élevés

Comme il a été dit précédemment, le venture capital s’adresse bien souvent aux entreprises en plein démarrage d’activités qui n'ont pas encore établi de solides antécédents financiers, c’est pourquoi ce type de financement constitue un grand risque. Les investisseurs en capital risque s'attendent souvent à ce que les entreprises réussissent à obtenir de bons résultats financiers rapidement. Cela peut entraîner des sacrifices en matière de qualité, de durabilité et de culture d'entreprise.

Les conflits d'intérêts : 

Des conflits d’intérêts peuvent naître entre les gestionnaires de fonds d’investissements et leurs investisseurs. Dans la plupart des cas, c’est dû à des motivations différentes. Par exemple, il est possible que les investisseurs soient davantage intéressés par la réalisation rapide de bénéfice plutôt que par le développement à long terme de l’entreprise, ce qui peut entraîner des problèmes d'alignement et une incohérence dans les objectifs. Par conséquent, la vision à court terme des investisseurs peut ne pas être alignée avec la stratégie de croissance à long terme de l’entreprise.

CONCLUSION

En conclusion, bien que le capital risque puisse être un moyen efficace pour les startups de lever des fonds, il est important de peser les avantages et les inconvénients avant de prendre une décision. Il est également important de trouver un investisseur en capital risque qui saura aligner les objectifs et les valeurs de la start-up, minimisant ainsi les futurs problèmes potentiels.

Les startups doivent surtout évaluer attentivement les conséquences de l'investissement en capital risque sur leur entreprise. Il faudrait se poser les questions suivantes : Est-il possible de valider mon idée sans recourir à des ressources externes ? Le produit/service nécessite-t-il des compétences techniques supplémentaires pour son développement ? Ai-je besoin de financement pour faire évoluer mon entreprise ? Suis-je prêt à accepter de céder une partie de la prise de décision au sein de mon entreprise ?

En résumé, si le dirigeant du startup veut à tout prix garder le contrôle de l’entreprise et souhaite conserver sa vision intacte, le financement en capital risque pourrait ne pas être la meilleure option. En revanche, s’il est prêt à accepter une certaine dilution du contrôle en échange d'expertise et de financement, cela pourrait être une option à considérer.

Vous pouvez trouver nos différents articles ici : https://www.mandalorepartners.com/research

N'hésitez pas à nous contacter pour discuter d'un partenariat ou pour plus d'informations sur cet article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com


Web Summit 2022 wrap-up #5: CLIMATE TECH, A TRILLION DOLLAR OPPORTUNITY

Welcome to our series of articles on the recent Web Summit 2022, a premier event in the tech industry. In this series, we will be highlighting some of the most exciting and interesting presentations, panels, and events that took place at the conference. From keynotes by industry leaders to breakout sessions covering the latest trends and developments in technology, there was no shortage of thought-provoking content at this year's conference. We hope you enjoy reading about the Web Summit 2022 as much as we enjoyed attending it!

Climate tech, a trillion-dollar opportunity

At the 2022 WebSummit, Nick de la Forge (Co-Founder of Planet A Ventures) and Seth Bannon (Founding Partner at Fifty Years) shared their insights on the opportunities offered by climate tech VC. Only in the first half of 2022, $26 billion were already committed to by investors across over 900 companies and startups developing climate tech solutions. This makes it one of the hottest venture capital and private equity sectors, which creates incredible opportunities in terms of both impact and financial returns.

Climate Tech Web Summit 2022

Which climate tech investment(s) should you focus on ?

Serious funding, policy efforts and resources are being deployed by governments across the board to boost the profitability and scaling of sustainability-focused ventures. Renewable energy and climate change adaptation are the trends to look out for. Within the financial industry’s efforts towards a more sustainable future, new technology in those areas will be crucial to curb global warming.

According to the panelists, finally, businesses working to actively reduce greenhouse gas emissions throughout their supply chains will gain a massive competitive advantage in the decade to come. They also underlined the fact that more lobbying in favor of the climate industry will be vital to its long-term growth.

 

Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Web Summit 2022 wrap-up #4: N26, What’s next for digital banking?

Welcome to our series of articles on the recent Web Summit 2022, a premier event in the tech industry. In this series, we will be highlighting some of the most exciting and interesting presentations, panels, and events that took place at the conference. From keynotes by industry leaders to breakout sessions covering the latest trends and developments in technology, there was no shortage of thought-provoking content at this year's conference. We hope you enjoy reading about the Web Summit 2022 as much as we enjoyed attending it!

N26, What’s next for digital banking?

In this session, Maximilian Taynthal, Co-Founder of N26 and Patricia Kowsmann, Finance reporter at The Wall Stret Jounal talk about what the future holds for digital banking, and how neobanks are closing the gap between them and traditional bank.

Web Summit N26

Over the last few years, the rise of the neobank has shown no sign of slowing down, and we're currently in an era of innovation that is reshaping how consumers interact with their banks. 

About N26

N26 is a German neobank founded in 2013. It offers a 100% digital banking experience designed to be simple, transparent, and secure. Actually, N26 has more than 8 million customers.  

If you want to learn more about the company, here is his website: https://n26.com/en-eu

What kinds of banking services do online banks offer?

With online banking, you can transfer money, exchange crypto, make online payment or pay bills via your bank card, and deposit your money. But unlike traditional banks, they can’t give loans. 

Digital banks are well known to offer lower fees so concretely how can online banks be profitable?

By their clients' deposit, banks like N26 can invest in profitable business. They make sure that it’s risk free, so their clients don’t have to worry about anything. 

In the future, digital banks even plan to remunerate their clients by sharing the benefit from their deposit. 

The pandemic situation, inflation, war, ... Did those situations infect digital banking?

It didn’t. It was even positive, digital banks got more revenue. Easy to use, digital banking’s clients can access their bank account just via their online account or via their mobile banking app. So that is the real difference of digital banking with traditional banking, they prioritize customer experience. 

What are online banking challenges?

They want to expand in more countries, get more customers, be more profitable, developpe their products, but their biggest challenge is to be completely independent of external funding! 

 

Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Crowdfunding: raising money in bearish markets

Crowdfunding has become a popular way for individuals and organizations to raise money for a wide range of projects and ventures. A crowdfunding platform, or a crowdfunding site, is a website or online service that facilitates the raising of funds through a crowdfunding campaign. These crowdfunding websites enable individuals and organizations to create a campaign, set a funding goal, and offer rewards or equity to individuals who contribute funds. With the emergence of various types of crowdfunding such as reward-based, donation-based, and equity crowdfunding, more and more people are turning to crowdfunding platforms to raise money for their projects. The ability to reach a global audience and raise funds through a crowdfunding campaign on a crowdfunding site has made it possible for many projects that might have otherwise been unable to find funding, to be realized. Crowdfunding platforms have become an essential tool for entrepreneurs, artists, activists and non-profit organizations.

Types of Crowdfunding

There are several different types of crowdfunding, each with their own unique characteristics and benefits:

  • Reward-based crowdfunding: This is the most common type of crowdfunding, and it involves offering rewards to people who contribute money to a project. For example, an inventor may offer a prototype of their product to people who pledge a certain amount of money. This type of crowdfunding is popular among entrepreneurs, artists, and creators who are looking to raise funds for a specific project or idea. According to a 2020 report by the World Bank, reward-based crowdfunding accounted for approximately 60% of the global crowdfunding market.

  • Donation-based crowdfunding: Involves raising money for a cause or charity, with no rewards or perks offered in return. This type of crowdfunding is often used for charitable causes, social impact projects, and humanitarian efforts. For example, a nonprofit organization may use donation-based crowdfunding to raise funds for a disaster relief effort or a community development project. According to the same report, donation-based crowdfunding accounted for approximately 10% of the global crowdfunding market.

  • Equity-based crowdfunding: Involves selling ownership stakes in a company or project to investors. In this case, the investors will receive a percentage of the company's profits or ownership in the company. This form of crowdfunding is particularly popular among startups and early-stage companies, as it allows them to raise funds and build a community of supporters while giving investors the opportunity to participate in new business opportunities. According to the same report, equity-based crowdfunding accounted for approximately 20% of the global crowdfunding market.

Each type of crowdfunding has its own advantages and disadvantages and it depends on the project and the goals of the project initiators to choose which type of crowdfunding suits them best.

Looking to the future, the industry is expected to continue growing, as more people become aware of the opportunities that crowdfunding offers and as more governments and regulatory bodies create framework to support the industry. Additionally, with the growth of impact investing and socially responsible investing, it is likely that crowdfunding will become an increasingly popular way to raise capital for projects that promote social and environmental causes. Additionally, the proliferation of online platforms and technology advancements will likely make crowdfunding more accessible and efficient, allowing more people to participate and benefit from the opportunities it provides.

However, it's also important to note that the industry will face challenges as well, such as the need for better regulation and oversight to protect investors and ensure that funds are used for the intended purposes. It's also crucial for the industry to ensure that crowdfunding is accessible and inclusive for all, and not just for certain groups of people with privileged access to technology and information.

Popularity of Crowdfunding

Crowdfunding has become increasingly popular in recent years as a way for entrepreneurs, artists, and creators to raise money for their projects. It has also become a way for investors to access early-stage companies and participate in new business opportunities. According to a 2020 report by the World Bank, the global crowdfunding market is expected to grow to more than $300 billion by 2025.

Popularity of crowdfunding

Source: Google Trends

Crowdfunding began to be well known after 2010, and then developed to be used in various different sectors.

Growth of Crowdfunding in France

In France, crowdfunding has seen a steady growth in recent years. The French crowdfunding market reached €1.3 billion in 2019, a growth of +20% compared to 2018. There are different platforms such as Ulule, KissKissBankBank, and Leetchi. These platforms have allowed thousands of French projects to be financed, ranging from creative projects to social and environmental causes.

Government Support for Crowdfunding in France

The French government has also taken steps to support the growth of crowdfunding in the country. In 2019, it introduced a new regulation for equity-based crowdfunding, which aimed to improve the legal and regulatory framework for the industry. The new regulation established a framework for the registration and supervision of crowdfunding platforms, as well as guidelines for the disclosure of information to investors.

Challenges Facing Crowdfunding in France

  • Lack of understanding of the industry among the general public

  • Lack of standardization and transparency in the industry

The challenges of crowdfunding are well developed in the article: Le crowdfunding Concepts, réalités et perspectives, published by Olivier Joffre and Donia Trabelsi on Cairn.info

International Market of Crowdfunding

Situation of crowdunding worldwide

Interest for Crowdfunding by region last year (Source: Google Trends)

The international market of crowdfunding has grown rapidly in recent years, with the market size projected to reach over $300 billion by 2025, according to a 2020 report by the World Bank. The report also estimates that there are over 2,000 crowdfunding platforms operating globally, with the largest markets being in North America and Europe.

North America

North America has traditionally been the largest market for crowdfunding, with the United States being a major player. According to a report by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, the crowdfunding market in the US was worth $17.2 billion in 2018. The US is home to a large number of crowdfunding platforms, including Kickstarter and Indiegogo, and the country has a well-established legal and regulatory framework for crowdfunding.

Europe

Europe is another major market for crowdfunding, with the United Kingdom, France, and Germany being some of the largest players. According to the same report, the crowdfunding market in the UK was worth $6.2 billion in 2018, while the market in France was worth $1.2 billion and Germany $755 million. Europe is also home to a large number of crowdfunding platforms, such as Crowdcube and Seedrs in the UK, Ulule and Leetchi in France, and Companisto and Seedmatch in Germany.

Asia

Asia is also becoming an increasingly important market for crowdfunding. According to a report by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, the crowdfunding market in China was worth $2.2 billion in 2018, making it the second-largest market in the world after the US. China is home to a large number of crowdfunding platforms, including JD Finance and Yungroup, and the country has a rapidly growing middle class that is increasingly looking for alternative investment opportunities.

Other countries

Other countries that have seen significant growth in crowdfunding include Australia, Canada, and Singapore. According to the same report, the crowdfunding market in Australia was worth $211 million in 2018, while the market in Canada was worth $150 million and Singapore $64 million. These countries also have a growing number of crowdfunding platforms catering to a diverse range of projects and investors.

It is important to note that the market growth and penetration of crowdfunding can vary in different countries, and is affected by different factors like culture, regulations, technology penetration, investor and entrepreneur's behavior etc. Additionally, the types of crowdfunding that have seen the most success also vary between countries. For example, in the US and UK, equity-based crowdfunding is more popular, while in France and Germany, donation-based crowdfunding is more common. Furthermore, the regulations and laws surrounding crowdfunding can vary significantly between different countries, and it's important for platforms and project initiators to be aware of these differences when operating in different markets.

In conclusion, the international market of crowdfunding is rapidly growing and offers a diversity of options for different types of projects and investors. The growth of the industry is expected to continue in the future, driven by the increasing popularity of alternative forms of investing and the growing number of people who are looking for ways to access new business opportunities and support social and environmental causes. The market growth and the specific types of crowdfunding that are more successful can vary between countries, and it's important for platforms, entrepreneurs, and investors to stay informed of the particularities of the market they operate in.

Comparison of Crowdfunding Regulations

The regulations of crowdfunding vary across different countries, and it is important for platforms and project initiators to be aware of these differences when operating in different markets.

United States

In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established a regulatory framework for crowdfunding under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, passed in 2012. The JOBS Act established two exemptions, Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) and Regulation A+, which allow companies to raise capital from retail investors through crowdfunding portals. Regulation CF permit companies to raise a maximum aggregate amount of $5 million in any 12-month period, with individual investment limits of $2,000 or $5,000. Regulation A+ allows companies to raise up to $75 million in a 12-month period, with no restriction on the amount an individual can invest.

Europe

In Europe, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has established a framework for crowdfunding regulation through the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) and the Prospectus Directive. The AIFMD regulates crowdfunding platforms that raise funds from retail investors to invest in alternative investments, while the Prospectus Directive applies to crowdfunding platforms that raise funds through the sale of securities to retail investors. In addition, the directive on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) applies to some forms of Crowdfunding using crypto-assets in EU.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has established a regulatory framework for crowdfunding, including rules on disclosure, investor protection, and the types of projects that can be funded. In accordance with the FCA regulations, crowdfunding platforms are required to conduct due diligence on projects and provide investors with accurate and complete information about the project before they invest.

France

In France, the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has introduced a regulatory framework for equity-based crowdfunding in 2019. The new regulation established a framework for the registration and supervision of crowdfunding platforms, as well as guidelines for the disclosure of information to investors.

China

In China, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the People's Bank of China (PBOC) issued a guideline for the regulation of crowdfunding platforms in 2016. According to the guidelines, platforms are required to obtain a license from the NDRC and meet certain requirements such as providing clear information about projects and protecting investor interests.

Singapore

In Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has issued a regulatory framework for crowdfunding platforms in 2015, which includes the requirement of platforms to be registered and regulated by the MAS, and it also sets rules around the disclosure of information to investors.

It's worth noting that regulations can change over time and can vary between different regions, so it's important to keep track of any updates or changes that may occur. It's also important for platforms and project initiators to consult with legal and compliance experts to ensure that they are aware of and compliant with all relevant regulations in the country or region where they operate. These regulations are put in place to protect investors and ensure that the funds raised through crowdfunding are used for their intended purposes, so it's important for everyone involved in the process to be aware of and adhere to them.

Furthermore, it's important to mention that not only the regulations are important but also the actual compliance with them by the platforms, as it's crucial that they conduct the due diligence, provide the appropriate disclosure and manage the funds with transparency. This will foster trust among investors and will encourage more people to participate and invest in crowdfunding campaigns.

In summary, the regulations and laws surrounding crowdfunding can vary significantly between different countries, and it's important for platforms and project initiators to be aware of these differences when operating in different markets. It's important to stay up-to-date with any changes or updates to regulations, and to consult with legal and compliance experts to ensure compliance with all relevant regulations. Additionally, it's essential for all parties involved to comply with these regulations to ensure the protection of investors and the proper use of funds raised through crowdfunding.

Conclusion

In conclusion, crowdfunding has grown rapidly in recent years as a method of raising capital for projects and ventures. It offers several different types of funding options, such as reward-based, donation-based, and equity-based crowdfunding, each with its own unique characteristics and benefits. The global crowdfunding market was worth approximately $16 billion in 2015 and is expected to reach more than $300 billion by 2025. The largest markets for crowdfunding are in North America and Europe, with the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany being some of the major players. Additionally, Asia is also becoming an increasingly important market for crowdfunding, with China being the second-largest market in the world after the US.

However, despite the opportunities that crowdfunding offers, it's important for the industry to keep evolving in a responsible and sustainable way, ensuring the protection of all stakeholders' interests. The regulations and laws surrounding crowdfunding can vary significantly between different countries, and it's essential for platforms and project initiators to be aware of these differences when operating in different markets. The growth of the industry is expected to continue in the future, driven by the increasing popularity of alternative forms of investing and the growing number of people who are looking for ways to access new business opportunities and support social and environmental causes. As the market continues to grow and evolve, it will be important for governments, regulatory bodies, and industry organizations to work together to ensure that crowdfunding is accessible, safe, and inclusive for all stakeholders.

Web Summit 2022 wrap-up #3: Cultivating investor relationships and long-term partnerships

Welcome to our series of articles on the recent Web Summit 2022, a premier event in the tech industry. In this series, we will be highlighting some of the most exciting and interesting presentations, panels, and events that took place at the conference. From keynotes by industry leaders to breakout sessions covering the latest trends and developments in technology, there was no shortage of thought-provoking content at this year's conference. We hope you enjoy reading about the Web Summit 2022 as much as we enjoyed attending it!

CULTIVATING VC INVESTOR RELATIONSHIPS AND LONG-TERM PARTNERSHIPS

In their panel on “Cultivating investor relationships and long-term partnerships” at the 2022 WebSummit, Harry Nelis of Accel Partners and Samir Desai, the founder of Super Payments, discussed what it takes for a start-up to find (and to attract) the right venture capitalists.

How to find right VC investors?

Warm introductions to VC firms

Both panelists highlighted the importance of warm introductions in the venture capital field. A market of a few is all you need when you are starting off : despite the truckload of rejections you may face from the venture capital industry as a whole, it is important to keep networking and to be resilient. Early stage companies will all eventually find the right venture capital firm, who will be interested enough to help them raise money. Harry Nelis also highlighted how, at his venture capital fund, most of the selected projects came from warm introductions.  Venture firms expect a great track record from founders as well, which can help secure additional capital. The slow-down in the VC investments market is also no reason to worry, according to the panelists : successful startups have been know to stem from times of crisis, and there is, in fact, a lot of money out available from many VC funds.

On sales skills and choosing the right VC fund  

It is no secret that great sales skills matter to close venture capital deals: venture capital investors look for ambitious, tenacious and convincing people, who they know will put vc money to good use. But startup founders are not necessarily great salespersons right off the bat ; according to Samir Desai, successful venture funding relies on being able to present a small reliable team, very involved in the company’s management, to angel investors — thus build a true identity for your company. One-on-one trusted collaboration is most important to raise startup funding, which is why engaging with outside contractors for sales is not necessarily recommended. Finally, the choice of the VC firm matters, especially for early stage startups — beyond initial vc funding rounds, it is crucial for the goals and characteristics of the venture capitalist to match the project. Hence, top VC firms should be researched and referenced, making sure they’re the right fit before you pitch for new companies to start building solid relationships with their investors. 




Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Web Summit 2022 wrap-up #2: TO INFINITY AND BEYOND: BEST USE CASES IN WEB3

Welcome to our series of articles on the recent Web Summit 2022, a premier event in the tech industry. In this series, we will be highlighting some of the most exciting and interesting presentations, panels, and events that took place at the conference. From keynotes by industry leaders to breakout sessions covering the latest trends and developments in technology, there was no shortage of thought-provoking content at this year's conference. We hope you enjoy reading about the Web Summit 2022 as much as we enjoyed attending it!

TO INFINITY AND BEYOND: BEST USE CASES IN WEB3

The Web summit 2022, held in Lisbon between November 1 and November 4 gathered many corporates, startups and influencers specialized in the Internet. It was also the occasion to explore the possibilities of Web3 in various fields, especially in marketing strategy.

On the 2nd of November, Marty Swant gave the opportunity to Sandy Carter (Unstoppable Domains), Amanda Cassatt (Serotonin) and Jeremiah Owyang (RLY Network Association) to share their views on marketing and Web3.

Web Summit Lisbon 2022 use cases in Web3

Web1, Web2, Web3: what are the main differences?

To better understand the new marketing strategies to be used in Web3, it is important to briefly reconsider the evolution of World wide web.

Web1, the origins of the Internet

Web1 was the first version of the Internet. It was a confidential and complicated system, only used by those who were able to code. At this time, the general public was not able to see the use cases of it and to measure its impact in their daily life.

Web2, the democratization of the Internet

Web2 is the Internet we know today. Way more user-friendly than the previous one, its adoption rate has been tremendous. Web2 has changed our everyday life, and companies heavily rely on it for selling their products. Every user can generate and gain access to content.

Web3, a broad new paradigm

Web3 is still in its early days,  and will definitely reshape our usage of social media and the Internet. With Web3, every user become the owner of its own content, and can control it. Instead of relying on CEO of large technology companies such as Twitter, Web3 allows us to create communities and have ownership over the Internet. Web3 produces decentralized autonomous organizations and redefine our use of online services.

Compared to current internet, Web3 adoption growth rate is impressive. Today, around 40% of South Asia has already adopted it, and 15% in the US. To make another comparison, the NFT trading volumes grow by 21000% in 2021, a way bigger growth than Web2’s one when Bezos launched Amazon.

Why do traditional companies struggle to adapt to decentralized web?

Companies need to change their marketing strategy in order to adapt to Web3. Decentralized blockchains, cryptocurrencies, NFT and metaverse are new game changers in the marketing field.

Companies need to change their marketing paradigm

Traditionally, companies have a short-term view on the return of a digital marketing campaign. In Web2, marketing efforts are all about reducing Customer Acquisition Cost (with the cost of targeted ads for instance) while maximizing Customer Lifetime Value (CLV).

In a Web3 paradigm, we shift to a user generated content model. Marketing is all about building a strong decentralized community that will use Web 3.0 to make content about the brand.

If traditional social media platforms are still used to discuss about Web 3.0, we will see in the near future new Web3 native social media platforms.

What should companies do to enter in web 3.0?

Start now

The common view between our panel specialists is that every company should start to create their web3 strategy today, because time will be needed to reap the benefits of it.

The best way to start, according to Sandy Carter, is to think deeply about its Web 3.0 identity, by showing to its community the desire to integrate web3.

Focus on what does the customer want

Web3 is not a magic solution and is useful only if it really helps customers. A company needs to have a very user-centric approach to provide services that are really useful to the next generation, and not only to be part of the decentralized internet race. So many products are built on a nonexistent customer demand!

Incentivize customers smartly

In Web 3.0, users are owners of their data. To gain access to this precious data, companies need to incentivized people correctly. It is the only way to build a real community where user generates content and help your brand to grow.

 


Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Web Summit 2022 wrap-up #1: FINTECH 2023: WHAT NEXT?

Welcome to our series of articles on the recent Web Summit 2022, a premier event in the tech industry. In this series, we will be highlighting some of the most exciting and interesting presentations, panels, and events that took place at the conference. From keynotes by industry leaders to breakout sessions covering the latest trends and developments in technology, there was no shortage of thought-provoking content at this year's conference. We hope you enjoy reading about the Web Summit 2022 as much as we enjoyed attending it!

FINTECH 2023: WHAT NEXT?

At the 2022 Web Summit that took place last November, in a talk led by the journalist Nick Huber, Carolyn Rodz (Founder at Hello Alice), Rodolphe Ardant (Co-founder & CEO at Spendesk) and Tegan Kline (Co-founder at Edge & Node) discussed the future of the fintech market in the incoming year.

2021 was the year of growth, what’s next for Fintech in 2023?

After a successful record growth in 2021, it seems that the fintech industry is facing tough times. But what is the reality of the fintech market, its challenges, and opportunities?

 If we look at the current market, fintechs were founded because the banks were incapable or did not want to take advantage of technology. According to Rodolphe Ardant, this is just the beginning of the fintech world: indeed, the public traded fintech is on average 12 years old while the legacy financial services in 90 years old. Moreover, Tegan Kline explains that there are a lot of opportunities in the fintech market, for example taking advantages of interest rates growing. We are just at the beginning of the disruption in the finance world.

 In the past 10 years, we saw many different business models emerge, and some business models will come up stronger after the crisis (such as B2B payment or banking software). The market should come back, and fintechs should ask themselves how to work with the major players in finance (especially banks and goverments) and not against them, while keeping focusing on individuals’ needs.

TRENDS OF FINTECH 2023: FREEDOM OF CHOICE

According to Carolyn Rodz, the reality of the market is that we all want the freedom of choice, and this is fintech is all about. It is hard to predict how the market will respond in 2023, but the valuations may come down within the fintech industry, the users will remain, which would leave a lot of opportunities to get into emerging businesses.

For Tegan Kline, there is a great opportunity within the NFT space within cryptos, and we could likely see a lot of fintech getting into that space. In addition, we would see the emergence of fintech using the metaverse, decentralizing and giving the power back to the users.

For Carolyn Rodz, the focus should be on anything that support open banking, community and human engagement (such as identity verification, data transferring, …).

Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

A view on the Web3 ecosystem

Mandalore Partners shares its view on Web3 and blockchain dynamics in 2022, focusing on mapping decentralized applications. The geographical scope is mainly Europe, North America and Asia.

Economy of Web3

Mandalore holds that the industry of Web3 will transform all economic sectors on a global scale. As a component of Web3, blockchains have the potential to have a greater impact on how we interact with the internet on how many software applications are currently operating their backends. The way we produce and transmit value online is particularly relevant from an economic standpoint. With the chance to have more power and individuality than ever before, creators are in charge right now.

As it can be seen on the following graph, web3 was a subject of growing interest during the 2 last years.

Search Volume Web3 - Mandalore Partners

2023 is likely to see other countries moving to position themselves as Web3-friendly – often through the use of central bank digital currencies – such as India's forthcoming e-rupee and China's Digital Yuan. This dynamics is all the more important as it accompanies the development of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and metaverse – all technologies which are closely related to new developments in Web3. This represents a very opportunity market for a venture capital firm. However for now, the relative cost of transactions is still prohibitive to many. Web3 is less likely to be utilized in less-wealthy, developing nations due to high transaction fees.

What is Web3 ? A decentralized web

Web3 is a decentralized, trustful, and private internet that makes use of blockchain technology. Web3 refers to the next generation of internet technology, which is based on a decentralized infrastructure. This means that no central authority controls or regulates the internet, and users have more control over their data and privacy: we talk about decentralized web. It has several key characteristics that differentiate it from the current internet:

Decentralized

The biggest difference between web3 and the current internet is that web3 is decentralized, whereas the current internet is centralized with still some static websites. This means that there is no central authority controlling or regulating web3, and users have more control over their data and privacy. It remplaces the ancient web by the ability to create open protocols and decentralized, community-run networks, combining the open infrastructure of web1 with the public participation of web2. One of the goals of the Web3 movement is to create a decentralized social networks.

Secure

One of the advantages of decentralization is that it makes the web3 more secure. Since there is no central server or database, it is much harder for hackers to access user data. Also, each user's data is stored on their own computer, so even if a hacker were to gain access to a database, they could only access the data of one person at a time.

Private

Another advantage of decentralization is that it makes the web3 more private. Since there is no central server or database, companies cannot track users' online activity. In addition, each user's data is stored on their own computer, so companies cannot access it without the user's permission.

Permissionless

Everyone has equal access to participate in Web3, and no one gets excluded.

Web3 and Blockchain

The Web3 is built on the blockchain which gives the precedent advantages. This technology is not only used for cryptocurrencies, it is also used to conclude contracts or to control the functioning of applications thanks to smart contracts.

As a reminder, it is a kind of registry that contains a list of all exchanges made between users. This register is decentralized - i.e. stored on the servers of its users - and very secure because it relies on a cryptographic system of validation by the users for each transaction. Hence the name "blockchain". It uses smart contracts that are algorithms that operates on the blockchain. You can find a definition of smart contracts on Binance Academy website: https://academy.binance.com/en/glossary/smart-contract.

In the case of decentralized web, this allows the creation of financial assets, in the form of tokens for example, to ensure the internal functioning of each service. The platforms is therefore operated, owned and improved by communities of users. The idea behind Web3 is that technologies like blockchain , cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) give us the tools we need to create online spaces that we truly own, and even to implement digital democracies.

Each user has his digital identity, creating a record on the blockchain of all their activities. And, for example, each time they post a message, they can earn a token for their contribution, giving them both a way to participate within the platform and a financial asset.

A Web3 Map

Venture Map of Web3 - Mandalore Partners

Venture Map of Web3

Here is a commentary about the different categories presented.

I. Infrastructure

Developer tools: Developer tools are pieces of decentralized blockchains software like protocols, Layer X solutions, APIs, and SDKs that make it easier for blockchains to communicate with one another and perform more robustly.

Data analytics: Startups in this category provides blockchain data and analytics solutions to their customers.

Security & Privacy: Startups in this category are developing security and privacy solutions on top of existing blockchains

Reg Tech: Companies that provides various regulatory and compliance solutions to the blockchain ecosystem in areas such as tax compliance and anti-money laundering

Entreprise: Startups working on blockchain-based solutions for healthcare institutions across several fields, including life sciences and clinical trials. Some companies offer blockchain-based supply chain solutions to address issues like agricultural traceability and help them with better vision. Some companies provide a range of blockchain technologies geared toward business use cases.

II. Fintech - Decentralized finance

Currencies: Currencies that run on different blockchains. Created largely with the intention of developing better currency for various use cases, these projects represent either a store of value, a medium of exchange, or a unit of account.

Payment: Startups that provide payment services and support cryptocurrency transactions by developing and running cryptocurrency exchanges or by creating cryptocurrency trading applications.

Insurance: Types of Company that provide insurance technology solutions on the promise of innovation. These projects protect against the vulnerabilities of smart contracts or price volatility by raising public funds to use as hedges.

Wallet services: Startups in this category are developing and operating
crypto wallets. It develops of digital asset security infrastructure helping crypto-native and financial institutions to create digital wallets.

III. NFTs

Most people have probably heard of NFTs, it is a transaction stored on the blockchain which corresponds to non fungible tokens, and therefore completely unique. The idea is to be able to use it as a certificate of authenticity associated with a digital or physical object. Each token is unique but obviously players can have ownership of tokens on different platforms. Among these projects, different types of tokens exist, such as governance tokens, equity tokens, security tokens, or utility tokens.

Gaming: NFT technology is being incorporated into video games by startups in this sector, opening up new business models like play-to-earn. The main contribution of the blockchain for users and players is the "play to earn": each player can play and indulge his passion by earning crypto-currencies. This model appeared with the birth of NFT, these certificates that allow to attest the authenticity of a digital object and therefore to own them, then to resell them. The decentralization brought by the blockchain (no central regulating entity) causes a potential paradigm shift: players no longer pay a license or subscription to play, but invest in the game to obtain tokens and develop, and then earn money from these benefits. Purchased NFTs bring decision-making power, which can take many forms and is independent of the publisher, and bring a gain.

Marketplace: Types of company that are developing and operating exchanges meant to help mint and trade NFTs on different platforms, for very various way of use (art, music,...)

Community: Examples of social media platforms designed for team collaboration, program management and member tracking. Interact with fans on a whole new level through easy to access channels where they can post commentary, fan art,...

Metaverse: The metaverse (contraction of "meta" and "universe", i.e. meta-universe) is a network of always-on virtual environments in which many people can interact with each other and with these digital objects while operating virtual representations - or avatars - of themselves. Corporations in this category are developing NFT experiences
related to the evolving metaverse.

Please find below the different maps on the web3 market that helped us build ours:

Web3 market map from TechCrunch

Tech Crunch Web3 Map

TechCrunch Web3 Map

Web3 market map from Coinbase

Coinbase Web3 Map

Coinbase Web3 Map

Web3 market map from Crunchbase

Crunchbase Web3 Map

Crunchbase Web3 Map

Web3 market map from SPEEDINVEST

Speedinvest Web3 Map

Speedinvest Web3 Map

You can find more information on our commitment to Web3 activities on our website: https://www.mandalorepartners.com/web3surance

Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Insurance Trends in Asia: A Bright Future For Insurtechs? #VC

Insurance in Asia has extremely high growth potential…

Insurtech and insurance in general has extremely high growth prospects in the region, much more so than in other more mature markets like Europe. 

Over 40% of the middle class population in Southeast Asia is uninsured: the scope of penetration for digitally charged insurance businesses through technology mediums like smartphones is huge. As standards of living rise and health concerns (for example linked to the pandemic) remain a preponderant issue, we expect demand for insurance products to increase. Penetration rates for Asia-Pacific stood at 3.8% for life insurance and 2.1% for non-life insurance in 2018, considerably lower than in the UK and the US that reported rates of over 10%. Insurance company Swiss Re estimates that by 2029, 42% of gross insurance premiums would originate from Asia-Pacific, with China accounting for 20% of this. Asian consumers are increasingly looking at insurance not just as a protection but also as an investment option.

This is likely to lead to significant revenue growth for actors in this industry, as shown above by the projection of the evolution of premiums in the coming years. 

….providing a unique opportunity for the development of insurtechs…

According to McKinsey, insurance companies in Asia are therefore very aggressive in terms of growth prospects, and insurtech can be a key way to rapidly reach under-served consumers.

The key point is that while there is a very large potential for growth, it may not be best served by traditional insurers. As shown above, customers now prefer digital solutions.  This is where insurtechs can play a major role. 

Indeed, VC funding in the sector has reached large levels in recent years. Venture capital has also recognized the potential profits to be made from digitally disrupting insurance. According to a paper by Bain,  in the past five years, venture capital firms have invested about $3.8 billion in Asia-Pacific insurtechs, including online sites that sell directly to the public, online brokers and advisers, and aggregators or digital marketplaces.

According to the report, in fast-growing markets such as mainland China, India and Indonesia, insurtechs can “leapfrog” incumbents and gain market share. Digital marketplaces, which allow customers to easily compare and select policies from competing carriers, may be able to conquer a significant share of the insurance profit pool. In major markets around the world, a majority of retail insurance customers—especially young, digitally active ones—are open to switching to another provider, including companies from outside the industry, such as retailers, automakers or tech firms, according to Bain & Company’s fourth global survey of more than 174,000 customers in 18 countries (“Customer Behavior and Loyalty in Insurance: Global Edition 2018”). Asia-Pacific insurance consumers are very receptive to new ideas and new players. In Thailand, Indonesia, mainland China and Malaysia, for example, more than 85% are open to buying from new entrants, according to Bain’s survey.

…which for now remain concentrated in mainland China, Hong Kong and other East Asian countries. However a key trend for coming years will be the emergence of new markets

Banks in financial hubs of SouthAsia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have already received significant investments in Insurtech: For example, DBS bank from Manulife of 1.2 Billion dollars, Citibank from AIA group 800 Million dollars and Standard Charted from Prudential 1.25 Billion dollars.

Singapore and Hongkong are providing a wide range of development and growth options like incubators, insurance labs and more for startups in the insurtech sector.

Asian Insurtechs startups and CVC

Examples of insurtech startups from around the region

As shown above, a number of high potential ventures have developed around the region. For instance, China is also seeking to build up big online platforms to provide various insurance options personal, medical, auto online. Malaysia has already started reaping the benefits of such platforms by slowly reducing the need for live agents.

Nonetheless, other markets are also seeing the development of insurtechs. For example, insurtech funding in India has increased from only 11 million USD in 2016 to 287 million in 2020, with startups such as Turtlemint which raised 30 million in late 2020. 

Insurtech can help the sector remove obstacles to growth…

According to McKinsey, Asian insurers currently tend to suffer from three main weaknesses: 

Sales force professionalization. The entire US insurance industry, as one example, has a few hundred thousand agents. Agency forces in Asia are significantly larger—China alone has roughly eight million insurance agents. However, the level of professionalization in Asia lags behind the developed world. Part-time and poorly trained agents are the norm in much of Asia. As customers continue to grow more sophisticated, Asian carriers will have to upgrade their agency forces. They can learn much from the West in terms of recruiting, capability building, and ongoing performance- and compliance-management. Western carriers are now helping agents migrate from product sellers to holistic advisors which provides a blueprint for Asia.

Analytics-driven decision making. The West is increasingly applying data and analytics in all elements of the business to improve the quality and consistency of decision making. In some cases, this has progressed to rely extensively on third-party data. In Asia, the use of data and analytics is less mature. Carriers need to invest in their internal data assets (i.e., capturing and storing more useful data), external third-party data integration, advanced analytics capabilities, and “last mile” adoption of analytics solutions. There is tremendous opportunity for carriers in all elements of the value chain, including pricing and underwriting, sales force effectiveness, customer servicing, and claims. Given the distributed nature of insurance operations in Asia and the talent gap, this is an even bigger opportunity.

Operational discipline and efficiency. Asian carriers can learn from the operational discipline of insurers in developed markets. Faced with the prospect of slower growth, Western insurers have long focused on improving efficiency through more optimized operations. Asian executives have underinvested in operational discipline and efficiency. It is not uncommon to find dozens of branches or field offices with widely varying operating practices. This increases costs, delivers suboptimal customer experience, and introduces significant compliance risk. Asian carriers will have to focus more time and investment on these issues in the near future. They can benefit from the new toolbox that has emerged which combines digital, analytics, robotics, and NLP to re-invent customer and back office journeys.

… and artificial intelligence is a key driver of change

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (A.I) allows for much faster understanding of this data. This empowers intermediaries and underwriters to engage clients knowledgeable with data driven policy advice in real time.

Customers want to connect with insurers from virtually anywhere and at any time. The employment of AI processing will soon permeate almost every facet of the insurance business. For example, the insurer QBE Asia has “started seeing benefits from integrated AI systems that streamline and automate our claims workflow and reduce costs by consolidating the underwriting processes on a centralized platform”. They also deploy Robotic Process Automation to save significant costs on repetitive non-value adding tasks and have started to actively integrate connected devices (Internet of Things, IoT) into their insurance processes.

Finally, public authorities are likely to modify and adapt regulations in reaction to the development of digital insurance and insurtechs

According to Bain, “digital disruption is getting a push from regulators. In Singapore, Hong Kong and, more recently, Indonesia, authorities are actively promoting digital innovation and have established government funded incubators, known locally as sandboxes, to encourage insurers to experiment with new technologies”. Singapore and Hong Kong are emerging as hubs for telematics and insurtechs, and consumer use of digital channels in those markets is growing rapidly. This means new regulations are likely to be put in place, and insurtechs should prepare for this risk.


Le Corporate Venture Capital dans la bancassurance #VC

La bancassurance est parmi les secteurs les plus actifs dans le CVC au niveau mondial…

Alors que le Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) est en plein développement à l’échelle mondiale, comme indiqué par le dernier rapport CB Insights sur le sujet, le secteur de la bancassurance se confirme comme une des références, dans le monde comme en France.

En effet, si on examine les principaux investisseurs CVC dans le monde, on remarque la présence de nombreux acteurs des industries financières, comme Goldman Sachs et Fidelity, tandis que des entreprises étrangères dans ce secteur, comme SoftBank et Alibaba, investissent des montants considérables dans les services financiers.

…. et impliquant principalement des investissement en fintech ou insurtech, tout en s'intéressant également à des secteurs non financiers

Les fintechs et autres startups liées à la finance restent une priorité pour la plus grande partie des banques. Comme l'indique le graphique ci-dessous, les principales institutions financières américaines ont grandement augmenté le nombre d'investissements dans des start up dans les innovations financières. Néanmoins, des organisations financières comme Goldman Sachs ou des AM comme Fidelity n'hésitent pas à investir dans des startups diverses, allant de la santé aux médias. Par exemple, en 2020 Citi Ventures a mis en place un fonds d'investissement de 150 millions de dollars dédié à l'impact investing.

Cela est également visible en France, avec une transition graduelle vers des portefeuilles de plus en plus généralistes, même si la stratégie pour la plupart des acteurs semble toujours clairement ancrée sur leurs métiers historiques. Par exemple, au sein du portfolio de SG Ventures (l’entité d’investissement en capital-risque de la Société Générale), toutes les startups sont liées soit à l’assurance, soit à la banque soit à la mobilité, qui est l’une des activités de la Société Générale à travers sa filiale ALD.

En France également, les entreprises de services financiers sont les moteurs du CVC, et s’organisent selon deux modalités principales

Les acteurs de la banque et de l’assurance sont parmi les plus actifs de l'écosystème CVC en France, et représentent une proportion importante des investissements corporate dans des startups innovantes. Leurs objectifs sont à la fois stratégiques, mais aussi financiers, et leurs investissements, initialement centrés uniquement sur leur cœur de métier, ont tendance à se diversifier de plus en plus.

Les sociétés du secteur de l'assurance sont les acteurs les plus prolifiques du paysage CVC hexagonal. De même, les banques françaises sont relativement actives dans le secteur du corporate venture capital. Certaines d'entre elles sont d'ailleurs parmi les principaux investisseurs en France. Par exemple, en 2017 le Crédit Agricole était troisième, à égalité avec Partech, un des principaux fonds de venture capital en Europe. Certaines banques ont été particulièrement précoces et pro-actives dans leur stratégie de financement de l'innovation, et il existe une hétérogénéité importante dans les montants investis et la diversité des portefeuilles.

Investissements réalisés par différents groupes bancaires français (avant 2017)


Le positionnement unique de Mandalore Partners:

Venture capital as a service : a new state of play

It’s an exciting time to be a gamer, game developer, entrepreneurial gaming leader, and an investor. Over the last few years, gaming has exploded to a $152bn+ industry and is forecast to double to $300bn by 2025, growing larger than the NFL, NBA, music streaming, and worldwide box office combined. Investors have poured over $60 billion of VC funding into gaming ventures. Recent ventures that joined the unicorn club include Game 24×7, Immutable, and Tripedot.

Venture dollars have followed, especially in Europe. In the past 5 years, venture capital investment within the gaming sector in Europe has risen from $636m in 2014 to $1.3 billion in 2021. 25% to 30% of all VC investments in gaming were made in Europe.

Gaming is just one of the tech industries that have emerged with the power of digital. Consider SustainabilityTech, ImmersiveTech, and Web3.0 or cyber security platforms.

With so many new tech sectors emerging, there have never been more sources of funding for startups than there are today. The very best early-stage companies have many options when it comes to financing their business — whether it’s angel funding, crowdsourced funding, accelerator funding, or venture funding provided.

Within the venture capital industry, traditional venture capital firms typically write the biggest cheques as they hold significant resources to support start-ups within their networks. Still, traditional venture capital firms may or may not have the knowledge and expertise to bring their portfolio companies more than financing, meaning negotiating also strategic corporate partnerships to support sustainable sources of growth.

If start-ups are mainly focused on how they can scale their business, then they can look to local and multinational corporations for funding and partnership opportunities. Some of these corporations such as Intel or Google have their own corporate venture capital funds for this purpose. The benefit of this option is that startup businesses can usually secure both strategic partnerships and the capital they seek.

However, there may be a downside if this relationship limits your flexibility to partner with other companies. Some young businesses look at these partnerships as a potential future exit strategy, while corporations may look at minority equity ownership as a test for future majority ownership stakes.

What is Venture Capital as a Service?

New companies create constant pressure that disrupts established ways of doing business, with the average business lifespan on the S&P 500 collapsing by nearly 70% since the 1960s.

In addition, these emerging tech players also have lots of options when it comes to getting funded. I’m not saying that VC is going anywhere, but it’s important to realize that the playing field has changed. In the past, new businesses needed VCs more than VCs needed new businesses. But with the rise of corporate VCs, angels, and crowdfunding, that is no longer the case. small businesses now have more options when it comes to financing.

Consider the corporate venture capital world of today. It is the corporate venture arm of a corporation that makes equity investments in startups, usually with the intention of generating a financial return and/or achieving strategic objectives. Corporate VCs can be either internal (a division of the corporation) or external (an independent VC firm funded by the corporation).

External corporate VCs are often used as a tool to access startup innovation and to build relationships with startups that can be leveraged by the corporation. Internal corporate VCs, on the other hand, are often used as a tool to generate a financial return for the corporation.

Still, as a way to address the emerging market dynamics for startups and corporations, a new venture capital business model has emerged. This model, known as Venture Capital-as-a-Service (VCaaS), provides an optimal mix of capital and business value to startups and corporations by combining strategic alignment, goal-based sourcing, and access to networks of corporate funds.

Firms including Touchdown Ventures and Pegasus Tech Ventures are providing startups with both flexible cheque sizes and targeted business engagements with strategic corporate partners. Touchdown has partnered with corporations such as Aramark, Kelloggs, T-Mobile and 20th Century Fox. Pegasus has partnered with corporations including ASUS, acer and SEGA.

Indeed, incumbent market players can use venture capitalist thinking to plan their market disruptions, evaluate insight to draw strategies, inform corporate strategy and minimize surprises from an impact and financial returns viewpoint — turning venturing into a profit center instead of a cost center by managing, investing, and partnering with portfolio companies.

There are many benefits the venture capital as a service model can provide. First, it allows you to access leading-edge thinking and high-growth potential innovations and to build relationships with tech-led businesses that can be directly deployed by the corporation. Second, it allows you to generate a financial return for the corporation. Third, it allows you to access venture capital thinking and expertise to inform your own corporate strategy. Finally, it helps you minimize surprises from an impact and financial returns viewpoint.

There are also some risks associated with venture capital as a service. First, if you are not careful, it can lead to a conflict of interest between the corporation and the venture capital firm. Second, it can be difficult to find a venture capital firm that is a good fit for your corporation. Third, the venture capital firm may not be able to generate the expected return on investment. Finally, the venture capital firm may not be able to provide the desired level of service.

The three models of Venture Capital funding

There are a few models currently deployed by organizations when it comes to venture capital funding that also leverage a corporation.

Firstly, corporations can choose to directly manage their Corporate Venture Fund or Do It Themselves. This has been the more “traditional” strategy, initially adopted by most major actors, from Google to Axa. It entails significant commitments, in terms of both financial, human, and organizational resources: internal teams and processes have to be set up from scratch, and venture money has to be actively monitored and managed. Our Venture capitalists’ service enables our clients to tailor very specific tech investment thesis and secure their operations with minimum resource involvement to accessing qualified deal flow as well as expensive and sophisticated back-office resources.

Secondly, there is capital investment in independent venture capital funds. This more passive venture capital funding approach requires less corporate commitment and resources, but it also leads to minimal mandate control, limited co-investing opportunities, a closed-end fund structure, and no investment committee participation.

We can clearly see there are advantages and significant downsides to both of these approaches. This is why there is now a more active and strategic alternative participative funding option.

As a financially optimized model, Venture Capital as a Service (VCaaS) can be a fully outsourced service, or it can be a platform providing organizations with the opportunity to complement existing or build new, in-house venture capitalist capabilities. VCaaS delivers financial and strategic returns, as well as scale, context, and focus for corporates, government organizations & family offices.

What are good examples of venture Capital Funds? 

Multiple major corporations have put in place a comprehensive venture capital strategy in the past few years. As noted above both Touchdown Ventures and Pegasus Tech Ventures are well known in the nonfinance sector with respectively 63 and 175 portfolio companies.

The ultimate goal is to accelerate the success of portfolio companies by connecting them to networks of multinational corporate partners to create opportunities for business development, manufacturing, distribution, and global expansion. Some of the core capabilities these corporate venture capitalist arms have bespoke and industrialized for corporations include:

  • Distribution deals focus on using existing and new social channels to bring new products and services to customers.

  • Co-marketing typically involves bundling corporate and startup product messages to potential customers who would be interested in the joint offer.

  • Vendor agreement structuring where one party buys from another. Corporations can purchase products or services from startups, or startups can buy from corporations too.

  • Supply chain collaborations generally allow startups to leverage the scale, experience, and relationships of larger corporations.

  • Licensing transactions can focus on sharing technology know-how, patents, or other forms of intellectual property, including content.

The insurance industry has also been dynamic with a few leading re/insurers leading the pack. Still much more can be done in the sector.

  1. AXA Venture Partners

With $1 billion of assets under management. Axa Venture Partners has been one of the pioneers of corporate venture capital in Europe, launching AXA Venture Partners in 2015 with a focus on seed and early-stage funding opportunities in Europe, US and Canada, Israel, and the Mena region. Unicorns include Blockstream and Phenom.

  1. MunichRe Ventures

Launched in 2015, Munich Re Ventures is an extremely active and respected corporate venture fund that counts seven unicorns, 2 IPOs, and 5 acquisitions. The fund has taken a diversified portfolio approach investing in tech companies in finance, insurance, enterprise technology, transport and logistics, aerospace, and environment tech among the few.

  1. Generali and Inco Ventures:

Designed in partnership with INCO Ventures, a pioneer in impact investing, Generali launched in November 2020 the Generali Impact Investment fund. Reserved for institutional investors, this fund aims to financially support the growth of companies and organizations that contribute to improving the lives of the most vulnerable families and the professional integration of refugees. Generali France has thus taken a new step in its responsible investment strategy, in favor of more inclusive and more sustainable savings. The fund is committed for 20 years to an ambitious approach to Corporate Social Responsibility.

Most corporations do not have one single fund. To diversify portfolio strategy and ensure that they cover a variety of aspects across their value chains, they seek expertise from a variety of venture capitalists and startup commercialization experts.

Why should corporations outsource their Venture Capital arm?

In the 1980s and ’90s, many U.S.-based companies outsourced their research and development activities to Asia to reduce costs and secure the technical talent required to meet the growing demand for new digital products and services. With new remote working demands and talent scarcity, there is a need to access structure competence more readily within countries. Diversifying the talent pool has helped American companies to hedge risk and remain innovative. Overall, these U.S.-based companies performed better and drove higher profit margins, often leading the world across a variety of sectors.

The innovative models

A few VC firms have developed innovative models such as venture-capital as-a-service (VCaaS) as a way to support corporates to modernize and industrialize their innovation activities. They help corporations manage their corporate venture capital funds and find the most innovative startups to invest in, based on their interest areas. The firms also help facilitate startup relationships, developing business and technology collaboration. In many cases, corporations learn about new technology trends, new business models, and best practices from these startups–helping the corporations remain innovative. Startups in this model benefit from access to decision-makers, business guidance, and potentially a new revenue stream.

A venture capital firm: Innotech Corporation

As one of the best-funded venture-backed companies, and a smart automation provider, Osaro, successfully leveraged the opportunities offered by VCaaS and received funding from  Innotech Corporation.

Partnering with Innotech Corporation and Pegasus Tech Ventures has been critical for our international business expansion as well as for funding across multiple rounds of financing. We look forward to continuing our growth together and highly recommend that fellow entrepreneurs establish similar win-win relationships between investors and corporations.

Derik Pridmore, CEO of Osaro.

Indeed, startups often lack the scale, expertise, and experience needed to quickly grow to new markets and segments. As emphasized by Venturebeat, this makes effective partnerships with experienced corporations all the more important:

As our world becomes more connected than ever, it has become easier for startups to expand their businesses into fast-growing markets abroad. Yet, in many circumstances they still need the right partner in order to do so.

Venture capitalists outsource corporate innovation

Outsourcing corporate innovation using VCaaS is a new way to address the ever-growing need of corporates to reinvent their business models. The approach relies on the expertise of angel investors, institutional investors, and corporate investors instead of relying solely on internal resources. VC firms that operate using this model are coming up with creative and flexible strategies that allow any corporation (large or small) to take advantage of corporate venturing thinking and invest in innovation. Outsourcing the investor’s expertise allows companies to run and grow their corporate venturing programs, generating top-tier results while keeping costs under control.

To sum up, both corporate firms and startups benefit from a VCaaS configuration. It’s a win-win framework for both sides as commercial engagements and decision-making are de-risked for all parties.

De-risking corporate innovation

There are two ways we look at de-risking the corporate venture capitalist conundrum.

For corporations: 

The framework allows for quick access to the VC’s network and deal-flow without having to start from scratch. It also eases access to a less expensive solution to in-house R&D to find new technologies and products. Working with the right venture capital firms, corporations benefit from an all-in-one solution with a competitive management fee–all for a fraction of the cost of typical R&D programs.

Corporates can also an innovation strategy without being hindered by the inertia and bureaucracy that is often present in very large firms.

For startups: 

The framework also facilitates easy access to long-term partnerships with established actors in their market. Indeed, the latter entails collaborations with firms that can help corporations quickly enter new markets and offers a potential new avenue to achieve a successful exit (e.g by being acquired by the corporation for instance.)

A young but growing practice

While VCaaS is a young, still fast-growing practice, several actors have already built a strong reputation and track record. As noted before, two of the well-established venture capital firms enabling corporate venturing include Pegasus Tech Ventures in Silicon Valley and Touchdown Ventures in Los Angeles. This means partnering with leading global corporations from Kellog’s to T-Mobile with clear gaps across their innovation value chain and supporting them in shaping and scaling activities enabling them to achieve their long-term goals. Similarly, Mandalore Partners, based in Paris, is working with leading insurance firms to help them put in place their venture capital investment thesis to start to benefit from the strategic and financial returns resulting from well-structured VCas a Service funds. From ideation to exits, we provide access to the resources and expertise you need to build a successful venture portfolio.

Roadmap for success

For us, success comes from quickly identifying growth ventures that fit within the strategic roadmap of corporate partners. After the VC introduces corporations to top emerging entrants, they work together to create joint development and revenue opportunities. Partnerships like this are mutually beneficial, leading to corporate innovation initiatives and helping startups scale their business faster.

VC money can drive many opportunities. What if you don’t have the time or resources to source and diligence these deals? Maybe you’re an entrepreneur who wants to raise money for your startup but doesn’t know where to start. Or maybe you’re an established business that needs access to future lens innovative thinking and wants to tap into the startup ecosystem but doesn’t have the know-how. This is where VC as a service comes in. We are a new breed of VC that provides not just capital, but also expertise, resources, and networks to help future-focused corporations and growth ventures succeed. Let’s not just write cheques. Let’s write success stories.

Don’t forget to listen to…

Sabine and I discussed VC as a Service recently on her podcast #scoutingforgrowth. You can find the discussion and episode just here.

About Minh Q. Tran

Founder & Managing Partner Mandalore Partners

Minh is the founder and managing partner of Mandalore Partners, which created an innovative framework that enables investors of early-stage companies to achieve scale by being exposed to a range of traditional, alternative, and tech venture capital assets.

In addition to his experience as one of the founding team members at AXA Strategic Ventures, Minh was also an integral part of several other VC firms, including Nokia Ventures, Bertelsmann Ventures, and Truffle Capital.

Minh is also a co-founder of Alchemy Crew where he works closely with Sabine VanderLinden to refine the corporate-startup engagement model through commercialization execution.

Twitter – Linkedinminh@mandalorepartners.com

Photo by Jonathan Pielmayer on Unsplash

VC-as-a-Service: Benchmark of the sector & Strategic Positioning of Mandalore Partners #VC #VCaaS

Venture capital (VC) is a form of investment for early-stage, innovative businesses with strong growth potential. Often led by funds, Venture Capital investments are not for the faint of heart.

However, VC investments can be a fully outsourced service build new, in-house VC capabilities for Corporations, family offices or Business Angels. Known as VC-as-a-Service, the demand for such a service is booming.

Why ?

Corporate venture capital (CVC) is the investment of corporate funds directly in external startup companies.

CVC is beneficial for corporations for two aspects:

  • From a strategic point of view, CVC represents a true external source of innovation and enables an active monitoring of the sector’s future evolutions for corporations. CVC is also allowing corporations to attract the best profiles willing to work in a dynamic environment.

  • From a financial perspective, CVC often leads to return on investment. As for classical VC investment, CVC investments are generally characterized as very high-risk/high-return opportunities.

CVC is also a great opportunity for start-ups. More than getting only financial resources like with VC funds, they can get the optimal mix of capital and business value from the corporations. Indeed, start-ups have access to the fund’s financial expertise but also to the corporations’ knowledge about the sector.

Thus, CVC is a win-win solution for both corporations and start-ups. However, this solution is hard to implement in real life.

Indeed, VC abilities requires a lot of time, resources, contacts in the start-up ecosystem to have access to a strong deal flow, expertise for deep innovative analysis, expertise about legal aspects of VC investments. Corporations do not always have all those assets in-house.

Moreover, a misalignment of purposes can rise between the financial and strategic department of a large corporations due to the high-risk nature of VC investments. Besides, once the investment done, the gap between conservative mindsets in corporations and agile ones in start-ups may not be profit holder for both.

As CVC is very hard to implement, one may wonder on the way to deal with it.

How ?

Many actors are offering external services to enable corporations to have access to VC abilities for investments.

Each actor offers VC-as-a-Service abilities, some are pure players like Touchdown Ventures, some are bringing also a consulting expertise like McKinsey and Mandalore Partners is bringing a Digital Ecosystem along with its VC abilities.

There are three different categories of actors offering VC-as-a-Service abilities.

  • Pure players like Touchdown Ventures. Among this category, pure players are often multi-sector oriented and operate at a local scale like Techmind or at a global scale like Pegasus Ventures.

  • Consulting groups like Bain are bringing along their CVC abilities some of their consulting expertise. They operate at a global scale and on many sectors but mostly digital ones (TMT).

  • Mandalore Partners is a pure player but also brings its Digital Ecosystem along with its VC abilities. Mandalore has a global expertise and is specialized in Insurtech.

What ?

The objective of VC-as-a-Service is to bring VC abilities to corporations and start-ups:

Sourcing is one of the hardest abilities to acquire when a corporation wants to acquire VC skills. Indeed, it requires a lot of time and relations to build an efficient network. Using VC-as-a-Service gives corporations access to top-notch deals. VC-as-a-Service also quickly identify startups that fit within the strategic roadmap of the corporate partners thanks to previous deals and accumulated experiences.

More than Sourcing, VC-as-a-Service also brings a structure and a platform to rely on. Indeed, VC-as-a-Service funds have financial expertise, fine knowledge of the sector and contacts to find the best diligence as possible.

An efficient CVC investment is not finished when the start-up has received the funds from the company. VC-as-a-Service funds also follows the portfolio of the company and helps the start-up in its future milestone.

Using a VC-as-a-Service fund is in fact time saving and cost effective. It only takes few weeks to launch and to follow a CVC strategy for a corporation.

All along the investment process, decisions are made by the corporate which is enlighten by VC-as-a-Service fund. The fund is not making any investment alone.

Le CVC, un secteur en pleine expansion

D'après l’article paru sur TechCrunch en mars 2022. 


Le boom d’investissements en capital risque qui a marqué l’année 2021 n’a pas été uniquement le fait de fonds en capital risque traditionnels. En effet, d’autres acteurs et sources de capital ont joué un rôle clé: des nouvelles méthodes d’investissements angel et seed, jusqu’à des fonds crossover qui soutiennent des startups late stage. Et au milieu de toute cette activité frénétique et des levées records, les investisseurs corporate ont continué à développer leurs importance au sein du paysage VC. 

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) est la méthode par laquelle des entreprises mettent en place leur propre structure d’investissement. Traditionnellement, cette démarche unit des objectifs stratégiques (M&A, accès à la technologie, partenariats) et financiers (retours sur investissement). La pondération de chacun varie en fonction de l’entreprise et du développement de leurs équipes CVC, mais il est rare de trouver des CVC qui n’ont qu’un de ces objectifs. Cela fait de leurs investissements un intéressant mélange d’investissement en capital risque classique et action stratégique de l’entreprise. Du point de vue des startups, le CVC est également très attractif. Par exemple, cela leur permet de s’adosser à un partenaire expérimenté, et donc de bénéficier de ses ressources, réseaux et expériences. La perspective d'être potentiellement racheté par le corporate offre également une sortie attrayante pour les entrepreneurs et les investisseurs. 


Les CVCs étaient exceptionnellement actifs l’année dernière, et il n’y a jamais eu autant d’acteurs. Si on analyse les données publiées par CB Insights, il est clair que 2021 fut une année charnière pour ce secteur, avec des records battus dans la plupart des indicateurs. Les CVC sont également de plus en plus présents au sein de l’espace médiatique. Par exemple, MondoDB, une startup de codage qui a fait son introduction en bourse il y a cinq ans, a mis en place son propre fond. MondoDB et d’autres startups à succès comme Coinbase sont intéressantes car elles sont actives dans le CVC avant même d’atteindre le statut d’entreprise mature et établie. Cette dynamique ne s'arrête pas là, et le CVC n’est désormais plus cantonné à une poignée de multinationales comme Axa et General Electric. Maintenant, même des entreprises privées plus petites s’y mettent, ce qui met en évidence à la fois les délais de plus en plus larges avant les IPOs, et l’abondance de fonds disponibles pour être utilisés en VC. 


Examinons maintenant les données du secteur de manière plus précise. Il y a deux indicateurs principaux pour examiner l'évolution du secteur. Tout d’abord, le nombre et la rapidité avec laquelle de nouveaux CVC sont mis en place, et le rythme auquel ceux déjà existants investissent. Si on examine le premier indicateur, il est clair que nous assistons, ces dernières années, à une expansion sans précédent du secteur. Selon CB Insights, il y a eu 221 nouvelles structures CVC, un chiffre en augmentation de 53% par rapport à 2020. Néanmoins, ce chiffre reste légèrement en deçà de l’augmentation en 2018, qui était de 259. 2021 reste tout de même la deuxième année en termes de créations depuis que nous avons des données sur les CVC. 


Une expansion rapide, ainsi que des acteurs diversifiés


Serge Tanjga, Senior Vice President chez MongoDB, remarque que, d’un point de vue technologique, les entreprises tech plus matures “mettent en place des équipes CVC car ils ont des capitaux en surplus à allouer, et parce qu'être un acteur VC aidera le positionnement de leur marque”, tandis que les entreprises tech plus jeunes “ ont tendance à lancer leur CVC pour attirer des startups qui puissent aider à aider à développer leurs produits, pour financer leurs clients existants ou supercharge des partenariats go-to-market”. Quand on analyse combien de CVCs sont mis en place, il est donc important de toujours se rappeler que ce secteur n’est pas un monolithe uniforme, mais au contraire ses acteurs ont une diversité d’objectifs. 


Il est difficile de déterminer quels types de CVC sont le plus représentés parmi le haut niveau de créations l’année dernière. Mais si on part du principe que la nouvelle “promotion” d’acteurs CVC est similaire à ses prédécesseurs, on peut prédire qu’un nombre important de fonds ont été lancés à la fois avec l’objectif “returns-first” et “strategy-first”. Si on s’interesse également aux montants investis par les CVC, on constate également une expansion constante ces dernières années, comme l’indique l’image ci-dessous, produite par CB Insights. 



Pour les startups, cela signifie que leurs options de financement sont non seulement plus larges, mais aussi que le segment “corporate” du marché est plus profond que jamais. Il est donc probable que les partenariats et investissements corporate-startup sont voués à continuer leur développement, et à concerner un segment d’entreprises de plus en plus large et varié.

Original Article:

The venture capital boom of 2021 was not built from merely traditional VC money. A host of other capital sources played a role in the global trend, from new methods of disbursing angel and seed capital to crossover funds pouring into late-stage startups. And amid all the noise, record-setting totals, and rapid-fire dealmaking, corporate venture investors were busy, investing gobs of parent-company cash into far-smaller concerns.

 

Corporate venture capital, or CVC for short, is the method by which wealthy businesses build their own investing arm. Traditionally, these efforts blend strategic goals (M&A, early access to technology, partnerships) and financial ones (returns). The exact mix varies by company and CVC effort, but it’s rare to find a corporate venture concern that has none of one or the other. This makes their investing an interesting blend of traditional venture and corporate opportunism.

CVCs were busy last year. New data from CB Insights makes it clear that 2021 was a colossal period for CVCs, an all-time record by some metrics and a near-record year by others. CVCs are in the news lately as well, thanks to MongoDB – a NoSQL company that went public in 2017 – putting together its own fund, an event that the technology world took note of. MongoDB joins recently public companies like Coinbase in employing corporate investor work before reaching mega-cap status. The trend goes further: We’ve even seen private companies launch their own CVCs, evidence at once of the lengthening period in which high-growth tech startups stay private and the sheer amount of capital available to pre-IPO companies.

 

Today, we’re exploring the data behind 2021’s CVC investing boom with commentary from Serge Tanjga, SVP Finance at MongoDB. Tomorrow, we’ll dive into the hows and whys of CVC in the current venture climate with commentary from a number of corporate investing players — and even one public company that is choosing to not build its own investing arm. Sounds good? Let’s get into the data.

 

How quickly is corporate venture capital investment accelerating?

There are two ways to track the growth of corporate venture capital: The pace at which new CVC concerns are set up, and the rate at which the larger CVC segment invests.

We’ll take them in order. It’s clear that more CVCs are being compiled in the current market than nearly ever before. Indeed, CB Insights data indicates that some 221 new CVCs were created in 2021, a huge 53% increase on 2020 data. However, the 2021 result was actually fractionally lower than the 259 built in 2018. That said, 2021 was the second-hottest year for which we have data when it came to new CVCs reaching the market.

 

Tanjga, discussing the CVC market from a technology perspective, said that more mature tech companies “tend to set up CVC arms because they have excess capital to deploy, or because being in the VC space will help with their brand positioning,” while younger technology companies “tend to start CVC efforts to attract startups to build on their product, to fund their existing customers or supercharge go-to-market partnerships.” So when we discuss just how many CVCs are being built, keep in mind that they are not a monolith when it comes to goals.

 

We can’t tease out a perfect split of CVC focus from the pace at which new funds were put to market last year. But if we presume that the new crop of corporate venture players is similar to those that came before it, it is safe to infer that a good number of returns-first and strategy-first CVCs were launched in 2021. For startups, that means that their set of capital funding options is not only broader than ever, but also that the corporate portion of the market is deeper than ever.

Why do we care?

Bell Mason : Key value curve for VCaaS

1. Frameworks for Corporate VC as a Service

Why do corporations need Corporate VC-as-a-Service ?

What is the Bell Mason framework for Corporate VC as a Service ?

2. Business case : how to implement the Bell Mason framework ?

Global view

“Go to market” scoring

“Team” scoring

“Competitive advantage” scoring

“Business Model” scoring

3. Mandalore Partners’ is adding a new criteria to the Bell mason model : impact


  1. Frameworks for Corporate VC as a Service 

    A. Why do corporations need Corporate VC-as-a-Service ?

Corporations need to create an environment that allows innovation in order to keep up with the competition, but also need to  provide enough structure to control risk. As a result, Corporate Venture Capital is a key to the strategic development of any corporation. Corporate VC can be outsourced to a VC fund which will source startups, elaborate the due diligence, and manage the portfolio. This is called “Corporate VC as a Service''. 
Corporate VC-as-a-Service can help Businesses to create a digital ecosystem, enabling synergies within the Corporate portfolio while minimizing the risk. 

In Venture imperative : a new model for corporate innovation, Heidi MASON and Tim ROHNER explain that corporate venturing is the best way to successfully test and launch innovative corporate growth strategies. 

Mason and Rohner describe how the Bell-Mason Diagnostic - an objective, multi-dimensional examination and scoring system - can be used as an assessment tool to measure and guide successful corporate venturing. 

B. What is the Bell Mason framework for Corporate VC as a Service ? 

The Bell Mason Framework for Corporate Venture Development describes the 5 Phase stages a startup is going through. The goal is to adapt the analysis of a startup according to its stage. Unlike traditional product development processes, this Framework describes best practice requirements by stage for the entire venture business, not only for the product.

VC funds like Mandalore Partners can offer Corporate VC-as-a-Service to companies which seek to invest in startups but do not want to bear the risk. Mandalore Partners and other VC as a Service implement their investment after a scoring methodology, like the one described in the Bell Mason Model. 

  • The five stages of a venture growth over time : 

    - Concept : idea, competitive landscape

    - Seed : business model, core team, research

    - Alpha : pricing, product pilote

    - Beta : validated business plan, first commercial launch

    - Market calibration : proven revenue model, roadmap, segment expansion, full team

  • The four dimensions a VC should analyze for each stage : Product, Market, Finance, People.

  • Successful business growth 

According to the Bell-Mason graph, according to its stage, a new venture show different “score” for each of the 12 dimensions. 

2. Business case : how to implement the Bell Mason framework ? 

A. Global view

  • Four milestones

There are four milestones, each of which contains 4 criteria. 

  • Rating

 For each of the four milestones criterias, we will use a scoring. The scoring will follow the following process:

  • Example from Mandalore Partners : 

The VC as a Service company will assess the startup following a rating of each criteria. It will give a final weighted score to the application of the startup, enabling to make a decision regarding the fact to implement the investment or not. 

B. “Go to market” scoring

Here is a break down of the issue tree : 

Then, we apply a grading system :

C. “Team” scoring

D. “Competitive advantage” scoring

E. “Business Model” scoring

 

3. Mandalore Partners’ is adding a new criteria to the Bell mason model : impact

As a Corporate VC-a-a-Service, Mandalore Partners is adding some criterias to the classic Bell Mason framework : impact.  Mandalore Partners is assessing impact through the following method, with the help of its partner Impact Track.

Mandalore Partners recognises the increasing added value of moving beyond Environmental, Governance and Social (ESG) Criteria and seeks to partner with investors that aim to optimise financial, social and environmental returns via impact investing. Hence, Mandalore Partners can help corporations to use corporate VC as a tool to progress regarding ESG criterias.

Mandalore Partners has developed its proprietary Diamond Impact Scoring Scheme, an impact scoring system that allows not only to evaluate potential investments through the impact lens but also to monitor the impacts of the portfolio companies.

Diamond Impact Scoring Scheme provides a 4-dimensional analysis of both anticipated impact risks and returns, thus it is more complete than ESG analyses that usually only account for minimizing negative impacts, or risks.

Reliable tool for screening and qualifying the impact performance, it also provides a visual framework that helps to disclose the results in an easily digestible format to the stakeholders.

 Diamond Impact Scoring Scheme incorporates both Impact Management Project (IMP) methodology, aligns to SDGs and weighs ESG criteria in the 4 following dimensions:

  • Anticipated Outcomes. This dimension is rated based on the findings of the overall assessment of the company’s expected impacts, using the IMP methodology.

  • Industry Leadership. This dimension is rated based on the findings of the customized ESG risk/impact profile of the company. It assesses the capacity of the company to be exemplary in managing its impacts on key stakeholders to protect and enhance value.

  • Investment Added Value. This dimension evaluates the potential added-value of investing in the company. The idea is to assess how the investment will contribute to the course, scale and depth of the generated impact and underlying business.

  • Alignment. This dimension assesses how effectively the company’s positive impacts align with financial returns.

La fiscalité favorable du Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) en France

De quoi s’agit-il ?

L’article 217 du CGI, entré en vigueur le 3 septembre 2016, prévoit un amortissement exceptionnel sur une durée de 5 ans des investissements des entreprises dans des PME innovantes. Chaque année, pendant 5 ans, une entreprise-investisseur peut déduire de son résultat imposable 20% du montant de l’investissement. La détention des titres doit durer au moins 2 ans.

Régi par la réglementation européenne sur les aides d’État au titre du financement des risques, ce dispositif a obtenu l’accord de la Commission européenne pour une période de 10 ans à compter de son entrée en vigueur, soit jusqu’en 2026.

Qui sont les investisseurs éligibles ?

Toutes entreprises soumises à l’IS peuvent en bénéficier.

L’investissement peut se faire :

  • soit directement par la souscription en numéraire au capital,

  • soit indirectement par la souscription en numéraire de parts ou actions de FCPR, FPCI, SLP ou SCR respectant le quota d’investissement applicable aux fonds communs de placement dans l’innovation (FCPI) (70% dans des PME innovantes, dont 40% minimum de l’actif en titres souscrits).

L’investisseur ne peut détenir plus de 20% du capital ou des droits de vote de l’entreprise innovante cible. Cette limite ne s’applique pas lorsque l’investissement indirect a eu lieu dans le cadre d’une délégation de gestion du portefeuille à une société de gestion de portefeuille et que les décisions d’investissement sont prises indépendamment par le gestionnaire du fonds. Le véhicule d’investissement doit respecter le quota précité.

Il faut enfin que l’investisseur n’aie pas déjà investi dans la même PME innovante avant l’entrée en vigueur du dispositif, et le montant de l’investissement est limité à 1% du total de son actif.

Quelles sont les PME innovantes éligibles ?

  • Il faut d’abord que l’entreprise cible soit une PME, à savoir une entreprise ayant moins de 250 salariés, un chiffre d’affaires annuel n’excédant pas €50M ou un total du bilan annuel n’excédant pas €43M, et ayant son siège dans un état membre de l’UE.

  • Puis, l’entreprise doit soit avoir réalisée des dépenses de recherche représentant au moins 10% des charges d’exploitation de l’un au moins des trois exercices précédant celui au cours duquel intervient la souscription (estimées et certifiées par un expert-comptable pour les entreprises n’ayant pas encore clos d’exercice), soit être capable de démontrer qu’elle développe ou développera dans un avenir prévisible des produits, services ou procédés neufs ou substantiellement améliorés par rapport à l’état de la technique dans le secteur considéré, et qui présentent un risque d’échec technologique ou industriel. Cette appréciation peut être effectuée par audit technique ou par une certification par un organisme chargé de soutenir l’innovation (exemple de la labellisation de BPI France).

  • Elle doit également soit n’exercer son activité sur aucun marché, soit exercer son activité sur un marché depuis moins de dix ans après sa première vente commerciale.

  • Enfin, la PME innovante ne peut pas recevoir plus de €15M d’investissements éligibles au dispositif.

Quelles perspectives pour la CVC en France ?

En 2017, première année du dispositif, l’investissement dans des entreprises éligibles a dépassé de 38% les projections du ministère de l’Économie pour atteindre €1,1Md, montant atteint également en 2020 malgré la pandémie.

La majorité des entreprises du CAC 40 dispose d’un fonds en propre ou a investi dans un fonds partagé entre plusieurs corporates. En 2020, un benchmark a recensé 49 CVCs en France.

Les secteurs d’investissement privilégiés en France sont la mobilité, la Fintech, l’Insurtech et la Medtech, selon un baromètre de 2018.

En pratique ?

Prenons l’exemple d’une SA avec €100M d’actifs souscrit des parts de FCPI pour un montant de €1M, soit 1% du total de son actif. Elle a délégué la gestion de son portefeuille à une société de gestion de portefeuille, peu importe donc si elle détient plus de 20% du capital ou des droits de vote dans l’une des entreprises innovantes cibles.

Chaque année pendant cinq ans, elle pourra déduire €200m, soit 20% de son investissement de €1M, de son résultat, réduisant ainsi son assiette imposable. Elle garde ses parts de FCPI pendant six ans, pour bénéficier aussi longtemps que possible de l’amortissement.

What is Corporate Venturing ?

Demystifying the world of corporate venture capital investing in insurance

By Sabine VanderLinden

With Corporate VC as a service, large established companies develop, sponsor or invest in startup companies from the earliest stages of formation to later stages of growth. They do this for the purpose of identifying new technologies to develop cutting-edge customer-driven solutions and delivering innovative products and services that can resist the effects of time. In simple terms, the startup company and the corporation will likely be in the same core area e.g., InsurTechs get backed by large insurance giants whereas a pharmaceutical firm concentrates on Life Science and HealthTech ventures. And we know in each case there may also be some overlap.

Corporate venturing as a service has some similarities to what R&D is in many industries. Not much used in insurance, but something that could bode well for larger companies if considered consistently and strategically.

The central point is that a startup company is evaluated and funded by the corporate venture capital arm of the business. This works well to shake off protocol and bureaucracy which can weigh down innovation when a parent company gets involved in these decisions.

Corporate venturing has some similarities also with Venture Capital (VC). As you would expect. There is certainly shared territory here even though some venture capital units do not like so much newbies corporate venture capital units. Venture Capitalists (VCs) are experts at the money side of things where they focus on the financial objectives, whereas the corporate venturing team draws expertise from strategy, finance, and the industry, with their fingers on the pulse of emerging trends, opportunities, and risks. The two can actually benefit each other enormously when working in tandem as we have seen with many emerging corporate funds signing up established corporate players as Limited partners.

Alchemy works upstream as an accelerator as a service and research lab, while Mandalore Partners positions itself downstream as a vc as a service and investment fund.

Mandalore's Insurtech Map

Mandalore Partners est une plateforme de Venture Capital (capital-risque) as a Service pour les investisseurs, qu'ils soient des particuliers (famille, entrepreneurs...) ou des entreprises (PME/ETI/Grandes entreprises) qui optimise leurs investissements financiers et stratégiques.

Particulièrement actif dans l’Insurtech, Mandalore Partners fait son propre mapping Insurtech et a développé une méthodologie dès 2019. En 2021, alors que les acteurs de l’Insurtech ont largement évolué, Mandalore Partners réalise un nouveau mapping de ce secteur en pleine expansion.

Pour toute information complémentaire sur les entreprises figurant dans ce mapping, veuillez nous contacter par mail : CONTACT@MANDALOREPARTNERS.COM

Pour toute information complémentaire sur les entreprises figurant dans ce mapping, veuillez nous contacter par mail : CONTACT@MANDALOREPARTNERS.COM

Pour cela, nous avons procédé en trois étapes :

1) Définition et structure de l’Insurtech

2) Benchmark des cartographies Insurtech existantes

3) Conclusion sur le mapping Insurtech Mandalore Partners

1 - Définition et structure de l’Insurtech

A l'instar des Fintech, on nomme Insurtech (ou Assurtech, en français) les startups du monde de l'assurance. Les Insurtech s'appuient sur les nouvelles technologies pour innover et proposer de nouveaux modèles et produits d'assurance. Le secteur est en plein boom et draine les capitaux comme le montre le rapport « CB-Insights Insurtech report Q1 2021 » avec plus de 7 milliards de dollars d’investissements en 2020 contre moins de 2 milliards de dollars en 2016.

On peut répartir les Insurtechs en quatre grandes catégories :

  1. l’innovation sur les produits d’assurance afin de proposer de nouvelles propositions de valeurs : néo-assureurs (comme Alan ou Luko), assurance collaborative (comme Otherwise ou Inspeer) ou paramétrique (comme Descartes Underwriting), etc.

  2. l’amélioration des process de distribution qui réduit les frictions entre assureurs-assurés : brokers (comme Wefox) et comparateurs (comme LeLynx.fr).

  3. les services aux assureurs et aux courtiers pour obtenir une meilleure gestion interne des compagnies d’assurances : SaaS (comme Qape), process optimization (comme Akur8) Data & Analytics (comme Dacadoo), etc.

  4. les services aux assureurs et aux courtiers pour avoir une meilleure relation avec leurs clients : claim / payment / policy management (comme omni.us), lutte anti-fraude (comme Shift Technology), marketing.

2 - Benchmark des cartographies Insurtech existantes

Une fois le secteur Insurtech défini, Mandalore a réalisé un benchmark de onze cartographies Insurtech existantes.

KleinBlue.JPG
Matteo Carbone.JPG
New Alpha.JPG
Oliver Wyman.JPG
Venture Scanner.JPG
Ailancy 1.JPG
Ailancy 2.JPG

On constate alors qu’il existe trois grands types de mapping :

-          Les mapping classiques avec une approche par chaîne de valeur (produit, distribution, services), approche utilisée par KleinBlue, Mandalore Partners, Insurtech Map, Ailancy, Oliver Wyman, Capgemini, PwC. Cette approche est la plus utilisée car elle permet de se représenter aisément les dynamiques du marché et surtout le positionnement de chaque start-up.

-          Les mappings originaux avec une approche qui peut se faire par tendances, leveraged technology, ligne métier (Ailancy), parcours client (Matteo Carbone), ancienneté (OW).

-          Par ailleurs, des mappings hybrides peuvent exister et se révéler tout à fait pertinents : ligne métier (ou technologie) vs. chaîne de valeur (comme Ailancy peut le faire).

3 - Conclusion sur le mapping Insurtech Mandalore Partners

La méthodologie retenue par Mandalore Partners en 2019 est plutôt classique : il s’agit d’une segmentation du marché Insurtech par chaîne de valeur.

Cependant, elle se différencie du mapping classique et très médiatisé KleinBlue parce qu’elle utilise, comme Capgemini (qui ne fait pas de mapping mais juste une segmentation) quatre catégories en divisant la catégorie « services » en « gestion opérationnelle » et « customer management ». Klein Blue, mapping le plus médiatisé en France ne distingue que 3 catégories.

Par ailleurs, elle se concentre sur l’Europe comme Ailancy dont la cartographie est peu médiatisée alors que KleinBlue se focus sur la France. Seul le mapping d’Ailancy a un scope européen mais il n’est pas très médiatisé.

Enfin, Mandalore Partners a tenu à créer des sous-catégories afin de segmenter encore plus précisément le marché.

Pour toute information complémentaire sur les entreprises figurant dans ce mapping, veuillez nous contacter par mail : CONTACT@MANDALOREPARTNERS.COM

Pour toute information complémentaire sur les entreprises figurant dans ce mapping, veuillez nous contacter par mail : CONTACT@MANDALOREPARTNERS.COM

Pour conclure, si dans l’approche Mandalore Partners la segmentation du marché présente une légère particularité (quatre catégories selon la chaîne de valeur), c’est surtout au niveau des sous-catégories et du scope géographique que notre mapping innove.